User talk:Tudorminstrel

A tag has been placed on Jessop Saville & Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Welcome!

Hello, Tudorminstrel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 13:48, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Well done for your work on railway related topics in the areas of Sheffield and Rotherham. Here's an award for you to stick on your user page. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 12:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Good work on railways in South Yorkshire! With regard to the Mexborough - Barnsley line, I have read elsewhere that this closed to passengers in 1966. Are you sure of the 1959 date?BaseTurnComplete 19:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, definately 1959 for the local passenger services between Doncaster and Barnsley. There was a newspaper train from Manchester Piccadilly to Cleethorpes via Penistone and Barnsley which ran later and this, at least at some time, had passenger accommodation. I travelled on it once and that would have been in the sixties. I will look at my wording.

Ta. I have a feeling that there were at least some stopping passenger trains until 1966 as I've seen that date mentioned eleswhere for the closure of Wath Central at least. However, sods law, now that I try I can't put my hand on the book that mentioned it so it's my memory being tested.BaseTurnComplete 15:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like your memory served you correctly. Having followed this up I've found that the local Doncaster-Barnsley-Penistone service did indeed finish in 1959, however the 1.17am Manchester-Barnsley-Cleethorpes through train was still running over the line in 1963.BaseTurnComplete 14:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further digging has shown that this train as still running on this line in the early 1970s. The return working was via Sheffield.86.145.166.71 17:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to "Thrybergh Tins"

Your recent edit to "Thrybergh Tins" (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

High Royds railway station

Are you sure / can you check your facts on this one? High Royds is the large mental health facility in Menston, West Yorkshire. There was a High Royds station (which went under a succession of names), connected to what is now the Wharfedale Line. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Thanks for your work on the MOB page

Looks like a lot of good useful info. Interesting to see you do stuff on Sheffield area railways too, One of my other interests!Talltim 19:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Elsecar Ironworks

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Elsecar Ironworks, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://nottinghamshirenotes.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default/1198054930228285487. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

Regarding your article, ‎Bolsover Colliery Company

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Tommosimmo (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Berner Oberland Bahn

Hi, I see you've contributed to the above article. Do you know if the carriages that are now preserved on the Chemin de Fer de la Baie de Somme (CFBS) are four wheel or bogie carriages? Mjroots (talk) 15:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CF YStC

Hi, you might want to look at the CFBS article for material to expand the CF YStC article. Mjroots (talk) 11:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firth Brown & other Sheffield co's

Just a note to say Ive tagged the article on Firth Brown for No references. could you please add some if possible. I currently collecting Old Sheffield companies article up and adding them to a list box (currently in my sandbox) like the Sheffield structures one, also looking for articles to add to a Sheffield companies Category, as per other areas. As looking at the originator of the article history I see you have created lots of others similar ones I'm leaving this note. Theres a lot of good articles there that are probably not being viewed as much as they should, and need categorizing to link them to Sheffield. So am adding the relevant ones to WikiProject Sheffield, if not already tagged. BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed that Newton, Chambers & Company, is also unreferenced, I have some info but not from a quality source, If possible can you add some good refs from your source material, (not tagged it) Thanks. -BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit changes

I came across your user page by chance, and enjoying browsing articles you'd created. I had a few observations? Have you seen WP:CONTEXT? It might be useful for you, helping to decide what to give Wiki links to. In this para there are a couple things that might use copyedit:

"The most obvious clue to the site of the works is the local pub, named "The Furnace". Looking out from the pub there is a large area of flatish land, now a playing field, which was covered by the works. The tramways can easily be traced, nowadays they are footpaths/bridleways and the route to the canal basin lies between long establish hedgerows. It is more difficult to trace the tramways to Tankersley Park or the Thornecliffe works, which became the centre of the Newton, Chambers empire, but not impossible."

"footpaths/bridleways". Forward slashes are ambiguous, and not recommended by most style manuals, including Wiki's. If this means "footpaths and bridleways" or "footpaths or bridleways" or "footpaths, where there are not bridleways", it's helpful to say exactly that.

Phrases such as "the most obvious clue", "can easily be traced", "but not impossible" are more suited to a travel guide than an encyclopedia. They aren't verifiable facts, in a strict sense, but also, depending on the reader's point-of-view, they might be misleading. (For example a professional archeologist with aerial photos has a different perspective than a weekend industrial archeologist, on the ground, etc.)

Now I'm off to read more of your interesting articles, thanks for writing them! 67.169.126.196 (talk) 21:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swinton Central railway station photograph

Thanks for spotting my mistake with the photograph of the Swinton Central railway station. You're correct, I'm not familiar with the area. I've moved the photograph. Edward (talk) 10:53, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bentley Crossing Halt

Do you know exactly where this station was? From your description it was next to a level crossing on the road that became the A19, however from looking at old maps the station doesn't seem to be shown and the future A19 had a bridge from the beginning of the line. However 'Bentley Crossing' is marked at the crossing just north of the current station. Talltim (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spike Island

A nice little article. I've moved it to Spike Island (Doncaster) and added a dab link to Spike Island. I've also added a citation template and reference list, which you might like to try doing in your future articles (see WP:CITE). Cheers, Marasmusine (talk) 11:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nunnery engine shed

I see that you started this article. Can I ask where you got the information, I would like to find out more? Thanks Talltim (talk) 08:36, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, much appreciated Talltim (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of North Lindsay Light Railway

A tag has been placed on North Lindsay Light Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Allen

Your recent edit on Edgar Allen, following the announcement that Balfour Beatty was to close the Sheffield facilities, said "This will see the end of the Edgar Allen steel making and engineering connection in Sheffield." Although not now strictly in Sheffield, its British Rema subsidiary still exists as an independent business. It was bought out of Edgar Allen in 1980 and first moved to the former Lucas Works site in Dronfield and then to the Sheepbridge industrial estate near Chesterfield from where it continues to operate today. Eltorreon (talk) 16:02, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maltby railway station

The article Maltby railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reference found the only published (gBook) references in the novel "The Fifth Form at Saint Dominic's" By Talbot Baines Reed, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 11:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Also please see here for information on adding references to articles. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:56, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Moor End goods station, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meadowhall (Tivoli Gardens) railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meadowhall (Tivoli Gardens) railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadowhall (Tivoli Gardens) railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MGWR Class D

Hi, Realise you may not have been active on Wikipedia of late but just to comment I may add/change some content to the article at some point in the near future and as you have contributed to it in the past you may wish to review or comment on it. If you have access to additional sources also please leave a message. See Talk:MGWR_Class_D for further information. Thanks. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Woodburn Junction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woodburn Junction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodburn Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]