User talk:Silver seren/Archive 16

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

→

Archive 20

POV

And with every comment you make you are showing your POV. More than once I stuck my neck out for you but I suppose you forgot that. We never have to agree on anything but thinking anyone should not be editing an article because they have a differing viewpoint is very unwikipedian of you. I'm pretty disappointed that you would suggest that.--MONGO 03:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

If someone has too POV of a stance toward the reliable sources to use them neutrally, then they should avoid a topic. If your POV on the subject didn't extend beyond your opinion, it would be fine, but you are constantly trying to discredit the reliable sources based on your POV. That is blatant POV editing. The only question we should be asking is whether the sources and authors are reliable sources. Nothing more. Silverseren^C 05:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Its not that simplistic but you're entitled to be wrong and rude if you wish. I shouldn't have wasted my time on you.--MONGO 06:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Hatoful Boyfriend

Hey Silver seren,

I just wanted to leave a friendly note regarding the Hatoful Boyfriend article that you nominated for GA-status. I took a quick look at it and noticed that there are a lot of sentences that are not sorced. If I was the reviewer I would of failed the article immediatly. I just wanted to let you know about this so you can fix it now before another person fails it (afterall, you've been waiting for 2 months).--Dom497 (talk) 23:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

@Dom497: Thanks, i've gone through it and fixed a few things, removing some unneeded sentences. At this point, it looks like the only "unreferenced" parts are in the plot section, which doesn't need to be referenced. Are there any other issues I missed? Silverseren^C 00:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. Based off a fast skim, it appears you fixed everything. Of course there is probably a few grammar issues in the article (as there is with most articles) but I haven't read the article in depth.--Dom497 (talk) 01:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hatoful Boyfriend

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hatoful Boyfriend you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SuperHamster -- SuperHamster (talk) 01:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

@SuperHamster: Thanks for picking this up! Sorry it took so long for me to get back to you, I had a Biochemistry exam to prepare for. I didn't know you were still around and editing. It's good to see you. Silverseren^C 02:06, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the edits! Hope the exam went well. I've been around :) I'll take a look at the article again soon. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hatoful Boyfriend

The article Hatoful Boyfriend you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hatoful Boyfriend for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SuperHamster -- SuperHamster (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

• New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
• New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
• TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for T. Rex and the Crater of Doom

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/The Machine Question at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Chork Nominated for Deletion

Hi Silver, I noticed you were on the Article Rescue Squad, so I thought I would toss you a heads-up that I've nominated one of the articles you've authored/worked on, Chork, for deletion. Dalamori (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations for achieving 50 DYK creations/expansions! I have also updated your count here :)  — ₳aron 13:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Silverseren^C 18:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

• New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
• New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
• Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Machine Question

Hello! Your submission of The Machine Question at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Machine Question

Harrias ^talk 07:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

WP:Cooperation mentoring

Hi Silver! I'm relatively new around Wikipedia, but have been doing some paid COI work in the time I've been here. I saw you were the founder of WP:Cooperation, and that you'd mentored users in the past. I was wondering if you still have the time or desire for such an undertaking. I'm looking for a mentor to help me understand the depths and nuances of the wide world of Wikipedia, and also who ideally has some background in dealing with COI editors, but the wikiproject seems relatively inactive. I realize I can find mentors through other channels, but I was hoping you're still active in the process, as it seems you have valuable insight into the specific problems with COI edits. If you can't, might you know anyone else involved in the project who might be able to help me out? Thanks! --FacultiesIntact (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@FacultiesIntact: I haven't been as active lately for a variety of reasons (one of the primary ones being university graduation), but i'm past all that now. I'm still trying to work on getting back into the swing of things here though.

