User talk:Callmehelper

February 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to KRSNA (rapper)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chanakya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mentioned a citing source? Those changes I make is entirely based on RTI file on Archeological evidence of India (ASI) for the actual historical existence of Chanakya. ASI replied there is no any historical existence of Chanakya or Kautilya. Callmehelper (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RTI and ASI are both governmental departments and are not scholarly in nature. Scholarly consensus matters here the most and that is not favorable to your edits. Ratnahastin (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Constitution of India. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 02:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey yo ratnahastin .

Please Look at the constitution of India where I edit the things that you called as a disruptive .

Please read those only two or three lines and make video in youtube and called ambedkar give credit to B N Rau only and give this wikipedia page as a evidence. But by the next few lines of speech make clear that he want to give credit to all the members who give the major contribution during the making of constitution.

So I add a bunch of lines more of that original speech so it appeared or giving the full intention of that speech.

But you remove those additional content and called it not necessary is entirely wrong and people when read it will be completely mislead. So I want to you change it and make it fair. I am waiting for 1 or 2 days , otherwise I will do again what I do in previous time. Putting original speech that make fair thoughts is good rather than giving one line that misguide the people.

I always follow the guidelines of wikipedia. But some people don't understand it .

I hope you got my point. Callmehelper (talk) 17:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is succinct enough. You don't have to provide a larger version because it is simply not needed there. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You either don't understand indian political scenario or your thoughts are completely Brahmanised. So clearly I have to do it myself. Callmehelper (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realize my comment about your thoughts and logic was inappropriate, and I apologize for that. I shouldn't make this type of comments.

But please try to understand my point of view as a neutral perspective. Callmehelper (talk) 13:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]