Jump to content

User talk:Brenont

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Brenont, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- zzuuzz(talk) 01:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Punctuation

[edit]

Hi Brenont. The Wikipedia Manual of Style recommends that editors do not change the spelling or punctuation of a particular variety of English which is established in an article. The punctuation within quotations which you changed at Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom is one of these issues where either approach is acceptable and so should not be changed. I would even say that in the case of "E II R" on the post boxes, where the quotation is not from normal language, it is arguably more than a matter of style, and is misleading to include the punctuation, but that is just a personal opinion. JPD (talk) 10:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I left a rewply to your question on this article's talk page. (Iuio 04:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Please see WP:3RR and reasd it before further editing. Also read WP:MoS, what you are doing is unhelpful, SqueakBox 03:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake - I was under the impression at the time that I was using UK English format. However, I am surprised that I can't use Wiktionary as a definitive source. Brenont

Elvis's stepmother

[edit]

You made a good point on [Talk:Elvis Presley]. Several weeks ago, a very small group of devoted Elvis fans began to remove every information relating to Presley's personal relationships and critical remarks concerning the Elvis cult from the Wikipedia article, presumably because some details (for instance, that Elvis's mother was an alcoholic, that Elvis spent most of his time with his friends from the Memphis Mafia, etc.) were not in line with their personal view of the megastar. See this edit by Northmeister, which removed large blocks of material from the article page. . For more details concerning the edit war, see [1]. Perhaps you may also have a look at the activities of the current contributors.

Variations of Spelling

[edit]

Hi Brenont. The Wikipedia Manual of Style recommends that editors do not change the spelling or punctuation of a particular variety of English which is established in an article. The change of spelling of the word rumour/rumor which you changed at Cary Grant is one of these issues where either approach is acceptable and so should not be changed. Thanks. Wildhartlivie 19:34, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I edited this article there were three occurrences of the spelling 'rumor' and three of the spelling 'rumour' and to standardize I made all spellings 'rumor'. American spelling had been used for 'favorite' in this article. Brenont

AfD nomination of Ben Leonard

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ben Leonard, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Leonard. Thank you. robwingfield «T•C» 22:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vogtsburg

[edit]

Thank you very much for your correctings of all the typos and the wrong grammar in this article!
Kiu77 11:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lester Piggott

[edit]

I've added a section to the article on Lester Piggott's family background if you'd like to have a look.Bcp67 05:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed bar

[edit]

Did you see my comment on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive#I_propose_a_fixed_left_hand_panel_or_toolbar? — Omegatron 04:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


1987: Lester Piggott jailed for three years

Former champion jockey, Lester Piggott, has been sentenced to three years imprisonment after being found guilty of an alleged tax fraud of over £3m. The 51-year-old remained stony-faced as he was sentenced by Mr Justice Farquharson at Ipswich Crown Court. But his wife, Susan, collapsed in tears as he was taken to Norwich prison. Piggott was jailed after failing to declare income to the Inland Revenue of £3.25m. The biggest sum on the charge sheet relates to an alleged omission of £1,359,726 from additional riding income. Another alleged that for 14 years, from 1971, he omitted income of £1,031,697 from bloodstock operations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.229.179 (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Farther/further

[edit]

From Fowler's:

"The fact is surely that hardly anyone uses the two words for different occasions; most people prefer one or the other for all purposes, and the preference of the majority is for further.... On the whole, though differentiations are good in themselves, it is less likely that one will be established for farther and further than that the latter will become universal."

Hesperian 05:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm III's birthdate

[edit]

Hello. If Malcolm III was born in 1031, it should be easy to find a solid reference. There is, at present, a reference to Archie Duncan's Kingship of the Scots which gives his age in 1040 as "at least two, possible as much as ten, years old", which is 1030x1038 (or maybe even 1029x1038), and indeed you did not change that reference when you changed the dates. Therefore, I have put the 1030x1038 birth date back so the article text again matches what the reference says. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me. I was not at all familiar with this date format and I looked for some time to see when 1030x1038 had been inserted into the article before I reverted it thinking it was vandalism. Thanks again. --User:Brenont 18:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for the excellent edits to the G&S and Gilbert articles. If you are interested in G&S, check out WP:G&S. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BBC Logo 1997-Present.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BBC Logo 1997-Present.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

whilst

[edit]

