User talk:Leszek Jańczuk

; Archives
	Archive 2008;
	Archive 2009;
	Archive 2010;
	Archive 2011;

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

vn-2

This user talk page has been vandalized 2 times.

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

Buster Seven Talk

Papyrus 50

I noticed you created initially this article and are a major contributator. Do you know the papertrail of this fragment and how Yale happened to obtain it?

Just happening by re P.Oxy. 85, but I can field this, Doug. The acquisition record is: "Purchased by Michael Ivanovich Rostovtzeff from Maurice Nahman in Paris, June 1933, with funds donated by Edward Stephen Harkness and Horatio McLeod Reynolds." The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 21:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Paris 1933. Let me know if any papertrail before this. --Doug Coldwell ^talk 21:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None, generally if you get to Nahman, that's the last stop. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't Nahman purchase it from somebody?--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:12, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(bringing the Nahman conversation back here where it belongs instead of my talk page)--Doug Coldwell ^talk 12:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So as not to keep bothering Leszek. Nahman and Idris Bell were some of a group of people that bought papyri that had made it into the private market so that pieces that had been stolen from excavations wouldn't go unstudied. (That's the generous way of looking at the people whom they bought from--that they were persuaded by a bit of money to further knowledge.) The only way you find out where Nahmann got this piece is to try to track down his estate and hope there are records. I doubt there are, but who know? (22:23, 5 November 2011‎ Cardiffchestnut)

So it appears that the paper trail goes back no further than the nineteenth century - at best?--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leszek didn't seemed to be bothered with the new Otium article I created. In fact he was very generious in his DYK help and I sent StuRat a barnstar for his work on the article. I love working with Leszek, User: StuRat, User: Wetman, User: Dr. Blofeld and other Wikipedia experts like these that I have worked with for many years. They don't seem to be bothered when I ask for their help and are very generous with their contributions for articles I created or information I need.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I meant bothering him with a conversation between the two of us on his talk page. Very few papyri have a paper trail going beyond the late 19th century because that's when they came out of the ground. But, then, one could say that a piece came out of the ground in any case and really be advancing a conspiracy of alphabetic proportions. I am, of course, kidding. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 22:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's let Leszek Jańczuk reply to his own questions. He is quite capable of answering and needs no help.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 12:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.Oxy. 85

I think that this is going to be a keep. Maybe we should think about getting a few more interested editors together and discussing how to proceed with the series. The Cardiff Chestnut (talk) 21:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, I'd be happy to help out. My knowledge of Greek has faded away, but I don't mind doing a lot of minor cleanup and checking. Also, I've been thinking about a navigation template as well, although it's a subtle problem because of the number of documents.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Otium

I am going to try to turn this article into a Good Article. Any suggestions or help?----Doug Coldwell ^talk 12:07, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've made it more concise. Does it need more "fine tuning"? Good Article possibility?--Doug Coldwell ^talk 16:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I go about getting Otium reassessed to possible B-Class and getting an assessment of "importance" on the WikiProjects?--Doug Coldwell ^talk 22:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks!--Doug Coldwell ^talk 23:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mark in the DYK submission template that I prefer ALT1. Can you strike through the original hook? Thanks.--Doug Coldwell ^talk 18:55, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer that ALT1 be the first preference to choose as a hook line. Can I do that?--Doug Coldwell ^talk 19:51, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your input would be appreciated at Talk:Otium#DYK submission template. --Doug Coldwell ^talk 23:22, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P. Oxy. category

Do you have any ideas on a better way to organize the category? Right now it's dumping them all into P, and sorting them by first digit. I'm thinking maybe groups of 50 or 100, either with subcategories or by piping them into the right sections?— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm planning to rearrange the navigation template to be organized by volume as well. My feeling is that 159-207, the ones Grenfell and Hunt skim over in V.1, should be described briefly in a single article, maybe a list? Or is there newer work on these ones that could support individual articles?— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

USEP discussion

You may be interested in a discussion about the future and the growth of the US education program along with the future of the Wikipedia Ambassador Project here. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 04:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit error

I am afraid that one of your 100,000 edits is in error. In the Philip Traherne article you put in an incorrect link to the Thomas Traherne article. Different persons, same name. It seems that Thomas was a popular name among Trahernes. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

DYK for Nag Hammadi Codex XIII

On 19 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nag Hammadi Codex XIII, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Nag Hammadi Codex XIII is the only surviving copy of the Trimorphic Protennoia, an early Christian Gnostic text? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nag Hammadi Codex XIII.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Codex Coislinianus/GA1

Begun review!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:42, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nag Hammadi Codex II

On 22 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nag Hammadi Codex II, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Nag Hammadi Codex II is the only complete manuscript of the Gospel of Thomas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nag Hammadi Codex II.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 08:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Leszek Jańczuk for helping to promote Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 07:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Coislinianus passed GA, good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:40, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oxy 654

Did you notice in Oxy 654 that a very small edit on top of your impressive 100k would make this acceptable with making an exception? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654

On 26 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that P. Oxy. 654 and P. Oxy. 655 are two of only three Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Thomas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 08:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 655

On 26 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 655, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that P. Oxy. 654 and P. Oxy. 655 are two of only three Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Thomas? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 08:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P. Oxy. numbering in category

I think it might be better if we pipe them to their actual document numbers, and only append 0's when we're in a volume that has both three digit numbers and 4 digit numbers. This way we don't have to calculate where an individual papyrus ought to be numbered in its subcategory, because we're just using the grenfell/hunt numbering. Is there something I didn't think of?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lectionary 179

The article Lectionary 179 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lectionary 179 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 22:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New templates

Bonjour,

You may now use two templates : {{Nomen sacrum}} and {{Papyrus siglum}}, e. g.