But, in short, yes, i'm available to mentor you if you'd like. What kind of mentor were you looking for exactly, beyond just COI things? Me just responding to questions you have and the like? Silverseren^C 22:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey Silver, congrats on your graduation! As for a mentor, I'm looking for pretty much what you described. Given my inherent conflict of interest in the pages that I get paid to work on, it'd be really helpful for me to get an outside opinion on not just what I'm writing, but how I'm writing it and how to best propose changes and improvements. I think being transparent about my actions is a good start, but I've found it's not always enough. I'm also striving to be an active member of the Wikipedia community outside of my COI work, and it seems like the more I learn about this place, the more I realize there is that I don't know. So far I've been trying to stay active in WP:GOCE, but I'm also looking for other places where I can bring value to the community. I'll take any help I can get, so really, thank you for taking the time! --FacultiesIntact (talk) 17:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

@FacultiesIntact: My main suggestion for working on articles that you have a COI on is to copy the current version of the article and paste it into a Draft located at Draft:(Article Name), which will allow you to improve it without having to directly edit the mainspace version. Once you have your edits completed, get several people to look it over and have one of them submit the new version into the article. Your best bet for reviewers is to ask at related Wikiprojects to the article topic.

As for other work, anything over at WP:BACKLOG would be useful, depending on what type of editing you do best. Silverseren^C 18:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Would you mind helping me review the work I've done on Honeywell? I prepared a draft a couple of months ago here, but haven't received much feedback on it. User:GeorgeLouis recommended introducing small changes slowly, and while I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea, I'm always curious to hear other opinions on the matter. Even after detailing all of my proposed changes on the talk page, I haven't gotten any real responses, and my experience soliciting help from users on relevant WikiProjects hasn't been terribly fruitful. Could it be because of how I'm wording things when asking for help, or because of the large-scale changes? One of my biggest hurdles has been finding other editors to actually collaborate with me in improving the articles I'm working on. --FacultiesIntact (talk) 19:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to check it out and crosspost it to the COI noticeboard. I have a question regarding decorum here as there's a few other things I have prepared and ready to be reviewed for publishing: would it be considered in poor taste to submit them for review while my other work is still awaiting publishing? I don't want to let it just sit around, but I don't want to inundate other users with a series of edit requests either. --FacultiesIntact (talk) 20:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Assistance

Hi Silver, I was wondering if you could perhaps help me out - I recently created a new entry for Josh Swade, a documentary filmmaker. Shortly after it went up, another user put NPOV and notability tags on it. I feel the entry proves the filmmaker's notability, that it is written in a neutral tone, and I've declared my COI on the talk page, so I feel like the tags are unnecessary, and are harming what would otherwise be a solid entry. Would you mind taking a look and, if you feel the subject is notable, removing the tags or offering whatever assistance you think is correct in this situation? FYI, two previous entries on the filmmaker were deleted for lack of notability, but, like I said, I feel his notability is proven with the entry I've written. Let me know your thoughts when you have a minute.--Bernie44 (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

• Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
• Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
• Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
• Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Help Updating Page

It's been over a year and I'm still having trouble getting someone to review the page I drafted to update the Food Allergy Research & Education page. Would you be able to help?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Acl92886/FARE

Acl92886 (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

@Acl92886: Right away, I can tell you that you need to work on the references in the article to establish notability. There are way too many primary sources from the organization's website itself in use right now. You need to replace most, if not all, of them with secondary news, book, or journal article sources. Silverseren^C 02:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Good to see you editing again.

-) Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I've still been around, but after graduating, I actually have had less time to pay attention to Wikipedia while i'm looking for a job. Silverseren^C 22:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Notes

Hi, these can be done either as a (sub)class of references, or using the efn (e-footnote, I guess) template, but not both at once. And of course one shouldn't change a system of referencing once it is in use. But since I agree with you that efn is easier to use, I've changed it here so we only have one system again. Verb. sap., as they used to say. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I was just working through the missing reference lists category and trying to fix articles via the simplest method. It does get really confusing when references are trying to use both efn and groups, especially multiple groups. Silverseren^C 18:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Silver seren/Ukrainian People's Militia

