User talk:Solidest/Archives/2022/February
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Solidest. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Bach
I believe that when merging infobox Bach composition into infobox musical composition, a Bach example in the doc would be appropriate, - actually Bach came first, the other was derived from it. BWV 1 might be a good example, TFA-to-be on 25 March. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- The templates themselves were merged back in 2020, and Template:Infobox Bach composition is now a redirect. I haven't touched the examples themselves in the documentation, as I only do styling and TemplateData things. And on the English wikipedia, as far as I know, it is not possible to automatically generate an example via TemplateData, i.e. Module:TemplateDataDoc is not used here. So feel free to build the examples manually if needed :) Solidest (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- some other day I may ;) - great work that you do! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Precious
infobox fixes in music
Thank you for quality articles such as Maceo Plex, Ed Banger Records discography and Ed Banger Records discography split from articles, for infobox fixes for musical compositions, hundreds of them, for other gnomish work such as cleaning categories and moving pages, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2698 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)