User talk:Kimon
 |
Hi, and welcome to my talk page! Please remember to:
If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions. If you need editing help, head here. |
|
no archives yet (create) |
WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
[edit]
WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.
Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!
This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psychless Type words!.
Invite
[edit] |
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
The Wikiproject Greece April 2009 Newsletter
[edit] The WikiProject Greece Newsletter Issue XI (VII) - April 2009 | |
| |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece/Outreach#Delivery options. | |
WikiProject Greece newsletter - March 2011 issue
[edit]| The WikiProject Greece Newsletter Issue XII (VIII) – March 2011 | |
| |
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece/Outreach#Delivery options. | |
TUSC token 3e214e409ec4a3a6247eb9468fb50865
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit] |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Ghassanid claim
[edit]Dear Sir, I'd like to know what are your arguments on declaring the Ghassanid claim a fantasy since it was not only legally recognized by courts in Brazil and the United States, but also by the US Congress and recently publicly recognized by the Vatican Secretariat of State. Are they all wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.247.72.196 (talk) 06:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Sacred Order of Saint Michael Archangel
[edit]Hello Kimon, can you as expert, take a look at Sacred Order of Saint Michael Archangel? This article is based on self-published sources and I have bad feeling about this Order? Thank you--Yopie (talk) 11:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tercio of Sicily, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Galicia, Zamora and William of Orange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
that was noy me you jerk jezes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C506:4E90:ED96:EDB4:2A03:CC37 (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Brian Reynoso
[edit]why the hell must you delete my paged like for real dude?! too bad it's about a teen who played for US's national 12u football team!! he is of course known for something !! XVSConner (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC) Brian Reynoso, hereby himself!
Real Confraria de São Teotónio
[edit]Please explain why the Real Confraria de São Teotónio is not an order. Thank you.
AWikipediaGuy (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Kimon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion Of Hello neighbor
[edit]its nighttime where I am so I cant continue it. pls don't delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by N64 Gamer 500 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Your CSD nomination of Hello Neighbor
[edit]Hi, why did you tag this article as WP:A1 even though the policy clearly says that "it only applies to very short articles" and the subject can be identified?. Lil Johnny (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017
[edit]
Hello Kimon. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Matt Hall (Geoscientist). It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. A7 in this case; but at 12 minutes the spirit is still the same. Also, it was a bad A7 nomination - company ownership is a credible claim of significance. VQuakr (talk) 05:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kimon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Avetik Chalabyan article up for deletion
[edit]Hi Kimon! About 2 years ago I wrote a biography of a living person article [Chalabyan]. The article has been recently marked as up for deletion. Any advice on why this might be happening, how to address it or what to improve would really be appreciated. Obviously, your vote as an experienced editor on Wiki would really go a long way to make sure it's not deleted.
Thanks in advance for your attention to the matter.
Alice Ananian (talk) 13:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kimon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Lords of the Manor
[edit]Dear Kimon, Thank you for your message which I have received. I am due to go on holiday tomorrow and will be away all week, so this is an interim reply as a courtesy to let you know that I will reply in the W/C 10 June once I am back. With best wishes, Armchair66. Armchair66 (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Lords of the Manor
[edit]Dear Kimon,
Many thanks for your patience, I am now back from holiday (I brought back with me a rather bad cold and a chest infection!) but as I am now fully recovered, I would like to respond as I promised to do. The first thing I would say is that I am not a historian. So, I won’t spend long on historical aspects as it is not an area of expertise that I have. However, my father did tell me much about the history of Lords of the Manor and this was confirmed by what my solicitor told me, when I acceded to the Lordship upon the death of my father, who left the Lordship to me in his will. To say, as John Martin Robinson does, that a Lord of the Manor is no more a lord than the landlord of the Dog and Duck, is not borne out by historical facts that are commonly known. For example, in earlier times, Lords of the Manor not only owned the land that comprised the Manor but also had power over the people who lived on his Manor. He was their Judge, and indeed, had the power at various times in history to put a man or woman to death. No one could leave or come to live on his Manor without his agreement.
Amongst many other things, he was also responsible within his Manor for many of the things Local Authorities (County Councils and the London Boroughs) are responsible for now. Maintaining roads, ditches, bridges, waterways and so forth. He was responsible for collecting taxes on behalf of the Sovereign from those living on his Manor and at times for ensuring the males in his Manor were trained in the skills (as they were then) of warfare, so they could be called to fight for the Sovereign if need be. (As happened on the Isle of Wight, the Wikipedia article on the Isle of Wight correctly states, in part, that “The French invasion on 21 July 1545 (famous for the sinking of the Mary Rose on the 19th) was repulsed by local militia.” What it does not say was that the local militia there at that time consisted of a very small standing army that was necessarily augmented, on the occasion of this surprise invasion, by the men of the many Manors of the Island, the various Lords of the Manor leading this augmentation. Had this invasion not been defeated, England may subsequently have had a different history to that which it has today. (The French wanted the Isle of Wight as a staging point from which to launch their fleet and army into England).
