User talk:Patken4

Hi Patken4, I am at State College and am involved with the PSU athletics department in a professional capacity. Please do not undo my edits regarding Beaver Stadium. I understand that you likely have this article on your watch list, however, you are not affiliated with The Pennsylvania State University. Thank you in advance.

Patken4, I was thrilled to see that you had started an article on Kobs Field at MSU. I am a descendent of John Kobs, and my family has remained actively involved with MSU athletics. I noted that the middle initial is wrong in the title, though corrected in the text (John H. for John Herman). Being miserably new to wikipedia, I haven't been able to work out how to edit the title so I thought I ought to consult you, the person who began the article in the first place. Thank you in advance for any assistance that you can give me. Best regards. Plummy28 (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, I did not know that. spongeman2007 No problem, maybe we should put it was reduced because of the lawsuit. Just a suggestion though. (So in the future people don't try to change it) Thanks again. spongeman2007

Hello Patken4...I'm a wikipedia user who also happens to be a Wichita Wings fan, and I wanted to ask you about the reversions you made on the Wings page. I heard that the National Alliance Soccer League bought the rights to the Wichita Wings name, and they were going to revive them, albeit in a much lesser indoor league. I wrote the sports editor of The Wichita Eagle, and he confirmed that this was the case. Since then (late November), I haven't heard anything about the Wings or this new soccer league. I was writing to ask if you had any news about the Wings current status, as I'd like to know more. If you do, please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks, Borksamoht 08:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I realize now that you edited a page that already had reference to the NASL removed by an anonymous editor. If you do know more about the current status of the Wings, please do let me know, but if you don't, I quite understand. Thanks, Borksamoht 22:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patken4, I see you did some editing on a Jack Schmidt page. The NHL player for the Bruins. I'd like to know how you knew/what you know about him, I'm his great Grandson. Please Email me at Jacobschmidt132@gmail(dot)com. Thank you.

Chatsworth Stadium

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chatsworth Stadium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? GetDownAdam (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the addition to the page! I understand how there is some notability now, but now I'm trying to find some kind of concrete evidence that Chatsworth Stadium is, or rather was, the old Kings Park Soccer Stadium. I'm not sure if you're from Durban, but if you are, you will know that there is a stadium in Chatsworth, a significant distance from Kings Park, where games are still played. If, in fact there are two notable stadia in Durban called 'Chatsworth', I'll swallow my words, but I have the feeling that there in an error somewhere and that this mistake is just being accepted on WP, and any changes or attempts to change it will just be rv because it looks like I'm just trying to delete an entire article, and people don't take kindly to that. I'm happy with keeping Chatsworth Stadium, but I'd like to remove all ties with Kings Park. I'd appreciate some help trying to sort it all out. Please! GetDownAdam (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Les Cox

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Les Cox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Orashmatash (talk) 22:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chatsworth Stadium

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chatsworth Stadium, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chatsworth Stadium. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? GetDownAdam (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Movement

What does this one think of the movement? --Kin Khan 02:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NBA Arenas

Hey, I noticed that you put up the arena histories of all the NBA teams on the infoboxes. Even though I completly agree that this information needs to be somewhere in the article, I'm not quite entirely certain if that info need to be on the infobox. Do you think you can intergrate this information within the articles itself, like using an "Arena History" subsection inside a team's history section of an article?

Thanks Dknights411 17:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome (long overdue)

Dodgers

It's fun to work together at the same time. Don't be shy if you think I made changes that you don't like. I am related to the O'Malleys, but not to Walter. He would be a cousin to my cousins. We married into a different branch of the family. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

Hello, Patken4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Conscious 18:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you?

Are you just going through all my submissions? If so thanks alot, I appricate any help with them as I can get.

Stadium stubs

Thanks for creating them. Really, I had some of them on my to do list for ages, but it took a guy like you to actually start the articles. :) //Halibu tt 00:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you create stadium stubs, please put in a link to some site about the stadium, for verification. [1] is useful. Otherwise, someone else has to do work to verify the article or mark it for deletion. Expecially today, on April 1st, when anything that looks bogus and doesn't have references has to be checked. Thanks. --John Nagle 18:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OVC

YOU ARE QUICK! Thanks for adding those last two tourney arenas...you beat me to it. WillC 22:55, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFL

Hi mate, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL if you love your footy, and also Category:VFL/AFL players. Drop us a line with any questions mate. Cheers, R o gerthat ^Talk 06:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

College Arenas

Texas A&M Corpus Christi plays at the old Memorial Coliseum, 402 S Shoreline Blvd, Corpus Christi, TX, tel.(361) 884-8227, but the box links to the Memorial Coliseum in Portland, OR. Can you fix this, please. This is under Division I College Basketball Independents. Thanks. Ross P. rossp

Hietalahti, Vaasa

Is Hietalahti, Vaasa really only a stadium? I thought it was a full district. I have only been in Vaasa once, and did not visit any other parts than the railway station and the ferry terminal, so I've never actually been to Hietalahti. Do you live in Vaasa, by any chance? JIP | Talk 08:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Cannon

Hi Patken, you might want to expand this article a bit more. Why is he interesting or significant? Why is it important that he was inducted into the Boxing Hall of Fame? etc. --pfctdayelise (translate?) 14:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

locations

if the conference websites don't have them and i can't find them online, i next email the school that won it that year....i have been doing this since january....i have less than a dozen to go. WillC 22:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German arenas

Hi! I have just announced some of your new stubs at Portal:Germany/New article announcements. If you write more about German sports venues, please announce your articles there so German editors see them and can add interwiki links etc. Thank you, and happy editing! Kusma (討論) 01:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NBL

Hey mate. I saw that you have been involved alot in basketball and would like to invite you to WikiProject NBL. Please add your name here to the members list and drop a line on my talk page. Cheers Jasrocks 10:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project

Take a look at the venues that have no wiki entries on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_the_Champions

You seem to be able to find info for venues faster than me....WillC 17:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New arenas being built

I go to www.arenadigest.com to get information on the new arenas, and I usually Google to confirm. User:Odulumni99

An error on one of your stadium articles

Hi, I just caught a major error on one of your stadium articles. (Tom Kimbrough Stadium) I just want to inform you but I will correct the mistake. The West Texas A&M University football stadium is formally called, Kimbrough Memorial Stadium and it is named after West Texas State University's former football coach and athletic director Frank Kimbrough.[2] I will transfer the information regarding West Texas A&M University to Kimbrough Memorial Stadium while I put some new info in Tom Kimbrough Stadium article because there is such a stadium in another part of Texas. :-) --Who What Where Nguyen Why 06:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Keep up the good work! - Darwinek 21:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GREAT WORK

Keep up the good work on China football and stadiums!!!! James Janderson 14:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

I just thought you might want to know that your article Angel Pagan has been nominated for deletion. Thanks, User:Clay4president

Mike Reid

Outstanding job on the Mike Reid article. I hope you don't mind: I duplicated your comments on my talk page on the disambiguation talk page as well. Thanks for the push in the right direction. (I, too, am an avid college football fan, but not not much of a fan of country music.) —Xanderer 03:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

African footy articles

Nice work on the Burkina Faso football (soccer) stuff. I've been following behind filling in the odd bit of info from the French articles, but you're a long way ahead of me. For the Angolan ones I haven't checked, but maybe there will be something in the Portuguese Wiki I can steal. Again, great stuff ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi your knowledge of football stadiums and football in obscure countries never ceases to amaze me! Where do you get this stuff from? James Janderson 14:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unofficial teams

You have created quite a number of "unofficial" national teams, I'd like to know the reasoning. --Cat out 15:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I created an article for each of the non-FIFA playing nations because other articles existed for like situations. I just stubbed out the remainders. Patken4 03:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why not present them in a list. I dont think any will get really large. --Cat out 03:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bougainville national football team

You have recently created the article Bougainville national football team. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. --Geoffrey Spear 15:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please Use Edit Summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Deenoe 14:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use default sort and if the only categories are things like living people and Harvard alumni, please add the improve categories tag. Thanks.

Another barnstar

		Football (soccer) barnstar
		I award this barnstar to Patken4 for creating articles on a number of football clubs. Conscious 09:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I wonder if there is a Category:Handball venues you may want to look into. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cuban baseball venues

Thanks for stubbing out a bunch of baseball venues in Cuba. I have added coordinates to nearly all, so if you click on the coordinates and then go to Google satellite maps, you can see the buildings themselves. Thanks again! Rolando (talk) 17:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi nice baseball stubs but isn't there national categories e.g Puerto Rican baseball players and American baseball players? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi yes my thoughts exactly. Could you imagine how many American baseball players!!!!! There is one for Puerto Rico though and others I beat you to it though! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 13:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quebec teams

Do you know anything about Quebec Junior "AAA" hockey? DMighton 00:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your addition to Memorial Coliseum (Lexington)

I see you added Category:Defunct college basketball venues to Memorial Coliseum (Lexington). The UK Women's team still plays most of their games there, so I would think that this category would not apply. --rogerd 02:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TRNC Stadia

Thanks for creating TRNC stadia articles!

I'd rather keep my anonymity.

PSCC

That was a pleasant surprise! I work very near that venue. Nice place. :) - Lucky 6.9 03:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American Hockey League

Thanks for helping out with the Aldege "Baz" Bastien Memorial Award article. Flibirigit 14:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your ice hockey articles

Hi there! It's great you have written so many ice hockey-related articles! However, please remember to use past tense (ie., 'He went on to win ...' instead of 'He would go on to win...'). If you could change that in all your contributions, that would be great! Cheers! Yuser31415 02:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AHL overtime loss

Your comments are sought at this talk page. Talk:American_Hockey_League#Overtime_Loss. Thanks! !!!! Flibirigit 18:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Manchester United players

Thanks for the link. That website does have Alfred Steward but misspelled his surname (Alfred Stewart). Yes, Alf Steward=Alfred Steward. I didn't bother to look for the Alf Steward article assuming that no one created it yet. Silly me, ;) --Crzy cheetah 04:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like Crzycheetah has answered the question. I agree it should be the same. As for whether you can help, I suppose you can just add more players to the list. Thanks for your help! Thaurisil 10:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you have added just about every player left on the List of Manchester United players. Thanks, that's really great! However, I would like to draw to your attention that some of the appearance counts of the players you have added are wrong. I think you may have read the appearance counts on this website wrongly. For example, for Harry Moger, you listed him as having 242 apps and 22 subs. However, the website lists him as having 242 league appearances and 22 FA Cup appearances. Also, that website only lists appearances in the league and the FA Cup, but not in other matches. In this other website, Harry Moger is listed as having 266 appearances with 2 appearances in "other matches". I have corrected their appearance counts, and a link to the edit can be found here. If you do not agree with me, feel free to revert the edit. Once again, thank you for your help and Merry Christmas! Thaurisil 15:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Palacio de los Deportes (Heredia)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Palacio de los Deportes (Heredia), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Palacio de los Deportes (Heredia). You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 22:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC) \ yeah it ok i added the expand tag for you to get evem more help okOo7565 05:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Republic of Saugeais national football team

I've nominated the article Republic of Saugeais national football team for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Republic of Saugeais national football team satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Saugeais national football team. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Republic of Saugeais national football team during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. Sandstein 22:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for South Lower Saxony national football team. Sandstein 23:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somaliland national football team, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rijeka national football team and probably more soon. Sandstein 20:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Manchester United F.C. players

I have nominated the List of Manchester United F.C. players to be a featured list. You may view the nomination here and state your support/objection. Thanks! Thaurisil 04:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SECC

You recently made an article on the Glasgow SECC Areana. From what it read, you were actually describing the SECC. I would have thought the Glasgow SECC Areana page should only be used for the upincoming building and not the current building on the Clyde. Your thoughts? -Coolmark18 15:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You think the changes I made are okay? I was looking for the 'planned building' box just before you put it there =p -Coolmark18 00:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navajo Nation national soccer team

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Navajo Nation national soccer team, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Fram 10:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-Purpose Events Center

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Multi-Purpose Events Center, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind if you remove the prod.TheRingess (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Malaya Sportivnaya Arena

I've nominated Malaya Sportivnaya Arena, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Malaya Sportivnaya Arena satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaya Sportivnaya Arena and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Malaya Sportivnaya Arena during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Inkpaduta 22:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

couple venues

i cannot find any sources about the john jay center on the campus of robert morris in pittsburgh....also, if you have anything on the atlanta memorial auditorium, also known as the atlanta city auditorium, that would be great...the southern conference tournament venues of the 1920s have been hard to come by. jjc is from the northeast conference. WillC 16:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Murray

Hello, Patken4. Just thought I'd let you know, you've created a Bob Murray page, that was already at Wikipedia. See Bob Murray (hockey player). Perhaps we could combine the 2 pages? GoodDay 19:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've created my 'Bob Murray' page, a mere 2-days before you created yours. Great minds, think alike. GoodDay 20:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campbell Center

THANKS! WillC 21:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR report

Generally, you should provide diffs of reverts when reporting there. However, the edits made by the anonymous user are obvious and disruptive vandalism. Reverting clear vandalism is an exception to the 3RR, however, you did do right to ask if you were unsure. I've warned the anonymous editor to stop, if it continues, report the user at WP:AIV. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Waldstadion (Aalen) and Städtisches Waldstadion

Hi Patken4, these two articles refer to the same stadium. It might help for your decision which one to keep, to know that the German article is at de:Städtisches Waldstadion Aalen, which is the official name, with "Städtisches" meaning "civic", however Waldstadion is the most common name. Cheers, --Dealerofsalvation 19:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPBiography

I notied that you were creating stubs on hockey players. When you start the talk page with {{ice hockey}}, could you also tag it with {{WPBiography|living=yes}} if the hockey player in question is still alive? Thanks. Hbdragon88 01:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Czech Republic, an attempt to build and maintain a large and neutral database of the Czech Republic-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the members section of WikiProject Czech Republic.

≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 10:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT

The correct syntax for DEFAULTSORT is {{DEFAULTSORT:sortkey}}

DEFAULTSORT is a magic word, not a template. For more info, see Help:Categories#Default sort key and Help:Magic words#Miscellany --DStoykov 20:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Daoust

Oh my, you just created the Dan Daoust article just as I was creating it. I was just starting before I flipped to another page when I flipped back someone else had already created it. Now there's a nice coincidence. Thanks for doing my work for me! lol. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 16:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How True. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 16:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow this is getting creepy, I knew you were gonna create the Iain Duncan page next cuz it was the only other one red-linked on my favourite personal creation NHL All-Rookie Team. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 16:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, there's almost a competition now between us to see who can create the articles for the best players in the dwindling articleless players pool. I think I'm done, because searching through the list I just can't see any more articles with any biographical meat on them, the last article I created today was of Bruce Crowder, and he played only 243 games and scored 98 points back in the 80s, and after him there's another significant drop off in career notability out of the players still without articles. But be sure to let me know if you somehow find someone else notable and manage to create an article about them. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 16:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree I think we basically have all of them. Friendly Competition is never a bad thing, I kinda have this competitive streak where I want to have the most (and most notable) NHL player articles created on Wikipedia, and SkudraFan1 gives me some competition there, its pretty stupid but its hard to argue with the results. Right now though I'm pretty much done creating stubs for awhile, I'm more going for maintenance, clicking on random player articles and making sure they are up to snuff.

Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 18:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:DEFAULTSORT

Great! Thanks! I was aware of it but I wasn't entirely sure how to do it or how it worked but I'll do it from now on. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 15:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joffre Desilets

Hello. Joffre Desilets, an article you recently created, does not properly cite its sources, as requested in WP:CITE. Please include a full citation for every source used in the article. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 18:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope

Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 02:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have done lot of articles about Finnish icehockey players. Please also add interwiki links to Finnish language Wikipedia [[fi:]] . --Zzzzzzzzzz 01:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People from categories

There is a lot of contention about the use of the people from categories. You seem to be using it to designate place of birth. From what I can tell this is against convention. Please respond before expending too much more time contributing to the project in this manner. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is that it is preferable to use people from categories to describe where people were raised or resided for legthy periods of time. A good example of a well policed category is Category:People_from_Wilmette,_Illinois. I have seen much debate at WP:CFD about proper uses of such categories. I am not sure everyone in Category:People from Chicago belongs there simply based on their birth. I concede that maybe they don't have a hospital in Wilmette and thus can't have births there. I am not sure.TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 19:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Articles

Hello there, I see all the new articles you have been creating here on Wikipedia - and I am trying to keep up with you! While I am busily assessing the articles with the WPBIO, could you also attach some tags to the article as well? {expand} and {unreferenced} if you can't get back to them to flesh them out? Also a {reflist} to automatically handle any references added in at a later date. Again, thank you and it has been - a challenge - to keep up with you! --Ozgod 03:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish ice hockey players

Are you creating articles about Finnish ice hockey players with some pre-defined template? I had to fix several of your articles that contained misspelled surnames (they were missing the diacritics on ä and ö). Not only that, but some of them had interwiki links to the Finnish Wikipedia, which led to nonexistent articles even when I corrected their spelling. Also, Ilves is an ice hockey team, not a place, and the wikilink to Nokia goes to the mobile phone company - I think you meant Nokia, Finland. JIP | Talk 17:02, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball players new articles

Hello and thank you for your great work with creating that NHL players articles. I see you are now creating articles about baseball players. Please, insert always also a death year and place information. Thank you. :) - Darwinek 19:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Including real full names would be good, too. - Darwinek 20:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Creation

A tag has been placed on Nemo Leibold, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

While I (and it seems others) appreciate your dedication to producing content, I think your efforts can be utilized by focusing on quality not quantity. Every article you have created (that i have reviewed) seems to do nothing more than list what teams a baseball player played for, the dates of birth & death (if applicable), and a snipet of information. These articles all meet the WP:SPEEDY criteria. I have marked a number of your pages as such. It would be great for you to spend some time creating articles with referenced content that does more than just state a bare boned list of facts. I will be happy to provide you with some examples of articles that are created with good content. Nothing personal and be well! I have marked this page for watching, if you want to continue discussing, we can do so on here. //Tecmobowl 00:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, they are basic stub articles. They contain basic information about the subject matter. All the information is properly sourced. If the articles were to be expanded, they would currently have a decent introductory paragraph. I don't see anything in WP:STUB that would disqualify the articles. Patken4 00:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate the effort to create stub articles, these creations do not merit inclusion in wiki at this time. Here is an example of a stub article that I wrote. It is an attempt to communicate a reasonable amount of information about the person so that it can be expanded on further at a later date. Be well. //Tecmobowl 00:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tecmobowl, if one of your reasons to delete these is that you're afraid no one will come along and improve on them, this can be easily corrected. If the baseball project has a list of articles that need to be expanded, I can add links to these articles on that list. That way, all members can simply clink on a link and improve any article and all the articles would be in a central location. Patken4 01:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is certainly "one" of my reasons, but not the only reason. You are clearly dedicated to wiki's intent, I just think we have different ways of going about it. I would love to bring in some more people to discuss this, and am open to suggestions on how to do that. I do not think that an article on a professional athlete where very little information is provided qualifies as a good stub. I too am guilty of this, so i don't want you to think I'm attacking you. During the 2007 NFL Draft, I was helping to create article stubs for athletes that were selected. I did the article for Laurent Robinson. As you can see, there is not much difference between that example, and articles you have created. I have been busy collecting information on Robinson, but if someone nominated that for deletion in the meantime, I would not complain. The fervor with which you create articles (which is quite impressive), leads me to believe you could not possibly enhance the articles and will not be doing so in the next day or so. I hope you see where I am coming from. Wikipedia is a powerful website and I would like the content to be as rich and as accurate as possible. // Tecmobowl 01:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of an infobox, there really isn't anything different between the Robinson article and my recently created articles. Robinson's article and, for example, Rick Camp, both have basic biographical information (birthdate, birth city) and a basic description of their nobility. Robinson's article adds height, weight, and college. They are both basic stubs. A stub does not need to be a good stub to stay. It just needs to assert nobility, cite sources, and provide a very basic biography of the subject. Expansion from that makes it a good stub. For example, this is how the Babe Ruth article looked for the first two months of existence. Granted, Wikipedia was far less known in 2001 than today. But the Ruth article at this point did not cite sources, did not signify itself as a stub (if they existed then), and did not categorize itself (once again, it existed then). If that article existed today, it would either be speedily deleted or an expansion tag added to it. Patken4 01:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I agree that the Laurent Robinson article is no different. If need be i can go place a {{db-author}} tag there. I agree that a basic biography is all that is necessary. However, I don't know that a line stating the teams the athlete played for suffices. Al Stump is a stub that I created that I believe does what is required. You will notice a couple of requests for citations, these came from a section of the Ty Cobb article. I am close to removing those as it does not appear anyone has been able to come up with a source for those statements. //Tecmobowl 02:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the assertion that these are valid stubs. I have removed the CSD template from all of the affected articles, as the CSD template was used incorrectly and I don't believe the nominations were done in good faith. See my response to Tecmobowl's post on my talk page for my reasoning. Caknuck 01:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well you just said the articles were not done in good faith, it's clear that you don't understand what that means. I have elaborated on your talk page and don't know how to continue this discussion with you. // Tecmobowl 01:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand perfectly what assuming good faith means. I invite you to review the three procedural anomalies I cited on my talk page. If you can reasonably explain your reasons for a) using CSD instead of AfD, b) not consulting the WikiProject prior to your mass nominations and c) targeting articles authored by one editor without discussing with the prior, then I will admit that my assumptions of bad faith were incorrect, and that this is just a procedural mistake. Caknuck 01:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After tagging the offending pages, I came here and left a tag AND a note. I don't believe I have anything else to say to you. Let's not clutter Patken4's talkpage with this aspect of the discussion. // Tecmobowl 01:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tecmo Banned Indefinitely. FYI--Tecmo has been banned indefinitely for repeated violations of Wiki policy.--Epeefleche 01:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot messages

I removed the myriad of bot messages from your talk page. I couldn't see what purpose the repetitive message were serving. Hope you don't mind. -- No Guru 06:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A message

I hope that you haven't left the project. Those baseball articles that you created are very valuable to Wikipedia and I encourage you to create more. Don't let the misguided actions of one editor drive you away. -- No Guru 16:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. You're filling a much needed gap in the wikirecord. While I don't presume to speak to the rest of WP:WPBB's Player Task Force, I know that *I* appreciate your efforts. Caknuck 20:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calling my actions misguided is just ridiculous. I made some edits and engaged in discussion about those eidts. Other editors reverted my edits and those have remained in place. What exactly is the problem with that? Further to the point, I have openly communicated that Patken4 was a productive editor to wiki. //Tecmobowl 20:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tecmo Banned Indefinitely. FYI--Tecmo has been banned indefinitely for repeated violations of Wiki policy.--Epeefleche 01:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patken...thanks for all the blue links. :)

Hey there. I want to thank you for giving everyone in my list an article. Stub or not, it is important that these people have articles, and I really appreciate you doing that. I can of course give the articles the once over and make them larger. But thanks for beginning them and thanks for staying on Wikipedia.

Keep in mind, however, that, since everyone on the list is finished...there will likely be a second list. There will be more red links. Try not to overwork yourself when you get to them. :) -- transaspie 23:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Some more thoughts==

I have spent some more time looking at the issue of stub creation and I must say I'm much closer to your side of the issue than the side I initially started on. The more I think about it, the better I like the fact that people take your approach. I generally focus on focusing my efforts on a small group of articles at a time. This works very well with your desire to create multiple pages. In the spirit of being more productive, I have an idea for you. There are some areas that allow for people to request new articles and to list articles that need improvement. Do you think there is a way to capitalize on your efforts to make sure the articles you create make a way into a well organized list? I just think the current situation needs some attention, and I would suspect that the community could benefit from these efforts. I would be happy to have this conversation on my talk page if you don't want the content here. //Tecmobowl 00:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know at the hockey project that I am a member of, we have a list of articles we have created in the last month or so. So as someone writes a basic stub, someone else will come along and add to it. However, this list only stays around for a month or two. If there were a list of articles that need improvement (probably best to break it down at the project of each sport instead of sports in general), then others can add to articles on that list. As an article gets better, it can come off the list. It could still be a good stub at that point, but at least it has been expanded. The only problem with this is some people who are unaware of the project won't add their articles to the list. But eventually someone on the project will see it and add it.

The other suggestion is to sub-categorize the expand command. Right now, it is broken down by date someone wanted the article expanded. It might be possible to direct those to the appropriate sport. I wouldn't know where to even start with this idea. Let me know your thoughts. Patken4 00:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Hope you don't mind, i wanted to keep my thoughts consistent with yours so i copied the info. I like the idea of creating a list of articles broken down by subject, we would be better off. I am hesitant to suggest something that relies heavily on my input, simply because I don't always have time to come on here and contribute. I also like your second idea, although I probably have less of an idea about where to start with that one than you do. Have you ever tried to start a "drive" or a project initiative (or whatever it is called on here). // Tecmobowl 01:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. One thing I've noticed at the hockey project is we do have everything categorized on the article's talk page. What we do is add a link to the project on the talk page and someone will later categorize the article on the talk page (stub, start, A-class, B-class, GA, FA). Here is the link. We do currently have a lot of unassessed articles, but those slowly dwindle. I would think most sports would have something like this available to them. This is probably the quickest way to getting what you want done. Patken4 01:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Verb tense

Pat, for someone who has died, you don't say "he is a former professional baseball player", you say "he was a professional baseball player". Okay? DS 18:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Hi there,

When you create an article such as Stade Charles de Gaulle, please include the national stub template (which is {{Benin-stub}} in the case of Stade Charles de Gaulle). Thanks--Thomas.macmillan 18:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Székesfehérvár Ice Hall

I've nominated Székesfehérvár Ice Hall, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Székesfehérvár Ice Hall satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Székesfehérvár Ice Hall and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Székesfehérvár Ice Hall during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rackabello 02:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moose Goheen/Temp

A tag has been placed on Moose Goheen/Temp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

temporary copy of Moose Goheen, hasn't been touched since created on 2007-06-12T21:45:58 (UTC)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. It doesn't appear that you're still working with this temporary copy, so I've submitted it for the speedy delete. If you still need it, let me know and I'll untag it. --健次(derumi)^talk 21:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Hall of Fame

Hi Patken, yes I've noticed all the articles that you also made (it's nice when you see somebody who shares the same entusiasm, many articles that I wanted to create you already had created and I believe the same thing has happened with you) and also I want to congratulate for all the articles about the stadiums and arenas of the world that you have made.

