User talk:Alex Mili
Alex Mili, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Alex Mili! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC) |
April 2021
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kosovo. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kosovo. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. No such user (talk) 18:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Kosovo article
[edit]Thanks for editing the Kosovo article! Unfortunately other editors, including myself, haven't agreed with the additions. I opened up a discussion on the article talk page, please elaborate on what you're trying to achieve there so we can reach a consensus before making new similar additions. --ZeiP (talk) 04:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CMD (talk) 05:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Marking edits as minor
[edit] Hi Alex Mili! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Brussels Agreement (2013) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --ZeiP (talk) 12:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Talk page discussion
[edit]Hi Alex Mili, two separate talk page discussions were opened on Talk:Kosovo regarding your various edits. Please participate there. CMD (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ahmet Q. (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
More reverting at Kosovo War
[edit]Hello Alex Mili. You seem to have already broken the WP:3RR at Kosovo War starting with this revert at 21:41 on June 3.. The next time you revert there you are risking a block, unless you get a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. The steps of WP:DR are open to you. EdJohnston (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
A report is filed on you
[edit]See there. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Edit warring at Kosovo War
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. See my warning above, and see the complaint about your edits at WP:ANI. You made ten reverts at Kosovo War in the last three days. EdJohnston (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex Mili, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kosovo and Serbia economic normalization agreements (2020). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ––FORMALDUDE(talk) 12:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite block
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.