Lords of the Manor introduced Bailiffs, who were responsible for the enforcement of law and order within their respective Manor and who had powers of arrest over alleged lawbreakers who they would bring before the Lord of the Manor or his appointed Steward, for trial and sentence. Here we have the start of the evolution of policing.
Lords of the Manor introduced a unified coinage, which bore, and still bears to this day, the head of the Sovereign on one side. In doing so, they began what we now call ‘the Economy’. Lords of the Manor introduced trading abroad, mainly in textiles at first. As a result, over the years, Manors became prosperous (as did the Sovereign who benefitted from the taxes) and some Manor grew to become towns and cities. So, to say that Lords of the Manor were or are, merely landlords equating to landlords of public houses, is misleading and incorrect. Lords of the Manor who registered their Manors with HM Land Registry prior to 13th Oct 2013, still retain many Manorial Rights, some of which also place duties and/or responsibilities upon the Lord of the Manor.
Both my father, and the solicitor who acted for me in transferring the Deed of Conveyance and Assignment on the death of my father, told me that during earlier times, Feudal Lords (Barons and Lords of the Manor) were the Nobles of England along with a growing number of Earls and Knights. There is no doubt that Earls and Feudal Lords (whether Barons or Lords of the Manor) were, until the Peerage was developed, the Nobles of England. When the Peerage became established, and I cannot recall the date when this is generally accepted to have happened, Peers became the “Greater Nobility” and Feudal Lords took second place as “Minor Nobility” - but remained nobility and that position my father and my solicitor (as said, a specialist in Archaic Law (such a specialist is necessary because the law relating to Feudal Lords falls within the remit of lawyers who specialise in Archaic Law)) were both very clear about. My father could have been mistaken (he wasn’t a historian either), but it is very, very unlikely indeed that a solicitor who has specialised in Archaic Law for very many years, would be mistaken.
It is difficult to cite specific documents because my understanding is that much has been lost in antiquity; and as said, I am not myself a historian. I also notice that the citations given in the relative Wikipedia articles, relate more to a particular person’s opinion/s on an issue, rather than citations of actual factual historical documents (the reference to John Martin Robinson’s opinion is an example – but I have to say that I believe his opinion to be without merit). But my father was particularly knowledgeable; as was the solicitor who acted for me when I acceded to the Lordship. Constitutionally, all the Lordships of the United Kingdom, including Feudal Lordships, have their origin in the Crown; and may only be deposed by the Crown. By virtue of this alone, all Lordships, whether Peers or Feudal, are noble (whether greater or lesser), in the United Kingdom. I would therefore respectfully ask you to reconsider re-instating my 1st edit to the effect that Feudal Lords are indeed Noblemen or Minor Nobles, whichever expression you prefer.
Moving to my second edit, when I acceded to my Lordship, the solicitor who acted for me (who, as said, is a specialist in Archaic Law) advised me at the end of the procedure that now I had legally acceded to the Lordship, my title had changed from Mr to Lord. He strongly advised me to contact various people to inform them of the change and to submit a copy of the Deed of Conveyance and Assignment, as they would require this as proof. I did as I was advised.
Absolutely everyone, without exception, who I contacted accepted the change in title and amended my title in their records. Some examples from what was a very long, list include Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), my local Council, the Department of Health, the NHS and it’s various subordinate Health Authorities, both of my 2 Government Pension agencies, the Utility companies (Water, Gas, Electricity), DVLA and various businesses such as my burglar alarm firm, my TV and Broadband provider, all my insurance firms and so the list goes on. I should also add that my father’s service papers, throughout his career in the Army and discharge his papers, all refer to him and/or address him as “Major The Lord [his name]”. The fact that UK Departments of State (and in my father’s case also, the Armed Forces of the Crown), businesses and so on, all acknowledge that a Lord of the Manor is entitled to the title Lord, surely speaks volumes about what is recent and current custom and practice. When it came to the Bank, I was told that for reasons of compliance with recent money laundering legislation I would need to come in person to see the assistant branch manager. I did so, and after completing the various checks and submitting the required documentation, we got chatting. During our conversation the assistant branch manager showed me the Bank’s Procedure document which she had up on her PC screen to guide her through the process. I read the piece on Lords of the Manor. I cannot now remember it verbatim but it began by saying that customers who have become Lords of the Manor will request a change in title to Lord. It went on to say that Lords of the Manor were members of the minor nobility of the UK and that such requests were to be granted on completion of the procedure, which it then outlined. It said that once the procedure had been completed, new cheque books and bank cards were to be ordered showing the changed title (i.e. “Lord [ Initials, Name])”. It went on to list the other bank records and reminded that they would need to be updated/amended too (i.e. I recall the customer’s internet banking account was one of them). I think all this is relevant because I am trying to demonstrate to you that it is indeed the accepted custom and practice for Lords of the Manor to be known as Lord [Name] in the UK.
