User talk:Star reborn

Hello, Star reborn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:51, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sohrab and Rustum

nice work on Sohrab and Rustum -- Decora (talk) 20:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harold the Dauntless

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Harold the Dauntless, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: The Bridal of Triermain. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Werner (Byron)

A tag has been placed on Werner (Byron) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Minima c (talk) 05:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Prose by John Neihardt

Category:Prose by John Neihardt, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Greg Bard (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Lord of the Isles

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Lord of the Isles, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Harold the Dauntless. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Lord of the Isles

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Lord of the Isles. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Harold the Dauntless. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Harold the Dauntless - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO ^{ACCIDENT &}_EMERGENCY 23:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry contributions

Hi Star reborn,

First off, I'd like to thank you for the poetry articles you've been contributing recently. These are valuable additions to the encyclopedia, and it's great that you've been able to track down so many poems which didn't have articles. However (there's always a but...) there are a couple of problems with your submissions. Firstly, they do bear striking similarities to each other, in both content and structure (for example, the entries on Harold the Dauntless, The Bridal of Triermain and The Lord of the Isles all opened with identical phrases: "XXX is a rhymed, romantic, narrative-poem by Sir Walter Scott. Written in 181x, it weaves together elements of popular English legend using dramatic themes." Also, many of the plot sections you have contributed end in a bullet list of cliffhanger questions, cf The Battle of Marathon: A Poem, Balder Dead, The Divine Enchantment). This may simply be your preferred style of writing, but it may also be because you are copying this text from another source (I note that your sole source for all these articles tends to be the Oxford University Press version of the text). If you aren't already aware of WP:COPYVIO, please make yourself familiar with it.

The second issue, which I've alluded to above, is the sparseness of sourcing - we need independent, ideally third-party sources to verify notability. These exist for all the poems you've written about; I've already added some to the Harold the Dauntless and The Bridal of Triermain, for example; you just need to cite them. I'm slowly going through your created articles and adding references, but it's along job; if you could take a moment to reference your work it would make life easier for the rest of us.

Apologies for the essay; as I said at the outset, your contributions are useful and appreciated - all I'm suggesting is that they could be improved. If you've got any questions, or you need help with any of your articles, please drop me a note on my talkpage (I'm already discussing your work there with another user).

Cheers, Yunshui (talk) 13:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to these articles, I am concerned that the images you have been placing on them as covers may not have accompanied published editions of the works. Can you please provide more information about the editions on which these works appeared (publisher, date, etc.) if they were published? Pending some further information, I have removed them for now. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Star reborn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Star reborn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]