Yes, I would like to finish all the articles on the College Football Hall of Fame. When I started there were missing a lot, some articles of members that were already done didn't tell that the were enshrined, and so on. However, I will be out on a vacation next week, so I won't be able to conribute much, but I appreciate your help (if you can, of course). My goal also is to have all the the articles of the players who have played at least 9 seasons in the NFL, and also of all the players taken in the first round of the NFL Draft.

Thank you again and take care.Gypaetus 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Patken4, I'll be leaving on the weekend so hopefully I start with a few articles, see you later.Gypaetus 19:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patken4, I just came back yesterday night, it was a good vacation, I saw a Seattle Seahawks scrimmage. I saw that you have begun the College Football Hall of Fame articles and that you're already in letter G. I hopefully continue in these days. Thank you for the great work. Gypaetus 18:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merges

Hi Patken, I would like to ask you for a favor: there are some articles of professional football players which are duplicated, I don't know how to merge or redirect, maybe you can help me. The articles are:

Thank you very much for your help. Gypaetus 18:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Patken4, I didn't know how to redirect pages, but I've learned on the spot. Those pages are fixed now.Gypaetus 23:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ice Hockey August 2007 Newsletter

edit

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter

Dear Patken4! You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up as a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey. The purpose of this newsletter is to update on the goings on of the project, as there have been major changes, and a lot of new recognized content in the past few weeks. If you are an inactive user, you probably won't recognize the new and improved state of the WikiProject!

From the project, Maxim.

edit

New recognized content

By Maxim
There have been a lot more Good and Featured articles written in the past few weeks. Here is a list:^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

Featured articles

Wayne Gretzky — Promoted on 2006-02-14; on Main Page on 2006-06-13
New Jersey Devils — Promoted on 2006-11-20; on Main Page on 2007-06-30
Martin Brodeur — Promoted on 2007-04-28
Fighting in ice hockey — Promoted on 2007-05-07; on Main Page on 2007-07-19
Dominik Hasek — Promoted on 2007-05-25

Good articles

Featured lists^[5]

Notes

^ All articles are in order of promotion, as written on the main WikiProject page; FA's have official dates of promotions.
^ A star represents a featured article or list
^ A green circle represents a good article
^ Stanley Cup is an A-Class article
^ The lists system differs from articles, and doesn't give an official date of promotion

edit

Article Improvement

By Maxim

Upon some discussion on the WikiProject talk page, the Article Improvement Drive page was revamped by Krm500 and Maxim. It was renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Article Improvement, and it includes two section. The first section is called articles in dire need of improvement. It list articles, usually important, that are in very poor shape. The second section is called requested help. Users list an article they request help improving a certain article, which will facilitate collaboration, which is the aim of any WikiProject. There is one article currently listed there, Henrik Lundqvist, here. The goal is to at least get it to Good article status.

edit

Diacritics

By Maxim

In the past few weeks, there has been quite heated discussion about the use of diacritics in article name. The current guideline is using diacritics in the pages of articles of all player names which require them, but redirects are exempt.

edit

Task forces

By Maxim
There have been two new task forces started within the WikiProject to coordinate major topics.

Sweden Ice Hockey task force

This task force was initiated by Krm500. Its current goal is to improve Henrik Lundqvist to Good or Featured article status. It covers all Swedish clubs, leagues and competitions and associated articles, players and coaches that are Swedish, or have played/coached for a Swedish club, and arenas in Sweden. They plan to eventually operate as a sort of a sub-project, which will have its own articles for creation, ranking importance and quality of articles, and co-ordinate article improvement. Its current members are Krm500, Bamsefar75, and CLAES.

New Jersey Devils task force

This task force was initiated by Bsroiaadn. Its goal is to improve New Jersey Devils to Featured Topic status. Although it currently meets the required article count, the task force wishes to improve it further. Its area of coverage is very similar to the Sweden Ice Hockey task force. Its members are Bsroiaadn, JHMM13, FutureNJGov, Sportskido8, Michael Greiner, JRWalko, and Soxrock.

edit

Requested Images

By Maxim
After discussion on the WikiProject talk page, Serte created a page for Requested Images. The page encourages users to license images for use on articles. The page also has section to request images for players, arenas, game situations, miscellaneous, and team and league logos. The page has been quite popular; since it was created on July 21, there have been six completed requests. There are four currently outstanding requests:

Patrik Eliáš — Photo of player, requested by Bsroiaadn
Scott Stevens — Photo of player, requested by Bsroiaadn
Daniel Alfredsson — Photo of player, requested by Maxim
Hart Trophy — Photo of the original Hart Trophy (retired in 1960), requested by Scorpion0422

edit

Article assessement completed

By Maxim
On July 12, Kaiser matias announced that he had completed assessing all the articles with a {{ice hockey}} tag, sorting them into Category:Unassessed Ice Hockey articles. Kaiser matias has ranked about 9000 articles in that category, and most were stubs, and "have no information at all", according to him. Everybody is encouraged to expand the stubs into real articles. This effort took around 5 months. A big thanks goes to Kaiser matias from me and all the project.

Note: You have received this newsletter because you have added your name here. If you wish to no longer receive this newsletter, please remove your name. From the automated Animum Delivery Bot (delivered on 19:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Hello WikiProject Ice Hockey/Participant

I am an advisor to the National Hockey League. With your help over the next few months I plan to review and correct any information on wikipedia relating to the National Hockey League, its franchises, players, executives and partership organisations. I am here to provide you with information. Your work is appreciated. --NHLsource 18:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester United F.C. seasons

This article is now a Featured List candidate. Please feel free to leave your comments at the candidacy page. - PeeJay 01:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Real Tamale United

Real Tamale United, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Real Tamale United satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Tamale United and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Real Tamale United during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Yamakiri on Firefox 00:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Man Utd league title winners

Wow, that's great work, mate. I didn't even think people were monitoring that page. Obviously those stubs will need a little cleanup, but you've made a great start there. Cheers. - PeeJay 00:00, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry McShane (footballer)

Hey there. Just wondering what source you used that states the above played for Blackpool? Neither of my (largely reliable) sources mention him. - Dudesleeper · Talk 09:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arena:MK or arena:mk?

The stadium is branded as stadium:mk - all lower case. Are you sure that the arena is using MK rather than mk? (yes, I know it is silly but we have to tell it like it is). [Although we are using "Stadium:mk" in body text in accordance with WP:Use English and so only the infobox uses the lower case s. But always lower case mk]. --John Maynard Friedman 12:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ice Hockey newsletter

edit

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter

Dear Patken4! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been more new thing going on at WP:HOCKEY, and I think this will help you to stay informed. Since the last newsletter sent out in August, there's been great changes. Read on to find out! Maxim_(talk)

This just in:
Maurice 'Rocket' Richard Trophy has just been promoted to featured list status, while the bot was delivering the newsletter. Maxim_(talk) 02:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I've just promoted Art Ross Trophy. And Clarence S. Campbell Bowl is at FLC. This should be the last update. Maxim_(talk) 00:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit

New recognized content

By Maxim

Especially due to the featured topic drive, there have been many new featured lists promoted concerning NHL awards. Here's the full list of all the 13 FL's promoted since the last newsletter.^[1]^[2]

There have been no new good articles or featured articles. Maurice 'Rocket' Richard Trophy has been given A-Class status due to multiple issues raised at FLC.

^ The last one, List of Calgary Flames players, is the only one not associated with the featured topic drive.
^ At the time of publishing, there were 5 lists at WP:FLC and 2 lists in the "Holding cell", as there's been an accepted guideline to not put more that 5 trophy lists at the same time to, "compensate for the sanity of the reviewers".

edit

Did You Know?

By Maxim
There have been 4 new articles featured in the Did You Know section? on the Main Page since August.

Wally Tatomir - August 4, 2007, authored by User:Maxim.
- ...that Wally Tatomir, head equipment manager of the Carolina Hurricanes, holds four patents on ice hockey-related equipment?
Mark Major - August 12, 2007, authored by User:Schmackity
- ...that ice hockey player Mark Major attained 355 penalty minutes during the 1997-98 AHL season for the Portland Pirates, where he averaged 4.5 penalty minutes a game and still holds the club record?
Garth Butcher - September 15, 2007, authored by User:Canuckle.
- ...that Garth Butcher was a member of Canada's first-ever gold medal team at the World Junior Ice Hockey Championships before becoming a pest and setting team records for penalty minutes in the National Hockey League?
AMP NHL Winter Classic - September 22, 2007, authored by User:Skudrafan1
- ..that the AMP NHL Winter Classic is scheduled to be the first regular-season outdoor National Hockey League game in the United States?

edit

Featured Topic Drive

By Maxim

Started by User:Scorpion0422, the aim of this drive is to make NHL awards a featured topic. A featured topic is basically a set of very high quality articles (good articles and featured articles/lists). In this case, the topic is NHL awards. Many users have helped, including Scorpion0422, Resolute, Serte, Hasek is the best, Maxim, Croat Canuck, Spike Wilbury, FutureNJGov, and T Rex/Dinosaur puppy. The progress has been very good; there are 12 featured lists promoted, and 2 good articles:

Hart Memorial Trophy (Scorpion)
James Norris Memorial Trophy (Scorpion)
Vezina Trophy (Scorpion)
Conn Smythe Trophy (Serte)
Frank J. Selke Trophy (FutureNJGov)
Lady Byng Memorial Trophy (Scorpion)
Lester B. Pearson Award (Scorpion)
Calder Memorial Trophy (Croat Canuck)
Bill Masterton Memorial Trophy (Maxim)
King Clancy Memorial Trophy (Maxim)
Jack Adams Award (Maxim)
Presidents' Trophy (Scorpion)
Stanley Cup (Earlier collaboration, very many involved)
Traditions and anecdotes associated with the Stanley Cup (Maxim)

Check the project page if you are interested in helping out. Although it's closer to being done than not, there's still work to be done. The next topic that might be tackled is Stanley Cup, but this remains purely speculative and in discussion.

Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. --Animum Delivery Bot 02:07, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Dickey-Stephens Park

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dickey-Stephens Park, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dickey-Stephens Park is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dickey-Stephens Park, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Vaughn

You created the Jon Vaughn page. I beefed it up this week. If you get a chance look it over because it will probably be on the main page in the WP:DYK section on Friday or Saturday (see hook at T:TDYK 10/15).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 13:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to comment on the baseball All-time roster standardization

Since you commented on the AfD debate for the Chicago Cubs All-time Roster, I thought you might have an interest in participating in a discussion on standardizing the baseball all-time roster articles. If you'd like to join in, the discussion is here. If not, please ignore this message. Thanks! --Fabrictramp 22:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Sports Arena

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Jackson Sports Arena, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 06:26, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK October 20

On 20 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jon Vaughn, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Andrew c ^[talk] 22:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most prolific article writers

A new list of the most prolific article writers is out and you're in the top 10. See description here Raul654 16:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Krylatskoe Sport Palace

Krylatskoe Sport Palace and Dynamo sports Palace are not the same building. Krylatskoe Sport Palace was inaugurated in 2006, a dome shaped building that can be seen via satellite at these coordinates 55.756835,37.442688 Please delete your redirect page. --ArnoldPettybone 01:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English Field

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article English Field, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of English Field. Brianyoumans (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium. Brianyoumans (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 46 support, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks for supporting me!

-Djsasso (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium

An article that you have been involved in editing, Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Tech Lacrosse and Soccer Stadium. Thank you. Brianyoumans (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pavlodar Central Stadium

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pavlodar Central Stadium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Pavlodar Central Stadium. DJBullfish (talk) 19:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gerard Gauthier

An editor has nominated Gerard Gauthier, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Gauthier and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

grumble

Ignore that last bit from me. I hit a wrong button and nominated one of your articles for speedy deletion. I undid that, then came here to undo the notice. As I was scrolling over to undo the change, I accidentally clicked on the link to revert my own edit as vandalism.

