User talk:Aleph-4

See also User_talk:Aleph4

Dave zelenski article

FYI, I have nominated this article for deletion; I noticed you had edited earlier. You can discuss it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave zelenski. --A. B. 23:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Laromlab

FYI, I have nominated this article for deletion; I noticed you had edited earlier. You can discuss it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laromlab --Aleph-4 09:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I think all I added was an {{uncat}} template. — RJH (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archive Page in User talk:jacklau96

Aleph,

Thank you for your suggestion on the achieve page of my talk page. The name of the page will be changed thank you.

--Jacklau96 01:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the self authored biographies issue. I have grossly simplified the article to just contain externally and easily verifiable facts. I spoke with two or three colleagues who have Wikipedia entries prior to making the entry, but neither knew how to create a sample. So I went ahead and did it. I hope the remaining article on Austin Tate is okay in your view?

Looks fine. You might mention one or two publications. --Aleph-4 21:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will revise to add a little more information at some stage. Thanks. --Austintate 17:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warrawong Sanctuary article

I am the webmaster for www.warrawong.com and I am allowed to use the information for here. I have also sent an email from warrawong.com to confirm this. Please do not put anymore copyright violation notices up as they are NOT violations! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.60.221.241 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 21 December 2006

See Talk:Warrawong Sanctuary for further discussion. --Aleph-4 10:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up...

On the matter of me accidentially deleting a deletion debate. I will do my best to avoid that! J Milburn 13:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frédérick Lacasse

Hi, Aleph-4. Thanks for deleting my article, i created this article mistakenly while I working on a private wiki and wikipedia at the same time and I didn't notice. Sorry for trouble.Frédérick Lacasse 15:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Larry d. Alexander

Hi Aleph-4, This is Larry D. Alexander. Thanks for the information about the Weekly Sunday School lessons and for your participation in the deletion of the article on me. Even though I have received many e-mail from disappointed fans, I agree with your administrators that I am not worthy to appear in your hallowed pages at Wikipedia as an article. I have included information about myself on my user page. Hopefully this will satisfy everyone concerned, and put this back and forth,re-occurring debate to rest. And as for the weekly sunday school commentary, it is already distributed nationwide via my e-mail network and so there is really no need to post it on wikipedia. Thank you and may GOD bless you always. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Larry d. alexander (talk • contribs) 13:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks a bunch for reverting vandalism on my user page! :) --Aiyda 17:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

       - and thanks again! Aiyda is cool like that. 09:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I make enemies on wikipedia by reverting vandalism an issuing warnings. I'm a real fun spoiler! :) --Ai y da is cool like that. 09:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Lange...Notability

I added a few citations to the new Harry Lange article to address the notability issue. He is often cited as an 'active portfolio manager' and 'legendary stock picker'. He was even named to the most powerful 30 people in Money Magazine this year. The piece is being written slowly to ensure that all of the information is correct. Any and all feedback is appreciated! Hbs07dl 22:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]