User talk:FeldBum

Write a new message

Using this template is the best way
Subject:

2006-2016 Messages

That's right--a decade of messages. All now here.

2016-2019 Messages

Another four years of messages, rounding out the teens, now here.

COI request

Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ricardo_Azziz#Edits_to_Consider

Hi, FeldBum!

Thank you for your changes.

I have answered your question # 9 about the InfoBox and added a suggested sentence to separate ASRM from SUNY.

Is there anything you need?

Thank you, Dan Martin [memdmarti] Memdmarti (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, thanks for the quick reply. I'll check it out. --FeldBum (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, FeldBum, Dan Memdmarti (talk) 03:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Title move to text and retitled as "COI request" Memdmarti (talk) 14:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, FeldBum for fixing the Infobox!

I added a new request ot the end of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ricardo_Azziz#Edits_to_Consider

Is that reasonable there or do I need to put it in a new help me section or somewhere else?

Thank you, Dan Memdmarti (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll reply there too, but here's what you need to do:

Clean up the page, removing any POV language, like "significant," "finally," "accomplished" and "thought leader." This isn't a bio crafter by the PR team; it's an Encyclopedia entry. We need to focus on the facts.
Clean up the citations. We need third-party sources, not first-party like USG.edu or GRU.edu. No press releases either.

Once that's done and we can remove those other two tags, we can tackle the paid tag.

--FeldBum (talk) 23:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you FeldBum for extraordinary work on Azziz. Memdmarti (talk) 23:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CV query

Can I use a university site (primary source?) to reference a CV?

As an example, mine is linked from the UTHSC web site to my website: https://academic.uthsc.edu/faculty/facepage.php?netID=dmarti27&personnel_id=228428.

Mine is relatively short at 28 pages with 120 or more published references. Azziz's CV had 87 pages with 722 publications in 2014.

How is that much information referenced on Wikidedia without refering to a CV?

Thank you, FeldBum! / Memdmarti (talk) 15:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Memdmarti (talk) 21:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, a CV on a university site is a first-party source on a first-party source, so it's definitely not going to work.

But the publications are good sources, even with you (or Azziz) as the author, so you can highlight some of those.

Any profile or bio of Azziz that mentions things from his bio, even if the reporter got that info from his CV, works. The assumption is that the reporter will fact his or her sources and and is thus more trustworthy that the first party himself/herself claiming something.

It may be tough, but that's what we need for citations. For example, https://memphismagazine.com/features/top-doctors2/ is a good source for you, even if much of that info is pulled from your CV. --FeldBum (talk) 14:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, FeldBum!

My younger, 39-year-old son likes articles like the one you found.

I will work on Azziz slowly.

Thank you, Memdmarti (talk) 18:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a fellow 39-year-old, sounds good. We'll get there. --FeldBum (talk) 19:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Memdmarti (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Adam McKay

Hi @FeldBum, we added a couple new request edits to the Adam McKay Talk page you reviewed Are you able to take a look? They are at the bottom here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adam_McKay#Reviewed_requested_edits. I’d appreciate your consideration very much. Thanks! Losangeles48 (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Losangeles48, I'll take a look. --FeldBum (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catching up requests this week. All done, Losangeles48. Details on the Talk page.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Match Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incubator. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TomTom COI request follow-up

Hello again, FeldBum,

In case you didn't see my last ping, I'm following up as promised per our Talk page discussion about the TomTom Group business structure section. You mentioned an interest in rewriting some of what I drafted. Appreciative of your volunteer time, I have proposed an update to my first draft in case it saves you some time. If this still interests you, I'm eager to know your thoughts. I'll be standing by in case I can be more helpful in discussion. Due to my COI, I'll remain hands-off from the article itself and defer to your best judgement. Appreciatively, Murley from TomTom (talk) 15:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hooked (app)

Hi. You probably missed the ping at Talk:Hooked (app). I think any remaining issues are minor and the draft is way better than the currently live article. Unless you oppose, I'll go ahead and merge the draft. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Paul 012! Got very busy with stuff recently. Made some edits and kept meaning to dive back in, but haven't found the time. I can keep editing on the new live article. --FeldBum (talk) 13:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I've gone ahead and completed the merge. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help at Talk:ByteDance

Hi FeldBum. Would you mind taking a look at my proposal at Talk:ByteDance#Fixing MOS:LAYOUT and MOS:LEAD issues? I pinged you, but you may have missed it. Thanks! JatBD (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with SSIC edits?