I'll figure out how to operate this computer eventually...*twiddle* Gromlakh (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Peterson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stacy Peterson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Stacy Peterson. SMS ^Talk 20:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tom Davies

I have nominated Tom Davies, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Davies (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Solumeiras (talk) 12:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Davies

I closed the AfD as it was my mistake creating it in the first place!! Anyway, thanks for that comment at AfD.. --Solumeiras (talk) 13:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album. Mdsummermsw (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

subst:adw|The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album}} Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album

An editor has nominated The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hastily Cobbled Together for a Fast Buck Album and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Thanks for editing the article I wrote on Travis Grant. Two questions: What does adding DEFAULTSORT do? What's the difference between Reflist and Reflist2? Thanks

Also, you might want to archive your talk page. It's getting very long. Enigma ^msg! 00:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Enigma ^msg! 05:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aragon Ballroom (Chicago)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aragon Ballroom (Chicago), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lonnylynn.com/Ballrooms/BRaragonIL.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Montreal Canadiens players

Hi. I removed George McAvoy, Ernie Laforce, Frank Mailley and Mickey Murray from the List of Montreal Canadiens players, and the latter three from the List of one-gamers in the National Hockey League. My reasoning is that both of those lists use hockeydb.com as their source, and hockeydb does not list any of those players as having played in the NHL. Can you reference the additions of those players? Hockeydb is quite reliable and, if it says those players never played in the NHL, I am inclined to believe it. Skudrafan1 (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow... I just noticed that you actually eliminated all the red links from List of Montreal Canadiens players. Bravo! Skudrafan1 (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, cool. I assumed you had a good reference for those players, or else you wouldn't have added them in the first place. Feel free to revert my removals of those players, but may I suggest that you add a reference to each of them (again, since hockeydb.com is the source listed for those lists)? Skudrafan1 (talk) 19:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter

edit

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter

Dear Patken4! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY; this newsletter will be sent every two weeks/months.

If you wish to not receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the newsletter mailing list. Thanks!

edit

New recognized content

By The Pancake of Heaven!
There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements:

2016 NHL Draft has been newly created and has immediately become a GA status article.
The Vancouver Canucks task force has become active again, thanks to Canuckian89!
J.D. Watt has been declined at WP:AFD.
Drafts related to the OHL have been published!

edit

Task forces

By The Pancake of Heaven!

We are working to create a new task force within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Pittsburgh Penguins. It hasn't been created yet; but it aims to expand articles based on former and current Pittsburgh Penguins players and articles. Good luck!

edit

New Administrators

Currently 0 promoted admins! Be the first one at WP:RFA.

edit

Featured Topic Drive

By Maxim

The original featured topic drive, initiated by Scorpion0422, has concluded succesfully. National Hockey League awards is now a featured topic, with 24 articles in total. Of them, 20 are featured lists, one is a featured article, and the other three are trophy articles that were too short to become featured lists. Eight users signed up to help out, shown here. The next Featured Topic hasn't been decided upon, and the ideas and organization for it fell apart. If you have any ideas, don't hesitate to share them at WT:HOCKEY.

edit

Notes

More editors are needed to help out with the newsletter. The newsletter creator doesn't have an infinite nor perfect supply of ideas, and thus he might omit some interesting news.
Portal:Ice hockey is being considered for featured status.
Should Chris Pronger have been suspended for more than eight games for stomping on Ryan Kesler? Vote here!
Help Patrik Stefan -- one of the greatest NHL draft busts -- become a GA status article.

Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. MonoBot (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ice Hockey March 2008 Newsletter

edit

WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter

Dear Patken4! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY; this newsletter will be sent every two weeks/months.

If you wish to not receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the newsletter mailing list. Thanks!

edit

New recognized content

By The Pancake of Heaven!
There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements:

2016 NHL Draft has been newly created and has immediately become a GA status article.
The Vancouver Canucks task force has become active again, thanks to Canuckian89!
J.D. Watt has been declined at WP:AFD.
Drafts related to the OHL have been published!

edit

Task forces

By The Pancake of Heaven!

We are working to create a new task force within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Pittsburgh Penguins. It hasn't been created yet; but it aims to expand articles based on former and current Pittsburgh Penguins players and articles. Good luck!

edit

New Administrators

Currently 0 promoted admins! Be the first one at WP:RFA.

edit

Featured Topic Drive

By Maxim

The original featured topic drive, initiated by Scorpion0422, has concluded succesfully. National Hockey League awards is now a featured topic, with 24 articles in total. Of them, 20 are featured lists, one is a featured article, and the other three are trophy articles that were too short to become featured lists. Eight users signed up to help out, shown here. The next Featured Topic hasn't been decided upon, and the ideas and organization for it fell apart. If you have any ideas, don't hesitate to share them at WT:HOCKEY.

edit

Notes

More editors are needed to help out with the newsletter. The newsletter creator doesn't have an infinite nor perfect supply of ideas, and thus he might omit some interesting news.
Portal:Ice hockey is being considered for featured status.
Should Chris Pronger have been suspended for more than eight games for stomping on Ryan Kesler? Vote here!
Help Patrik Stefan -- one of the greatest NHL draft busts -- become a GA status article.

Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. MonoBot (talk) 18:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Living hockey players

Just wanted to drop you a reminder to use the "Living people" category for any hockey players who are...well, still living, naturally :) --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 21:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join Saskatchewan WikiProject

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.

As you have shown an interest in Ed Cooper, Gary Aldcorn, Larry Sacharuk, Dick Meissner, Lane Lambert, Walter McCartney, Hubert Macey, Perry Ganchar , Louis Denis, Jerry Engele , Jack Church, Cal Swenson, Don Borgeson, Ross Perkins ,Dale Henry, Pat Lundy, etc we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.

Please assist with any ongoing requests

You might like to take an extra interest in our To Do list

Another project dedicated to Saskatchewan is the Saskatchewan Roads and Highways Wikiproject

Also, a descendant project for Saskatchewan is the WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 21:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to the Utah and Rhode Island college football venues tempates

Thank you for the links that you added to those templates. Gwguffey (talk) 01:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sports Stadiums

I checked your sandbox. One suggestion is that we keep this list based on current values: current capacity and currently in use or not.

It could have happened that once in a particular match, there was a huge attendance beyond the capacity of the stadium, but that's basically a fault of organizers. They should not have allowed people more than they can accommodate safely. And its also a trivia that once so many people attended and only once so happened. Current capacity of the stadium looks like a better criteria for ranking. If you agree, you can drop the column for maximum capacity.

For the other point, currently in use for sports or not, for example Strahov Stadium is not used for sports anymore, its just a training ground for now and it may make way for other use in future. So, I would suggest moving it to the second table. Also, some stadiums can accommodate more people when the stadium is used for concerts. But, here we are considering only sports use. So, either max capacity or current capacity should not be considered if it is not for sports use.

Also, another point you may consider. Some users wrote in the discussion page about why states for US stadiums are not mentioned. I think it is better to add State/Province information in Location info, as far as possible, for all entries. If you need help for this, I can help.GDibyendu (talk) 09:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in present list also, there are Stadiums with less than 100,000 capacity - nothing wrong about keeping it that way. But, currently it does not have maximum capacity column now, so that's a change.

If you want to add it, then you should be also able to provide information whether the default max capacity was ever attained or not. And another logic is that: 'capacity' always means how many it can accommodate, not exactly how many were actually present on certain days. Also, for such a case, there will be difference in official and unofficial numbers and in some cases, you'll find that not all the people were able to reach the gallery and all. These type of info can be there in stadium-specific page, but list can avoid those details and stick to official capacity without bothering about whether it was ever full/over-crowded or not. BTW, I am personally not against the addition of the column, but it does not seem logical to me to rank the stadiums based on one day's crowd.

About State/Province info, for example, the largest stadium's location is actually Speedway, Indiana, USA. It's surrounded by Indianapolis city but it's a different town officially. If the state is not specified, then just mentioning Speedway, USA does not give clear picture about where exactly it lies. Current list mentions the location of this stadium as Indianapolis, USA (which is more well-known place).

Anyway, you can discuss these issues in the discussion page of the current wikipage also so that you can get more views on these.GDibyendu (talk) 06:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well Done, man. It's better that you have created a new page with clear cut definition of what it contains. Changing the old page could have caused edit wars or disagreement (in including racing tracks) etc. GDibyendu (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glaspalast (Ludwigsburg)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Glaspalast (Ludwigsburg), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Glaspalast (Ludwigsburg). Cactus26 (talk) 11:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of König Palast

A tag has been placed on König Palast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM on a public computer 19:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea

Yea thats fine. Jwalte04 (talk) 23:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hi, I saw some of the new NFL players articles you made and wanted to ask you if you could please use the Template:Infobox NFLretired, instead of the old one, the old one isnt being used anymore, thanks.--Yankees10 21:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie

Just stopping by with cookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man!

Hey man how have YOU been!

Good day?

Rectorshield (talk) 11:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Estadio de Beisbol Lic.Eduardo Vasconcelos

I have nominated Estadio de Beisbol Lic.Eduardo Vasconcelos, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio de Beisbol Lic.Eduardo Vasconcelos. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - -[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 05:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sports facilities

Hi, Patken4. Thank you for joining WikiProject Sports facilities. As you can see, there is an attempt begin made to try and get the project back up to active status. Your contributions towards fleshing out the future of the project would be very much welcomed. Also, check out the project's talk page and give your thoughts on the proposal to merge/expand the project to a broader scope. Your opinion on the topic would be appreciated. --Gwguffey (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions

Hey. When creating baseball articles, make sure to follow the naming conventions at WP:NC-BASE. For example, your Ward Miller articles should've been created as Ward Miller (baseball). Keep up the good work. Wizardman 17:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

		The Original Barnstar
		For taking on and completing the task of creating at least eleven articles I requested: Al Demaree, George Chalmers, Hugh McQuillan, Mule Watson, Virgil Barnes, Curly Ogden, Emil Yde, Monte Weaver, Ernie White, Sig Jakucki, and Gary Waslewski. Thanks! Kingturtle (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Can you please see Template:Infobox NFLretired#Parameters, because I saw some of the infoboxes you added to the new articles, and it doesnt seem that you know how it works, if you have any questions just ask, thanks--Yankees10 23:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Carisbrook

Hi Patken - just to let you know that I've moved New Carisbrook to Awatea Street Stadium, the name by which the proposed stadium is better known here in Dunedin, also the name used most widely in the press. Grutness...wha? 00:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on WikiProject Sports facilities

Hi, Patken4. I just read your response to the planned stadium template, but I'm afraid I don't understand it. Is there a typo or am I just being dumb? (probably, I'm just being dumb...) Anyway, a clarification would help me out. --Gwguffey (talk) 15:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estádio da Ferrovia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Estádio da Ferrovia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stadium notability

Hi. I noticed that you are creating articles about stadiums. What exactly it your notability criteria for these stadiums? How many people must it seat for it to be notable? Don't you think that a better place for information about these few-thousand-seat-stadiums is the city or town where the stadium is located? --brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:43, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bryant-Denny Stadium

Last time I checked, the LA Coliseum was around 94,000. I'm checking up on that though.CH52584 (talk) 00:00, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Omaha ballpark

Hey Patken4, just a quick note to say thanks for starting this article. Please feel free to jump in on any of the sports facilities in Omaha, or any other topic you choose related to the city. • Freechild'sup? 13:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chattahoochee Valley Vipers

I have nominated Chattahoochee Valley Vipers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chattahoochee Valley Vipers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 22:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should indoor velodromes be counted as indoor arenas?

Wondering what you think? P.S thanks for helping to revert bad edits to the lists I created. Willy turner (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason I asked is that i came across the Gwangmyeong Velodrome, which has a capacity of 30,000. Should it be added to your List of indoor arenas by capacity, or not? Willy turner (talk) 22:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Derrick Hoskins

Hi, I hate to bother you, but do you have any references to prove this person is notable? Bearian (talk) 23:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I assume he must have actually played. Bearian (talk) 14:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United players

Hey man, good to see that my list is actually serving a purpose to people other than myself! The problem with the players in question is that they all played before 1945, so information on them is limited. The book Football League Players Records 1888-1939 would be very useful, but unfortunately the cheapest copy on Amazon is still £25. If I manage to find any sort of biographical information about said players, I will surely keep you aprised. In the meantime, if you want to do some more digging yourself, that would be fantastic. – Pee Jay 21:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ever so much for doing all those stubs. I'll try to compile a list of all United players with 25-49 appearances who are still without articles if you feel up to it! Either that or we could just work through all the redlinks on the page together. – Pee Jay 00:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair dos. I'm doing the list of 25-49 appearance players right now. Should be done within the hour! Good luck with the players with 10+ goals. – Pee Jay 00:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now completed the list of Man Utd players who are currently without articles, and it is split into 25-49 appearances, 10-24 appearances, 5-9 appearances, 2-4 appearances and 1 appearance sections. I hope this will encourage anyone who views my page to create an article or two (or three!) – Pee Jay 15:44, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Charlie Radford

A tag has been placed on Charlie Radford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rtyq2 (talk) 00:15, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United player list correction

Cheers for the correction mate. I've made the amendment now. – Pee Jay 19:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Rube Schauer

A tag has been placed on Rube Schauer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Irunongames (talk) 21:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sports venues

Hi there is a current proposal at stub sorting to split the European sports venue stubs. However to split by category we need 60 articles per category. Any chance any of the following countries have more venues and could be pushed over 60? Count Blofeld 09:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. Count Blofeld 22:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pabellón Polideportivo Municipal Fernando Argüelles

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pabellón Polideportivo Municipal Fernando Argüelles, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Seemingly unnotable local sports arena. Google web and news archive searches only come up with a few passing mentions

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bristol Arena

I have nominated Bristol Arena, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bristol Arena. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TimTay (talk) 09:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Cairns

I'm tempted to go with the StretfordEnd.co.uk data until I can check my physical sources. Unfortunately, I won't be able to access those for another few weeks as I've come home from uni for Christmas. I would suggest holding off on creating the James Cairns article(s) just yet. – Pee Jay 20:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just had another thought. Since the placeholder link for James Cairns goes to James Cairns (footballer), why not write as though it's one individual at that location. If the article needs splitting later, then so be it, but I think we ought to go by what the club's official stats site says. – Pee Jay 16:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man. I've just had an email back from StretfordEnd.co.uk, and they've confirmed for me that, as far as they know, the two James Cairnses that are listed elsewhere are in fact the same person. He merely played in a different position in his second spell at the club. – Pee Jay 10:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I, PeeJay, hereby award you the Working Man's Barnstar in recognition of your work in creating stub articles for each and every one of the remaining Manchester United players. KUTGW! – Pee Jay 20:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, man. You deserve it for all that work you've done over the last few weeks! :-) – Pee Jay 21:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

When creating articles for the Indonesia project - it would be appreciated if you could tag the project on the discussion/talk page so that they are incorporated into the project - thanks Satu Suro 12:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Persigo Gorontalo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Persigo Gorontalo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability. who are they?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Merbabu (talk) 12:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Persibo Bojonegoro

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Persibo Bojonegoro, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Merbabu (talk) 12:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Professional

Not a WP:RS in sight - if you remove a prod please either find at least a web link or WP:RS - as it is your word against anybody elses if there is nothing for WP:V - thanks Satu Suro 14:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio Chihuahua

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Estadio Chihuahua, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Local sports facility without claim towards notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Colombo Cricket Club Ground

On 1 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Colombo Cricket Club Ground, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Tip-'O-the-Day!