{{Nomen sacrum|ΙΗΣ}} : ΙΗΣ ;
{{Papyrus siglum|13}} : ${\mathfrak {P}}$ ¹³ (without link) ;
{{Papyrus siglum|13|}} : ${\mathfrak {P}}$ ¹³ (with link).

Better than esoteric expressions !

Budelberger ( ) 23:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah/Oxyrhynchus Papyri 159 through 207

Maybe you can take a look at this and see if you think I'm on the right track for the rest of volume I? Is there more information about each that ought to be included? Do you have suggestions on how to cite the information more efficiently? I'll write an introductory paragraph, of course, or you're welcome to if you'd like. Other comments? When I'm done with it I'm thinking I'll make redirects to fill in all the redlinks in the template and as placeholders for future articles. Does that seem good to you? Also, what the heck is SB? It should be easy to figure out, but it seems to be assumed everywhere.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lectionary 183

The article Lectionary 183 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lectionary 183 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12

The article Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 11:31, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Magi: Lost Kings or Aliens w/ GPS

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

Happy Holidays..--Buster Seven Talk 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Mazovia unexplained deletion

Would you mind to consult the discussion page before deleting parts of the article, please? --Rejedef (talk) 15:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Hey? Howz things? Anything you want reviewed?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate it and I'll review it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DId you nominate it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for correcting those errors at Billy Sunday. John Foxe (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit request for Codex Zacynthius

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Codex Zacynthius at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Braincricket (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Eighth Air Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Furth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12

Hi ! I've reviewed this article, and I'm pleased to say that it nearly meets the GA criteria. There are a few outstanding issues, however, so I've put it on hold for a week so you have time to sort them out. Thanks. --He to Hecuba (talk) 17:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Leszek Jańczuk for helping to promote Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12 to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 06:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Franchi biography project

Hi Leszek Janczuk: I am a new editor and am on my third of three Sergio Franchi articles I am creating. On his biography, I see you have made some contributions which are very subtle and obviously valuable. I think you also removed the notice I had posted on the "Stardom in America" section that this was an "article under construction." The section is very obviously uncomplete for I have just completed his American debut. If you do not have any objection I would like to repost the "Under Construction notice." The article is still listed as Stub Class, and I am not yet ready to ask for a formal review. The Stardom in America section is only about 15% complete, and then I want to add photos and an American Musicians Template. I am sure I have caused some confusion working on an active article, but being new, I was not sure how to work on a stub article in two places-- the stub and a sandbox. Please take some of your valuable time to explain this to me. Should I just go ahead with my additions (paragraph by paragraph) and leave the "Under construction" notice off? Thanks for your attention to this matter. Please reply the Sergio Franchi article talk page. Thanks, CatherineCathlec (talk) 15:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again: Thanks for a short helpful answer! Also having trouble finding out how to incorporate an American Musicans Template into my article. The Wiki Help box doesn't lead me to an answer. CatherineCathlec (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Online Ambassador, Spring 2012

Hi, Leszek Janczuk! As you may know, the Wikipedia Education Program has instilled a new set of standards that courses must meet to officially join the program for the semester. As you can see, one of the requirements is that at least one ambassador or professor is a Wikipedian, as this should give students more access to helpful information about contributing to Wikipedia and creating good content. You are listed on the Online Ambassador page; are you still interested in remaining active this semester? Some of these classes will have to remove themselves from the program should they fail to meet these standards, but we would like to ensure that new students are receiving proper support during the editing process. Please let me know if you are still interested in mentoring these students this semester and/or visit the Online Ambassador talk page to select a course that still needs an Online Ambassador. Thank you!216.38.130.164 (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amblypneustes platyterus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amblypneustes platyterus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Urchins

I spotted some of the articles you created recently and I am wondering if this sentence is proper English: "It came from the genus Amphipneustes". I am not sure if you even need to state this fact, because it is also in the taxobox. If you do want to state it in the text, you could say: "It is placed in the genus Amphipneustes". Cheers Ruigeroeland (talk) 13:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Papyrus 12

