Jump to content

User talk:Kolakowski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

11th and 7th millennium BC

A tag has been placed on 11th and 7th millennium BC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of 11th and 7th millennium BC

[edit]

A tag has been placed on 11th and 7th millennium BC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KingNewbs (talk) 17:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with 11th and 7th millennium BC. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KingNewbs (talk) 17:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

[edit]

Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy against original research. This is not the appropriate venue for posting your own theories. I've proposed 11th and 7th millennium BC for deletion in five days on that basis; but if you agree that the page is inappropriate for Wikipedia, please put {{db-author}} on top so it can be deleted faster than that. Thanks! —Angr If you've written a quality article... 17:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 11th and 7th millennium BC

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 11th and 7th millennium BC, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11th and 7th millennium BC. Thank you. Dawn bard (talk) 18:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jalowka

[edit]

There are five Polish villages with that name, please see Jałówka. There was never a town with that name. There is another village named Narewka. It is the site of the administrative unit, Gmina Narewka, but none of the five Jałówka villages are in it. All are in the same geographical region, Podlasie Voivodeship. We need to move your article (Jalowka) to the appropriate location - either one of the Jałowka villages of the Narewka one, once we can figure one which one are we talking about.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 02:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Hello and welcome Kolakowski! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Polish POW's in the Soviet captivity

[edit]

This article needs a major rewrite. It reads currently as an unreferenced essay. Will you work on it in the next few days? We could usefy it for you. If not, it will be deleted (I'd like to merge some content to Camps for Russian prisoners and internees in Poland (1919–1924) but unreferenced content is not very helpful). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pedros Cup

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pedros Cup, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no claims of notability, it is even unclear what kind of an event this was?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not try translating http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro%27s_Cup to rescue Pedro's Cup? Fences&Windows 01:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Polish POW's in the Soviet captivity

[edit]

The article Polish POW's in the Soviet captivity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content fork of an existing article: Polish prisoners and internees in Soviet Union and Lithuania (1919–1921).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the other article. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Illythr (talk) 00:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upord

[edit]

The article Upord has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable WP:Neologism. Google can't find a definition

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Battle of the Bzura. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. The section question was added (diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_the_Bzura&action=historysubmit&diff=356632525&oldid=354787988). Not sure if it is supposed to be a part of the article. If so please revert my edits and try to incorporate that section into the article. Thank you. Yamaka122 ...:) 02:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Janow

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battle of Janow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 14:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksander Jeljaszewicz

[edit]

Thank you for this interesting article. Please consider adding inline citations and nominating your work at T:TDYK. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwik Kalkstein

[edit]

This article is also ready for T:TDYK if you could just expand it slightly (to over 1,500 characters), add reference to the second paragraph, and categories. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 20th Infantry Division (Poland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Sergeant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages E-8 and E-7 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Sergeant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SSG and SGT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:TPhoto 00002.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TPhoto 00002.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Ncosoldier2006.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ncosoldier2006.jpg. However, it needs some more information before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image is from and who the author is. Please be specific, and include a link if possible.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:RobertKmyself.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RobertKmyself.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Robertkolakowski.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Robertkolakowski.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:7thSerbWaffenSS.jpg

[edit]

Hello, Kolakowski!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:7thSerbWaffenSS.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited White Transparent (apple), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skidal uprising

[edit]

Thanks for this interesting article. In the future you may want to expand such articles and nominate them at T:TDYK for front-page exposure. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discusion of interest

[edit]

See User_talk:Poeticbent#J.C3.B3zef_and_Wiktoria_Ulma. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:40, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two-finger salute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited August Agbola O'Browne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H.Q. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mr Agboola Brown.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mr Agboola Brown.jpg, which you've sourced to Claims it's on Polish Wikipedia but I couldn't find it; no evidence the pic is PD.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 04:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have some pierogi!

[edit]
The Pierogi Award
On behalf of WikiProject Poland, I want to award you those ceremonial pierogi's for your continued Poland-themed edits. Dzieki! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of August Agbola O'Browne

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of August Agbola O'Browne at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for August Agbola O'Browne

[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crucian carp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaniow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lubusz Voivodeship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatinate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted WP:SPEEDY edit

[edit]

Hey, saw that you accidentally blanked most of the speedy deletion page. Just wanted to give you a head's up that you did this, just in case you did it while trying to do something else to another page. I've done mistakes like that before, so no big, just have to be a bit more cautious is all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 11th and 7th millennium BC

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 11th and 7th millennium BC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Angelo Michael (talk) 08:22, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amir al-Mu'minin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Caledonia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • be viewed, along with countries like [[Greenland]], as an independent--and--semi-sovereign country (term coined by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kolakowski].
  • of Paris, Tokyo, Sydney, Auckland, Brisbane, Melbourne{{#ifexpr: {{#time: U |6 June 2014}} >= {{#time: U |now}} | (from 6 June 2014)|}}, Osaka, Papeete, Fiji, Wallis, Port Vila,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Półtorak (Mead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National sport

[edit]

Hi: I've reverted your addition because you did not provide a source. Please find one so that it can be readded. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted you again because we don't cite Wikipedia - ourselves - as a source. You've been around for several years, you must know this. Find a book or newspaper to cite saying that one or both of those are in effect "national sports" in Poland, and find a source about the third one being proposed as a national sport. Sources don't have to be in English, but they do have to be reliable and independent. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:46, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Why Die for Danzig?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashubian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Your recent edit to the page Racism in Poland appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Zalewska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gross. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Kolakowski. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Łomianki

[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Kolakowski, thanks for creating Battle of Łomianki!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please WP:INLINECITE your references; without this, it gets tricky, as hopefully many editors will add to your good work and sources will become unclear and less helpful to those using it for research.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Kolakowski. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Heaviest Artillery Regiment

[edit]

Hello! I stumbled upon the article 1. Heaviest Artillery Regiment which you created some time ago while going through the category Category:All articles lacking sources. Any chance you could add a ref for where you got some of that information? Thanks a bunch! Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a gentle reminder if you don't mind, I took another look for sources and came up empty handed. Is there another name the regiment might have been known under? Also i don't speak Polish, so this makes me fairly useless in this regard. Thanks! Ajpolino (talk) 23:27, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Kolakowski. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Krzysztof Różnicki moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Krzysztof Różnicki, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krzysztof Różnicki (August 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The subject does not meet the notability criteria for a track and field athlete WP:NTRACK, and the sources in the article don't otherwise establish notability. The athlete profiles provided don't constitute significant independent coverage
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pi (Talk to me!) 15:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kolakowski! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pi (Talk to me!) 15:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Krzysztof Różnicki

[edit]

Hello, Kolakowski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Krzysztof Różnicki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kolakowski&oldid=1141498056"