Why is 'while' better than 'whilst'?Zigzig20s (talk) 02:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am going by Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Avoid_contested_vocabulary--User:Brenont (talk) 03:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also see List of English words with disputed usage Brenont (talk) 18:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

[edit]
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For Taking the challenge, and correcting at least 200 spelling errors, I, TicketMan - Talk, award you this Copyeditor's Barnstar. Thank you. --TicketMan - Talk - contribs 10:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

[edit]

In a recent edit to the page Cary Grant, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on Wildhartlivie's Talk page: Please see your previous (Aug 2007) posting on my Talk Page "Variations of Spelling" and my reply. It too related to the Cary Grant article. I believe every article needs to stick to one spelling version, and have taken into account all the considerations you have brought up both in August and today. Is there something I am overlooking? Brenont

Thanks for fixing typos et al

[edit]

Bill Gammage was an early page I worked on. Thanks for doing the tidying up. I have learned a lot since then and will join the typo brigade. Regards Stellar (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priscilla Bunbury's Virginal Book

[edit]

Thank you for editing the above article. Unfortunately I have had to revert your edits as you unintentionally modified the spelling from the original to modern [2]. If you look at the list of pieces you will notice that the spelling is the original seventeenth century, and should of course be left as such. Thanks. Nick Michael (talk) 10:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Sabbat (jap)

[edit]

Thanks for the edit on Sabbat. That probabaly took a while. I was the one who added that huge chunk into the history section, but it was directly from the Sabbat website so it had a bunch of errors. But you were bold and took care of it. I did, however, correct a few erros that you made, but all in all that was a great edit, thanks. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 22:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awards Center Newsletter

[edit]

I'm pleased to announce that the Awards Center will be getting its own newsletter shortly. If you want to receive the WP:AWC newsletter, put your name here. --Sharkface217 20:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Jong wook

[edit]

Hi I would like to ask you the article Lee Jong-wook. I saw you deleted large parts of the materials concerning Election, Magaret Chan ,etc. I was quite wondering why the elction is not related to Dr.Lee direclty as you mentioned. And your edition was too strong to keep supporting main information.

The election of any positions, whoever, would be posted as you can see many articles in Wiki and other encyclopedias. I want to ask you why the election part is not concerning main streams about him. Every representative have gone through election and his campaign is considered to exist. See Ban Ki-moon as examples.

Secondly, I was quite curious what is not TIME. I searched whole web for getting links concerning Dr.Lee's position not only US web but also Korean websites. Would you explain why you decided to remove whole texts?

It is necessary, at least as I think, to discuss the gap between you and me. You can say tghe quality of information is absolutely important than just that of quantity. But I am sure I did make much effort on this article for writing objective references and contents. Frankly, I hope to keep his life and idea on Wiki continuously with abundance.

Hear from you soon. Thank for conerning. Pju0353 (talk) 02:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:11, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military of Niger

[edit]

Please bear in mind: people from Niger are Nigerien, not Nigerian -- those would be people from Nigeria. Thanks. T L Miles (talk) 02:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SS Carl D. Bradley

[edit]

Thanks for catching those errors. Apparently I was having a very bad day on the key board. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 02:10, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Stan[reply]

changing spelling in image names

[edit]

Thanks for attempting to correct my bad spelling, however the "correction" you made on Tithe Barn, Pilton was to the name of an image and therefore after your change the image didn't appear. Please preview your edits to ensure that they have the intended effect.— Rod talk 08:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dash to Endash replacement.

[edit]

See above comment about previewing, basically. Your edit broke Souter's Supreme Court templates at a time of heavy load on the article. If you're using a script to do this, could you change it to ignore text inside File / Image / Template blocks? That'd probably fix this issue... SnowFire (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dashes

[edit]

np, can see how it can easily be overlooked. Thanks for your attention to detail. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Niihau

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your edits to Niihau, however you changed the regional spelling endemic to the article location to one that fits your own personal style. This is inappropriate and Wikipedia policies and guidelines are very clear about these types of changes. For this reason, I have reverted your changes except for your correction of a spelling error. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 08:34, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notie

[edit]

Hello, Brenont. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Brenont. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 20:53, 24 October 2009 (UTC) Doesn't involve me as it happens.[reply]

Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom GA review

[edit]

