User talk:Richrakh

Welcome!

Hello, Richrakh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Re: Political scandals of the United States

If you are going to add a lot of information, you might be well-served to cite every addition. I've had to revert some of your edits - on at least one occasion to reinstate information that you claimed you could not find (the Americorps thang). You might consider using the discussion page to run some of these things by other editors. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 17:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll do that.````

Edit warring doesn't require strict violations of the 3rr rule. Suggesting that a blog reporter's private sex life is a federal government scandal, or that someone's unconfirmed allegations of a person's homosexuality is a scandal when no confession, confirmation or loss of office exists is BLP violation and synthesis. This has all been addressed on the talk page and will be taken to ANI next. μηδείς (talk) 01:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Larry Craig

I fixed your reference problem at Larry Craig. You might want to take a look to see how it's done.[1] However the detail you added doens't appear necessary for the intro, and is already in the body of the text. Maybe it'd be better to leave it out of the lead? Will Beback talk 21:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scandal article

I see you do a lot of good work on the Scandal article. Good. But do not assume you own the article and can override others, including myself, who are also allowed to make their contributions to it. Thanks. Hmains (talk) 03:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not own this article. Neither do you. Do not assume that you can make major changes without discussion. If you check the discussion page, I've commented on numerous issues there. You should do the same. You've made a lot of changes here, most of which I haven't touched, but to combine the executive and legislative branch and then add a judicial branch by itself without regard to the date or administrations it occured seems very confusing to me. I happen to like it the way it is, which is how I found it. You could possibly start three new articles, one for each of the three branches, all seperate. That seems to be the way you're heading.

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Happyme22 (talk) 01:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Political sex scandals of the united states

The article Political sex scandals of the united states has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reexists as a nicer form with diff. captialization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andewz111 (no 'r') (PingusTM) - Linux rulez! (nudge me) 06:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Political Sex scandals of the United States

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion discussion

Hi! As I have mentioned you in a discussion about speedy deletion (with regards to your article about political sex scandals in the US), I thought it best to let you know. Pleased be assured that it isn't your actions that are being discussed, more about the categories and warnings used when articles are created in good faith but are largely negative and unsourced.

You are welcome to join in the discussion - it can be found here. Stephen! ^Coming... 13:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James O'Keefe

The use of verbatim, unattributed quotations [2] ("O'Keefe was to record a video of the following script before Boudreau arrived", from [3]) in articles is considered plagiarism. Whenever you incorporate the exact text of a source into an article, please provide appropriate attribution in the form of quotation marks, <blockquote>, or similar. Also, Wikipedia style guidelines discourage the excessive use of quotations, even when correctly attributed. Thank you. Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Convicted politicians listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Convicted politicians. Since you had some involvement with the Convicted politicians redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Hasteur (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC) Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 15:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of American politicians convicted of crimes for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of American politicians convicted of crimes, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of American politicians convicted of crimes until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 19:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of political sex scandals in the United States for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of political sex scandals in the United States, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of political sex scandals in the United States until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 19:51, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop violating BLP and SYNTH on this list. Stick to basic facts and stop misrepresenting sources and trying to build moral cases against people whose viewpoints you disagree with. μηδείς (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.

You have been warned repeatedly. BLP violations and adding synthetic remarks related to persons not in relation to their actions as federal politicians are violations of wikipedia policy and will be reported as edit warring. μηδείς (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

other items of interest

Also see actions being contemplated at List of United States Representatives expelled, censured, or reprimanded and List of United States senators expelled or censured Hmains (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 14:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump

In your edit summary here, you state that a tenet of [[WP:NPOV] is]:

Try not to quote directly from participants engaged in a heated dispute; instead, summarize & present the arguments in impartial tone.

Mr. Obama's words, that the (2012 Presidential) race was "distracted by side shows and carnival barkers", is a matter of public record. Also it is not clear that he is describing any particular person, and the words are not part of a direct argument between himself and any particular person. In my opinion the words should stay in. Shearonink (talk) 03:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul

Hi. Your recent efforts to add subsections for Paul's political positions was valuable and I can understand the motive in making searching for Paul's positions easier but I believe did not coordinate well with the preexisting prose. Since the the Paul article has received consensus as a good article, I don't see the existing summary text for Paul's positions as too long. However, if a wiki user wishes to quickly find information quickly on a specific position they can go to the Political positions of Ron Paul article where there are many sections that zoom in to specific positions.

If you plan to add additional text using the debate material, I caution that care should be taken not to copy word for word the your cited sources but rather summarize using the neutral voice in your own words. Please refer to wiki policy WP:COPYPASTE for guidance with this in your future edits. Thanks. Kjmonkey (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Newt Gingrich presidential campaign, 2012

Hey, I appreciate your edits to the Newt Gingrich presidential campaign page. It's looking better every day, and I liked the tighter paragraphs you put into place. I do have to disagree with the idea of a proposals section at the bottom, as we are working with a campaign and its developments in chronological order on that page. I kept the link to his political positions, but I would like to talk with you about the section. You can chat with me on my talk page or on the article talk page. thanks!

--Screwball23 talk 02:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Georgia

List of state and local political scandals in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Dan Doyle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charlie White

List of state and local political scandals in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charlie White

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William J. Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of state and local political sex scandals in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Steinberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ken Ard

List of state and local political scandals in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ken Ard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. When you recently edited List of state and local political scandals in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derrick Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. When you recently edited General Services Administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martha Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. When you recently edited List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Miranda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richrakh. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]