The article was removed in 2010. A Polish article, based on Polish only sources exists. The Talk page is blank, so the critic perished.Xx236 (talk) 08:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Xx236: Okay. And? Silverseren^C 19:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm interested why the article was removed and how to restore it.Xx236 (talk) 05:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@Xx236: Based on both discussions at AfD, it looks like the main thing that needs to be done is to add additional reliable sourcing, preferably sources that are available to be perused online, rather than having to rely on the word of the editors using the offline sources, as there are concerns about the accurate use of those offline sources. So if you can find news articles, books, scholarly articles, ect, online that have information on the militia, then that would be a good step toward making the article ready to return to main articlespace. Silverseren^C 07:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

The Polish article quotes:

• https://www.academia.edu/1314919/The_Lviv_Pogrom_of_1941_The_Germans_Ukrainian_Nationalists_and_the_Carnival_Crowd
• http://www.uamoderna.com/md/199
• https://www.academia.edu/1439240/Rites_of_Violence_The_Pogroms_of_Summer_1941

I haven't read the articles and I don't have any opinion about their quality. Xx236 (talk) 08:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@Xx236: Those looks like perfectly reliable sources to me. Feel free to edit and work on the article in my userspace (you can even move it to your own userspace, if you'd like). My only suggestion is to be careful that you don't mix up any information between the People's Militia and the Ukrainian Auxiliary Police, which was a concern during the AfDs, as the former eventually became the latter. Silverseren^C 17:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

There are more people interested Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland.Xx236 (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

• New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
• Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
• Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
• American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Question for my mentor

Hey Silver, I know you've been away for a while, but I was wondering if you could help guide me with a question I had. I've been working on David M. Cote on and off for a long time, and after initially butting heads with nearly everyone (I was rather new at the time) I've started to make some progress with another editor. However, at this juncture, we disagree on whether the CEO of a corporation can/should be held solely responsible for the actions of the company. Would this be a suitable question to open up an RfC?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 22:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@FacultiesIntact: That's a fine thing to have an RfC on. Personally, without knowing about this specific case, I would say that inclusion of company actions on a biography article should only be done if the actions or controversy relate to the person specifically, such as if they were involved in corruption in regards to the company. It has to be some sort of personal activity. But a controversy just involving a company in general should be on the company page and not on a biography page, as that would be a very undue weight issue. That's my two cents on the matter at least. Silverseren^C 22:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

So I instead opted for a 3O, and got a response from someone there. However, the editor I'm in a dispute with has yet to respond to the opinion itself or my inquiry a week ago as to whether or not he agrees with it. How would you recommend I move forward from here?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 22:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

@FacultiesIntact: I would bring it up with the person who responded to the 3O, so see what the next best course of action would be. Silverseren^C 22:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Oleogustus

Hi Silver seren: I have approved your DYK nom at Template:Did you know nominations/Oleogustus. Just letting you know that I made a minor addition to the hook (rather than going through the whole ALT process), adding the word "fatty" to the hook, because the proposed basic taste is not detected in all rancid foods. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:44, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

@Northamerica1000: I'm fine with the change. It makes the statement much more clarified. Silverseren^C 19:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

All right, and thanks for the reply. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Oleogustus

Gatoclass (talk) 16:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Trypophobia

I've fixed the archive numbering for the talk page (couldn't get the links to show up on the current talk page) and so modified the link in your post here. Hope you don't mind. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks for the help. Silverseren^C 00:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Question about periodic table layout