Hi FeldBum, can you help with some edits on Samsung Strategy and Innovation Center. I submitted an Edit Request too, but you were really helpful last time.

Thanks, LeannaTruong (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for reviewing Appian Corporation

Hello, I’m reaching out to see if you would be willing to review the Appian Corporation article. For full transparency, I have a declared COI and have worked with other editors to update the page through talk page requests. There was also a {{Cleanup-PR}} flag added back in October, and I have subsequently worked with editors to clean up the page in response to that flag. I am looking for an uninvolved editor who is willing to review the page and decide if it would be appropriate to remove the flag. If there are additional changes needed, I’m happy to draft up suggested edits to help with that process. Thank you! JMGAppian (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JMGAppian, I'll take a look. Just a heads-up that this is a hobby and I can get bogged down with real work and life while I dive into this, so both be patient with me and feel free to bug me. I won't mind at all. --FeldBum (talk)

Thank you FeldBum, I really appreciate any time that you are willing to spend on this and I completely understand. JMGAppian (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FeldBum, thank you for taking the time to review the Appian page and make some edits. I was curious what your thoughts were on the flag (Cleanup-PR). Do you think that flag is still necessary or do you feel it would be appropriate to remove at this point? Again, really appreciate your time and help. Thank you! JMGAppian (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me give it a little more attention, but I think it should be good to remove shortly. Just need to review the features sections. --FeldBum (talk) 22:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I very much appreciate your time and willingness to review the page! JMGAppian (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FeldBum, I just wanted to check in to see if you had any concerns about the remaining content on the Appian page or if you think the flag can be removed. Thank you! JMGAppian (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with Alan Greenberg edits?

Hi FeldBum, can you help with some edits on Alan Greenberg. I submitted an Edit Request too, but you were really helpful last time.

Thanks, LeannaTruong (talk) 21:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll take a look. You added two sections here, so I'll remove one. --FeldBum (talk) 17:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey LeannaTruong, looks like you meant to add your request to Talk:Alan_C._Greenberg instead of Talk:Alan_Greenberg_(businessman), which from your request looks like the right one. Also, you didn't add the Edit Request code to the page. Just make sure to add "{{request edit}}" to your requests so that other editors can help to, alongside pinging me (not that I'm not flattered 🙂).--FeldBum (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HiFeldBum Oh no! You're right. I went ahead and fixed that edit request. Hoping those edit requests are feasible.

Thanks, LeannaTruong (talk) 9:32, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit Requests for Young Sohn

Hi FeldBum, can you help with some edits on Young Sohn. Since you've been super helpful lately, I went ahead and submitted a edit request on his page directly.

Thanks, LeannaTruong (talk) 9:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

LeannaTruong before you add more edit requests you need to fully comply with WP:PAID. See my message on your talk page. GSS ^💬 16:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wait on your compliance/conversation. Ping me when you want me to take a look. --FeldBum (talk) 16:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any word, LeannaTruong or GSS? If you haven't already, add the companies you work/represent for to your User page.--FeldBum (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, FeldBum I haven't heard back from GSS, but I went ahead and added the clients/agency I represent for transparency in my User page. Hopefully this can help clear things up! Thank you for the guidance. LeannaTruong (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding headless CMS page

Hi FeldBum. I saw you are the most involved editor on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headless_content_management_system and I have a quick question. While I am new to Wikipedia I am 8 years web dev and wanted to contribute to the topics I know. With that being said, my first attempt to add something was labeled as spam. What did I do wrong? I would suspect linking to an outside source. The thing is the topic of headless CMSs needs to be more versatile ie to feature different articles from different authors (we now have a couple from the same author and/or source). Anyway, any input from your side is more than welcome. Thx in advance for your reply.

