Jump to content

User talk:Victorgrigas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"untrue statement"

[edit]

I can actually picture some fairly obvious ways for that not to be untrue.--SarekOfVulcan 08:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Summit-lorez.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

sarcasm?

[edit]

I don't know how the `sth happend to fasiscists' statement feats into Wiki. But it's your pagina.

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Andy Shaw, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Andy Shaw. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Diez2 17:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a cat that would let me do that to him too, and probably it wouldn't hurt or bother him at all, (and it would be funny, because I'd know I wasn't hurting him) but the picture as it stands is kind of disturbing and is unlikely to ever be used in any encyclopedia article. Someone has already tagged it for speedy deletion and I'm inclined to do delete it. Please let me know what your intention was in uploading this photo. Cheers. Dina 04:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. It isn't really an issue of censorship, so much as utility. Wikipedia doesn't generally host images purely for creating galleries on userpages. I did not tag the image as offensive (someone else did)-- as I said, I can see that the cat probably isn't being harmed. But it's difficult to see where else in the encyclopedia the image could possibly be useful (we don't have an article on Fake kitty torture) and it's clearly offended at least one editor. That's why I asked. Note: Adding it to Animal abuse was, honestly, not the world's smartest idea. It will likely be deleted very quickly, whether I do anything about it or not. Cheers. Dina 04:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commodity Fetishism and diamonds and cars and pearls and anything luxury...

[edit]

With your rationale, you would quite happily and arbitrarily add a link to any article that seems to fit the notion of commodity fetishism. If diamonds are an example of commodity fetishism is quite different to a related page link. The 'See also' section is to direct the reader to articles that RELATE to diamonds NOT luxury in general. Your link is irrelevant to the article topic. SauliH 05:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:29 the cat.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:29 the cat.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECUtalk 13:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I've added some content to the article, if you want to take a look. Any other stars of Chicagoland TV yet to be covered?Zagalejo 05:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:S1-kultur-2 copy.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:S1-kultur-2 copy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Thigahmahji martinlut 101b.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thigahmahji martinlut 101b.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I have nominated this article (and many other HP product pages) for deletion via AFD; please use the link at the top of the article if you would like to add your comments to the discussion. --Brianyoumans 07:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


To revert to a pre-vandalism version, I had to overwrite your updates to her page. Please feel free to re-add them. As the aldermanic election nears, People are mistakenly believing that vandalising her page will help or hurt other candidates. Most serious challengers believe that Daley's record should be made public and that rational discussion of her strengths and weaknesses will lead to appropriate results in the election. So addition of NPOV positive and negative information to her page will be welcomed and not arbitrarily deleted. But I am keeping a close watch on it for vandalism. Jeffab123 09:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of American Merchant Stripes

[edit]

An editor has nominated American Merchant Stripes, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Merchant Stripes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 22:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Fenwick High School, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --ElKevbo 06:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Looptopia Millenium Park Police.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Looptopia Millenium Park Police.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

stencil = 1984

[edit]

I know you uploaded the picture, and it seems obvious, but do you think we can assume that 1984 means the book? --Knulclunk 03:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Coalition for Change and Progress

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chicago Coalition for Change and Progress, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Piuro 19:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

108 North State Street

[edit]

Would it be possible to get pictures of different languages instead of 3 of the English? Also, please either properly cite the woodblock stuff or remove it. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 22:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wham!
wham!

Greetings from WikiProject Graffiti, you are part of a dedicated group of people working to better Wikipedia's coverage of topics relating to Graffiti. Latest News:

If you are looking for something to do:

  • We still have a To Do list.
  • You can help spread important templates.
  • You can improve these pages.
  • You can also help but uploading pictures or images of Graffiti and Street art.

And remember you can add some input at our talk page. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 09:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Victory87.jpeg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Victory87.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arbeiter Zeitung (Anarchist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Darkwind (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Chicago paper was published by anarchists, the kind of Germans that the fascists murdered. The fascists certainly did not borrow ideas from them just because they wrote in the same language. Are you thinking of the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung? --Orange Mike 01:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (hopes you realize "Zeitung" means "Times")[reply]

yes i understand that but im more interested in how people of any political base will have the need to study and criticize other political structures. I was actually making a link (putting those double brackets in) of Arbeiter Zeitung on the - i forget - haymarket riot page? and when it was blue, i clicked on it and found the fascist article and all i could think is how ideas flow from one direction into another meaning that the anarchist workers paper printed in chicago would have a fascist counterpart printed in germany several decades later! The first must have affected the second. The population of germans in chicago was tied to the germans in germany by family, history, language, culture etc. and this would help these ideas promulgate.