Have you ever thought about archiving your talk page?

Food for thought. - 4.240.159.216 (talk) 23:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mikel John Obi

I'm not sure about that one. From what I understand, Obi was never a Manchester United player, and the money we received for him was a compensation package agreed by a tribunal committee. – Pee Jay 18:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

... for work on Manchester United player articles. I appreciated the time put in while creating a season article. Calebrw (talk) 22:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Packers articles

Ahhhh I didn't even think of that! Thanks for going through and adding all the categories. I will definitely add that to my template for future articles. Thanks again! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 04:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio Zapote

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Estadio Zapote, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

It has virtually no sources and it's basically one sentence; not even of stub quality

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Crackthewhip775 (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Football player articles

Hi, I see that you make a bunch of articles on former American football players and I was wondering if you wanted to create more. I have a list of some players dont have articles, and I can just leave you the redlinks on your page, if you are interested. I have a bunch of guys like J. P. Machado or Mark Gunn. So if you are intersted I can just leave you some more--Yankees10 00:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great!, I got like 100 or something, I did this way back in the April of 2008, but never got to them, and then I realized recently, that you do a great job in creating baseball and football player articles, so I thought you would be interested. Also great idea about the subpage at WP:NFL, Ill be sure to do that over the weekend. Should I start leaving you some of the names.--Yankees10 00:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hers some:Ray Farmer, Lyle West, Kerry Glenn, James Pruitt, Rickey Watts, Walt Williams (American football), Anthony Marshall (American football), Anthony Harris (American football), Derrick Harris, Joe Prokop. Tell me if you want more, or if this is good for now--Yankees10 00:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ill do that, thanks--Yankees10 01:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What should I name the page, should I name it WP:NFL/Articles to create--Yankees10 16:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

alright thanks--Yankees10 16:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I created it at Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Articles to create, theres still a bunch more I'll add, but you can start creating now if you want.--Yankees10 17:16, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just have one request, it was agreed that the flags should not be used in the infobox, thanks--Yankees10 19:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Colliflower

Please review the additions I made to Harry Colliflower, a stub you created. Have a great day! Flibirigit (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Smith

yeah the O-lineman. Do you use Pro-Football-Reference.com?--Yankees10 00:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think that PFR is the better site, it shows many more things on the player pages like the Pro Bowl years, All-Pro years, tackles, whether they were starters, and rankings. Another thing DB isnt that great with is the names, for example DB has Junior Wren as Lowe Wren, but meanwhile PFR and other websites have it as Junior. Thats why I dont use that website --Yankees10 00:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Haman Stadium

I have nominated Haman Stadium, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haman Stadium. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. T-H (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tony Grimshaw

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tony Grimshaw, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as has never played in a fully-pro league.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Giant Snowman 19:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Junak Arena

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Junak Arena, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The object is not notable (it even doesn't exist). As of May 2008 (the article is created in 2006) it's not clear if there will be a hall (variants with 2000 and 10000 person capacity are discussed) or an open playground. I don't find more recent news about the project. Construction works never started on the site.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nk (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Marshall Islands national football team

I have nominated Marshall Islands national football team, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marshall Islands national football team. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stu.W UK (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Miami Beach Convention Center

A tag has been placed on Miami Beach Convention Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Regards,--Tilla2501 (talk) 23:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

I've been meaning to give you this for a while

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For all your great football, baseball, etc creations Yankees10 20:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you deserve it for all your great work--Yankees10 21:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madison Square Garden (1925)

Hi, I have nominated one of your articles Madison Square Garden (1925) to Did you know. For the nom to be successful, the article needs more citations. Since I didn't write the article, I am wondering you can help. Thanks and good luck.—Chris! _ct 05:23, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Aaron Robinson (footballer)

I have nominated Aaron Robinson (footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Robinson (footballer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stu.W UK (talk) 11:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Albany Municipal Coliseum

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Albany Municipal Coliseum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for nearly three years, fails WP:V

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abbott Memorial Alumni Stadium

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Abbott Memorial Alumni Stadium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for nearly three years, fails WP:V

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Abbott Memorial Alumni Stadium

I have nominated Abbott Memorial Alumni Stadium, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbott Memorial Alumni Stadium. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stifle (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Albany Municipal Coliseum

I have nominated Albany Municipal Coliseum, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albany Municipal Coliseum. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stifle (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ascot racecourse

Yes I can, It's Wikipedia page about it says (and I quote) "Over 300,000 people make the annual visit to Berkshire during Royal Ascot week, making this Europe’s best-attended race meeting." which states that Ascot has had more than 100,000 people attending it and so it can be included on the list. The C of E (talk) 06:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vince Pazzetti

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vince Pazzetti, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP for non-professional athlete.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Drawn Some (talk) 02:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: a few things

I'm not quite sure that that would work because the former stadium lists give the Article a bit more substance if you know what i'm saying).

I think that your idea of lowering the minimum capacity limit to 30,000 would be a good idea (why don't we make it 35,000?) because I'm sure theres several other notible stadia that aren't in this list due to the minimum capcity being to high, that should be. The C of E (talk) 16:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gary Jones (American football)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gary Jones (American football), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Subject is not notable, having played for professional teams, but not achieving anything worthwhile.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Becky Sayles (talk) 06:44, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of closed stadiums by capacity

Great list, must have been some work to get all the information together! I was wondering about the Olympic Stadium (Munich). It is still used for concerts and other sports, I don't think it quite fits the inclusion criteria. Also, what about a Futures list at the bottom with stadium that are known for certain to close soon, like the Rosenaustadion? Might make it easier to keep the list up to date. Anyway, great work, EA210269 (talk) 09:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wembley

I didn't add that section about Wembley The C of E (talk) 11:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lloyd Klein

I have nominated Lloyd Klein, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Klein. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WuhWuzDat 19:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New List Article assistance

Dear Patken4

I have just created a new list article here called List of stadium stands by capacity and I wondered if you'd like to help contribute to it The C of E (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ESPN

Nice spot mate! Cheers :-D – Pee Jay 19:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of New Finn Harps Stadium

I have nominated New Finn Harps Stadium, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Finn Harps Stadium. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pookeo9 ^{Talk If you need anything} 11:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of AEL Arena

I have nominated AEL Arena, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AEL Arena. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pookeo9 ^{Talk If you need anything} 23:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Misnomer

Please move this article. Explanation on the discussion page. Hazaña17 (talk) 12:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Hazaña17 (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey Stubs

Hi. If you're going to create dozens of hockey player stubs, could you please at least use Hockey Reference.com, which prints dates of death when they are available, instead of just dates of birth? That way, no one has to go back and properly complete the article. Also please be careful not to create duplicate articles, particularly on players that you yourself created the article for in the past. Cheers, CP 18:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogor_Stadium - Bogor is in West Java - and in the text you put Surabaya - which is in East Java - please be more careful when creating these massive lists of stadiums - geographically challenged stubs are an embarassment Satu Suro 00:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Daultan Leveille

I have nominated Daultan Leveille, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daultan Leveille. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 12:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Patken4! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 114 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Art Hauser - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Glenn Holtzman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vic Zucco - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dave Frye - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jimmy Jones (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sherman Howard (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hurvin McCormack - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ken Johnson (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
John Johnson (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Charley Scales - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. Freddie L. Solomon

12. Gordon Jones (American football)

13. Clay Shiver

14. Ken Blackman

15. James Atkins (offensive tackle)

16. Wayne Radloff

17. Jason Ball (American football)

18. Tony Berti

19. Matt Darwin

20. Lance Scott

21. Chris Port

22. Pratt Lyons

23. John Richardson (American football)

24. Tyrone Robertson

25. Randy Edwards

26. Shawn Patterson

27. Benny Perrin

28. Michael Hunt

29. Bruce Herron

30. K. D. Williams

31. Pat Shea (American football)

32. Kevin Westgarth

33. Derrick Hoskins

34. Rod Gilmore

35. Andrés Mora

36. Don Oakes

37. Gordon Robertson (ice hockey)

38. Robert Dickson (ice hockey)

39. Bob Barton

40. Glen Richardson

41. Alex Grant (musician)

42. Paul Mitchell (baseball)

43. Denis Morel

44. Anthony Allen (American football)

45. Matt Cushing

46. Jessie Small

47. Damon Jones (American football)

48. Ryan Wetnight

49. Dick Strahm

50. Fred Martinelli

51. Chuck Klausing

52. Joe Fusco

53. Jim Christopherson

54. Marino Casem

55. Aurealius Thomas

56. Kevin Dent

57. M. L. Harris

58. Laurie Walquist

59. Tyrone Keys

60. Adam Piatt

61. Jiří Kochta

62. Josef Horešovský

63. Richard Farda

64. Vladimir Yurzinov

65. Jiří Králík

66. Jiří Lála

67. Jiří Holík

68. Bohuslav Ebermann

69. Mats Waltin

70. Mats Åhlberg

71. Juha Rantasila

72. Viktor Zhlukyov

73. Victor Shalimov

74. Vladimir Shadrin

75. Boris Mayorov

76. Vladimir Lutchenko

77. Sergei Babinov

78. Urpo Ylönen

79. Jorma Valtonen

80. Jorma Vehmanen

81. Jorma Peltonen

82. Esa Peltonen

83. Timo Nummelin

84. Mika Nieminen

85. Pekka Marjamäki

86. Raimo Kilpiö

87. Matti Keinonen

88. Rick Paterson

89. Terry Caffery

90. Andrew Lorraine

91. Jerry Reed (baseball)

92. Jacob Cruz

93. J. R. Phillips

94. Eric Yelding

95. Jeff Tabaka

96. Masato Yoshii

97. Lorenzo Hampton

98. Chuck Nelson

99. Steve Myhra

100. Brent McClanahan

101. Alex Arias

102. Ron Heller (tight end)

103. Vernon Perry

104. Dokie Williams

105. Vince Workman

106. John Fourcade

107. Danny O'Shea (ice hockey)

108. Dollard St. Laurent

109. Murray Wilson

110. Howard Griffith

111. Tom Beck

112. Walter Byers

113. Don Marshall

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

On earning the Working Man's Barnstar for your tireless creating of football stadiums! Your output is prodigious! Lou2u (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Venues of the 2016 Summer Olympics

Hi Patken4! I saw that you have created some articles about the venues of the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro... Could you create the remaining articles to avoid red links in {{Rio de Janeiro bid venues for the 2016 Summer Olympics}} and Venues of the 2016 Summer Olympics? Regards; Felipe Menegaz 00:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Are you there? Felipe Menegaz 22:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the impatience. About those articles you mentioned, I'll take care. Regards; Felipe Menegaz 23:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dave Barnett

I have nominated Dave Barnett, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Barnett. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Blue Rasberry 03:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References and External links

Hi, I noticed on a number of articles such as Micheal Haley you started you put a reference but put it in the external link section. I suggest you create a reference section when you are adding references else other editors are going to prod, tag and otherwise start removal of your articles. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 18:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DSC Indoor Arena

The article DSC Indoor Arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never built. The tennis tourney mentioned in the article was not held.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 04:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Physical Fitness Center

The article Physical Fitness Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dwayne Reed (talk) 00:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Euro 2016

Hi Patken4!

I have a website. subject: Euro 2016 ^[3]

Would you like to become an editor? We need editors who can speak English.