A review to see if Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom meets Wikipedia:Good article criteria has started, and has been put on hold. Suggestions for improvement are at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/GA2, and are mainly to do with coverage and neutrality, and building the lead section. Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom is one of our most high profile and popular articles, attracting an average of over 11,000 readers every day. You have made more than 40 edits to the article, and so you might be interested in helping to make the improvements needed to get it listed as a Good Article. SilkTork *YES! 12:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Claddagh ring

[edit]

Will you kindly post at the talk page if you have ideas, criticism or suggestions? You are probably only acting in the article's best interests, but a couple of us over there would like to know what.75.21.159.227 (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Panel game

[edit]

Hello! I saw your editing of the panel game article and would really appreciate it if you could briefly pop into a discussion on the Hollywood Squares article on whether it is a panel game (there are cited descriptions if you're unfamiliar with the show). Here's the discussion. Thank you so much! 76.105.176.44 (talk) 22:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

c for circa

[edit]

Hallo, in your edit here you changed "c. 1709" to "c1709", but see WP:MOSNUM which uses the "c. 1709" style. PamD 15:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typoscan is working again

[edit]

Just in case you haven't been following Wikipedia:WikiProject TypoScan, Reedy got this working again. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 01:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Runni Saidpur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wolgast may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lucille Lortel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | birth_place = [[New York, NY]], [[US]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 Australian Super Touring Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Negrini

[edit]

Thanks for great edit, I always wondered how to do that with multiple refs and now I know (sorry - I am a beginner in Wikiedits). Nicoderno1 (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of mottos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Boston College]]: Aien Aristeuein/αιεν αριστευειν ({{lang-gr|Ever to excel); Religioni et bonis artibus ({{lang-la|For religion and the good arts}})

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Popstars: Der Weg ist das Ziel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page How Do You Do (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve : correction request

[edit]

Hello,

I saw you corrected the page Bavay. In this town is located a protected area, the Carrière des Nerviens Regional Nature Reserve. This article is a translation of w:fr:Réserve naturelle régionale de la Carrière des Nerviens, whis is candidate to the status Article de qualité. So I would like to ask a status GA, A ou FA for the english article. Would you help me please. Would you correct it ? Thanks a lot. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 12:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your editing. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 16:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Earlier, I did not have time to watch your correction. Really, thank you very much for your work. Christian COGNEAUX (talk) 18:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of mottos

[edit]

Please explain to me as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors what you would expect us to do for the List of mottos. You can answer right here. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names

[edit]

Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names (more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.

Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.

Best wishes & thanks --Frze > talk 09:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog template made by User:TheJJJunk

[edit]
Backlog status (Purge)
Category Current status
Pages with incorrect ref formatting  Not done
Pages with missing references list  Done
Pages with broken reference names Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",".

Best wishes --Frze > talk 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New REFBot

[edit]

There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- Frze (talk · contribs) 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Metropolitan Tower may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Metropolitan Tower (Chicago)]], a building in Chicago, Illinois, [U.S.]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of hobbies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skating (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mikael Tariverdiev may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Waiting". But he is best known for his music in many popular [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[movies]] (more than 130 films, included "[[Seventeen Moments of Spring]]" and "The [[Irony of Fate]]"—see [[
  • *''Moods'' (6 preludes from the cycle ''10 chorale preludes imitating to the old masters'', 3rd Organ concerto,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isadora Duncan

[edit]

I saw your recent edits to Isadora Duncan. While I agree with your changing hyphens to en-dashes in dates, and deleting spaces around em-dashes, I don't understand why you changed en-dashes to em-dashes. To me, an en-dash with a space at either end is easier to read than an em-dash which runs right up against the text at both ends. I know it is a matter of preference and that both are acceptable, so of course I will not revert your edit, but I just would hope that you don't go through articles changing all en-dashes to em-dashes.CorinneSD (talk) 00:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Hi I shall revert the em dashes. I see now from WP:MoS that either is valid and should be used consistently in the article. Thanks for pointing this out. Let me know if my new edit doesn't go far enough. Thanks--User:Brenont (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vel' d'Hiv Roundup may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • d'Hiver and the [[Drancy internment camp|Drancy]] and [[Beaune-la-Rolande internment camp]]s]] nearby, then shipped by [[Holocaust train|railway transports]] to [[Auschwitz]] for extermination.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OER inquiry

[edit]

