User talk:Andrewrabbott

Welcome! Hello I'm trying to ask User_talk:Andrewrabbott a question about the entry for Thomas Barker Mellor, as I'm currently researching one of his daughters-Miss Mabel J Mellor, born 1879. Doyou have any more info about the family?

Thanks David Colyer

From Bexhill UK Hello, Andrewrabbott, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 15:56, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Many thanks for the splendid job you have done on improving Wikipedia's coverage of Churches in Cornwall - I am hugely impressed by the work you have put in. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 22:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Organ Scholars at British Universities and Colleges

Hi there; I see you went through and made amendments to a large number of college articles for the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge, including an interwiki link to an article you've created here. However, you've incorrectly formatted these edits. If you want a 'see also' reference you should use the {{seealso}} template. Can you go through and fix them (since you made those edits, that's only fair right?)? There are also concerns I have regarding the notability of examples you have provided on the List of Organ Scholars at British Universities and Colleges article: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and the examples you include must be notable. Coldmachine^Talk 08:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Church break-out articles' talk pages and WikiProjects

Hi,

I notice you've recently created a load of break-out articles for churches on the Isle of Wight (eg: Holy Cross Church, Binstead from Binstead). Appreciate the work put in to clarify the articles. However, it would have been useful if you'd had a look at the talk pages - most of the places will have had a {{WikiProject Wight}} template at the top, which could do with being on the church's page as well. If you're doing this for churches in other areas of the country, this could affect other WikiProjects as well. Hope that's helpful. :)

Thanks! --Peeky44 (talk) 19:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:TrinityMethodistHarrogate.JPG

Hope you don't mind - I took the liberty of editing the photo you uploaded (File:TrinityMethodistHarrogate.JPG) as the original was a bit dark. I also adjusted the converging verticals. If you don't like what I did, please feel free to revert... Cheers -- Euchiasmus (talk) 07:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harrington Bridge

Nice article ... if it was to grow a bit to 1500 characters of pure text (exc. bullets, titles, lists etc) in the next 2 days then we might get it on the front page. Interested? Victuallers (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Harrington Bridge

On January 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Harrington Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Google street view links

Hi, can you put these GSV links in the external links sections of pages rather than in the lead please? All links in the body/lead should be internal rather than external. Thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for City of Nottingham Water Department

On February 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article City of Nottingham Water Department, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Friends of Cathedral Music

Hello! Your submission of Friends of Cathedral Music at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer Waters 07:17, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Friends of Cathedral Music

On March 17, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Friends of Cathedral Music, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oh … life!

"==Life== He died at 24 James Street," [1] … so it goes :-) If you are interested in the bit in-between, I'm expanding the article with some PD text. cygnis insignis 14:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strettons

Well you seem to have three that could be used as DYKs, got any idea for how many hooks you need? Hope youre OK with my changes to Sempronius? Victuallers (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC) ....[reply]

I see we now have two nominations at DYK. Surprised I had no reply? Victuallers (talk) 09:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you OK with the double nom? It not then its easy to split it. Also have you considered adding more refs (DYK likes a ref per para) to Severus and William and nomming them too? Victuallers (talk) 10:35, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victuallers has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!

If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

DYK for Sempronius Stretton

On 8 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sempronius Stretton, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sempronius Stretton, who sketched people in early Canada, was painted at the Duke of Wellington's annual banquet celebrating their victory at Waterloo? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cbl62 (talk) 18:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Great Recoinage of 1816

Hello! Your submission of Great Recoinage of 1816 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 10:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Pneumatic Despatch Company

Interesting article -- a definite for DYK!

Could you have another look at the lede paragraph of the article? The first sentence introduces a company, the second and third sentences discuss the railway that the company built, but do not say as such -- the subject of the two sentences is still the LPD Company.

In the quote I changed 'value' to 'valve', since the context suggests that is the correct word. (Could you double-check the original source, please?) My handwriting can make these two words look identical, so I suspect the same transcription error has occurred here too.

Incidentally, if you look at the article history you'll see that an anon editor has been making numerous changes -- was that you, not logged-in?