First, may I thank you for all the splendid work you do here on Wikipedia, in particular relating to biblical manuscripts. I recently uploaded a picture of what I think is Papyrus 12 (File:Papyrus_12.png. According to your edit summary, the picture is of some other manuscript. I got it from 'The Amherst Papyri, vol. II' by Grenfell & Hunt ([1]). The manuscript contains a letter, but the text of Hebrew 1:1 occurs on the same papyrus. If you look at the top of the second column, you can find the same letters from Hebrews that are quoted in the article. (see also Grenfell & Hunt vol. I, p. 30) Can you please check the picture to see if I'm mistaken? Thanks in advance. -- Lindert (talk) 16:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Followup: You stated the picture was in fact P. Amherst 2, but that is not correct. In Grenfell & Hunt vol. I no. 2 is printed in Plate II, and that is a different manuscript. The picture is in fact Plate XXV from Grenfell & Hunt vol. II. The index states that this is no. 3a, but 3b is on the same papyrus. Have you looked at the Greek text at the top center of the image? That is exactly what Papyrus 12 (P. Amherst 3b) contains, including the nomina sacra. -- Lindert (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't mean to be obnoxious, and you are certainly much more knowledgeable about the subject, but I simply cannot see in File:Papyrus_12.png this text you link to. Are you sure we're talking about the same picture? here you can see that the picture is actually P. Amherst III, not II. On the contrary, I clearly see the first words of the Letter to the Hebrews on top of the second column, exactly where I would expect it for Papyrus 12. In fact, I am positive that the text is this letter instead. I would gladly accept correction, but what I see in the picture is that it is in fact Papyrus 12 containing Hebrews 1:1. -- Lindert (talk) 19:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 WikiCup

Hi Leszek, I'd like to personally invite you to participate in the 2012 WikiCup. You can signup here. – Lionel ^(talk) 09:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gibbet of Jesus

Some time ago, you participated in Talk at an article which has been variously named Torture stake, Cross or stake as gibbet on which Jesus died, Historical disputes over the shape of the Crucifix, Dispute about the shape of the gibbet of Jesus, Dispute of Jesus' execution method, and Dispute about Jesus' execution method. Editors are considering another name change; I thought you might participate in that discussion.--AuthorityTam (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2012 WikiGrail

Hello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiGrail! The competition has officially begun! Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A judge will then update the main table frequently, which can be seen on the WikiGrail page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at Full Rules. There's also a section on that page listing the differences with the WikiCup. For those currently competing in the WikiCup, note that you can submit your WikiCup content to the WikiGrail. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! Good luck! – Lionel ^(talk) 06:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I was just looking at same of the MSS you have done work on and was astonished at how many edits and great articles you have made; you are amazing! Your work on the papyri, unicals, miniscules and the like is unparalleled. It's people like you that make me love Wikipedia. Blessings on you! Wikibojopayne (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that the article is copyedited. It's very nice! Good luck with the GAN and all the best, Miniapolis (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868

On 4 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that according to art-historical analysis the 9th-century illuminated manuscript Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868 (pictured) was copied from a 3rd-century model? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Codex Vaticanus Latinus 3868.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

	love of books and languages
	Thank you for giving us the background of ancient sources, supported by your vast knowledge of scriptures and languages, including the language of Bach, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 87th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (5 October 2010)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAR of Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12

An article that you have been involved in editing, Codex Basilensis A. N. III. 12 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Fifty Bibles of Constantine

Hi - thanks for your contributions on this page. Do you know if theses bibles were composed in Latin or in Greek? (I believe Greek.) If so you might want to update the article with this information. Geĸrίtzl (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit request

Please see my comments, here, regarding your copyedit request, thanks. -- Despayre ^{tête-à-tête} 17:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chinpa Tenpel

An article that you have edited has been nominated for deletion. I would appreciate your feedback at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinpa Tenpel. gidonb (talk) 02:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lectionary 179

Hello.

After reviewing the good article nomination of Lectionary 179 which I closed as a fail back in November 2011. I feel that it was closed too quickly and that it was slightly unfair on your part. I was wondering if you would like me to re open the review and work with you to help it become a good article and this time I promise to give you adequate time to correct any issues raised. Thank you. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, the article is currently on hold for 1 week. I have removed some of the points I made earlier as it seems that you have already corrected some of them. If the remaining issues are corrected, then the article will pass. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are doing some great work on this article and there are only a few minor issues left. May I suggest that you request a copyedit at WP:GOCE as there are places where the grammar could be improved, I have tried my best but I think a more experienced copy editor would do a better job. I have also added some clarification tags within the article, for a few sentences which need to be clarified so no one gets confused when reading the article. If you need any help or any specific explanation as to why I have placed a tag there, just ask. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a request at WP:GOCE. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 20:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba

Witaj. Piszę do ciebie na angielską Wiki, bo widzę że jesteś prawdziwy poliglota. Mam prośbę abyś poprawił wersję francuską hasła Wojny napoleońskie w sekcji kampania Rosyjska 1 i 2 zdjęcie w wersji francuskiej chodzi o podpis taki sam jak w polskiej wersji (2 i 3 zdjęcie). Kilka lat temu kogoś prosiłem co deklarował że zna francuski jak widzisz to pusta deklaracja. Dziękuję. I jeszcze jedno Przykuta zrobił ankietę czego brak na wiki – dopisz mu że brak interwiki – robię polskie hasło, i mógłbym je uzupełnić albo konfrontować ale nie ma komu dodać interwiki! Prawie każdy deklaruje ze zna najmniej 5 języków ale nikt nie fatyguje się by dodać interwiki. Wtedy można polskie hasło uzupełnić albo skonfrontować co od treści. I jeszcze jedno hasło Feliks Steuer – polska wersja jest zgodna ze źródłami ale ślunska nie! Co więcej za brk linków które ktoś wcześniej usunął ktoś chciał skasować całą treść tymczasem śląska wiki nie ma żadnego działajacego odnośnika i nikomu to nie przeszkadza.! Czy mógłbyś przetłumaczyć na angielski i skończyć z tą propagandą? bp tp zpstało przetłumaczone na angielski, dla wszystkich! Pozdrwiam St.Mons — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.79.241.78 (talk) 17:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lectionary 179

The article Lectionary 179 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lectionary 179 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 19:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La Bella Principessa

Hi! Could you investigate this a little? --Ghirla^-трёп- 21:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed with ru:wikipedia

Hi. There is a discussion in commons about deleting the works of creator Victor Bulla (Булла, Виктор Карлович). The bottom of the ru:wp article on him states that rehabilitated in 1958. If this is the case the copyrights on his works expire 70 years after 1958 and not 70 years after his death in 1938. I wonder if his family did the legal process, or the editor confused amnesty with rehabilitation. I don't read or speak Russian so I can't verify it. If you could add a {citation needed} tag to the statement, that may help. You could also just let me know what the template is in ru:wp and I may be able to add it as well. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2

You nominated the above noted article for GA status. I have done the review at Talk:Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2/GA2 and left some comments and questions. Please respond at the GA2 page so the review can continue. maclean (talk) 04:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New quality assessments for the education program

I'm leaving this message because you were one of the editors who assessed articles for the Public Policy Initiative last year. The Education Program is running a new set of assessments to evaluate the impact of the current set of courses on Wikipedia. If you would like to contribute assessments, please take a look at Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Research/Article quality and do as many assessments as you have time for. Please also let anyone else know who you think might be interested in being an assessor. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 216

a jednak :-) - John Belushi (talk) 12:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leszek, zapraszamy!

You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region.

Hey i am posting this article for my Sociology of Religion class, and i would appreciate it if you would review it and let me know what you think. Thank you

Definitions: Religions of Secularization and Pluralism

Invisible ReligionInvisible religion a term brought to us by Thomas Luckmann in 1967, the description of the term has a connection with secularization which is defined as a decline in tradition religion. In this theory, religion becomes a term for any human action or thought that is above the animal level (Christiano, 71), for example something as simple as cooking your food in the kitchen demonstrates us as engaging in religious behavior. Invisible religion makes way for individualistic and privatized forms of religion where unlike traditional Christianity people are able to display self-expression, self-actualization, and individual practices while the concept of religion is present. Religion can be considered invisible because, no human being has the ability to look into the heart of another human being and see if they truly have a relationship with Christ. Visible typically means to see with your eyes, therefore religion can practiced as invisible because no human in recent history has seen Christ with their eyes.

Civil ReligionCivil Religion according to Bellah is that most people in the United States share common religious characteristics expressed through beliefs, symbols, and rituals that provide a religious dimension for the entire American community (Christiano, 65), promoting national unity. For example holidays like the Fourth of July are religious but also have an aspect of American pride. How so? During the Fourth of July festivities the people in America are celebrating the Declaration of Independence, remembering America as a nation under God. Civil religion is often widely displayed during presidential elections, when candidates are running for presidency in America they often use civil religion to appeal to voters using nationalism and religion to establish creditability and gain the trust of voters.

PluralismPluralism is a term that expresses the idea that the various religious groups are in competition with each other (Christiano, 78).Religious pluralism is tolerable, because it doesn’t change what it means to be a follower of Christ. This competition does then create a religious marketplace in which the various denominations are using marketing skills to draw in members. Just as caffeine is addicting people tend to get addicted to the religious goods and services offered by a church, therefore often times churches will provide a variety of goods for example, tee shirts, pens, coffee cups and other purchasable items for their members and services marriage counseling programs, food drives, debt relief services that make the members of the church want to remain a member.

