User talk:Mlgeek

Welcome!

Hello, Cmind77, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Collective Knowledge (software), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! noq (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Collective Knowledge (software)

The article Collective Knowledge (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of meeting notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Collective Mind article

Hi Mlgeek. As part of the new pages review process, I have blanked and redirected the Collective Mind to cTuning foundation. The reason I have done this is because it does not appear to meet the criteria for inclusion as a standalone article, which usually requires significant (detailed) coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. The topic may also be better served if covered together, as the related topics may provide additional context for the reader. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

I'd also like to ask if you have any external relation to Dr Fursin or any of the related projects (the foundation, cKnowledge or MLCommons), for example, if you have worked with Fursin or the projects, or know them personally outside of your research for the articles you have written. In general, we would ask people to disclose such external relationships and make use of the draft review process where possible so that they can receive feedback, for example, on things that they know externally might not realise would need a reference. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]