EdJogg (talk) 14:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of London Pneumatic Despatch Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Rosiestep (talk) 22:50, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Great Recoinage of 1816

On 10 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Great Recoinage of 1816, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the Great Recoinage of 1816 the design of the portrait of King George III by Benedetto Pistrucci was met with such public hostility that it was withdrawn? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for London Pneumatic Despatch Company

On 21 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article London Pneumatic Despatch Company, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1863 the 3rd Duke of Buckingham and Chandos was propelled underground from Holborn to Euston railway station in a parcel capsule to demonstrate the system built by the London Pneumatic Despatch Company? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

L&Y Railway ships

Hi, re this edit, I created the table with ship article names per WP:MOSSHIP. I see that you've created a number of articles on these ships, which is good. I note the use of a year disambiguator in your titles. As it is quite likely that a number of ships carries the same name, then the use of a year of launch disambiguator is in compliance with MOSSHIP. However, titles should really be at SS Foo or TSS Foo.

I suggest the following moves are made -

Duke of Albany (1907) to TSS Duke of Albany or TSS Duke of Albany (1907) if more than one ship with that name, with TSS Duke of Albany created as a ship index page.
Duke of Argyll (1909) to TSS Duke of Argyll or TSS Duke of Argyll (1909) as above.
Duke of Clarence (1892) to TSS Duke of Clarence or TSS Duke of Clarence (1892) as above.
Duke of Connaught (1902) to TSS Duke of Connaught or TSS Duke of Connaught (1902) as above.
Duke of Cornwall (1898) to TSS Duke of Cornwall or TSS Duke of Cornwall (1898) as above.
Duke of Cumberland (1909) to TSS Duke of Cumberland or TSS Duke of Cumberland (1909) as above.
Duke of Lancaster (1895) to TSS Duke of Lancaster or TSS Duke of Lancaster (1895) as above.
Duke of York (1894) to TSS Duke of York or TSS Duke of York (1894) as above.

Let me know whether you want to make the moves, or you'd like me to do the honours. Mjroots (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Duke of Argyll needs a shipindex page creating anyway, as does Duke of Lancaster. Mjroots (talk) 16:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the moves as you can see. PS is the preferred prefix for paddle steamers, rather that P.S. (or worse, P/S). Any questions about ship articles please ask at WT:SHIPS. Please remember that the internet can be a great source of info which can be used to supplement book sources when writing ship articles. Mjroots (talk) 13:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Just noticed the edits to the ship article titles. I think some of the ship names may occur on later vessels, so I'll move them if it becomes necessary. (Andrewrabbott (talk) 13:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

My personal feeling is that all ships should be dabbed by year of launch, but this is not something that is supported. If it becomes apparant that an article needs to be moved, the previous title can then be turned into a shipindex page, as I did with TSS Duke of Lancaster. Should two ships have the same name and year of launch, I dab by builder, (year). Mjroots (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Andrew. Many of these ships are not "TSS" as marine steam turbines were not used in passenger vessels until the twentieth century. (TS King Edward was the first.) So the vessels which are prefixed with "TSS" but are not turbine-powered need to be moved again. I have done that with SS Duke of Lancaster (1895). Regards, Kablammo (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

North Lancashire Steam Navigation Company

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of North Lancashire Steam Navigation Company, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.marine-heritage.connectfree.co.uk/belfast.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drogheda Steam Packet Company

Hi, I've expanded this a bit. Do you have a page number for the book ref? Mjroots (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ship names

Just a reminder that ship names should always be in italics per WP:MOSSHIP. Mjroots (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LNWR ships

Have you created all the articles that you can from the book, or do you intend to write articles on the others too? Mjroots (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm hoping to add the others. I'm just a bit short of time at the moment. I'd like also to cover LMS ships, but that's a much bigger project.(Andrewrabbott (talk) 15:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

That's great! There's no rush with Wikipedia. We all do what we can when we can. Mjroots (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Ships

WikiProject Ships Hello Andrewrabbott! I noticed your contributions to a ship article, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Ships, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of ships of all kinds. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! ~~~~

A Question

Where did you find the citation "the Company of Proprietors of the Birmingham Waterworks for the purpose of providing a sufficient and constant supply of good and wholesome water for domestic, manufacturing and other purposes" for your Birmingham Corporation Water Department article?