Hi Brenont, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Tickler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MOD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the citation error corrections

[edit]

Thanks very much for correcting the "p" vs. "pp" errors I had made at Tintin in Tibet. Obviously I had never done a top-to-bottom check for that kind of error, and I really appreciate that you did. I mainly stopped by to thank you for being the only editor out of around twenty that have nitpicked this article—for prose only. No one, not once, has ever looked at all the research I did or all the cited references I wrote, until now. I just checked, and you got them all. Thanks again. (By the way, you made two errors which I have just fixed.) Prhartcom (talk) 03:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Creation Museum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • certainly not 'the cursed offspring of Ham.' In fact, it is only one of Ham's sons who was cursed (and not Ham himself—the younger son Canaan... And this 'curse' of Canaan has absolutely nothing to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charing Cross Hospital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blitz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 July

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southerner (New Zealand train), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ute. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earl Hamner, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Thomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruth Ellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CID. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for your edits in Suicide in Iran, but there have been some changes that I considered them not appropriate. I can give you some examples, but I have to emphasize that I'm not talking about those error fixations; just the ones I intentionally wanted them to be like what it was:

1- Line 2: mental illnesses was right, because we are talking about different illnesses, not just one, and if you look, you can see that reasons of suicide in that line are all in plural.

2- Line 196 under "shooting": I didn't want to mention weapons only, but any lethal equipment. So, lethal equipment is right.

Off course, my grammar knowledge is not sufficient for editing an encyclopedia, but I tried my best to create that article.

So, please take a look at things I mentioned and see if there is any way to put them that way.

Thank you.Poorya0014 (talk) 07:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Poorya0014
I have changed mental illness back to mental illnesses. (Reminds me of the words fruit and fruits either of which can be used in the plural.) In your sentence both can be used as plurals but the one you chose is the better one to use among other plural words. I have picked up on a few more small edits. As for lethal equipment, can you please give me an example of a shooting other than by a weapon (such as a handgun or a semiautomatic weapon). Lethal equipment would cover, for instance, a tank but you are talking about shootings here.
--Brenont (talk) 22:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. It's a small world we live in! I live in the same country and province as yours and internet really has lifted barriers. Before starting, please excuse me for my grammar and writing and I know my English sucks, but I try my best to write as official in the article as possible. I've seen in the history of the article that you mentioned it is not possible to refer to that article as a reference. Am I right?

OK, now let me answer your questions:

1- By duty soldiers, I meant those who are serving in the military service and are in the lowest rank of military in Iran; those who just have begun the service.

2- About the ref #4, yes it's there. It's in Persian.

3- Now, about the plural form of mental illness, you were right. It's like the plural of fish, but my mine is used to plural sign "s" at the end of the words and it is just a preference. Although I have to say that I didn't know that mental illness could be both plural and singular.

4- About the term lethal weapon, if we want to be more accurate, it could have redundancy hidden in it, because the primary use of a weapon is to kill (be lethal), so the word lethal could be omitted if you wish. Now, why I used lethal equipment rather than weapon, is because there are other equipment that shoot something like a weapon, but they are not weapons. For example, nail shooters (nail guns). Although I haven't seen a record of suicide by that, but that was why I chose equipment over weapon. Again, because you are a native speaker, I prefer your edits over mine.

Thank you, and if you are interested, please expand the article, as it is the first google suggestion when you type suicide in Iran in English.Poorya0014 (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

1. duty soldiers - are you meaning conscripts?
2. About ref #4, it might well be the correct article in Persian but a search of the English word 'suicide' at that address does not bring up the English translation of the article on that subject and on that date. That was surprising but we have to go by the ref of the article in Persian.
3. I feel I should not leave you with the impression that mental illness could be both plural and singular. (I am no English major.) An example of the group use (my term) of 'mental illness' is "Many sufferers of mental illness happen to be Iranian." You wouldn't use 'illnesses' in that sentence even though it would be assumed that not all suffered from the same type of mental illness.
4. How about writing "in those provinces, people have easier access to weapons and tools used lethally than do other provinces."
I am about to make these edits and a few others but please undo what you don't like. You have quite a good command of English, I believe.
--Brenont (talk) 02:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good job! I agree with all those edits.Poorya0014 (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. There are some things I've come up with. First of all, once a language learner, always a language learner. So, literally I am learning from you and this is a very good opportunity for me, especially, when I look your edits, I kind of understand my mistakes. OK, about the notable Iranians section, there are some matters:

1- About finishing a sentence with a period, I've heard that the sentence must be a complete sentence, but not a phrase or semi-sentence. In some cases like Homa Darabi, you've written: "... Death by immolation." Here, we miss the doer or any pronoun, so the sentence is not complete. Am I right? Please just correct me and leave it as its if I'm wrong.

