User talk:Mayasofstar12
January 2021
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Carmen Sarahí, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 14:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rebecca Black, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You are adding occupations that Black is not notable for, nor are they sourced in the article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rebecca Black, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Re: Modern Standard Arabic: You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 09:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Important notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ameliastaron12, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)