Hi Vivaldi011, welcome to Wikipedia and glad you are helping on Headless content management system. We need to make sure content on the page is sourced by a third-party and avoid WP:PRIMARY content, since any company can say whatever they want about themselves. Also, Wikipedia is not a directory; it's an encyclopedia. If you want to teach people about specific headless CMS platforms, start on drafts for those pages instead of linking externally to them. --FeldBum (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I actually wanted to propose changes. For example, in the Wiki article headless CMSs are referred to as API only why they can be Git-based as well. Unlike with API version content is in your Git repository present as flat-files and devs can use it from there (Forestry and NetlifyCMS come to mind as an example). Also, not all API-first headless CMSs come with RESTful API. Some use GraphQL (like GraphCMS). And some have both options. Finally, while the list of headless CMS providers is far from complete why not use/share URL with a list like https://jamstack.org/headless-cms/ . My point is I'm afraid those changes coming from a newbie would not be taken into account (which I understand to a certain point since I've been a part of DMOZ-odp for a long time). Take the spam label for my suggestion as an example. Apart from my misunderstanding if adding a link is ok, the URL itself is an in-depth overview of the most popular headless CMS solutions. A good primary resource, written by the devs in the field (no ads, no affiliate links etc). Sorry for making this too long...do you think any of the proposed changes made by me would be taken into consideration? Again thx in advance for your reply.

Go forth and make those changes, Vivaldi011--but only if you have third-party bylined articles to support those assertions and changes. Wikipedia is not a guide, so helpful as that link may be, it's not appropriate here. Your expansion into how headless CMSes work is; it just need to be properly supported. --FeldBum (talk) 14:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Vivaldi011:, want to help me write some pages for headless CMS providers? I want to do Kentico, Conteful and CommerceTools. Thanks! --FeldBum (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @FeldBum:, sorry for being MA (vacation and all). I actually finished git vs API research for citation and will be adding this on Monday. And I can help with Contentful and Kentico Kontent (if that's what you meant). Don't have experience with CommerceTools. Please lead the way. Thanks! --

@Vivaldi011:, all good about being away. This is a side project for all of us, so take whatever time you need. Want to start on a Contentful draft on your sandbox and I'll do a CommerceTools on mine and then we'll review/edit each other's and work on Kentico together (or any other variation thereof)? --FeldBum (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @FeldBum: check my Sandbox please (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vivaldi011/sandbox). I've added 2 suggestions there. One for headless CMS page and the other for Contentful page (suggestion of what should be covered). As there are no templates to what needs to be on the page take a look and let me know what you think. Thx. --

Hey @Vivaldi011:, that headless CMS looks good; just needs a small rewrite. I can make that edit for you on the page. I'll start a Contenful draft based on your notes, but can you help me find some citations. I think we do Lede and History for now. I just did one for Commercetools. Want to check that one out and see if I'm missing anything? Thanks! --FeldBum (talk) 15:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again Vivaldi011, I launched pages for Contentful and Commercetools. I'll get to Kentico next. Want to take a look? Thanks! --FeldBum (talk) 03:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Partners follow-up

Hello, FeldBum. I'm following-up in case you hadn't seen my last ping and reply at the Francisco Partners Talk page. Do you still have interest in helping where you advised recently on best handling of updates to the introduction?