Please contact me: nilbek@hotmail.com.tr or tr:User:Nazif_İLBEK

Nazif İLBEK (talk) 08:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:30, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Estadio Guillermo Soto Rosa

A tag has been placed on Estadio Guillermo Soto Rosa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Crazynas^t 12:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Hansis

Not sure if you noticed, but the lead for the article on Ron Hansis refers instead to Bobby Reynolds. I don't know whether the error's in the page title or the text. regards. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 20:08, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Barnett

The article Dave Barnett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 00:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ron Abegglen

The article Ron Abegglen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 23:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shakira Tour

Apologies --Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:24, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thank you for your contributions to the Austin F1 Circuit. It's much appreciated. Wiki id2 (talk) 11:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stadiums

No worries Patken, im sorry, I didnt mean to be rude. I appreciate that without your help all the lists of stadiums pages would have been utterly ruined by now. If you agree with my points about the whole seating capacity vs. total capacity thing it would be good if you said so on the talk page, so we can show the idiots there is consensus. Perhaps a sentence in the lead stating that the page goes by official capacity rather than record attendance would clear that issue up? Also, if you agree with my suggestion that all edits to capacity that dont cite an official source will be reverted, please state your agreement in the "references" section of the talk page. That way, it wouldnt be too controversial or difficult if one of us reverted all offending edits, say, once a week. I wonder, would you support an attempt to ban new or unregistered users editing any of our problematic pages? I presume our request would have more chance of success if we were both behind it. Cheers, Willy turner (talk) 00:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. I wasn't actually aware of the issue of people altering capacities to take account of new record attendances; probably because I unfortunately have had to spend several months away from wikipedia to do stuff in that dastardly "real world". (ie. trying to get a university degree) I will be going back to uni in about a month, so you might want to try recruiting another sane, reasonable "stadiophile" to help you battle the vandals. I suggest we start a section in the talk page explicitly stating that the page deals with official capacities, not record attendances. If you start said section on the talk page I will back you up 100%. One does feel some sort of sympathy for the people making these edits, because it is confusing when a stadium hosts an attendance in excess of its official capacity. I admit I do not completely understand how this is possible, other than by shoving more people in than is safe. Can you enlighten me on this issue? However if the list is to have any sense and consistency it clearly must be arranged by official capacity. Perhaps you would be interested in making a "List of stadiums by record attendance", or a similar list that was confined to the US, or just College Football? Something along the lines of Record attendances of English football clubs. That way we could deflect the problem users to that page. However I think the easiest way of dealing with this is to make the aforementioned statement on the talk page, continue mercilessly reverting bad edits (each time pointing out said consensus on talk page), recruit other like-minded people to help us, and seek semi-protection for any problem pages. BTW, do you read the skyscrapercity forum on stadiums? It seems pretty much the premier online forum for stadium enthusiasts; perhaps we could recruit some of them to help our lists? Cheers, Willy turner (talk) 01:18, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caribbean Cup

Hi, I saw that you're quite proficient in the creation of football stadiums and with the upcoming Caribbean Cup in Martinique one of the venues does not have an article. After your good work with Victoria Park, I thought you might be able to create the Stade En Camée which is in Rivière-Pilote, where one of the groups is being hosted. Thanks and good luck. --Spartan008 (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melville Stadium

The article Melville Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:RS when checking search engines. Feel free to ignore this message if you have due reason to believe that this message was sent by mistake, but respond on the talk page, please.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zucchinidreams (talk) 17:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arena de Lachine

A group of us are working on clearing the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article in the above header has been without sources for the past four years and may be removed if none are added. I wonder if you can help do so. Sincerely, your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kralendijk Municipal Stadion

The article Kralendijk Municipal Stadion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant published (gBooks) mention fails, WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 17:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sky Bank Arena

The article Sky Bank Arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable stadium, no sources available to verify article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mipo Stadium

The article Mipo Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no support for this article, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leroy Thompson (running back)

The article Leroy Thompson (running back) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 03:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Sykes

Please review my additions to Phil Sykes.Sandcherry (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To merge the article of Honda Civic hybrid into Honda Civic

Hi. I just noticed from the discussion page of Honda Civic Hybrid that you had participated in previous discussion of merging the article of Civic hybrid into that of Civic. Currently, there's a renewed similar discussion here. Please feel free to drop a line. ---North wiki (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NEIU Physical Education Complex

The article NEIU Physical Education Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found a few promotional web hits and no published (gbook) WP:RS, fails WP:V and WP:N, Does it exist; yes, are there reliable sources for any of the article content; No

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edgar Wilson (footballer) for deletion

The article Edgar Wilson (footballer) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar Wilson (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imyourfoot (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sportzentrum Maspernplatz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sportzentrum Maspernplatz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 06:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Moluccas national football team for deletion

The article South Moluccas national football team is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Moluccas national football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stu.W UK (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Estadio Juan Carlos Durán

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Estadio Juan Carlos Durán, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.worldstadiums.com/stadium_pictures/south_america/bolivia/santa_cruz_saucedo.shtml.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thunder Castle Stadium

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Thunder Castle Stadium, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.thaifootball.com/webboard/index.php?topic=968.0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahrawi national football team

The article Sahrawi national football team has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and gives no evidence of notability. The fedefutbol link says there is no match history for this team.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stu.W UK (talk) 18:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sahrawi national football team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sahrawi national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahrawi national football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stu.W UK (talk) 21:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of S. R. Bhosle Krida Sankul Stadium

The article S. R. Bhosle Krida Sankul Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I dont find any information on this stadium in Google News or Google Book Search, in fact I have never heard of it before

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 07:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ocean City Convention Center

The article Ocean City Convention Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found the external link just added to this article. I am pretty sure the roland-e-powell-convention-center is not what is being described in this article. I looked around ococean.com and did not find support for this article as written. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Day of Spring!

Theres nothing like seeing a field full of spring flowers.

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring 2011! Mifter (talk) 20:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn 2011!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to there talk page with a friendly message.

Don Gault

Hi, I'm confused by the Don Gault article, which I see you started. It starts off talking about someone called Bud Schwenk. As I know nothing about the subject I've simply put a "cleanup" tag on it.--A bit iffy (talk) 15:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy Note: Deletion Review of Nail Yakupov

He won OHL:ROY now; no announcement of CHL award yet far as I know. As you commented in the deletion discussion, your further opinion is welcome at the deletion review. CycloneGU (talk) 05:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I see your talk page is over 200,000 bytes. Would you like assistance archiving it? CycloneGU (talk) 05:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hugh Kerr (footballer)

The article Hugh Kerr (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hydrolysed (talk) 18:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of USMA Stadium

The article USMA Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stadium was never built, article is unsourced, no mentions in news/on internet

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TonyStarks (talk) 04:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Community Maritime Park

The article Community Maritime Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, not yet constructed, stadium. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 16:58, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pingtung Baseball Field

The article Pingtung Baseball Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published WP:RS works referencing this subject, fails WP:N, the Taiwan language article does not contain WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Patken4! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Yale Field (1884)

I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Yale Field (1884) in the New Articles list-- The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing.Jipinghe (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dubai Sports City‎

The article Dubai Sports City‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Longwayround (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bubba Green (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Baltimore Colts

Rusty Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Punter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Boris Shlapak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltimore Colts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Plaza de Toros de Jaén, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaén (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iowa Fight Song for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iowa Fight Song is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iowa Fight Song until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PG Pirate 23:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of On Iowa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On Iowa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On Iowa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PG Pirate 23:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Sedgefield Country Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donald Ross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Athletics Center Arena - aka O'Rena

A tag has been placed on Athletics Center Arena - aka O'Rena, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. X96lee15 (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Phil Emery (American football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgetown College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lehigh Valley Phantoms

I don't plan on recreating the article but there is proof and announcements that the team is coming. They are knocking down buildings and a website has been launched. There was proof, you said there wasn't! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolinapanthers17 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Coughlin–Alumni Stadium

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Coughlin–Alumni Stadium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mike Fultz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltimore Colts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For openers ...

		The Hockey Barnstar
		For all your fine hockey work over the years ... you’re part of the original Hockey Barnstar class! Ravenswing 21:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Hagberg

You created his article. I am just writing to inform you he is not a living person. Hagberg died in a 1970 auto accident. I edited his article. You might want to further neaten it up.

If you reply to this, please write here and not at my talk page...William 15:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio José María Bértora

The article Estadio José María Bértora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over five years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio José Bernardo Pérez

The article Estadio José Bernardo Pérez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over five years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio Bachiller Julio H. Molina

The article Estadio Bachiller Julio H. Molina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over five years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio José Pérez Colmenares

The article Estadio José Pérez Colmenares has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over five years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio 10 de Diciembre

The article Estadio 10 de Diciembre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for over five years, fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Pepperdine Waves men's basketball, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malibu and Doug Christie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NHOCKEY

You might want to take a look at WP:NHOCKEY it changed a year or so ago there are no awards that make you meet NHOCKEY except First-All Star Team/All-American etc anymore. And leading scorer has never met NHOCKEY. Only top 10 all time leader. So one of the top 10 scorers in the history of the league not just a single season leader. Hard to keep up with changes sometimes I know. :) -DJSasso (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenn Merkosky

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Glenn Merkosky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 17:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic medalists

Hi Patken4. I see in the past you have created a number of pages of Ice hockey Olympic medalists. In the List of Olympic medalists in ice hockey, there are around 80 players missing. Would you be interested in creating the missing articles, or would you like me to do it? Get back to me with your answer on my talk page. --Hockeyben ^{(talk -} ^contribs) 00:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	zdr dobvih novi ne6ta v statiqta ti za armeets arena. super ideia moje6 li samo da promeni6 imeto da stane - Arena Armeec Sofia za6toto taka e pravilno. Legendaryirelia (talk) 12:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited RKS Skra Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arkansas State Red Wolves men's basketball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jonesboro

Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders men's basketball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Murfreesboro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:29, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Looks like the last time I stopped by your userpage was in 2008 when I left you a cookie, so it's about time I brought another. Anyway, wanted to say good job on the stadium articles you created today. Rosiestep (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Estadio de la Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jaen

Saint Peter's Peacocks basketball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Dunne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amoranto Sports Complex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Athletics

Estádio Municipal 14 de Dezembro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paraná

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Harvard University people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rowing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ron Lee (running back), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltimore Colts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:45, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you havn't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 04:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stade Port Autonome

The article Stade Port Autonome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOCITE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kennesaw State Owls men's basketball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of North Dakota men's basketball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Jones (basketball coach) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Chaparral Ice, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Chaparral Ice" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 00:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southern Oregon Heat

The article Southern Oregon Heat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:GNG, no significant coverage outside the local newspaper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 00:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Geneva Cubs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Geneva Cubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ...William 13:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chagos Islands national football team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chagos Islands national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chagos Islands national football team (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 09:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard Nobel laureates

Hello! Please take a look at and join the discussion on the page of list of Nobel laureates by university affiliation where a user disagreed with the content of Harvard section and had kept removing stuff, if you have time. Thanks!

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Estadio Nacional (Mexico), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tad Smith Coliseum.

The article Tad Smith Coliseum. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a building on the campus of U of Mississipi. Don't be fooled by the name of the article. This is not the Tad Smith Coliseum (note the period at the end of the title for this article). For some reason, an editor moved it to its current title (see article history). No indication this is a significant building on the campus.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 17:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estadio Fortunato Bonelli

The article Estadio Fortunato Bonelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article makes no claim to notability and has been unreferenced for nearly seven years. Unable to find sufficient coverage in secondary to warrant keeping.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrew³²⁷ 17:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estádio do Bolhão

The article Estádio do Bolhão has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article makes no claim to notability and has been unreferenced for nearly seven years. Unable to find sufficient coverage in secondary sources to warrant keeping.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrew³²⁷ 17:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PRODS

Instead of cluttering your talk page with a bunch of notices, I am writing to let you know that I have proposed that the following articles be deleted:

Estádio do Bolhão
Estadio Fortunato Bonelli
Estadio Francisco Carranza Limón
Estadio Francisco Zarco
Estadio General Ángel Flores
Estadio José Jorge Conte
Estadio Juan Canuto Pettengill
Estadio Luis Aparicio El Grande
Estadio Metropolitano de San Cristóbal
Estádio Municipal 22 de Junho
Estádio Municipal de Rio Maior
Estadio Osvaldo Casanova
Estadio Socios Fundadores
Estadio Teodoro Mariscal

Let me know if you have any questions. I would be happy to work with you on these articles if you provide sources and a reason for notability. Andrew³²⁷ 17:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

for this. Dloh cierekim 13:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Not so unreferenced after all. Dloh cierekim 13:12, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Wolfe Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Wolfe Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Wolfe Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Ultraviolet (talk) 22:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wayne Hall (ice hockey) for deletion

Hi Patken4: I haven't been able to find any mainstream media discussion of the Wayne Hall (ice hockey) and have opened an afd discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Hall (ice hockey). If you can find any reporting on this individual to establish notoriety other than the single page of statistics currently linked, feel free to add, otherwise I think we should let it head for deletion. Thanks for your assistance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsadR (talk • contribs) 22:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball and Beer! What better combination!

patKen - thank you for sharing this information regarding a member of our family. I have a lot more information about Joe Strauss and would like to add it, but what I don't have is a good image of Joe. I was delighted to see yours, an wondered if I could get a better version from you?

