User talk:Ponruy

Welcome!

Hello, Ponruy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 08:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mendelssohn

Thanks for your query. The date of 1836 is perectly correct and is supported by the references. Just because he was working in Leipzig didn't prevent him returning to Dusseldorf for the Festival! Ihave added an extra sentence and reference to the section on Dusseldorf about his leaving.Best regards, --Smerus (talk) 18:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delius

Thank you for your contributions. I have reverted them in accordance with WP:OVERLINK. A surprising number of readers know what, e.g., the United States and England are. Tim riley (talk) 18:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message – a pleasing one to get. Yes, now I look at it you're quite right about the two links you suggest restoring. I ought to have spotted those before reverting en masse. Regards. Tim riley (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that the Japanese WP has a Featured Article on Gabriel Fauré ([1]). If you are minded to translate into Japanese any of the other English WP Featured Articles on composers it would be excellent. Tim riley (talk) 19:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've copy-edited the Piano Concerto (Delius) article, but please don't hesitate to undo or alter any of my changes that don't say exactly what you intended to say. I enjoyed the article and learned a lot from it. I haven't heard the piece for years, and shall now go and listen to a recording of it. Tim riley (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You absolutely must not feel worried about getting me to copy-edit your English articles. My own linguistic skills in any language other than my own are not good, and I am filled with admiration for someone like you who can write an article in a language not his own. It is, I assure you, a privilege to be able to help with fine-tuning your English prose, and I shall be happy to be at your service for future articles. (PS. I listened to two of the three versions of the Delius Piano Concerto yesterday via the wonderful Naxos Music Library, but, forgive me, I found it pleasant but unmemorable.) Tim riley (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Kosenko

Thank you for improving the article Viktor Kosenko with more detailed info. I like when people turn 6 into 7, not 6 into 9. Thanks ! Krenakarore ^TK 16:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. This kind of contribution is what I can only do for English Wikipedia. Please inform me if there are anything unsuitable with my action. I put reply message here because I don't know how to use your talk page!--Ponruy (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Piano Concerto (Delius)

On 25 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Piano Concerto (Delius), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first version of the Piano Concerto by Frederick Delius was never performed in public, but the composer played a two-piano reduction with Ferruccio Busoni in 1898? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Piano Concerto (Delius). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Thanks for your note. I'll follow up in the very near future. I hope all is well with you. Best wishes, Tim riley (talk) 13:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the plagiarised material, but left intact the purely factual info. I have explained on the article talk page what I have done. Congratulations on spotting the problem and saving Wikipedia from any accusation of violating copyright. Tim riley (talk) 13:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louis Adam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henri Lemoine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gustave Doret, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conductor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ponruy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ponruy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ponruy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]