Works Cited Christiano, K. J., W. H. Swatos, and P. Kivisto. Sociology of religion, contemporary developments. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc, 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blivethnkopen (talk • contribs) 02:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Howdy! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:06, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rylands 458

Hello Leszek! Could you please inform me where you found the picture of Papyrus Rylands 458

? Thank you. —Mendelo (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nice work

Papyrus 90 is really excellent. Decora (talk) 00:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mark 16

If you have time, perhaps you could look at this recent edit to Mark 16 - I feel it doesn't exactly meet NPOV standards, but whether it could with a small rewrite, or not, I am not sure. Evercat (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 852 (Gregory-Aland)

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 852 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BabelStone (talk) 23:48, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 852 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 852 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minuscule 852 (Gregory-Aland). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 994 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 994 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 1073 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 1073 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 1074 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 1074 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 1080 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 1080 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 1093 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 1093 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 1216 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 1216 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 873 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 873 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 905 (Gregory-Aland)

On 10 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 905 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the spurious text of Matthew 16:2b–3 is not found in the New Testament codices 852, 994, 1073, 1074, 1080, 1093, and 1216, but it is in codices 873 and 905, although marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. You have new messages at Puffin's talk page.
Message added 14:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 14:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lectionary 102, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek New Testament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Minuscule 880 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 880 (Gregory-Aland)

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 880 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Online Ambassador

Hi Leszek! Are you interested in being the Online Ambassador for any classes this term? We've got a few classes that are looking for ambassador right now (Canada, US), so if you're up for helping any, please do! Let me know if you have any questions, or if you'd like me to pick a course for you. Two in particular might be interesting for you: Women in Relgious Traditions: Islam and Death & Afterlife: Islam.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Those two classes have not become active, but you can still sign up now to support them as an Online Ambassador if you want to. Then, when they do get started, they'll have someone they can turn to for help.--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 880 (Gregory-Aland)

On 11 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 880 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that minuscule 880, a 15th-century manuscript of the New Testament, was written by George Hermonymus, a teacher of Reuchlin and Budeus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minuscule 880 (Gregory-Aland). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

The elusive St. Mary Deipara.

Hi, Leszek!

I notice that you added a note about the manuscripts from the St. Mary Deipara to the article Wadi El Natrun a few years ago, and that you seem to be some kind of expert on Syriac documents...

I wonder if you could confirm (or, much less likely, reject) my opinion that this monastery is the same as the one described in our article Syrian Monastery, Egypt? You wouldn't also happen to know how that monastery commonly is namde nowadays in English (and e.g. in Polish)? I asked about this a few months ago on Talk:Syrian Monastery, Egypt, but got no responses, which frustrated my attempts to make a more consistent article naming and links.

Best regards, JoergenB (talk) 20:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Cofają mi się maile wysyłane na Twój adres. Puść mi może pustego to sprawdzę. Pozdro Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address." Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Manuscript Additions to Comma Johanneum

Greetings, Leszek. The Comma Johanneum article could use two more Greek mss added. One is 177, which Daniel Wallace discovered or announced has the entry in the margin. The other is ms 2473, XVII Century - Athens, National Library. 2473 seems to be agreed upon in textual circles. I can make the changes, but since you have handled most of the manuscript area, and know the graphs and all, I would prefer you take the first shot.

Thanks.

StevenAvery.ny (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hasło o tobie

Bardzo krotki hasło by było w DA. Jak tak można połowa adminów pl wiki powinno mieć hasło. Jak będzie Da to tylko ze trzebię lubią ludzie a tak pewnie nawet było w DNU. A tu o tak byle jaki opis ma mieć wyróżnię. Ledwie temat ruszony a tu już zgłoszenie do DA. To takim opiciem może być DA hasło o Michael Schumacher bo nawet jest więcej opisu. 89.17.224.6 (talk) 19:24, 2 December 2012 (UTC)PS: Ja ty masz hasło na wiki to szef działu aerodynamiki McLaren, mieć to hasło bez większego kłopotu. A jest na odwrót człowiek, pracuje przy bolidach które wygrywają jest śmieciem. A duchowny który wykonuje swoją bo jest doktorem bez problemu ma hasło. A to nie fair. A jak tu nie myśleć że człowiek robi się debilem. 89.17.224.6 (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Po prostu widać popularność, a nie wymagania. Jak tak idzie to lepiej zrobić opcje "like" a nie udawać ze się sprawdziło. Pewnie następny eksperyment Tomaka. 89.17.224.6 (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dorientep1 (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Witam Pana Panie Leszku[reply]

Napisałem odnośnie moich problemów z użytkownikiem DingirXul...

Panie Leszku piję do sformułowania: "Użytkownika Dorientep1 tym razem sobie odpuśćmy"... Panie Leszku, chciałbym Pana zapewnić o prawdziwości oficjalnej zgody p. Zeeny Schreck dla moich interwencji w (fatalnie się przedstawiające) polskie hasło dotyczące tej Pani... zdaje się, iż (tak polskim jak angielskim) administratorom Wiki list od p. Zeeny (zapewniający o szczerości moich działań) został wysłany... oczywiście nic nie usprawiedliwia moich błędów związanych z pierwszymi moimi edycjami na polskiej Wiki, ale aktywność użytkownika DingirXul jest najgorszym koszmarem każdego edytora... Oszczercze enuncjacje tego użytkownika (jego podejrzenia o kradzież zdjęcia p. Zeeny) to po prostu skandal. Lada moment powstanie hasło o mężu pani Zeeny - Nikolasie... Lada moment będę pewno znów (bez żadnego problemu z mojej strony) osobiście załatwiał z Panem Nikolasem by jego oficjalna zgoda na moje edycje została (oficjalnie - a jakże toć to Polsza!) wysłana do administratorów... czy przed zabraniem się do tworzenia hasła o Nikolasie użytkownika DingirXul trzeba uprzedzić by naostrzył kosę?