I imagine it was the statute 7 Geo. 4 c. cix, but I'm having the hardest time finding the actual text of that statute. Please let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.59.180.108 (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Andrewrabbott! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Mary Hardstaff Homes

Hi Andrewrabbott, I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Mary Hardstaff Homes--However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing. It's nice to see you editing!Amy Z (talk) 04:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plymouth Corporation Tramways

Hello, Andrewrabbott, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Plymouth Corporation Tramways, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Nottingham Corporation Tramways. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Plymouth Corporation Tramways at any time. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Company article

		The Epic Barnstar
		Thank you for creating the new Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Company article, and improving Wikipedia's coverage of historical-topics. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Street Tramways

Would have helped if it said that in the first place. ;) Argyle 4 Life^talk 18:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Exeter Corporation Tramways

An article that you have been involved in editing, Exeter Corporation Tramways , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. NHSavage (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC) As you created this article, I wanted to notify you of my proposal of this merger. There is not much content in either article at present, and given the significant overlap between the two systems, it seemed to make sense to link them.--NHSavage (talk) 15:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sir Gervase Clifton, 4th Baronet

The article Sir Gervase Clifton, 4th Baronet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

genealogical stub which establishes no notability for the subject

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ilkeston Town Hall

Hi, according to the book `History of Ilkeston` published in 1889 the Town Hall was built in 1866, if you have reference to built 1867-1868 then please revert quoting ref. Regards --palmiped | Talk 19:42, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a reference to the foundation stone being laid on 27 September 1866 - Nottinghamshire Guardian - Friday 05 October 1866. The English Heritage listing information says that the building was constructed between 1867 and 1868. I can't find any reference to an opening ceremony at the moment. Andrewrabbott (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Smith's Bank

Andrewrabbott

As you started the Smith's Bank article you may like to look at the talk page - I am proposing a major extendion of the article.

Regards

Bebington (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham Gazette

Nice work on the Birmingham organists. May I ask where you have access to the Gazette - is it electronic? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - British Library website Andrewrabbott (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Splendid, thank you - I shall have a look. Do you think, in that case, you could include URLs in your references, please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

St John's Church, Wolverhampton

You should add this new article in the St. John's Church disambiguation list page. I would do it myself, but don't know to which part of England it belongs. Regards, Gilliam (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

newark church organ

Hi, your recent edits to this do not make sense...please check this:

"It was and placed on the west gallery. In 1814 the organ was re-located on the chancel screen and the choir, which had led services from the organ gallery, returned to the chancel."

What does it mean? It needs some rewording, thanks Peter morrell 18:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding info on Douglas-Hamilton

Hi there - thanks indeed for the added info and pic re H.A. Douglas-Hamilton. He was known to my great grandparents when he was vicar at St Cyprian's Kimberley. All the best Blarcrean (talk) 08:07, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dates of St Alban's vicar

Nice work, as usual, on St Alban the Martyr, Birmingham. In the list of vicars, you had:

Thomas Benson Pollock 1896 - 1895

I've assumed the later should be 1897, and changed it, but can you check your source, please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore Stephen Tearne

Hi. I wonder whether you could please help me, regarding the meaning of the letters FSSc after the above man's name? Your article contains the only mention of FSSc after a name that I can find. I'm researching a late 19th century priest who was a Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society, and he also had those same letters after his name (besides FRGS). However, although there are plenty of mentions of the "Science Society, London" on the internet, there is no source (that I can find) to say exactly what it was. My 19th century priest was not a member of the Royal Society (their historical membership list is online) and they use the letters FRS anyway. Any ideas? --Storye book (talk) 11:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Just letting you know that, since posting the above question, I have managed to answer it myself. See Society of Science, Letters and Art. --Storye book (talk) 17:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Andrewrabbott (talk) 10:53, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Charles James Buchanan, 4th Baronet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 13:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you very much for the barn star! Much appreciated. And thank you also for the hard work that you do to support Wikipedia. Cheers. --Storye book (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kirkby Stephen

I have started a Talk Page for your new article - which separates Kirkby Stephen's parish church from the article on the town. This includes two suggestions for alterations - but I have not yet made any changes to the two main articles, pending comments from you and/or others. John Hamilton (talk) 11:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:William Bidlake

Category:William Bidlake has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Sionk (talk) 04:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Please see my proposal to rename Category:Roman Catholic churches in England by County and Category:Roman Catholic churches in England by county and Category:Roman Catholic Churches in Nottinghamshire to Category:Roman Catholic churches in Nottinghamshire Hugo999 (talk) 07:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James Woolley (clockmaker)

Hi Andrew. What made you write this article? Asking because I think I descend from one of his nephews. Eddaido (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC) He's someone of local interest, and I saw one of his clocks at Nottingham Industrial Museum in Wollaton Park. Andrewrabbott (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham churches; template

I'm enjoying your new Birmingham church articles. It's good to learn new things abut my home city. Thank you.

