User talk:Loranchet

Welcome

Hello, Loranchet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Wwwhatsup (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Image:Ahmed Abdallah Sambi, President of Comoros.jpg

Hello, when you posted the image of Ahmed Abdallah Sambi you listed it as self made but as it is photo of poster it is actually a derivative work, which would be a copy right violation. I beleive that if you list it under fair use it would be ok. The image may or may not get deleted before you have a chance to do this, either way you should be able to just reloaded with correct licensing. Jeepday (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving ahead with the deletion, you are welcome to try for the fair use. Jeepday (talk) 04:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Modern art of Tanzania, by George Lilanga.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Modern art of Tanzania, by George Lilanga.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. jonny-m t 02:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Zaltbommel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mnemba Atoll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stone Town may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Town 5 Stevage.jpg|thumb|300px|The House of Wonders, now hosting a museum on Swahili culture]].]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heelkakobdhexaad

Hi Middayexpress, You wrote this article. However, the geographical coordinates you give correspond with a stretch of empty desert on Google Maps, on http://www.bing.com/maps and also on http://www.geographic.org (the site that you refer to). Moreover: http://www.geonames.org/ does not know such a place. There is however a village called Kob Dhexaad not far from there, at: 10.656479, 49.498864. Loranchet (talk) 12:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Loranchet. The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency indicates that the area's coordinates are 10° 41' 00" N and 49° 28' 00" E ([1]). This is therefore what is indicated on the page. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 13:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. But you can see that at these coordinates there is just empty desert. And on http://www.geographic.org/ the place is named Heelka Kobdhexaad and not Heelkakobdhexaad. Under that name (Heelka Kobdhexaad) I have found this place also on http://www.geonames.org/. Geonames puts geographical features in certain categories, such as river, city, mountain, etc. and it classifies Heelka Kobdhexaad as a "locality", not as a "populated place". A locality is "a minor area or place of unspecified or mixed character and indefinite boundaries". You call it a town (not even village, but town). Why? You see there's neither a town nor a village there! And the website used by you (http://www.geonames.org/) says nothing about the type of place, whether village, or plain, or stream, or so. What makes you think it's a town? Loranchet (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I cited geographic.org (linked above), not geonames.org. "Heelkakobdhexaad" is likewise an alternate name for the area [2]. Additionally, town is a synonym for "locality". Please also leave all responses if any here so that they are in one place. Thanks, Middayexpress (talk) 14:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, typo from me. The site you refer to (geographic.org) does list Heelka Kobdhexaad as a "locality" not as a "populated place", see here. Together with the fact that there's nothing there, can I convince you it is not a town? 20:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Per here, a "locality" and "populated place" are interchangeable; both also aren't really specific as to size and may include towns, villages, hamlets and cities. In any event, I've changed it to locality. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Middayexpress. But note: "town" and "locality" are NOT interchangeable! A town is a locality but a locality is not a town. A cow is a mammal, but a mammal is not a cow. All for the good of Wikipedia! :-) Loranchet (talk) 22:43, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what the wikilink above states. Btw, I'm aware whenever you post a new reply here, so no need to alert me either. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 22:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dooxadacambaareed

Hi Middayexpress. Could you please change the article's name into Dooxada Cambaareed? It is not Dooxadacambaareed. The one-word-version is only used by Geographic.org "as a form of the full name that allows for alphabetical sorting of the file into gazetteer sequence" (quote from Geographic.org). Same is for many other Somalia geography stubs. Eg. Heelkakobdhexaad: the correct spelling is Heelka Kobdhexaad. Thanks! Loranchet (talk) 09:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Loranchet. Dooxadacambaareed is an alternate name for the area (see top of screen on getamap as well [3]); same thing for various other Somalia geography stubs such as Heelkakobdhexaad [4]. It's also closer to an anglicized spelling. However, Dooxada Cambaareed may be the commonname. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done for both. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maxamedbuurfuule