?What fascist article? There was an anti-fascist paper of the same name in Austria many years later; but no fascist paper had that name. Are you sure you don't have things mixed up here? --Orange Mike 02:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC) (in schöne Milwaukee)[reply]

oh shit maybe i put somethign in my bong that i shouldnt have, but i could swear thta there was a fascist paper of the same name on here......

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Arbeiter Zeitung (Anarchist), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Arbeiter Zeitung (Anarchist) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Arbeiter Zeitung (Anarchist), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Declined to delete

[edit]

Well knowing that it is an historic newspaper, I have declined to delete it as an admin and removed the tag. I have also added to it a little and added an academic reference. There should be no further difficulty. The date from your apparent source is probably not correct, and I am checking. The title is being moved to Arbeiter-Zeitung (Chicago) per the Manual of Style. DGG (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, I've strengthened the article considerably, placing it in its proper context in labor and Chicago history. Solidarity forever! --Orange Mike 14:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC) (IWW I.U. 660)[reply]

Chicago Seed

[edit]

A great source of info on the Seed is the book "Uncovering the Sixties:The Life and Times of the Underground Press" by Abe Peck. Peck was an editor of the Seed. At the moment, I don't have time to work on Wikipedia, but I wish you well in building up the article. BTfromLA 19:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of John Jovino Gun Shop

[edit]

John Jovino Gun Shop, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that John Jovino Gun Shop satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Jovino Gun Shop and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of John Jovino Gun Shop during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jmlk17 06:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Warrick L. Carter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Arx Fortis (talk) 04:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Audio Active

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Audio Active requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eatcacti (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the above article for deletion, because of my concern that it doesn't meet the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (books). You are welcome to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Success of Open Source. EdJohnston (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Neo (nightclub)

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Neo (nightclub) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pumpmeup 06:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. I just wanted to explain my edit to you: I removed the gallery in the Graffiti article itself because there is already a link to a gallery of political graffiti present (the commons template in the external links section). The 'Uses' section also starts with an example of political graffiti and that is sufficient for the article itself as an visual example: see guidelines Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Images. I suggest you add the pictures to the gallery in commons, if you'd like. I also want to note that some of the pictures in the gallery weren't political though: e.g. the viking graffiti, the kilroy graffiti. Or what do you suggest? Key to the city (talk) 13:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lumpen Issue 97.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lumpen Issue 97.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lumpen Issue 98.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lumpen Issue 98.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Icke & Er

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Icke & Er requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 23:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sharkula

[edit]

I have nominated Sharkula, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharkula. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. αѕєηιηє t/c 20:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage image removal

[edit]

I have removed copyrighted content from your userpage in accordance with WP:FAIR#Policy. αѕєηιηє t/c 20:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Old Town Ale House

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Old Town Ale House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblbrox (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

laughing_man image

[edit]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Laughing man - Chicago Sticker Graffiti .jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.productionig.com/contents/works_sp/38_/index.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Laughing man - Chicago Sticker Graffiti .jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Laughing man - Chicago Sticker Graffiti .jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Laughing man - Chicago Sticker Graffiti .jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Laughing man - Chicago Sticker Graffiti .jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Laughing man - Chicago Sticker Graffiti .jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. F.U.R hurts Wikipedia 19:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for your efforts:

--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cactus & Windmill.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Cactus & Windmill.JPG. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Cactus & Windmill.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhi and Hitler

[edit]

Hi. Much of the discussion on Gandhi and the Second World War is in the section on non-violence. You may want to consider moving the quote there (along with a source citation!) and integrating it into that discussion (or, perhaps, including it in a box). Regards. --Regents Park (paddle with the ducks) 12:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IBM and the Holocaust

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article IBM and the Holocaust, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tsubasa (talk) 02:19, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know?

[edit]

Don't you know how to rotate an image?

It is easy.

For example, using MSFT Paint:

Open MSFT Paint.

Select the image using, File, Open, then browse for the image.

With the image open in MSFT Paint, select Image, Flip/Rotate.

Then choose how you want to rotate the image:

Flip horizontal
Flip vertical
Rotate by angle
90°
180°
270°

Say, "Rotate by angle", 90°.

This will fix an image like, , would now be how it is supposed to be. I would be embarrassed to post such a simple fix.

- 4.240.165.47 (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Goldman's grave

[edit]

The picture, we thought, would help us find it as we aimlessly wandered through the Waldheim Cemetery yesterday. Luckily it was a beautiful day.