p.s. tak sobie myślę, że skoro tyloma mail'ami do osób o których piszę na Wiki okupuję proste edycje... to co to będzie, jak przyjdzie mi tworzyć hasło o... aż strach pomyśleć, osobie która... nie żyje...

````

Wikipedia Ambassadors update

Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador.

You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here.

Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course.

If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.

Please do these steps as soon as possible

First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible.

Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at:

Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list).

After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.)

As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.

Communication and keeping up to date

In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:

The education noticeboard has become the main on-wiki location for discussion of the Education Program. You can post there about broad education program issues as well as issues with individual courses.
The Ambassadors Announce email list is a very low-traffic announcements list of important information all Ambassadors need to be aware of. We encourage all Ambassadors (and other interested Wikipedians) to subscribe to the list; follow the instructions on the link to add your email address.
If you use IRC regularly, or need to try to reach someone immediately, the #wikipedia-en-ambassadors ^connect IRC channel is the place to find me and fellow Ambassadors.

Ambassador training and resources

We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.)

Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training.

The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it.

Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way!

--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 20:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lessing, Eichhorn, James R. Edwards

Cześć. You are exponentially the most competent/productive editor in the NT documents articles. I wonder if you would be so kind as to take a stroll past Hebrew Gospel hypothesis (which should really be named Proto-Gospel hypothesis) and (1) do a broad article review. (2) which is a really presumptive and tentative request, if you consider that any of these hypotheses justify a chart of the quality of File:Streeter's the Four Document Hypothesis.PNG, would you consider making one? I am not sure that any do. The James R. Edwards book review includes a chart, but I am not sure if any of these hypotheses have a place in mainstream synoptic scholarship to justify the use of time. Apart from that, many many thanks for zillions of helpful NPOV edits. Z najlepszymi życzeniami! In ictu oculi (talk) 02:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minuscule 886 (Gregory-Aland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicetas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nomination Review: Leo Igwe

Hi, thanks for stopping by and taking a look at my DYK nomination for the Leo Igwe article. I responded to your comment there, if you're still looking to review the page. Thank you for your time and contributions. Nmillerche (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lectionary 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pascha

Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 278 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Obol

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 311

On 1 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 311, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lectionary 311 is a bilingual Greek–Arabic manuscript of the New Testament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lectionary 311. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 282

On 3 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 282, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 282 was used for redating Papyrus 46, a manuscript of the New Testament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 282. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 890 (Gregory-Aland)

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 890 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 267

Hello! Your submission of Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 267 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few more issues need to be addressed, and there's a query about the content of one of the sources. Please stop by when you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Reassessment: Comma Johanneum

TO BOTH: 7Jim7 and Leszek_Janczuk I appreciate your interest in the article itself, but much of your posts to the discussion on the good article status are not relevant to that topic. I am glad to see that they are being posted to the appropriate talk page. Can we agree to complete the process and then delete the "off topic" material from the Reassessment Page where it simply makes following that discussion extremely difficult? I will gladly insert a short note there to explain what has been done, but would prefer both of you to be in agreement first. Thanks! Jpacobb (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 890 (Gregory-Aland)

On 5 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 890 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Minuscule 890 once belonged to Cardinal Bessarion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minuscule 890 (Gregory-Aland). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 888 (Gregory-Aland)

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 888 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 11:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 888 (Gregory-Aland)

On 7 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 888 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Minuscule 888 has an unusual order of Gospels: Matthew, John, Mark, Luke? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minuscule 888 (Gregory-Aland). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Graham

Dziękuję, bardzo mi miło! Dasz wiarę, że to pierwsza "gwiazdka" jaką otrzymałem na Wikipedii? To, co prezentuję na mojej polskiej stronie użytkownika to odznaczenia za wkład w Wikiźródła. Pozdrawiam --Teukros (talk) 19:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

25% in Harringay?

Thanks for adding the TFP link to the Harringay page. Can I ask where the 25% figure came from? Are you aware that 100% of the Park itself (as opposed to the neighbourhood of Finsbury Park) is in the ward of Harringay? hjuk (talk) 12:34, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Los Angeles Crusade (1949)

Hello! Your submission of Los Angeles Crusade (1949) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • AAPT) 22:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jean Hurault de Boistaillé

On 31 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jean Hurault de Boistaillé, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Jean Hurault de Boistaillé, ambassador of France, used his appointment at the embassy to collect manuscripts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jean Hurault de Boistaillé. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Los Angeles Crusade (1949)

Hello! Your submission of Los Angeles Crusade (1949) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 12:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland)

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter (May 2013)

Hi, I thought I would drop you a note to say that I mentioned in this month's issue of Ichthus. If you wish to receive the full content in future, please drop me a note on my talk page.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland)

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 11:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please check once more.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 20:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland)