Thanks so much,

Jenny O'Donnell Foreverwiser (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JKT Ruvu Stars

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JKT Ruvu Stars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bojo1498 (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estadio Fortunato Bonelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estadio Fortunato Bonelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Fortunato Bonelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ManicSpider (talk) 11:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estadio José Jorge Conte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estadio José Jorge Conte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio José Jorge Conte until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ManicSpider (talk) 11:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estadio Juan Canuto Pettengill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estadio Juan Canuto Pettengill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Juan Canuto Pettengill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ManicSpider (talk) 11:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estádio Municipal 22 de Junho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estádio Municipal 22 de Junho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estádio Municipal 22 de Junho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ManicSpider (talk) 11:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prairie View A&M Panthers and Lady Panthers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panthers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Continental Baseball League

The article Continental Baseball League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this entire league, nor its teams meet WP:GNG, no references, only sources in a google search are trivial or local

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 19:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Football venues in St. Helena

Category:Football venues in St. Helena, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mee Suwan Stadium

The article Mee Suwan Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stadium for 3000 people. Unsourced since several years. We don't have articles for much bigger ones.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dusty Allen

The article Dusty Allen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charlie Ane

The article Charlie Ane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 10:08, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troy Auzenne

The article Troy Auzenne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Clark (American football)

The article Robert Clark (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no refs

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 10:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estadio Osvaldo Casanova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estadio Osvaldo Casanova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Osvaldo Casanova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Garcia

The article Jim Garcia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Al Manara Stadium

The article Al Manara Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could not find any evidence that this stadium exists, most Google results are Wikipedia mirrors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk to me 02:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Dent

The article Kevin Dent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced blp

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avono (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shipwreck Kelly

You created this article, so I invite you to a move discussion by clicking above linked heading. --George Ho (talk) 07:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pavilion des Sports for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavilion des Sports is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavilion des Sports until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 03:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ricky Patton

The article Ricky Patton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stan Fritts

The article Stan Fritts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Harvey (American football)

The article Jim Harvey (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kerry Glenn

The article Kerry Glenn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randy Edwards

The article Randy Edwards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Farmer (wide receiver, born 1948)

The article George Farmer (wide receiver, born 1948) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derrick Ransom

The article Derrick Ransom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Sollee

Hi Patken4, I'm new to writing / editing Wiki. I'm using view history to see who has done what, but I'm not sure that i'm completely understanding how things work. It appears that you've added a category using HotCat. Does this mean that you physically went to Eric Sollee's page or is Hotcat automatically scanning all of Wiki (all new articles in Wiki?) looking for categories and then added them to the article? Also, the article, Eric Sollee ended up in Category C / low importance for many categories. Is this done automatically by a script? by humans? what are the criteria? Eric Sollee is probably of low interest to someone looking for celebrity athletes, but for someone looking for major changes to the history of fencing, it's probably of much higher interest, or hopefully will be when they understand Sollee's impact. thanks. RobSVA (talk) 16:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roberts Center

Hi -- I see you authored the Roberts Center article in 2006. Can you add any reliable sources? I couldn't find any sources confirming that this stadium even existed, let alone dates of operation. Noticed that you were still active on WP so I thought you might know where to find some. :-) —Tim Pierce (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Can you help me improving romanian football ? Liga II and Cupa Romaniei, there are many editions to create. At least 1-2 seasons, if everyone will create 1 edition will be done by the end of the week. Thanks--Alexiulian25 (talk) 10:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Castle Fieldhouse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Castle Fieldhouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Castle Fieldhouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 17:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elias Mansur Stadion

The article Elias Mansur Stadion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Orphan article with no updates to relevant references for six years brings the necessity and notariety of this article into question.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abovethestorm (talk) 05:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parque Alberto Romo Chávez

A tag has been placed on Parque Alberto Romo Chávez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

duplicate of Estadio de Béisbol Alberto Romo Chávez, this should redirect there

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John, AF4JM (talk) 00:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Bob Morris

The article Jim Bob Morris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced biography of living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ViperFace (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Soldiers Field Soccer Stadium

An article that you have been involved in editing—Soldiers Field Soccer Stadium —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Kingpin1000 (talk) 22:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yunlin Indoor Arena

The article Yunlin Indoor Arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable; no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 11:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey on the ice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hockey on the ice. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . Right now this links to bandy, which is quite ridiculous if you ask me. Hockey on ice is ice hockey, and the redirect should justifiably go to that page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Grant (musician)

I've WP:PRODded this article you created years ago, doesn't seem to have good evidence (or any evidence) of notability, and notability isn't inherited just from bands once played with. can you see if you agree? FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 15:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Astroballe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Astroballe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:48, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Institute of Physical Education Samut Sakhon Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Physical Education Samut Sakhon Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ Assumption Thonburi School Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Mahanakorn UNI Stadium article is also nominated in the same discussion. Paul_012 (talk) 19:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://nycbl-sswanson-sswanson.blogspot.com/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Little Falls Veterans Memorial Park saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! 2607:FCC8:F243:B900:41C6:F7D4:9BD6:98E8 (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Patken4. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Old Bridge Township Raceway Park‎

The article Old Bridge Township Raceway Park‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joepa^T 03:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ed & Bertha Fitzpatrick Arena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed & Bertha Fitzpatrick Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed & Bertha Fitzpatrick Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Woodstock Ballpark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woodstock Ballpark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodstock Ballpark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 15:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Los Angeles Blades

The article Los Angeles Blades has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user promoting the sport or roller hockey.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Los Angeles Blades for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Los Angeles Blades is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Angeles Blades until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Health and Physical Education Complex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Health and Physical Education Complex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health and Physical Education Complex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 03:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Health and Physical Education Arena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Health and Physical Education Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Health and Physical Education Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 16:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Keim

The article Mike Keim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. BangJan1999 23:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your edit on Gao Minglu. I appreciate it a lot.

Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 09:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC) (sorry, I'm affiliated with Pitt but I still think you are pretty nice)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willian Araujo

Hello, Patken4. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Willian Araujo, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Willian Araujo to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

menaechmi (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Patken4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James Hopkins (footballer, born 1876)

Hi Patken4, I've just come across the above article, which you created back in 2008. The article remains unsourced, so was going to try to at least reference the text that is currently there. In doing so I've found a discrepancy with the date of birth. I realise this was quite a long time ago, but do you know where you got the 1876 date from? This doesn't appear on the extlink that you added (maybe it did back then). The source I've found puts it at 1873 – see "Boujaoude, Charbel (19 June 2017). Manchester United Players' Careers. Lulu.com. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-387-04950-9.". Unless, you have a more reliable source, I'll move the page. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Joyce, Michael (2012) [2002]. Football League Players' Records 1888 to 1939. Nottingham: SoccerData. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-905891-61-0." confirms 1873, so I have moved the article acordingly. Nzd (talk) 12:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prabook as a source

Hi Patken4. I noticed that you recently used prabook.com as a source for information in John Putnam Demos. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that prabook.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis J. Aguilar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RPI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Ramsay (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Ramsay (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Ramsay (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Echetus Xe 23:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Police Academy Stadium

Hello, Patken4. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Police Academy Stadium, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Boyd

Hi, I'm just wondering what your info is regarding Days Corner, November 17, 1940 as the death information for the hockey player Billy Boyd. Any info appreciated. Thanks.Researchguy (talk) 22:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Institute of Physical Education Samut Sakhon Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Physical Education Samut Sakhon Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Physical Education Samut Sakhon Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 10:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahanakorn UNI Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahanakorn UNI Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahanakorn UNI Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paul_012 (talk) 10:52, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rod Morrison NHL player

Hi, could you tell me your source for his date of death? Thanks. 67.71.67.194 (talk) 12:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campo de São Paulo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campo de São Paulo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campo de São Paulo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 12:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ellis Auditorium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellis Auditorium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellis Auditorium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 16:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estadio Tetelo Vargas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estadio Tetelo Vargas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Tetelo Vargas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 16:14, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Královo Pole indoor arena

The article Královo Pole indoor arena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7. No indication of importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PackMecEng (talk) 02:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brad Calip

The article Brad Calip has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 18:50, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Isaac Byrd

The article Isaac Byrd has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 18:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donnie Elder

The article Donnie Elder has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 19:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Keith (defensive back)

The article John Keith (defensive back) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darryl Sims

The article Darryl Sims has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Harvard Business School alumni

As explained at the top of the category page, is ONLY for "For graduates of Harvard Business School." HBS might be happy for those who spend $82,000 for their six-week Advanced Management Program (AMP) to describe themselves HBS alumni, but that is not the Wikipedia category criterion. Edwardx (talk) 23:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't up to Wikipedia to define what an alumnus is, it is up to the school. The school says people who complete the Advanced Management Program are alumni. People who have completed the program have won alumni awards [4]. Patken4 (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As noted on my talkpage, I am copying your reply to your talkpage and continuing the discussion here.

In your edit summary for Dave Lewis (businessman), reverting my removal of the category, you stated that "you might want to check HBS's own rules on that", and linked to HBS Advanced Management Program That HBS page stated, "Upon completing AMP, you will become a lifetime member of the HBS alumni community.", which is not the same as HBS saying that AMP attendees are HBS alumni. In any event, it is up to Wikipedia to decide its rules, not HBS! The AMP is only a six-week course, without any academic entry criteria and no assessment during or afterwards. Steve Jobs attended Reed College for a lot longer than six weeks, and is not in the alumni category. HBS also offer one-week courses - should they be in the alumni category? What about people who receive honorary degrees? Edwardx (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the public would expect those in the category to be those who had graduated with a degree or other significant qualification from Harvard Business School. A six week course can never lead to a significant award as it is simply not long enough to do so. One can see why HBS might like the money and why graduates of Trent Polytechnic might want that on their CV. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Patken4. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brian McKenzie (basketball)

The article Brian McKenzie (basketball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NBASKETBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 21:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sportivnyi Stadium

The article Sportivnyi Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I suspect this is some kind of hoax. Sources show PFC Lokomotiv Tashkent currently makes its home at Lokomotiv Stadium (Tashkent), and previously at JAR Stadium. I've tried searching "Sportivnyi" in every possible way I can - +stadium, +Uzbekistan, +Tashkent, and all came up with only Wikipedia mirrors and nothing else. Nothing on Google maps at all. Not a single news hit or trivial mention anywhere, and you'd think a 17,500-seat stadium would make the news at least once in its life. Not to mention it seems strange that a popular football club would somehow relocate from a 17.5k seat stadium to an 8k seat stadium?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assiout Cement listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Assiout Cement. Since you had some involvement with the Assiout Cement redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ben5218 (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Hubbard (rower), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Theological Seminary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jackie Hunt

The article Jackie Hunt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Still unsourced after 12 (twelve!) years. One yard is not anything to get a Wikipedia article about. Does not meet WP:GNG and will never meet it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPS1992 (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joplin Memorial Hall

The article Joplin Memorial Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yes this building exists. But it isn't clear to me what makes it notable. Can find very little in reliable sources mentioning it; basically just a little bit of local news coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SJK (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Al Naft Stadium

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Al Naft Stadium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mjs1991 (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Campo dell'Unione Via Flaminia

The article Campo dell'Unione Via Flaminia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not prove notability and very little available online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estádio Joaquim Morais

The article Estádio Joaquim Morais has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sure, it exists, but there's no sign of notability. Googling provides some local news articles but nothing substantial or relating directly to the stadium.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 13:12, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mebrat Hail Stadium

The article Mebrat Hail Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing but Wikipedia mirrors online. The Amharic Wikipedia has even less information. No notability to be found for this stadium.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 08:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mit Okba Stadium

The article Mit Okba Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another stadium that does not prove notability bar its existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 09:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wondering how you arrived at the date of April 2, 1977 for the death date of former NHL player Larry Thibeault. Any info much appreciated.Researchguy (talk) 18:13, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diamond at the Summit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diamond at the Summit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond at the Summit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bobby Johnson (wide receiver)

The article Bobby Johnson (wide receiver) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 02:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damon Jones (American football)

The article Damon Jones (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 02:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Popson

The article Ted Popson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Snowycats (talk) 04:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stade Omnisports (Lamentin)

The article Stade Omnisports (Lamentin) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable stadium as required by notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chuck Ehin

The article Chuck Ehin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Schenectady Civic Center

The article Schenectady Civic Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for more than 13 years. Search returns very little. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Schenectady Civic Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Schenectady Civic Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schenectady Civic Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Carse

Hi, I noticed you added his date of death (ages ago) and am wondering if you recall your source for this date or how you came to this date? I'd like to be able to verify it. Some sources say he died in Hawaii, and this is definitely incorrect. Any info on his passing (date, city) appreciated. Thanks.Researchguy (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Jeff Bezanson" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jeff Bezanson. Since you had some involvement with the Jeff Bezanson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Bruno H Vieira (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Niue High School Oval for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niue High School Oval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niue High School Oval until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stade Olympique l'Emyrne