Hi Middayexpress, I see that you used Maxamedbuurfuule for an article of a Somali village of which the real name is Maxamed Buurfuule. In countless other Somalia geography articles you have done the same: melting the words together and make it one single word. But would you ever write an article called Losangeles, Puertorico or Rhodeisland? I guess you wouldn't. So please revert ALL your erroneous spellings of Somali towns and villages back to the correct ones. Thank you! Loranchet (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe getamap's alternate naming scheme was already explained above. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is something wrong with me? If I type Maxamedbuurfuule in Getamap I am referred to Maxamed Buurfuule. See it here at Getamap; it is always spelled as two words. Loranchet (talk) 19:38, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look again at the very top of the screen in that link (where it says "Map, Weather and Photos"). That's getamap's alternate naming scheme. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:42, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is weird. There's no "Map, Weather and Photos"-link on the top of my screen. Maybe the site looks different depending on whether you open it from Europe or from the US or so (this is sometimes the case). However, lower on my page there is a wheather, map and photo section, but they all use the two-word-version of Maxamed Buurfuule. In any case, do you think that the "alternate naming scheme" of one particular website is an enough authoritative source to consider the name to have been changed from Maxamed Buurfuule to Maxamedbuurfuule? I don't think so. Geonames.org knows only 1 single name variant: Maxamed Buurfuule. So does Geographic.org here. Why do I make such a fuss about this? Because Wikipedia is authoritative, and by creating articles with an erroneous name that name gets copied and used in a lot of other websites. It's already happening. As a serious author you should't want that. So please be convinced and change it. Best regards, Loranchet (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The alternate name is at the top of the screen. It is indeed weird that you apparently cannot see it since it's in the page source too :) By the way, kindly post any future responses here on your talk page. Thanks, Middayexpress (talk) 21:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's in the page source: http://www.getamap.net/maps/somalia/hiiraan/_maxamedbuurfuule/ But that is the only place where I see it in one single word. But that's just done to prevent the use of a blank space or %20 in URL-encoding. You know that. That's not enough to consider that to be the correct spelling! Please read my argumentation in my previous comment. I hope for a substantial reply, Middayexpress. Can we look into this seriously? Thanks! Loranchet (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the page source obviously because it's displayed on the page itself. I also politely asked you to post any future responses here (see WP:HUSH). Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Qandala District may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

120223_OCHASom_Administrative_Map_Bari_Qandala_A3.pdf Administrative map of Qandala District]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks; has been repaired. Loranchet (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 timeline of the War in Somalia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of-khatumo-civilians/ "TRAGEDY IN TALEH: Puntland forces massacre dozens of Khatumo civilians"], WidhWidh Online, 29 November 2013, accessed 3 December 2013.</ref> According to other versions,
stories/201312010085.html Somalia: UN Special Representative for Somalia Appeals for Calm in Sool"], AllAfrica.com, 30 November 2013; accessed on 3 December 2013.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bari, Somalia

Hi Middayexpress, On 3 August 2012 you edited this article, adding 2 districts to the Region of Bari: Waiye and Armo (=Carmo), making it a total of 8 districts. I do not think this is correct. The other 6 districts are OK, and when you open these district articles, a map of Bari appears in the infobox with 6 districts, not 8. Could you show a reference for the existence of the 2 extra districts? Thanks! Loranchet (talk) 20:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Loranchet. Waiye/Waciya and Armo/Carmo are official districts of Puntland [5]. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I had seen this. But why do you add Waiye/Waciya and Armo/Carmo but not Ufayn, Bargaal, Rako and Xafun, which are also districts of Puntland within the territory of the (old) region of Bari? Loranchet (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other than Bargaal, the others were re-directs or redlinks. You also indicate that you saw the district listing yet you still wrote above that you didn't think the districts were correct. Interesting. Middayexpress (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I adapted the article for more clarity. Loranchet (talk) 00:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They were listed in the Districts of Somalia article at one point I think. Feel free to delete the ones you think are dubious.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dr. Blofeld. So if you agree I will request for the deletion of the articles on the following districts, after researching whether they really cannot be proven to exist: Balidhidin District, Bareeda District, Habo District, Hiriro District, Qodah District and Tager District. Loranchet (talk) 22:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are of course free to nominate them for deletion at AFD, but nominating actual places is viewed as obstructionist. You'd better be sure. You'll also see 1 is sourced the other exists on the Somali wikipedia, so if YOU know better than everyone else go right ahead. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmedgab

Hi Middayexpress. I value much of you work on Somalia. But here, I see that you have again created an article on a Somali town that is not a town at all, but (in this case) a river (wadi). I have now seen many examples of geographical entries created by you that are totally erroneous. Even in the very first version you added a source that clearly states: "Axmed Gaab (Axmed Gaab) is a wadi (class H - Hydrographic) in (Togdheer)." So you knew from the start it's not a town. Then you edited the article dozens of times but you never corrected this. Why are you doing this? Please correct the article (and use the right spelling: Axmed Gaab) or delete it. (It is such a small stream that in my view it does not deserve a separate article, because no extra information will ever be added for this wadi). Please reply here. Best regards, Loranchet (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen you mark many localities and populated places as anything other than that, so it would appear human error works both ways. At any rate, you may be in part right here, as Ahmed Gab (anglicized spelling) is apparently a wadi [6]. I've fixed it. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human error; it happens. Thanks for correcting! But two remarks: firstly: I politely requested you to answer here. Secondly: Contrary as you say, I don't think I've marked "many localities and populated places as anything other than". Rather on the contrary, I'm correcting many of such errors by others. Give me examples where I went wrong, and I'll gladly admit -and correct- it. Please continue discussion here. Loranchet (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, the discussion makes more sense here for context. If it bothers you, though, feel free to delete it as is your prerogative. As an example of such human error, there's G.W.B Huntingford's "The Town of Amud, Somalia" (a proper name), which for some reason you changed to "The ruined town of Amud, Somalia" [7]. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With a equal amount of respect: As the discussion started here, on an article created by you, it makes to more sense to have the debate here. Anyway, as regards Amud, we are both right. The article by Huntingford is indeed called "The Town of Amud", but its first sentence reads: "The ruined town of Amud is built on .. (etc)". I have corrected it as promised. Regards, Loranchet (talk) 16:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did politely ask you earlier to "post any future responses here (see WP:HUSH)". At any rate, the "ruined town of Amud" is just a fragment of the first sentence; it is certainly not the title of Huntingford's article "The Town of Amud, Somalia". Glad that was cleared up, though. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Middayexpress. If I start a discussion on your talk page, you always refer the discussion back to my page, saying you wish to continue the discussion there. If I don't comply, you adorn me with a WP/HUSH-tag, reminding me of your wish. But when in our most recent discussion I requested you to have a discussion on your page, you simply ignored my request and when I remember you of MY wish you just give me a WP/HUSH. Why should I honour your requests when you just ignore mine? Please explain for the sake of a better understanding between us. Loranchet (talk) 17:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was already explained above, in detail and several times, what the naming conventions are. I'm not going to repeat myself elsewhere and out context when all of the info is already here. I've also already pointed you to WP:HUSH. Kindly respect it. Any future posts on this matter that aren't made here but instead on my talk page out of their global context will be deleted. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 17:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Afariridookiibuurqumayo

Hi Middayexpress, Afariridookiibuurqumayo (article created by you and revised >30 times) is not a populated place. The spelling is incorrect. Please correct both. Thank you! Loranchet (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per getamap, Afariridookiibuurqumayo/Afar Iridookii Buur Qumayo is indeed a locality [8]. Kindly do not waste my time again. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Waste your time again? You wasted 33 edits on this article never correcting its main error, namely that it is not a populated place at all. So please consider a 34th and final correction. Thanks! Loranchet (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A locality is a populated place. So yes, time wasted indeed. Middayexpress (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alollammagad

hi Middayexpress. You created this article and say this place is in Mudug, but you joined a map placing it in Bay Region, which is 700 km further south. Also the correct spelling is Alol Lamma Gad, which you did use in earlier versions of the article. Please correct it. Thanks! Loranchet (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The coordinates and region are from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency [9]. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Geographical Feature classification and Feature Designation Codes

Hi Loranchet. "Locality" is often a synonym for "populated place". But your point is taken. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Loranchet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Loranchet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ceel Garab Jeelow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceel Garab Jeelow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceel Garab Jeelow until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 00:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I see you tangled with Middayexpress over these Somali placenames. I and a couple of other people are going through them to weed out all the localities and other problem names, so if you're interested you might want to cast an eye at AfD for a while. Mangoe (talk) 00:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Qansax Timir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qansax Timir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qansax Timir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hut 8.5 14:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Loranchet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please go to Talk:Kurds and explain

how your edit reflects the sources. Because I don't see how it does. Don't bother doing it here, I didn't revert you and others need to see your explanation. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug, thanks for comment, I did post an entry on Talk:Kurds, with a ref. Another user had already removed my addition to the article though. Let's await the discussion on the Talk Page.Loranchet (talk) 11:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mozart Group

Hello Loranchet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mozart Group for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Thanks for contributing to the article Workman, Clark and Company. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of automobile manufacturers of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atsuta. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dangorayo District

added a link pointing to Nugal

Godobjiran District

added a link pointing to Nugal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dangorayo District

added a link pointing to Nugal

Garowe District

added a link pointing to Nugal

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]