On 5 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that minuscule 897, 922 and 1187 contain the spurious biblical text of Pericope Adulterae but are marked as doubtful? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minuscule 897 (Gregory-Aland). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 922 (Gregory-Aland)

On 5 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 922 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that minuscule 897, 922 and 1187 contain the spurious biblical text of Pericope Adulterae but are marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 1187 (Gregory-Aland)

On 5 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 1187 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that minuscule 897, 922 and 1187 contain the spurious biblical text of Pericope Adulterae but are marked as doubtful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Blue Qur'an

On 7 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Blue Qur'an, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Blue Qur'an is written in gold and silver on parchment colored with indigo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blue Qur'an. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Blue Qur'an

Hey Leszek, I just wanted to say thanks for nominating Blue Qur'an for DYK! It didn't even cross my mind that it was a long enough expansion. It's cool to see the manuscript get its 6 hours in the sun. Happy editing! Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 14:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry to steal your project! Thanks again. :) Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 15:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonshō

Hi Leszek. Thank you for reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Bonshō so promptly. I wonder if I could ask you to take one further look at it; after you passed the DYK nomination I was doing some expansion and came across what I believe is a better hook - would appreciate a yay or nay from you. Cheers, Yunshui 雲‍水 12:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kilka krótkich pytań ;)

Witam serdecznie!

Mam na imię Kamil. Jestem studentem 3 roku komunikowania publicznego PWSZ w Legnicy, obecnie w trakcie pisania pracy licencjackiej ;)

Jako temat obrałem "Artykuły na medal w polskiej Wikipedii". Dwa podpunkty ostatniego rozdziału chciałbym poświęcić najaktywniejszym wikipedystom. Jednak, żeby efekt był bardziej wiarygodny, nie chcę posługiwać się jedynie suchymi statystykami i domysłami.

Dlatego też chciałbym zapytać czy znalazłby Pan – jako autor haseł medalowych – chwilę czasu by odpowiedzieć na kilka pytań związanych z Pana aktywnością w ramach projektu? W głównej mierze zależy mi bowiem na poznaniu motywacji autorów wyróżnionych haseł.

Jeśli wyrazi Pan taką wolę, w następnej wiadomości prześlę pytania.

Z góry dziękuję za odpowiedź.

Pozdrawiam,

Kamil - drzoker@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drzoker (talk • contribs) 18:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brissalius caparti listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brissalius caparti. Since you had some involvement with the Brissalius caparti redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 19:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1959 in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thx

teraz dopiero zauważyłem :-) - John Belushi (talk) 06:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of non-existent villages

I've seen your speedy deletion taggings of Basen, Podlaskie Voivodeship and Mikołajowy Las, and it is only because of the good fortune that I understand Polish that I didn't remove the deletion tags. If you are going to do any more of these then please don't tag them as hoaxes, which implies that the creator was deliberately trying to deceive, and give an explanation on the talk page of why they are incorrect so that the reviewing admin can see that they should be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aftershock (1990 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Standing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 313

On 11 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 313, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lectionary 313 and Lectionary 315 were purchased by Baroness Burdett-Coutts, a philanthropist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lectionary 313. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lectionary 315

On 11 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 315, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lectionary 313 and Lectionary 315 were purchased by Baroness Burdett-Coutts, a philanthropist? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:04, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

BeastMaster (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daniel Fitzgerald

Dark Vengeance (1993 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Standing

Vanishing Point (1997 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James MacDonald

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amazons and Gladiators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Norton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

create Article

hello am Amilton am Pastor of Christ, Brazilian singer and theologian is that you would create an article on wikipedia for more because I have been rejected do God's work by brail and the world and here they blocked my name and ask their help with this my email: pr.amiltondecristo @ hotmail.com site: www.amiltondecristo.org. continue to bless you (User_Marcos) 05:05, 31 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.26.10.248 (talk)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	hello, thank you for your awesome work. Please email me I would like to keep in touch with you on issues regarding textual criticism as I have found your work helpful. I have some questions I would like to ask you, thank you angelos@morethan12.org Courier01 (talk) 03:39, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your awesome and tireless work! I was wondering if you could email me as I have a few questions regarding textual criticism. I created an account just to talk with you lol. Anyways thanks again, please email me at angelos@morethan12.org Courier01 (talk) 03:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dead Right (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Green (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evangeliarium Spalatense, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wiretapper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minuscule 923 (Gregory-Aland)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Minuscule 923 (Gregory-Aland), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://answerparty.com/question/answer/how-do-u-round-678-to-the-nearest-ten.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minuscule 924 (Gregory-Aland)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Minuscule 924 (Gregory-Aland), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://answerparty.com/question/answer/how-do-u-round-678-to-the-nearest-ten.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updates for SwissLife entry

Hello, I am writing to you because I wondered if you could kindly have a look at Talk Page, where I have proposed some information I'd like to add to the entry. Since you're among its past editors, I'd like to have your opinion about it before moving on.

Thank you in advance Fabienne Strobel (talk) 12:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Billy Graham's crusades (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Buffalo, Columbus, Kongo, Phoenix, Saint Louis, Albany, Petersburg, Pekin, San Juan, Providence, Washington, Anglia, Islandia, Launceston, Sunderland, Jordanian, Huaiyin, Nancy, Pecs, Drezno, Dothan, Ponce, Basile, Akra, Halifax and Moshi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/List of Billy Graham's crusades at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

love of books and languages