Hi! Thanks for your question at the Elements Project about the placement of the lanthanides, actinides, and group 3 at Wikipedia's periodic table. Nature published a good news item on the table layout here at the same time that they published the paper with with lawrencium ionization data. The news article does a great job explaining the situation in a brief way, and notice how Sato, the lead author of the Lawrencium article, wrote that he didn't think his team's paper answered the layout issue in either direction. However, there have been many reasons to not include lanthanum and actinium in group 3 for many years, so Professor Poliakoff's statement is also understandable. I changed Wikipedia's table in 2005 to remove these two elements from group 3 and make Wikipedia's table "not-wrong" (in Poliakoff's view), and Wikipedia's table has been mostly not-wrong since then, although there are still multiple ways to be not-wrong. You can read about that at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Flying_Jazz#Starting_in_June.2C_2005:_Periodic_Table_and_other_chemical_matters . I'm answering on your talk page instead of on the Elements Project page because I've found that the tiny number of editors in that project repeatedly misrepresent the words of other editors and even the plain text of authors in the literature, so I don't contribute there any longer.

The organization that might at some point put out a nomenclature recommendation is IUPAC. The IUPAC meeting referred to in the Nature news item took place just last week ([1]), but I haven't heard any news yet about IUPAC addressing this group 3 issue, and I'd be surprised if they issue any recommendation about it. With time, I think the 32-column form of the table with lutetium and lawrencium in group 3 will gain in popularity, but that's an editorial decision for every book and web page to make. Flying Jazz (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Here is further information that I found earlier today (assuming that you're interested) about IUPAC's lack of interest in the question . Flying Jazz (talk) 00:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Civility

Please do make up motives about my editing such as your did here "You are being purposefully disingenuous and I think you are aware that you are." Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Also with comments like this you may need to take a break for a bit [2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Silver seren. You have new messages at WP:MCQ.
Message added 10:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ww2censor (talk) 10:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, Silver seren. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 14:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

– Thanks for joining the project! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2015)

A Old Colony Mennonite family observing the practice of plain dress Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Plain dress Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Historic house • Soufflé Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

DYK for Grace Eldering

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lucille Farrier Stickel

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2015)

Two high divers in mid-air Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: High diving Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Plain dress • Historic house Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2015)

Transection of a human head Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Head Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: High diving • Plain dress Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 00:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Folta talk comment

Dear Silverseren, thanks for your comment. could you please move it under the section I started - it was an edit conflict - we both wrote at the same time ! Thank you . --Wuerzele (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

for transparency please move your comment in the appropriate section, the one I started. what is so difficult about that ? I will move it, if you dont.--Wuerzele (talk) 19:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Kevin Folta mediation

I have asked for mediation in regards to Kevin Folta. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:52, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Kevin Folta". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 22 September 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 19:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Kevin Folta, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2015)

"Boy on white horse" by Theodor Kittelsen Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Scottish mythology Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Head • High diving Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2015)

Personal finance – an example image of personal budget planning software Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Personal finance Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Scottish mythology • Head Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Books and Bytes - Issue 13

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

• New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
• Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
• Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
• Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2015)

An example of musical composition – Scherzo in A flat (Borodin) Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Musical composition Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Personal finance • Scottish mythology Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2015)

Costumed performers from the 2006 Bristol Renaissance Faire Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Costume Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Musical composition • Personal finance Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Advice

Hey Seren, hope you've been well. I was wondering if you could help advise me on avenues to pursue in making changes to David M. Cote. If you remember, I was butting heads with another user about what was appropriate content for the article, and took it to 3O. The opinion agreed with me, but the users concerned are no longer involved in editing the page. I've since submitted an edit request, and I know standard protocol is to wait, but are there any other channels I could go through?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 02:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2015)

Ice hockey is an example of a team sport. Pictured is an 1893 ice hockey match at Victoria Rink, Montreal. Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Team sport Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Costume • Musical composition Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2015)

Models promoting Zombieland at San Diego Comic-con. A zombie comedy is a horror comedy subgenre that involves zombies. Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Comedy horror Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Team sport • Costume Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Silver seren:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Sent to users on my mailing list. To opt-out forever, just remove your name.

• Happy (belated) Halloween! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2015)

Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Allegra Versace Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Comedy horror • Team sport Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2015)

Marie Serneholt at the 48th Guldbagge Awards. Hello, Silver seren. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Marie Serneholt Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Allegra Versace • Comedy horror Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

DYK for Every Single Word

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)