User talk:92jb

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Corgi Toys, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 09:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to be unblocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92jb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to request that both my personal account and the IP address at which I am situated will be unblocked. I agree that the additons I have made to numerous pages have not been factually accurate nor constructive and thus accept the punishment handed to me for such actions. Due to the fact that I have accepted the rammifications of my actions and the potential for future such punishments, I request that my own and the IP address at which I am situated will be unblocked in order for positive, factual, constructive additions to the site to be made. I hope my appeal is successful. Bensonjs (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking through your persistent vandalism, I note that almost all of them are extreme violations of the WP:BLP policy. As including defamatory information on articles about living persons could open Wikipedia to risk, the edits are serious enough that it remains necessary to protect Wikipedia from such actions. Note: this is not punishment, but prevention (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

92jb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting that my account is unblocked. There will be no future violations from this account. Otherwise, please can my account be closed?

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

92jb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am again resquesting that my account be unblocked. I have a full understanding of the vandalism that my past edits culminated in and thus apologise for that profusely. This account will no longer be utilised for such purposes and instead only constructive edits will be made. I have displayed this by correcting a mistake on the Kitty (rapper) page regarding video views. Such positive additions and edits are set to be the future of this account. Thank you.

Accept reason:

Per discussion with blocking admin, who has deferred to my judgement. It's been long enough; you get a second chance. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]