Is it possible for you to give me some sort of idea as to where this is? I heard it isnt too far from one of the entrances and Im wondering if we were in the complete wrong cemetery alltogether as we were surrounded by different ones on all sides of the street.

It would be much appreciated.

Can you email me at myyellowchair@gmail.com?

Thanks HadasPrittypistol (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

7th millenium BC figurines photo

[edit]

Hi, thank you for uploading this photo. Unfortunately, I've had to remove several instances of its usage because the the phrase "anthropomorphised rocks" is factually, grammatically and syntactically incorrect. There are numerous fields that study such figurines, these include archeology and art history, but linguistics is not really one of them. The subjects within the work of art may be anthropomorphic, however the same cannot be said of the medium. Otherwise, for instance, you could describe a painting as an "anthropomorphised canvas". ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Swaptree.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image info request

[edit]

Hi. Could you please add some info about File:Woodblock Enter.jpg? Eg, do you remember what country or city you were in when you photographed it? Thanks. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:08, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Graffiti Blasters

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Graffiti Blasters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable company

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Luk talk 13:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Woodblock graffiti, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodblock graffiti. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Graffiti Blasters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graffiti Blasters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Flaneur_Sharkula.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Flaneur_Sharkula.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 07:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sharkula_Bookings.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sharkula_Bookings.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 07:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Zoom H4n, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kevin (talk) 06:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Looptopia 2008.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Looptopia 2008.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Schmidt Metzgerei

[edit]

Could you please tell me where exactly the old "Schmidt Metzgeri" is located in Chicago? Thank you very much. Shahrdad (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you!! I looked it up on Googlemaps, and it is at 1800 North Hudson Avenue, Chicago IL 60614-5202, right at the corner of Hudson and Menomonee. It's now the Mary Aileen O'Callaghan Law office. Thank you again. I don't think I could have found it without your help. Shahrdad (talk) 12:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Oliver Hodge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Union (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 18:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Isaac Le Maire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article doesn't show how this person is actually notable. In addition its completely unsourced, and appears to be a bad machine translation since much of it is practically unintelligible

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jac16888Talk 18:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Synesthesia pizza computer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 05:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sputnik the Cat.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago photo during the 2011 Groundhog day winter storm

[edit]
Chicago's Fullerton Harbor looking south during the storm (left) and on a clear day for comparison

I don't really know how to nominate a photo on wikipedia, let alone two photos, but your two photos really capture how Chicago has changed during a (heavy) Winter's day. I love it (well, I hate Winter, but I love how you captured it), and if you, or anyone else, knows how to qualify these photos for 'featured picture', I'll back it up 100,000%!! Anyhow, a great appreciation from my side of the screen towards you! Robster1983 (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, hurrah, them photos are nominated! :D Of course, the moment I saw your email, I logged in to give the nomination my big support. Hopefully many other Wikipedians appreciate the photos also! Robster1983 (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just found out your photos weren't promoted. Sorry to hear that, I really am. They had my vote, for sure! On the other hand: since 'photo' seems to be your middle-name, chances are that you'll surprise us with another photo soon. Anyhow, keep it up! Robster1983 (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A big thanks

[edit]

A big thanks for the cigar! Usually I don't smoke, but for this occasion I will gladly make an exception, and know for sure that I will enjoy it! :) Thnx! Robster1983 (talk) 18:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lumpen (magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability, no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ·Maunus·ƛ· 03:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article you created Dead_Drop_(USB) seems like an interesting concept, but I was wondering if you could point out a source for it actually being done. I'd love to see the article stick around. Monty845 (talk) 01:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why not uploading your images at Commons?

[edit]

Hi Victor, I wonder why you do not upload your images at Wikimedia Commons, so every project could use them, instead of uploaing them at the English Wikipedia? Regards, Pilettes (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed it while having a look at the images from the eartship-article. But in general it is a little bit a shame, that not ervery project can benefit from your pictures. Perhaps you can change your force of habit and upload in the future at the commons, so we all can benefit from your contributions. If you have a image uploaded at wikipedia and not in commons and I think it would be useful to have it at the commons, I will upload them there (if copyright makes no problems) but we all can have it easier. I would be pleased. :) Regards, --Pilettes (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Powerdecal for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Powerdecal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerdecal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. @ d \/\/ | | |Talk 01:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solar Cells Soldering.JPG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Solar Cells Soldering.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lool Cuab.JPG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Lool Cuab.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lool Cuab.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lool Cuab.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 08:05, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lool Cuab Smoking 1.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lool Cuab Smoking 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lool Cuab Smoking 2.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lool Cuab Smoking 2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lool Cuab Smoking 3.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lool Cuab Smoking 3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Old Town Chicago Poster.JPG

