User talk:Tisdale4life

Image tagging for Image:2wgyz38.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2wgyz38.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Freshoutthebodyshop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Freshoutthebodyshop.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Newfreshoutthebodyshop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Newfreshoutthebodyshop.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hsm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hsm.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Freshoutthebodyshop.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Freshoutthebodyshop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Freshoutthebodyshop.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Freshoutthebodyshop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lastchristmasashley.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lastchristmasashley.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D.O.E.

A tag has been placed on D.O.E., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.131.112.254 01:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of O-Luv

O-Luv, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that O-Luv satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O-Luv and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of O-Luv during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spellcast 05:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hsm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hsm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ashley Tisdale's second studio album

An editor has nominated Ashley Tisdale's second studio album, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Tisdale's second studio album and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fat Joe has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Rror (talk) 21:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Fat Joe constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Rror (talk) 21:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Ashley Tisdale, you will be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ashley Tisdale. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. The replacement of a photo of her with a logo in the article was inappropriate. Please discuss the change/removal of the picture of you think it is warranted. Otherwise, you will be blocked for defacing the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:L cc60cfdfb9057f4a840583ca0136b692.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:L cc60cfdfb9057f4a840583ca0136b692.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —C.Fred (talk) 22:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:T.O.S7.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:T.O.S7.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —C.Fred (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:L cc60cfdfb9057f4a840583ca0136b692.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:L cc60cfdfb9057f4a840583ca0136b692.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:L cc60cfdfb9057f4a840583ca0136b692.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kanonkas : Talk 10:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Da 1 U Luv 2 Hate

I have nominated Da 1 U Luv 2 Hate, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Da 1 U Luv 2 Hate. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Reverend X (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]