User talk:Moviephilee

Welcome!

Hello, Moviephilee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jigra did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Ravensfire (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article Kishkindha Kaandam did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. RangersRus (talk) 19:47, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thalavan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 04:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Anweshippin Kandethum, you may be blocked from editing. Charliehdb (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moviephilee: Please refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES for reliable and unreliable sources. Koimoi is unreliable source and I ask you to either find a reliable source or revert your change on Kishkindha Kaandam. RangersRus (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Greatest of All Time have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk.
When sources differ, we show the range, do not just pick the number you like - Arjayay (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Petta (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
It was explained to you above, that Koimoi is NOT a reliable source - Arjayay (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I told you before that Koimoi is unreliable WP:ICTFSOURCES. RangersRus (talk) 14:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Singham Again, you may be blocked from editing.
IMDB is not a WP:reliable source as WP:IMDB - Arjayay (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hello Mummy.
Filmibeat is not a WP:Reliable source as per WP:ICTFSOURCES - Arjayay (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lucky Baskhar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You can't claim something has happened, before it does - Arjayay (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Moviephilee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I extremely apologize for my misconduct. I am still learning and unaware of the sources that are reliable. All the information posted from my side were after careful considerat8ion, but I didn't realize that those were unreliable sources.However, I assure you that such an incident will not occur again from my side without reliable sources. I kindly request to revoke my ban. Moviephilee (talk) 03:13, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See my note below. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moviephilee I am going to unblock you based on your request. However there will be little tolerance for disruptive editing going forward. Please read and make sure you are abiding by the relevant guidelines when making changes to articles. Specifically WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. If you are in doubt, ask an experienced editor or open a discussion on the talk page of the relevant article before making changes. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]