I made {{National Pipe Organ Register}}, which may ease your workload; see this example of it in use. It will also save problems later, if the register changes its URL structure. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I'll use it in subsequent articles Andrewrabbott (talk) 21:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St Mark's Church, Great Wyrley

I would be grateful if you would kindly apply your skills - and the sources to which you have access - at St Mark's Church, Great Wyrley. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some amendments. Is that the kind of thing you were hoping for? Andrewrabbott (talk) 20:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly so; many thanks. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Andrewrabbott, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all of your contributions to articles relating to WikiProject Christianity, especially your recent creation of Emmanuel Church, Bentley. You are making a difference here! Keep up the good work! With regards, Anupam^Talk 14:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NHLE

Hi Andrew. I'm enjoying your work on listed churches. Just one suggestion: you tend to cite the British Listed Buildings website but (although useful) this is an unofficial record, uses obsolete reference numbers, and is not automatically updated as the listings change. The official list, which contains mostly the same information but, unlike BLB, is maintained and uses a current index, is the National Heritage List England (NHLE), which has its own template for referencing (see Template:NHLE). When I can be bothered, I cite both. Just a thought – keep up the good work. Dave.Dunford (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I'll use the template in future articles. Andrewrabbott (talk) 09:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI: I think {{NHLE}} will still work, but the template has recently been renamed Template:National Heritage List for England entry. Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper archive references

Hi, ideally you need to add (subscription required) template to the references. Regard --palmiped | Talk 11:39, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When Copying Within Wikipedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pentrich, Derbyshire into St Matthew's Church, Pentrich. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Charles Liddell

Hi,

Knowing your inerest in church organs and organists, I thought you might be inertested in this clock (pictures above), in the collection of Birmingham Museums Trust, which caries a plate with the inscription:

Presented to Laurence Charles Liddell on his retirement by the parishioners of Tardebigge and Bentley in grateful appreciation of his 19 years service as organist at St. Bartholomew's Church

Can you shed any light on him? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of Freedom of the City recipients (military) page, your edit caused a wikilink error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

York's churches

Hi Andrew, I've just noticed and been impressed by your recent edits to articles on York's churches. I'm based at York Museums Trust as part of the Yorkshire GLAMwiki Network Project and may be able to help you find more resources on these churches. There's also St Mary's, Castlegate which currently lacks an article and is now a de-consecrated contemporary art space used by York Museums Trust (website here). Perhaps it should get an article? There's a little on its history here and here. What do you think? Cheers, PatHadley (talk) 14:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Deanery of Christianity (Lincoln)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deanery of Christianity (Lincoln) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

AfD deletion nomination: CofE deanery articles

Bundled together at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deanery of Alresford DBD 20:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edward Staveley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Staveley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Staveley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Hampshire!

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Hampshire! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 2,690 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Hampshire.

Browse the new WikiProject page
Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Churches by height

Category:Churches by height, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 21:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St Nicholas, Moreton

Can you add anything to St Nicholas, Moreton, which I just started, please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been able to find anything on the National Pipe Organ Register for this church, and also the newspapers have very little. I tend to see details of church restorations if they took place after 1840 or so, but there isn't anything I can find for this church. I'll keep looking Andrewrabbott (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blisland Parish Church

Hello, You have been making many new separate articles for churches in Cornwall in the last few weeks. Blisland Parish Church is one that you have not yet improved and it is one of the more interesting of the restored parish churches. I included a basic account of it in the Blisland article long ago and now feel that a separate and fuller article is needed.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 08:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St Andrew's, Croydon

You might find St Andrew's, Croydon of interest; there's an interesting story relating to its organ. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries, please

Once again:

Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 14:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Harris (organist)

There seems to be some incorrect information regarding this person's date of birth. I have been working on some family history and this Joseph Harris is my fourth great grandfather: http://www.geni.com/people/Joseph-Harris/6000000024103789199?through=6000000024104048913#/tab/source

If you click on the Google Books link in the Overview to the relevant page in A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers & and Other Stage Personnel in London: 1660-1800 Vol. 7 - the date of birth cited, 8 September 1743, accords with his baptism record here: https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:N1W8-LZN ,son of John and Mary, born in Bristol and christened on 08 Oct 1743.

I don't want to change anything myself on this page as I'm not an experienced and confident Wikipedian, but would like to see the information corrected if possible, please.