I used your suggestions to draft an updated sentence, hoping to make it easy to apply to the live article. If you're willing, I ask that you make these updates on my behalf. I do not wish to do so myself, due to my paid conflict of interest. Thanks again for your help. Janice at FP (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping, @Janice at FP:. Made some infobox edits but I agree with the other editor. Let me know if there are any edits I missed.--FeldBum (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FeldBum: If you're still willing to review requests for Francisco Partners, you may be interested in another request for additional updates. Thanks again for your help. Janice at FP (talk) 19:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Janice at FP, sure. I'll take a look now. --FeldBum (talk) 18:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FeldBum: Thanks very much! Let me know if you have any questions. Janice at FP (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Janice at FP, made those edits. --FeldBum (talk) 22:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TomTom article edits

Hi, Murley here, I wanted to check if you're still interested in working on updates we discussed on the TomTom article Talk page? No worries at all if it slipped through the cracks, I know you edit many articles. I thought perhaps it would be easier for you if I write some revised content for you to review? Let me know what you think. Cheers! Murley from TomTom (talk) 11:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. Let me check it out now. --FeldBum (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Started making some edits, using [1] as my guide. Let me know if I get anything wrong. Following the cites I find. --FeldBum (talk) 23:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FeldBum, thanks so much for your edits so far! I'll let you know if I see any issues. And if there is any other way I can help, don't hesitate to reach out. Cheers! Murley from TomTom (talk) 07:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Murley from TomTom, getting back into this. What do you think about combining history and product history and then breaking out by time (1991-1999/name change, 1999-2005/IPO, 2006-present)? --FeldBum (talk) 22:02, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OkCupid help

Hi FeldBum, can you help me again? I submitted an edit request for OkCupid. Someone took it down because it was formatted right, so I just resubmitted it. Thanks, LeannaTruong (talk) 21:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, LeannaTruong, I'll check it out. --FeldBum (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cracker Barrel requests

Hi FeldBum. Letting you know that there are a couple of open requests on Talk:Cracker Barrel. You assisted me in the past, so I was hoping you might have some time to review my recent requests. Thanks! CB JessicaM (talk) 18:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CB JessicaM. Sure, I'll check them out. Been a busy few weeks recently but I should have some free time this week/weekend. Feel free to bug me about it. --FeldBum (talk) 02:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey FeldBum, I wanted to let you know I posted a new request for Cracker Barrel. If you're up for helping review, that would be wonderful. Thanks for everything you've done! CB JessicaM (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CB JessicaM, checking it out now. --FeldBum (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FeldBum: Thanks! Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. CB JessicaM (talk) 14:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Alan Greenberg again

Hey FeldBum, can you help with some updates to Alan Greenberg's page? I submitted an Edit Request again but you've been so helpful in the past. Thank you. LeannaTruong (talk) 14:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with King Features Syndicate

Hey FeldBum, can you help with some updates to King Feature's page? I submitted an Edit Request just now but you've been so helpful in the past. Thank you. LeannaTruong (talk) 20:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @LeannaTruong:, looks like a lot but I'll check it out as soon as I can. Also, you should add {{request edit}} to the top of the request so it goes into the official queue. --FeldBum (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help with NetSuite

Hey FeldBum, thank you for your help on NetSuite edits. Can you help with some new edits on Talk:NetSuite?

Thank you,

Camillefrancis (talk) 19:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, @Camillefrancis: The request made more sense in a different section, so I did them there. --FeldBum (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, @FeldBum: I see why that section makes sense, appreciate your help --Camillefrancis

Happy Passover!

Happy Passover!

Hello FeldBum, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this passover. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a happy passover or easter, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Happy editing,
𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 14:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Happy Passover}} to other user talk pages.

Raush is indeed ready to go

Checked the standings and he is in the top 10

https://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/lightweight/

I will work on fixing the article up in minor ways but I think it's good to go. Thank you for your helpHeinzMaster (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Richard Arlook

Hi FeldBum,

I came across you back in 2020 when an editor requested edits on the Adam McKay page. I recently did some edits and edit requests on the Richard Arlook page. I have no connection with him and would appreciate if you could take a look at it.

Thanks!

TanookiKoopa (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone got to this before me. Need anything else on the page? -- FeldBum (talk) 01:52, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate you taking the time. I'll do some more work on the page later.

