User talk:RunningWildGadget

Regarding edits made to Villains in Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, RunningWildGadget! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.png, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 01:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Villains in Bobobo-bo Bo-bobo

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, RunningWildGadget! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.png, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 01:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 01:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bo-bobo_Team_UjikinTOKIO.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bo-bobo_Team_UjikinTOKIO.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RunningWildGadget (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This seems to be related to the edits I made to the Bo-bobo pages, right? The Villians page in particular. So I'll build on that. When I first got there, it wasn't an organized chart of links going to other pages, it was one page with different catagories and there were links on most of the names that appeared that was fowarded to an image and I thought I could get better pictures. Granted, I didn't know at the time that links were not exactly supposed to be used for pictures, but that's what was happening with the article so I thought it was okay. Even when I got the messages from the bots that my links were removed, I just disregarded it because I didn't think it was harmful and the previous links made by the other editors, as to my knowledge, weren't having thiers removed. I didn't think there was a significant difference to the link I was using and the links they were using. The picture links were removed eventually to...renovate the page to what it is today. And one of the first things to do, apparantly, was to eliminate the picture links. I got confused when the person who got the links out said at the end of his edit summary, "Add links accordingly". I thought he meant to add picture links, so I did. Then they were removed by some other user and I got up to speed on the whole revision thing. They said they should put thumb pictures for just the major characters and try to do group pictures if possible for everyone else. I got two pictures of each kind, and then I got note that one of them somehow had a copyright problem concerning with the copyright tag. I disregarded that too, because I did the other thumb picture the exact same way and I was never notified about that one having a copyright problem. Both pictures are still being used today, so I don't think they're bad. Look, all I was trying to do was help, I did what I thought what I thought we were doing with the article. The edits regarding writen stuff in that article and other articles didn't seem to bother anyone and no one complained and they're still being used today (though somewhat revised). I've never even heard of Pikminlover or the concept of being a sockpuppet until I got back and saw that I was blocked. That's all I have to say on my behalf.(I was going here on 3 different computers before I was blocked, If that helps).

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pikminlover. — Sandstein 05:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What are you saying?

Just what does that link mean? The only evidence I see is that my name just happens to be a anime show name. I want a deeper reason, I still don't what you're trying to say...

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bo-bobo Team UjikinTOKIO.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bo-bobo Team UjikinTOKIO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BoBoBo Halekulani.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BoBoBo Halekulani.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Council roll call

Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Council participants list. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that WT:COUNCIL has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the WikiProject Guide or Directory, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Participants and remove the asterisk (*) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on April 30 2008.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 22:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]