Chelseawoman1 (talk) 11:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure this is the same person as article has different place of birth and father is also different ? --palmiped | Talk 11:37, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, have only just seen your post after doing quite a bit of editing, palmiped (not sure why I wasn't notified before?) - but yes, I am sure that all of the other information matches my ancestor. It has been quite a while since I've done any editing on Wikipedia or used these talk pages, and I'm not experienced with html, so please feel free to pass on any basic advice! Chelseawoman1 p.s. I have a jpg of his face sourced from a cousin who has been involved in creating the Harris family tree - but I will have to check with her details of its origin and whether it's okay to put it up on Wikipedia.

Yellow fever and Capt. Kelly

In this edit You appended the statement about deaths of crew duty yellow fever with "including Capt. Kelly". However, our article on Capt. Kelly Benedictus Marwood Kelly Indicates he lived till 1867.

This source Suggests he did not die of yellow fever although it indicates that some websites made this claim. Unless you disagree, one of us should make the change.--S Philbrick (Talk) 17:34, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I must have copied the death from Yellow Fever from a source but I can't recall which one. I agree that he lived until 1867, so I'm happy for the edit to be made. Andrewrabbott (talk) 17:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Midland Railway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philip Hardwick railway stations has been nominated for discussion

Category:Philip Hardwick railway stations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Great Central Railway page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:William Neville Ashbee railway stations

I see you have recently created this category; I created the original article about W. N. Ashbee. In the interests of consistency, should the category also use his initials, rather than full name? This is how he is generally referred to in sources. Ultimately, there might be a case for renaming both as "Neville Ashbee" as I formed the impression from one source that this is how he was known in his life, but as yet I haven't found enough evidence to justify a change. In the meantime I think we should have consistency between article and category. The Sage of Stamford (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether it should be left as it is. All of the other categories under Railway station architects use the full name of the architect? Andrewrabbott (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Palindrome

Notifying all named accounts who have edited this article this year. There is a discussion of whether this article should contain foreign language palindromes. If you would like to comment the thread is Talk:Palindrome#Non-English_palindromes_2 Meters (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrewrabbott. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Kaukas

Hi, I saw you made a page for Bernard Kaukas, I know his family well and they are delighted that there is a page about him. They would love to know what prompted you to make this page? Thanks, Flynntoff (talk) 21:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was just interested in architects who worked for railway companies. It would be great if a member of the family wanted to expand the article with more information on the buildings which Bernard designed. Andrewrabbott (talk) 20:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andrewrabbott. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stealing my article

Hi could you please explain why you have stolen my article Golden Hind(passenger train)? 146.200.77.220 (talk) 20:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weirs on the River Trent

You may be interested in creating an article on all the weirs from source to mouth, or just on this one in Beeston. There are multiple references to the results of the coroners inquest. I would like to see a sizeable chunk on the hydrology of the river and historic flow rate, the civil engineering practice and practise and a tie in to the Hydro, and river safety techniques.Hammond, Laura (8 August 2017). "Spot where Owen Jenkins died is 'highly dangerous', says coroner". nottinghampost. Retrieved 13 February 2018. --ClemRutter (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English architects from Nottinghamshire

A tag has been placed on Category:English architects from Nottinghamshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 17:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MV Nottingham (1949)

The article MV Nottingham (1949) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of notability. WP:GNG not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrewrabbott. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrewrabbott. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Church of St Michael and All Angels, Beckwithshaw

You might remember that you very kindly sent me a barnstar for my article on the above, five years ago. As a consequence of the research, I got the building listed on the grounds of it being a pristine and almost unchanged example of the architect's work. However, I've recently learned that the vicar and churchwardens have now gained permission to gut the place on the grounds of modern community needs. This is a small village, not an inner-city church with massive amounts of parochial and social work to do. They are going to remove the pews (designed by the architect) to clear the floor entirely, and punch a hole in the side for a kitchen and lavatory. Other churches in the area have been adapted far more discreetly. They are going to put in a lot of lighting too. All this will completely destroy the type of theatre for storytelling, in an atmosphere of natural light and shade, that Barber went in for. No longer a peaceful otherworld for sacredness and mystery, but now a secular area for a secular approach. The sad thing is that future generations may well want this building, which is a work of art, to go back the way it was, but the pews and maybe other stuff will be gone forever. I have no religion myself, but even I can see that the place had atmosphere. Storye book (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS Baron Osy

PS Baron Osy (1851), which you created seems to have some inaccuracies. You state that she was renamed Malakhoff in 1856, but she was still named Baron Osy in April 1857 when she ran down and sank HMRC Curlew. At the time, she was a Belgian registered ship. Mjroots (talk) 09:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the Baron Osy of 1851 was renamed Malakhoff because a new ship taking the name Baron Osy was built in 1855. There is an article on it on the Dutch Wikipedia site here https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Osy_(schip,_1855) Andrewrabbott (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that would explain it. Have corrected the list. Mjroots (talk) 06:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All Saint's Yafforth - which Pritchett?

