User talk:Dalemurph

Dalemurph is currently a student at a school in Warwick^[1] (Warwickshire) He aspires to help Wikipedia by adding constructive imformation on its many pages. In the future he would like to be a administrator for Wikipedia, and help it in that way also. He is constantly expanding his knowlege on many things, and has recently added imformation on a page Bodies (Sex Pistols song)^[2] Dalemurph (talk) 12:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted Account Problem

Cheers, sorted it now. Thanks for your help. Dalemurph (talk) 16:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Password change should do}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I believe the account may be unblocked, but I will periodically make sure no vandalism occurs on this account. If it does, I will immediately indefinitely block.

Request handled by: Bedford ^Pray 17:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Bedford ^Pray 17:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Aylesford School

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Aylesford School. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 15:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Roman architecture has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Mattie ^TK 09:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Gordon Brown constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Mattie ^TK 09:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 09:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Has your account been compromised again? weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 09:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Dalemurph (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

88.211.98.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism: Sounds like it's been compromised again

Blocking administrator: WBOSITG (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 10:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dominic mccrave has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 13:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

I've blocked you indefinitely, because of vandalism. I acknowledge this is a somewhat unusual case, and if another admin wants to unblock, that's ok with me. PhilKnight (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dalemurph (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Account sorted out now

Decline reason:

It appears that this account is too seriously compromised; after three separate blocks for allowing other users to vandalize using this account, I'm reluctant to unblock. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This appears to be the third time your account has been compromised and become a source for vandalism. Do you have any specific plan for preventing this from happening a fourth time? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Users are expected to be responsible for the security of their own accounts. Perhaps this user needs some education? "My account was hacked" should work at most once. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^ Warwick
^ Bodies (Sex Pistols song)

[1] Warwick

[2] Bodies (Sex Pistols song)

[1]

[2]