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stade Olympique l'Emyrne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Crazy Boy 826 00:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"FC Ciudad de La Habana" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect FC Ciudad de La Habana. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 12#FC Ciudad de La Habana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry Desaulniers

Hi, just wondering how you ascertained his date of death? And, do you have any idea in what city he died? Thanks.Researchguy (talk) 15:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Augusta Convention Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augusta Convention Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusta Convention Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynn Thomsen

The article Lynn Thomsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable college sportsman

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estadio Argelio Sabillón for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estadio Argelio Sabillón is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio Argelio Sabillón until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New Asteras Tripolis Stadium

The article New Asteras Tripolis Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Such a stadium doesn' exist; it's just the old one renovated and expanded

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Grant (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Grant (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Grant (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plastic Stadium

The article Plastic Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources for 11 years, can find none today. ENPPI's home stadium is currently the Petro Sport Stadium; this article's title could simply be a mistranslation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andy Parker (American football)

The article Andy Parker (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rex Tucker (American football)

The article Rex Tucker (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Lawson (American football)

The article Steve Lawson (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Garth Mann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garth Mann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garth Mann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 23:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalutara Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalutara Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalutara Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Themillofkeytone (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Pope

The article Daniel Pope has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Prokop

The article Joe Prokop has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leonard Renfro

The article Leonard Renfro has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jermaine Williams (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jermaine Williams (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jermaine Williams (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

New3400 (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Washington County Convention Center

The article Washington County Convention Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

small convention center, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 04:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DSC Multi-Purpose Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DSC Multi-Purpose Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSC Multi-Purpose Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 20:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DSC Indoor Arena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DSC Indoor Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSC Indoor Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 20:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DSC Hockey Stadium

A tag has been placed on DSC Hockey Stadium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Incomplete sandbox, notability concerns, dead project

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 20:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DSC Hockey Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DSC Hockey Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSC Hockey Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 15:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bob Parent (ice hockey)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bob Parent (ice hockey) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 15:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BZA Raumerstraße

The article BZA Raumerstraße has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 03:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stadion Bäuminghausstraße

The article Stadion Bäuminghausstraße has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability (WP:GNG)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maharaja's College Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maharaja's College Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharaja's College Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Powerful Karma (talk) 13:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Mitchell (ice hockey)

The article Red Mitchell (ice hockey) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

poorly referenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 15:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 423.3 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Lafreniere for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Lafreniere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Lafreniere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Primefac (talk) 09:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eddie Novak

The article Eddie Novak has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Junior Bryant

The article Junior Bryant has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estádio da Baixada (Ibirama)

The article Estádio da Baixada (Ibirama) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The topic of this article isn’t notable and this article only uses one source. Please join in the discussion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycoMa (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Justin Lucas

The article Justin Lucas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sreeram Dilak 03:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stade de Diaraf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stade de Diaraf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stade de Diaraf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Persibom Bolaang Mongondow

The article Persibom Bolaang Mongondow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and does not pass WP:NSPORT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 05:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Benteng Stadium moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Benteng Stadium, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Curtis Adams (American football)

The article Curtis Adams (American football) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shantavira|^{feed me} 20:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SC Rade Svilar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SC Rade Svilar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SC Rade Svilar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ravenswing 12:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"FK Obilić Stadium" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect FK Obilić Stadium. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#FK Obilić Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ravenswing 06:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Zemun Stadium" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Zemun Stadium. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Zemun Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ravenswing 06:45, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stadion Hajduk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stadion Hajduk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stadion Hajduk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ravenswing 11:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salle 11th November

The article Salle 11th November has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced and searching find nothing of help to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 11:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zemun Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zemun Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zemun Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ravenswing 12:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FK Obilić Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FK Obilić Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Obilić Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ravenswing 12:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some information

Greetings @ Patken4,

You seem to have covered lot many sports events and sports venues on Wikipedia over the years.

Since last couple of years I have been covering women's rights and human rights etc.

I am looking for Wikipedia sport venue (stadium) articles which have covered crimes or untoward incidences happened there at such sport venue.

Please do suggest such articles.

Thanks for your help.

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fred Banks

The article Fred Banks has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 0qd (talk) 04:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woody Bennett

The article Woody Bennett has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Larry Glueck

The article Larry Glueck has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Middlefield Cheese Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middlefield Cheese Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middlefield Cheese Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aren Miller

The article Aren Miller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NHOCKEY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Newman (ice hockey) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Newman (ice hockey) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Newman (ice hockey) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sunan Stadium

The article Sunan Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The stadium does not exist. The current geodata refers to the pyongsong stadium that was constructed in 1991^[1]^[2], which is home to the pyongsong striker force which seems to be a football club. Not the sunan stadium and it is a name that never existed. There is no reason to be named sunan when the stadium is not even in pyongyang but in pyongsong. Also the original source was also dubious at best. It is neither mentioned in north korean or south korean sources. And neither in english sources, so the current "fact" is not found anywhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kerala Cricket Association Stadium

The article Kerala Cricket Association Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No progress on this stadium since at least 2013, hasn't even broken ground (despite the 2010 claim in the article) and is unlikely to ever be built. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trade Fair Ground

The article Trade Fair Ground has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This stadium is definitely the same as Mavuso Sports Centre.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Benteng Stadium

Hello, Patken4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benteng Stadium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Art Stringer

The article Art Stringer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minsk Ice Palace

The article Minsk Ice Palace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks indicia of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Your draft article, Draft:Benteng Stadium

Hello, Patken4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benteng Stadium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Ji11720 (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Fall

The article Joe Fall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable under WP:ANYBIO; he likely (although missing verification) met WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TartarTorte 17:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Fall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Fall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Fall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TartarTorte 18:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stade Centre Salif Keita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stade Centre Salif Keita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stade Centre Salif Keita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim McKeever (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim McKeever (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim McKeever (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chumpih ^t 11:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joaquin F. Enriquez Memorial Sports Complex

The article Joaquin F. Enriquez Memorial Sports Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Doughty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Doughty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Doughty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 15:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teddy Partridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teddy Partridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddy Partridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 10:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Randy Mitton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randy Mitton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Mitton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Edwardx (talk) 10:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al-Shohada'a Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Shohada'a Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Shohada'a Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Baseball venues in Germany has been nominated for merging

Category:Baseball venues in Germany has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Williams (guard) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Williams (guard) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Williams (guard) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ČEZ Stadion Chomutov

The article ČEZ Stadion Chomutov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable stadium, no longer in use. Redirect to Rocknet aréna, which mentions it might be helpful. No sources cited. External link is dead. Searching finds little, nothing that would suggest notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stade Marche Verte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stade Marche Verte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stade Marche Verte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Sheehy (businessman) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tim Sheehy (businessman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coliseo del Boulevard

The article Coliseo del Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability in WP:RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Finch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Finch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Finch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hank Allison

The article Hank Allison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any significant coverage to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 06:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Dunn

The article Dave Dunn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Football Stadium in Grivka" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Football Stadium in Grivka has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 2 § Football Stadium in Grivka until a consensus is reached. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dave Dunn

The article Dave Dunn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet notability for athlete

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Cichy

The article Joe Cichy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Loka Stadium

The article Loka Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable lower division stadium, unsourced for years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Starke

The article Joe Starke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Katrin Eggenberger

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Katrin Eggenberger, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Cofield

The article Tim Cofield has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:48, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Deery

The article Tom Deery has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kurt Sohn

The article Kurt Sohn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American football stubs

Wikipedia guidelines were changed early last year to require all sports biographies to have at least one piece of WP:SIGCOV (not counting database entries). In recent months, there have been efforts to draftify en masse sport substubs that do not comply with this requirement. Accordingly, we have begun a campaign to improve American football biographies that could be targeted in a similar RfC. This list identifies some of the articles that are the most vulnerable based on the new guidelines. Approximately 113 of the listed articles are ones that you created in years between 2007 and 2012. E.g., John Baylor, Larry Benz, Bill Berthusen, Rickey Bolden, etc.

The list includes articles I created as well, and it is not intended as criticism of you or anyone else, as such stubs were permitted prior to the change in policy. Instead, the purpose is to encourage each of us to clean up these stubs so as to avoid draftification or deletion. I am hoping that you will revisit these articles to add the required SIGCOV. Thanks, Cbl62 (talk) 23:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rafik Sorman Stadium

The article Rafik Sorman Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After searching, unable to find sources to establish notability. Several online websites, but no indepth coverate about this stadium. Article was created on 29 June 2006

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winkin Sports Complex

The article Winkin Sports Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 01:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Winkin Sports Complex

Hello Patken4, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Winkin Sports Complex, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winkin Sports Complex.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:50, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Charles Skold

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Charles Skold, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Holly Sargent

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Holly Sargent, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

William Hartwell - Proposing for deletion

The article, William Hartwell you created on 12 December 2008‎, has been proposed for deletion (PROD). If you can update that page by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit the article and do so. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 16:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oman Arena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oman Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oman Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Latham Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latham Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latham Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chaparral Ice for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaparral Ice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaparral Ice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ruth E. Nemzoff

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ruth E. Nemzoff, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Quigley moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kevin Quigley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sounder Bruce 18:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Palais des Sports Robert Oubron

The article Palais des Sports Robert Oubron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not exist in French so not notable in English. Article has been tagged for over a decade as unsourced - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kevin Quigley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kevin Quigley. Thanks! Newystats (talk) 00:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Quigley has been accepted

Kevin Quigley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Newystats (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Argja Bóltfelag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Argja Bóltfelag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argja Bóltfelag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jilin People's Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jilin People's Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jilin People's Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zanahary (talk) 00:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Category:Indoor ice hockey venues on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Law

I have used Keith Law's own words to back up my edits, and that is as reliable as a source gets. And a lot of people care about domestic violence, particularly when a "journalist" who has raged against Trevor Bauer refuses to condemn one of his close associates for far worse offenses. RBG8877 (talk) 23:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Show where any RS covered this. New York Times, ESPN, Wall Street Journal, New Orleans Times-Picayune? Anyone? Patken4 (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beni Ebeid Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beni Ebeid Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beni Ebeid Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bingo Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bingo Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bingo Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 05:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eissporthalle Iserlohn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eissporthalle Iserlohn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eissporthalle Iserlohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 14:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Horse racing venues in Bangladesh

A tag has been placed on Category:Horse racing venues in Bangladesh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Al Ulufi Stadium

The article Al Ulufi Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSTADIUM, no significant mentions in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Young Arrows F.C.

The article Young Arrows F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lorzestraat

The article Lorzestraat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:N; no clear WP:ATD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coronation Park (Sunyani, Ghana)

The article Coronation Park (Sunyani, Ghana) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bones Park

The article Bones Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

supposedly there is a 20,000 seat stadium on a tiny island with no sources found?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Stadion Zürich

The article Stadion Zürich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject doesn't exist - it was only a concept that has never materialised. Can merit a brief mention in Zurich at best, not a standalone article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of R. L. Vaughan Center

The article R. L. Vaughan Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced tag dated from back when Obama was president. Only source I could find was a primary source (looking at it, it’s an exact copy. So Copyvio likely applies too).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roasted (talk) 20:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Estoril Court Central

The article Estoril Court Central has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources for its existence. All Portuguese sources point to the Portugal Open being hosted in the Estádio Nacional. Coordinates of this article also point there. Capacity and Construction Date listed here do not match that of Jamor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Güngören M.Yahya Baş Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Güngören M.Yahya Baş Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Güngören M.Yahya Baş Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 14:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Estádio D. Afonso Henriques (1965) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estádio D. Afonso Henriques (1965) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estádio D. Afonso Henriques (1965) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

44 Gabriel (talk) 02:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zemun Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zemun Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zemun Stadium (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravenswing 09:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Trade Fair Grounds" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Trade Fair Grounds has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 11 § Trade Fair Grounds until a consensus is reached. J 947 ‡ ^edits 02:16, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of F. M. Palacios Field

The article F. M. Palacios Field has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unimproved 15 years. No relevant and reliable sources online Google (nearby hotels don't count), G news, newspapers, books, or scholar. Run of the mill, very small stadium. Not enough information to merge anywhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lokotrans Aréna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lokotrans Aréna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lokotrans Aréna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paradygmaty (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] All articles are in order of promotion, as written on the main WikiProject page; FA's have official dates of promotions.

[2] A star represents a featured article or list

[3] A green circle represents a good article

[4] Stanley Cup is an A-Class article

[5] The lists system differs from articles, and doesn't give an official date of promotion

[6] The last one, List of Calgary Flames players, is the only one not associated with the featured topic drive.

[7] At the time of publishing, there were 5 lists at WP:FLC and 2 lists in the "Holding cell", as there's been an accepted guideline to not put more that 5 trophy lists at the same time to, "compensate for the sanity of the reviewers".

[8] ttps://www.joongang.co.kr/article/2646904#home

[9] ttps://www.dailynk.com/%E5%8C%97-5%EB%A7%8C%EB%AA%85-%EC%88%98%EC%9A%A9-%ED%8F%89%EC%84%B1%EA%B2%BD%EA%B8%B0%EC%9E%A5-%EC%A4%80%EA%B3%B5/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]