TanookiKoopa (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fansided tweak

Hi FeldBum, I had a small tweak I was hoping you'd be willing to make to the Fandom of the Year section of the Fansided article, just to make sure the headings and body text agree and was wondering if you'd seen it. Please let me know! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New FanSided request

Hi FeldBum, I made another request on the FanSided Talk page and was wondering if you'd seen it. Please let me know! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 19:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another FanSided request

Hi FeldBum, I made a request about some questionable content on the FanSided Talk page and was wondering if you were interested in reviewing it. Please let me know! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - sorry for the delay. I'll take a look now.-- FeldBum (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open requests

Hi FeldBum, I just wanted to see if you'd had the chance to look at those requests on the The Players' Tribune or Fansided articles. Please let me know! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 20:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Da Fre (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also some of the sources do not mention Da Fre so not useful and IMDB is not a reliable source. See also the notability guidelines for actors and filmmakers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stefano Da Fre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FeldBum! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris K. requests

Hello FeldBum! Thanks for taking an initial look at my suggested recognition text for the Chris Kempczinski article. I'm comfortable with you adding the sources and text you think are best. I've also submitted two additional edit requests, if you are interested in taking a look on the Talk page. Thanks! MattMcDonalds (talk) 15:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @MattMcDonalds, sure. I'll take a look. --FeldBum (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Da Fre (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Still using IMDB as a source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stefano Da Fre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 08:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brayola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bare Necessities.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:MTV.com

Template:MTV.com has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Hubbard

Hi @FeldBum, can you help with an Edit Request I have on Talk:Nathan Hubbard. Thank you so much!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camillefrancis (talk • contribs) 20:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - taking a look @Camillefrancis --FeldBum (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yitzchak Mirilashvili assist

Hi FeldBum. I was wondering if you've had a chance to look over my request on the Yitzchak Mirilashvili article? As you can imagine, the current language about the Deri donations is very upsetting. It isn't presented neutrally, suggests that making donations is a crime, and essentially WP:COATRACKs a lot of the Deri details on Mirilashvili; none of which is supported by the sources. In fact, the sources indicate that Mirilashvili was never accused of or found to have done anything wrong. I presented my suggestion for language relating to the Deri gifts in a previous post. Of course I'd be happy to work with you to craft something else if necessary. With my COI declared and my continued cooperation with the community, I'd be grateful for the removal of the tag as well. With thanks, January2424 (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @January2424, thanks for the reminder. I'll take a look today but feel free to bug me if you don't hear back quickly. --FeldBum (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FeldBum, thanks for your review of the Yitzchak Mirilashvili article. For transparency and clarity, I responded on the article Talk page. I'd be grateful if you'd take another look and make the changes. If there is a need for more clarification or details, please be in touch. Thank you again, January2424 (talk) 11:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI request

@FeldBum: Hi again, FeldBum. Thanks again for your help reviewing Nathan Hubbard - I was wondering if you also could possibly help with an Edit Request I recently added to Talk:Popular Mechanics?? Camillefrancis (talk) 20:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - I'll take a look now. -- FeldBum (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Library of Congress Subject Headings

Hi, I omitted the at sign before your username on my reply to you on the talk page for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Don't know if that caused my reply to escape your notice, so I thought I'd check back in with you. Cheers, Monkeysoap (talk) 15:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - was off for a bit but I'll take a look tonight or tomorrow @Monkeysoap -- FeldBum (talk) 01:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dana G. Peleg Verification

Thanks so much! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burford

I am always learning. Found it easy to paste the proposed edits onto the page and click "show changes" to see what was being changed. Went ahead and implemented but feel free to double check or clean up anything in case I missed something. CNMall41 (talk) 06:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Page move

Hello FeldBum. I saw your reply to my edit request on Talk:List_of_Zionists. I agree, "Historical Zionist figures" also works. I'd like to open a poll but don't think I'm allowed to as I'm not EC yet. Bitspectator (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bitspectator, no worries - I can start the poll. I think it's a good idea. --FeldBum (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you. Bitspectator (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: COI Request

@FeldBum: Hope all is well!! Reaching out to see if you could review a recent Request I added to Talk:Runner's World. Noting my COI. Camillefrancis (talk) 21:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll take a look. --FeldBum (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Runner's World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]