2- As I know there are some difference between British and American version of English, can I ask which one is your preferred one? Because I've read your page and you mentioned you're from England, I thought maybe some of your edits is due to that fact. Again I'm just learning and although as a language learner you should be familiar with any major dialect or accent, I'm unfortunately not that much familiar with British English. Though I have to mention that to me the British accent is nice, but because I learned English in an American-founded institute, I usually understand American a little bit better than British.

3- You have not provided any reference for the notable Iranian section. Why?

4- What does "c" mean here: (c1887/9–1920)?

5- I've added some punctuation to the text of notable Iranian section and I did so because I've seen similar ones in here. Are they right?

Thanks.Poorya0014 (talk) 05:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. 1- You're correct and I think it best to have complete sentences. 2- In this article I have seen American spellings only -- they are behavior, Organization and favorite. There is no overriding reason to change them to British spellings -- in that case the ruling is whichever is written first. I don't see any British spellings. 3- References are required and will take time to decide on the necessary references and how to present them. I will start writing them up, shortly. 4- "c" in (c1887/9–1920) is short for and used for the Latin word circa. It is in the Wikipedia article for that person but isn't really needed as the slash in 1887/9 means or. 5- OK.--Brenont (talk) 03:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NB

[edit]

Frescos is a perfectly good spelling, and rather more common these days. Johnbod (talk) 15:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of PHQ cards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Grey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suicide in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alireza Pahlavi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for checking

[edit]

Thanks for your sic contribution on Andrew Corbet. You've no idea how many times I have to reverse "corrections" to early modern prose. Or perhaps you have. Sjwells53 (talk) 11:12, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Leprosy in Malta - second pair of eyes

[edit]

Hello! I noticed that you were a contributor on the History of leprosy article. I was wondering whether you might be able to have a look at an article I have recently translated from French to English on Leprosy in Malta, as I would really appreciate a second pair of eyes. Any and all help gratefully received. Beckettnoti (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help with the tidy up! Much appreciated! Beckettnoti (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaius Atilius Regulus Serranus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aeolian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Tidying up" URLs breaks them

[edit]

Hello! In this edit, you (perhaps inadvertently) tried to tidy up the typography in a URL, at the same time as making other changes. URLs don't work like that: they are sequences of characters intended for computers that are only incidentally human-readable, and must always be copied exactly, without any alterations. Another editor has already reverted the URL edit, so you don't need to.

Otherwise, your changes to the template parameters looked fine to me. Many thanks for your efforts. -- The Anome (talk) 06:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roanoke VA page

[edit]

Hey I just saw a mistake on the page for Roanoke Virginia. I saw you were the last one to edit it....

There's a link to the Science Museum of Virginia in Richmond, when it should be the Science Museum of Western Virginia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_Museum_of_Western_Virginia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19B:C601:5EF0:B18E:43A5:CA40:DF7 (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fitzroy Iron Works - New errors being displayed after your recent edit

[edit]

Hi Brenont, Just noticed that you have made two recent edits to the Fitzroy Iron Works. Thanks for helping. But I have also noticed that the articles now show two errors that did not exist prior to your edits, namely: "Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing < /ref> (see the help page)." and "Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). " I am not sure what you did, and I do not know how to remove these errors myself. I don't feel right about just 'undoing' what you have done, as I presume that it was an overall positive contribution, but could you get rid of the new errors that are now - displayed in red - on the page please?

Westerham

[edit]

I see you changed the date of the church to 12th century. The source I found showed 13th. What was your source?SovalValtos (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Generations In Jazz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marymount College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Richards (rugby union), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five Nations.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vinland Saga

[edit]

Thanks for copyediting the such article. If possible, could you revise the article of Thorfinn (Vinland Saga). I think there is enough commentary about the character already. Cheers. Tintor2 (talk) 22:15, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brenont&oldid=1258265091"