User talk:REJS H
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Problems with upload of File:Aurela Gaçe, Albania 2011.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Aurela Gaçe, Albania 2011.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Eno Popi has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aurela Gaçe, Albania 2011.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Aurela Gaçe, Albania 2011.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:56, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Eurovision Song Contest 2011
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eurovision Song Contest 2011, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. That template was there for a reason, and should remain as long as Eurovision 2011 re-directs there. Do not attempt to remove any more of these templates without a valid reason - mass content changes are usually unwise without first consulting other editors and establishing a consensus. CT Cooper · talk 21:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Shkoder.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Shkoder.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:LuizEjlli.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:LuizEjlli.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Template deletion spree
[edit]Mass indiscriminate removal of templates such as this is disruptive editing, and you have already been warned about this above. These template are there for the functioning of the article, and should not be removed without a good reason. Please stop. CT Cooper · talk 22:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Eno Popi has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:13, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Continued removal of templates
[edit]This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2007, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is your third warning of mass removal of templates, and it will not be tolerated any more. One more removal like this, and you will be blocked. CT Cooper · talk 12:22, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
You have not been blocked; the above was a final warning that if you continue to remove templates without a reason, then you will be blocked. Thank you for donating to the project, however there is no right to edit Wikipedia and there are circumstances that editors have to be prevented from doing so when their edits become disruptive. Your edits removing templates from articles have had to be repeatedly reverted as they are disruptive, and to reiterate, you were asked twice to stop before a final warning was issued.
I get the impression that English is not your first language, and that the reason you continued removing the templates despite me asking you not to is because you did not understand the messages you were receiving. If this is the case, then please consider focusing your attention on the Wikipedia in your native language, that will welcome contributions. CT Cooper · talk 23:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
I have replied to your most recent message on my talk page. CT Cooper · talk 12:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Betn.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Betn.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Flag of the United States, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Please see WP:Bold, revert, discuss. Your attempted changes have been rejected, it is now time to go to the article's talk page and discuss why you think your changes are justified. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Why?
[edit]Why do you continually remove the original date of adoption for the flag of the United States, yet approve of the date for the original flag of Albania? There's no reason to remove one while approving of the other. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Your edits to Flag of the United States appear to be a continuation of the problematic behaviour which you were warned about for Eurovision Song Contest articles. By continuously re-imposing edits on Flag of the United States, you are edit warring, which is not permitted. Refusing to respond to editors requests to stop is also unacceptable, and is considered disruptive. I am going to remind you again that if you continue this behaviour, you are likely to have your account blocked. CT Cooper · talk 22:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Skënder Drini has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cloudz679 20:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Skënder Drini
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Skënder Drini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:35, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to X Factor (Albania season 1), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 13:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to X Factor (Albania), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shriram (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at 2010 FIFA World Cup Final, you may be blocked from editing. Roger (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, this is your final warning now. You have told multiple times now not to edit war with other editors, and have repeatedly ignored such requests. Your style of editing - repeatedly re-inserting/re-removing content regardless of editor objections - is not acceptable on this project and must either change or you will now longer be allowed to edit. If I see one more instance of edit warring from this account, then I will block it for a minimum of one week. CT Cooper · talk 15:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Corrupted image upload
[edit]I'm not sure what happened, but clearly File:LuizEjlli.png did not upload properly and needs technical intervention. I have filed a bug report here. CT Cooper · talk 15:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Your RfA
[edit]Hi there. It looks like you're putting together a request for adminship. You may not be aware that extensive experience (typically a few thousand edits) is required before most voters will seriously consider an RfA. I recommend you wait until you have more experience before submitting your RfA, as it is likely to be quickly closed. Please let me know if you have any questions. 28bytes (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- The good news, though, is that the things you want to do (editing, uploading, joining subprojects, and fixing errors) do not require becoming an admin! You can do those things right now, because anyone can edit here. Please feel free to send me a message or reply here if you have questions about how to do anything specific. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Rejs12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
VQuakr (talk) 18:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Did you know that you have some "user space" with which to disclose your interests, edit drafts, and collect links? Start by clicking on the link above. Bearian (talk) 20:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:LuizEjlli.png
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:LuizEjlli.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. CT Cooper · talk 20:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Your RfA and editing
[edit]Rejs12345, what I said at User talk:CT Cooper/Archive 7#Why? still stands. I would strongly recommend you do not attempt to seek adminship at this time. It is clear you want to help, but your style of editing hasn't always been helpful, as has been made clear by the messages I and others have been left on this page. Please listen to the many comments on this page and read the help and policy pages provided for you. CT Cooper · talk 20:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rejs12345
[edit]A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rejs12345, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —cyberpower (Talk to Me)(Contributions) 10:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Vizion Plus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Albanian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Muharem Serbezovski, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Records, Roma and Romani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:36, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Dimitris Korres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Please keep the article for Dimitris Korres Rejs (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]REJS H (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked for no reason as an admin thinked that I may have been a sock puppet of User:Rejs12345 since an edit for this article was also made from this user. But I have created this account many years ago and isn't related to the other accounts.
Decline reason:
Not remotely plausible. Yamla (talk) 13:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I didn't used another account and I requested a password reset from this account days before. I was editing normally when it appeared blocked. Even I may have been using the same IP, it doesn't really matter. Rejs (talk) 14:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Please unblock my account as I have been a Wikipedia user since 2011! Rejs (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Please unblock my account as I have been a Wikipedia user since 2011! Rejs (talk) 05:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Please unblock my account as I have been a Wikipedia user since 2011! Rejs (talk) 19:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- You are free to follow the process outlined in WP:UNBAN. It's not relevant that you've been a Wikipedia user since 2011. You'll also want to drop the ludicrous claim that you are not the person behind Rejs12345. In fact, you'll need to explain why you made such a claim, as it will likely be held against any request to be unbanned. --Yamla (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
I made a claim to be unblocked since I have used the account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rejs12345 but isn't related to my account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:REJS_H even I have used that account. Please consider my issue that I have been blocked and my desire to be unblocked since I have made very good edits to English Wikipedia. Rejs (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- You are confused; blocks apply to the person, so this was a very clear case of evasion and a violation of WP:EVADE. And remember, you are banned, not just blocked. You need to follow the process outlined in WP:UNBAN. --Yamla (talk) 19:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't know what process to follow there. I submitted requests at UTRS but I wasn't unblocked. Please unblock me here or un UTRS Rejs (talk) 04:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
I don't know what process to follow there. I submitted requests at UTRS but I wasn't unblocked. Please unblock me here or un UTRS Rejs (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedia Admins!
Please tell me the true steps to unblock my account: User:REJS H as I haven't another Wikipedia account that I should be blocked.
Best regards Rejs (talk) 12:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]REJS H (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please unblock me as I have been not a sock puppet of User:Rejs12345 because I am a different user and I have made different edits. I have contributed on English Wikipedia for a long and I have made helpful edits and have created helpful articles for visitors
Decline reason:
Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rejs (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
You've already admitted the sockpuppetry. You've already admitted you were lying before. Continuing this transparent lie will make it all but impossible for you to ever be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 22:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)