Thank you for giving us the background of ancient sources, supported by your vast knowledge of scriptures and languages, including the language of Bach, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 87th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eight years ago, you were recipient no. 87 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

English style

You are quite the prolific contributor to Wikipedia. Thanks for your work. One comment: I saw your very recent article on Paulus Bombasius. The English style was clearly that of a person for whom English is not his first language. I cleaned it up. I hope you have someone around you who can take a quick look at your original articles before publishing. It might help. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walker Texas Ranger 3: Deadly Reunion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walker Texas Ranger 3: Deadly Reunion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walker Texas Ranger 3: Deadly Reunion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Your ever-growing list of articles on esoteric topics (for us...) amazes me every time I see it. Thank you for giving us your time and expertise. Drmies (talk) 00:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to join WikiProject Women writers!

Hello Leszek Jańczuk! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of New Testament minuscules (1001–2000), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princeton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Synchronism material on the last kings of Judah vs. kings of Babylon

Dear Sir, I suppose you are a friend of User:John Belushi and so I'd like you to join the discussion which is to settle whether or not the diagram I added to Kings of Judah contains any information which is against the rules of Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. Apologist en (talk) 17:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 69 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 69 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 69 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:29, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Battle of Rogue River, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Crawford, George Montgomery and Michael Granger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWL Questia check-in

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC) [reply]

KatzenGlaube

Paetz = Jantschuk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.126.253.139 (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Codex Zacynthius

Hello Leszek, there are couple of reference issues in the article. You seem to have edit the article plenty of times, so I assume you're very familiar with it. I'm considering a possible reassessment for the article as it is currently rated GA status. Plz take a look for any possible improvements to keep GA status. Thnx & Cheers! — JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Zwölf Stücke, Op. 65.
Message added 10:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday!

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 03:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion

Until that discussion has reached consensus, it is not appropriate to remove the merge notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leszek Jańczuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!
Best wishes, A 10 fireplane (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A 10 fireplane (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy 2019

begin it with music and memories

Not too late, I hope ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glosolalia

Hi, Could You look at this article about glosolalia in polish wikipedia? I know that last time when You were there You wrote that it was too biased. I have inserted there some adjustments of style and information about another linguistic research (e.g. by M. Motley). If you could take a look, I would be very grateful :)

Isabelle de Charrière

Hello Leszek Jańczuk, Could you write/translate an article about Isabelle de Charrière 1740-1805 for the Danish Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. There 're existing two Danish translations in the book 'Anebilleder en antologi om otte kvindelige for fattere. - København, Hønsetryk,1980. (Le Noble (Den højadelige) og 'Mistriss Henley') and several potrait paintings and a drawing of her by Jens Juel. Hope you can do it or find some other Danish Wikipedian to do it. Boss-well63 (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minuscule 2814, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	While I was revising Vulgata Sixtina and Sixto-Clementine Vulgate (my revisions are now over, you can have a look if you want), I noticed you had produced this very convenient article on the Polish Wiki [pl] pretty recently, article which helped me to improve those Vulgate pages. Amazing job, keep on the great work you are doing! Veverve (talk) 18:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pauline epistles#Abbreviations

I didn't want to ping you on the talk page, but I started a discussion you might be interested in at Talk:Pauline epistles#Abbreviations. St Anselm (talk) 03:47, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claude Choublier

The article Claude Choublier has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dark Vengeance (film)

The article Dark Vengeance (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old Latin New Testament manuscripts has been nominated for renaming

Category:Old Latin New Testament manuscripts has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Manuscripts of Iliad

Hi, this should be Category:Manuscripts of the Iliad, as a matter of English grammar. It is difficult to move a category for grammar errors, unless it is the creator asking. Please ask for a "speedy rename" at WP:Cfd - I can't do this. Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leszek. I think you should follow the steps at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Speedy renaming and merging. It seems to me that this edit was a mistake. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems ok now - thanks! Johnbod (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lima: Breaking the Silence

The article Lima: Breaking the Silence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, tagged since 2013. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lima: Breaking the Silence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lima: Breaking the Silence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lima: Breaking the Silence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of White Phantom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Phantom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Phantom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bill Davey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Davey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Davey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Capt. Milokan (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Leszek Jańczuk a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lima: Breaking the Silence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lima: Breaking the Silence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lima: Breaking the Silence (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 13:25, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death Train (2006 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death Train (2006 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Train (2006 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DonaldD23 talk to me 22:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fourteenth Anniversary on Wikipedia!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 (talk) 20:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Leszek Jańczuk!

Happy New Year!

Leszek Jańczuk,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Said

I think that you said somewhere that Erasmus translated from the Vulgate into Greek in dozens of places. I wonder if you have a full list. T56h89 (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]