Hi Andrew,

I've recently created a page for James Pigott Pritchett Jr of Darlington, son of James Pigott Pritchett of York, and have been trying to work out which of Wikipedia's references to the father actually mean the son.

The page for All Saints' Church, Yafforth which you created a few years ago, says:

The church dates from the twelfth century but was almost completely rebuilt in 1870 to designs by the architect James Pigott Pritchett of Darlington. Pritchett died in 1868 before the church was completed.

There must be an error here - the JP Pritchett who died in 1868 did not practice in Darlington - but I don't know which part is wrong. The listed building register just says "Virtually rebuilt in 1870 by J P Pritchett".

It seems more likely to me that the rebuilding was the work of JP Pritchett of Darlington, who was still alive in 1870 to do the work; but I didn't know if there was a specific source saying that the Pritchett in question had died in 1868 (so was JP Pritchett of York). The answer may be in the York Herald article you cited, but I don't have a login to read that.

Thanks for any help you can offer! TSP (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TSP, I'm afraid I don't know. The article only mentions JP Pritchett but doesn't specify which one. Andrewrabbott (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Andrew - if the source doesn't specifically mention the Pritchett in question dying in 1868, then I think that will be Pritchett Jr. TSP (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandweid.JPG

Do you have any more information about Sandweid railway station? I've looked in the usual places, and I can't find any evidence of it existing aside from your photograph of the departure board. Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mackensen. I'm afraid I don't have any additional information. I used the station whilst on holiday which is where I took a picture of the departure board. Andrewrabbott (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Jalland

The article Robert Jalland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a nineteenth-century architect which does not state that he has any claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tacyarg (talk) 20:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cyril Francis Musgrove

The article Cyril Francis Musgrove has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources, no assertion of notability either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 04:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frederick Arthur Sefton Cottom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Arthur Sefton Cottom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Arthur Sefton Cottom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 18:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Station masters

Could you check your recent edit for Lostwithiel railway station. That date can't be correct! Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out. Just a typing error. Andrewrabbott (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Trepte

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Trepte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ GB fan 11:08, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ships of Red Funnel Ferries has been nominated for renaming

Category:Ships of Red Funnel Ferries has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Arem Seven (talk) 10:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buildings containing meridian lines has been nominated for deletion

Category:Buildings containing meridian lines has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Clocks in Sweden has been nominated for merging

Category:Clocks in Sweden has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Estonian cabinetmakers has been nominated for merging

Category:Estonian cabinetmakers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Baily (priest) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Baily (priest) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Baily (priest) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:United Reformed churches in North Yorkshire

A tag has been placed on Category:United Reformed churches in North Yorkshire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:57, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Library Country Life

Hi,

Sorry for using your talk page, but I couldn't think of a better way to access you. You have shown an interest in British (Country House) Architectural History. I have suggested that Wikipedians gain access to the Country Life Archive on The Wikipedia Library (https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/suggest/). Please feel free to support this suggestion (titled "Country Life Archive (Proquest)" on the linked page) if you think this is a good idea.

Feel free to @ me here with any questions.

Cheers, EPEAviator (talk) 04:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St Nicks. Nottingham

Hi, do you know what the ? mark is supposed to mean for this organist.. Miss E.M. Spurr c.1878 - 1889 - ?

Regards palmiped^Talk 16:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St Thomas's Church, Grenville Street, Birmingham

Hi there, strange query but I have read that you edited the information for St Thomas' Church on Grenville Street, Birmingham recently. I am currently trying to get the information as to who owns The Peace Garden at St Thomas' as my Grandma and Grandad wanted their ashes scattered there as they grew up around there. Really hope you can help. Hannah 80.1.12.65 (talk) 09:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't know who owns it. There are some who say it is a public park, so perhaps start with Birmingham City Council? Andrewrabbott (talk) 17:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tower Bridge railway station

The article Tower Bridge railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub, doesn't help anything, aren't many references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Loymdayddaud (talk) 08:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smyth's Siding railway station

The article Smyth's Siding railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability at all, line doesn't even have a page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]