User talk:Riposte97

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Funny seeing you at GSL all of a sudden

[1] Surely you're aware of WP:HOUND? DN (talk) 09:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have to confess to growing a little tired of you. Please stay off my talk page. Riposte97 (talk) 10:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Bessent

Hi Riposte97, nice to meet you. I have some suggested updates for the Scott Bessent page. He is an advisor to Donald Trump and since you appear to be interested in editing political subjects, I hope that you will take a look. The edits were initially rejected, but I've revised them and I think they are now more appropriate for a BLP. Thanks for your time! MG for Scott Bessent (talk) 14:18, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 01:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank. Now please don't post here in future. Riposte97 (talk) 01:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]