User talk:Skeene88
Welcome!
|
Tigers Template
[edit]I have reverted your change to add colour to the template. Long term consensus within the Rugby union Wikiproject is to use standard wikipedia navbox colours rather than club colours. noq (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Leicester Tigers
[edit]I am not vandalising anything and don't make a big thing out of it. I rework and balance out current squad pages for those top professional rugby squads. That's it. They play at any position that is on their wiki pages. NikeCage68 (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
John Jackett - Falmouth and Leicester
[edit]Hi, I'm thinking of showing Jackett as both a Falmouth and Leicester player for the 1906 and 1907 Home Nations games. John Griffiths' Book of England International rugby lists him as being solely a Falmouth player for those games and notes for the NZ game in 1905 "Jackett became the first player capped direct from Falmouth club". For his 1909 games Jackett is listed as Falmouth/Leicester. It looks a bit ambiguous as I can see on Jackett's article that you've got a citation for him joining Leicester in 1904 and playing seven years for the club, so I assume he played variably for both clubs during the period as well as representing the Cornwall county side. For the 1908 Anglo-Welsh tour, Clem Thomas's History of the British & Irish Lions also gives him as a Falmouth player only. Any thoughts? --Bcp67 (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. No doubt Jackett would be amazed if he could know that his career was being discussed more than 100 years after he played for England! Happy enough to leave things as they are - as you say, circumstances were different back then and he was associated with both clubs, possibly at the same time, and the link leads to his article where readers can find out more about him. All the best! --Bcp67 (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (George Worth (rugby union)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating George Worth (rugby union), Skeene88!
Wikipedia editor Tessaract2 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
It's definitely a stub, but it's a new article, so that's basically a given. Not bad!
To reply, leave a comment on Tessaract2's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Skeene88. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation
[edit]Hi, it's great to see someone take an interest and keep articles like 2016–17 English Premiership (rugby union) up to date (even if it's the wrong code :-) ) but can you please make sure the links point to the right place George Ford, Billy Burns and Joe Marchant are all disambiguation pages so the right one needs to be selected. Can I recommend one of these disambiguation tools as a great help in checking whether links needs disambiguating or not. Thanks. Nthep (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leicester Tigers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Memorial Stadium and Martin Corry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
|
The Rugby Union Barnstar | |
| For your unrelenting, high quality maintenance of all things rugby union and in particular Leicester Tigers. TGB13 (talk) 22:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
Alex Lewington appearances
[edit]Hi Skeene, I was under the impression that the Wiki stat boxes for all sports only include league appearances? Therefore Lewington's LV Cup appearances wouldn't be counted? TGB13 (talk) 20:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Skeene88. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Leicester Tigers
[edit]Given how much information was in the article, the Start class rating didn’t really apply any more. I thought a higher class rating was a no brainer, so I moved it up to a C. Do you think it deserves a different grade? CUA 27 (talk) 19:42, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Overall the article is in decent shape, one of the better rugby club articles out there. Congrats on your hard work. Since you asked for feedback, here are some further thoughts:
- I tagged the lead. It reads as fanboy stuff. I’d suggest tone down the accolades, and insert some plain vanilla facts.
- I didn’t like the fact that the Honors section comes first. For the same reason as above. I suggest moving it further down the article.
- The History section is quite long. I suggest trimming to 1/3 or 1/4 the length, and move more info to the linked History of Leicester Tigers article if it’s not there already.
- The Season Summary table could be improved. Too much colour, and too much repetition of the name of the competition (we don’t need to repeat Premiership or Heineken Cup twelve times.
- The Notable Players section with eight subsections, including many lists and tables and many many flags, is far too much. I’d suggest creating a separate article called “Leicester Tigers players” or something like that, dump a lot of these tables into that article, leaving the main article with no more than 2-3 list of the very best players.
I would make some of these changes myself, but I don’t know how they would be received, which is why I offer them as suggestions. Overall, as I said at the outset, there is a lot of useful information in here, but if you are looking to improve it further, look for ways to reduce some of what’s there, in particular the lists and tables with an overload of names, colours, and flags. CUA 27 (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Some other ideas on things to add — There is no text re any affiliate teams (eg, the A-side, any youth or U-20 team, any women’s team?). I don’t know how many affiliate teams there are, but if there are some, then perhaps a brief section with one short paragraph re the more notable of the affiliate teams. If more ideas occur to me on items to add I will pass them along, but I doubt I will have much given the article is mostly complete already. CUA 27 (talk) 02:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]
Hi Skeene88, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 02:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
ARU referees
[edit]Hi, Skeene88. After being directed to the Rasta Rasivhenge talk page, I saw you were part of an earlier discussion on rugby referee categories. I have subsequently proposed a merger of categories as a potential solution. Please visit Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 March 15#Category:ARU_referees if you would like to comment. Thank you. -- Ham105 (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Tuilagi has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Acebulf (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Premiership Rugby Logo 2018.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Premiership Rugby Logo 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
BLP
[edit]That material at Mark Bakewell should not be restored. He isn't mentioned by the source, and the source is tabloid journalism, which should be avoided when writing about living persons. Please make yourself familiar with our biographies of living persons policy (BLP), particularly WP:BLPSOURCES. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 19:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Skeene88 I realise that you have made some recent contributions to rugby union pages and thought I'd let you know that there are currently a number of discussion at WT:RU which might be of interest to you and could do with some more input. Thanks. Jgjsmith006 (talk) 23:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Skeene88. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Kit body leicestertigers19h.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Kit body leicestertigers19h.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Kit right arm leicestertigers2019h.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Kit right arm leicestertigers2019h.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for November 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saracens F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wigglesworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Rugby numbering schemes
[edit]Since you asked, here is the World Rugby regulation regarding the numbering of players according to their position. As you can see, it is at the very least recommended by World Rugby that the "left flanker" wear number 6 and the "right flanker" wear number 7. There doesn't seem to be a distinction regarding which is the openside and which the blindside. That, I assume, is how South Africa get away with swimming against the tide of every other international team. – PeeJay 15:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Re: Mat Protheroe
[edit]I'm not sure I agree. While he may self-identify as Welsh, he has played international rugby for England, which makes this more controversial. – PeeJay 15:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Dan Kelly
[edit]Hello. Sorry, it seems that the other Dan Kelly played for Birmingham & Soluhull RFC. -- Postoronniy-13 (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hallo, I think I checked and found it was half an hour since the red link was added, so didn't know you were still working on the page. Same thing can happen with categories: add a redlinked category, or create a category and it gets deleted as "empty"...! Sorry about that. I did use "rollback AGF". PamD 12:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Suggestions
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit] Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to List of common false etymologies of English words. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. (Even if Atlas are sods) Nosebagbear (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Nosebagbear: Lol, no worries, thought it might stay up for a little longer.Skeene88 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I hate to say it but I actually saw it through the rugby forums and laughed at it there, rather than actually finding it through Wikipedia :D Nosebagbear (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Nosebagbear: Lol, no worries, thought it might stay up for a little longer.Skeene88 (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,