Since I returned from holiday, I have managed to speak with 37 other Lords of the Manor (who I know because we meet twice a year for a dinner) by telephone, and they all confirm that they received the same advice from their respective Solicitors which they followed; with the same result that I report above.
People become Lords of the Manor due to various reasons. Some may purchase a Lordship of the Manor as an investment for their children or grandchildren, some inherit the Lordship and so forth. Quite a number of us undertake small charitable things in our localities when we are asked to, such as presenting awards to Army, Sea and Air Cadets, Police Cadets, young people qualifying in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award Scheme, Awards in Schools, Opening events, Citizenship Ceremonies and so forth. Some of us are often asked to be after dinner speakers at charitable events, and so on. Many of us are also asked to sit on community consultative groups and committees, sometimes as members, sometimes to chair them. What I am trying to say is that there is a whole raft of things that Lords of the Manor do in the communities in which they live. As a result, it is not unusual to be well known in our respective local communities. I know that there is no such thing, for me, as ‘nipping quickly to the Co-op up the road’ to get some milk or whatever. People will greet me on the way and often want to chat (and it is a pleasure to do so – even if I am occasionally in a bit of a hurry). I and my colleague Lords of the Manor are nearly always greeted with “Good Morning Lord [Name]” by local people, by the local police, by councillors and so on.
There is no doubt in my mind, that it is absolutely true to say that it is indeed the custom and practice for a Lord of the Manor to be addressed as Lord [Name]; both by official bodies, government bodies or businesses and the public at large. I have to stalwartly, but respectfully, disagree with the reason given for editing out my edit, which was “Patently Untrue”. I have to say, with due respect, that it simply is not patently untrue Kimon. I would therefore respectfully ask you to reconsider re-instating my 2nd edit to the effect that it is certainly Customary in recent times, for Lords of the Manor to be known as Lord [name], Lord of the Manor of [Place name] or Lord [Name] of [Place name]. Otherwise we find ourselves in a strange world where Wikipedia definitively say it is not custom and practice, but notwithstanding, it is nevertheless exactly what happens in real life, day in and day out, here in the UK.
Kimon, I hope you will not be offended by anything I have expressed above, as said I am not a historian by any means beyond the 6th Form at School (a very long time ago!). I am also very new to Wikipedia and if I have breached etiquette along the way, I apologise. I hope you will be able to give what I have said, your consideration.
For Completeness and the avoidance of doubt, I should add that Lords of the Manor should not be equated with Scottish Lairds – Scottish Lairds are an entirely different kettle of fish, as they would be the first to agree.
I look forward to learning of your decision,
With very best wishes, respectfully, Armchair66. Armchair66 (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your signature
[edit]Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
--'''[[User:Kimon|<font color="black">Kimon</font>]]'''<sup>[[User Talk:Kimon|<font color="#008080">talk</font>]]</sup>: --Kimontalk
to
--'''[[User:Kimon|<span style="color:black">Kimon</span>]]'''<sup>[[User Talk:Kimon|<span style="color:#008080">talk</span>]]</sup>: --Kimontalk
—Anomalocaris (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
You updated your signature to
'''[[User:Kimon|<span color="black">Kimon</span>]]'''<sup>[[User Talk:Kimon|<span color="#008080">talk</span>]]</sup>: Kimontalk
The markup <span color="...">...</span>]] does not do anything.
If you wanted it to do something, you might change your signature to:
'''[[User:Kimon|<span style="color:black">Kimon</span>]]'''<sup>[[User Talk:Kimon|<span style="color:#008080">talk</span>]]</sup>: Kimontalk
If you didn't want it to do that, you might might remove this nonworking markup and change your signature to:
—Anomalocaris (talk) 07:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Caught by a colocation web host block
[edit]
Kimon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 104.129.204.101
The 104.129.192.0/20 IP address block is used by Zscaler that provides their secure connection services to major corporations around the world, including the Fortune 500 company I work for that employs thousands. Kimontalk 12:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You'll need to disable your proxy if you wish to edit here. If you can demonstrate an exceptional need, WP:IPBE may be available to you. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
IP block exempt
[edit]I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking for three months. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Requests for Florida peer review
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Requests for Florida peer review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello Kimon! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
+rollback
[edit]
Hi Kimon,
After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
- Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
- Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "
[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful. - Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
- If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
—Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)