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Old Town Chicago Poster.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 08:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bask Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo Feb 2 2011 storm 2.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bask Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo Feb 2 2011 storm 2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYs (TALK) 07:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bask Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo Feb 2 2011 storm.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bask Chicago Lincoln Park Zoo Feb 2 2011 storm.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYs (TALK) 07:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cross Country Skiing Belden Ave Chicago Feb 2 2011.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cross Country Skiing Belden Ave Chicago Feb 2 2011.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYs (TALK) 08:19, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting

[edit]

Dear Victor,

it's nice to hear about the Wikipedia Stories Project. I will be happy to meet you at Wikimania. I arrive a day before Wikimania itself to participate Chapters meeting and ComCom meeting... Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 13:56, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi Victor! Sure, I'd be willing to tell you my story at Wikimania, though I don't know how exciting or interesting it is! I'll be in Haifa from Wednesday evening through Saturday evening. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 22:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania Interview

[edit]

Hi Victorgrigas! You did message me! (Alex suggested me as I am part of the minority of editors) Do you still have any open spots this weekend? I can talk a bit about the student club idea to encourage new editors. MichChemGSI (talk) 10:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article People are Knowledge (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of People are Knowledge (film) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People are Knowledge (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People are Knowledge (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)TCM20:19, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bananaski for you

[edit]
A bananaski for you
yummmmy Ashstar01 (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Charles Bernardini. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Bernardini has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail and phone call

[edit]

I replied to your e-mail but it bounced. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. sonia03:24, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad. I was free today, but I'm busy until at next week. Try me then. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. I am going to try the address connected to your account here. --Guerillero | My Talk 23:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please send me the e-mail address to use. I have time to talk this afternoon if you wish. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OWS new york times

[edit]

Great finding(File:Nytimesoccupywallstreet.jpg)! Thanks for contributing that, and i hope you'll find more! Mrwho00tm (talk) 18:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed them from the irrelevant articles. It only applies to OWS, so don't add your distorted propaganda or anti-news agenda to anymore articles. Thanks. 99.162.63.241 (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimesoccupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimesoccupywallstreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No story

[edit]

Thanks for the invite, but I don't have any story. I just futz around on Wikipedia as a hobby. I hope I am doing no harm but doubt that I am doing much good. I am very skeptical about the longer-term value of the project. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VasuVR : Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. You have new messages at VasuVR's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

01:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

I'm indeed interested in participating in Wikipedia Stories Project. I understand that you had requested me to send a mail in this regard. But will you be able to identify me by my mail id. Or can you send a test mail to me using the "E-mail user" option?-RaviMy Tea Kadai 01:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and my my reply. --Bhadani (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replied by mail. Tintin 15:14, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

I don't think so I will be able to makie it to WikiConference India, however if You can personally meet me in Mumbai or even phone conversation will do. Thank you!! -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Nytimes_occupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes_occupywallstreet.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:43, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, History of debt

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, History of debt. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Debt. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Debt - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interview

[edit]

Yeah, sure, I'd love to help you, sir. My email address is constantinecesak@hotmail.com. I'll give you my phone-number through my email. Kostantino888Z (talk) 03:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Fort Dearborn.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Fort Dearborn.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interview again

[edit]

Dear Victorgrigas, thanks for your kind message. I would love to give an interview and help the community in whichever way I can. You can find my e-mail address in my user page. Please do contact. Or I will send you a mail. — Legolas (talk2me) 14:42, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion occurring for – File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]

There's a discussion occurring on the Occupy Wall Street discussion page here regarding this image: thumb|center.
—::Northamerica1000(talk) 16:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes occupywallstreet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WCI 2011 Pics

[edit]

Hiya, Just strolling by to request you to upload pics from WCI 2011 to Commons (I see you have done the hackathon, would love to have ones from the main event as well). Cheers, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure- i have a bit of a backlog now, but i'l get to it as soon as i can! :) Victor Grigas (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great photos of WCI 2011 - and the Indians with cellphones had me laughing aloud. Cheers! Bishdatta (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking cap

[edit]

The article Thinking cap has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi Victor,

Thank you for your message. I'm sorry, but I'm not interested in being interviewed for the project.

Happy holidays, — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Harmarket Monument with Anarchist Graffiti.JPG

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harmarket Monument with Anarchist Graffiti.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Haymarket Monument by Mary Brogger 2.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haymarket Monument by Mary Brogger 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Critical mass Chicago, passing Haymarket Monument.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Critical mass Chicago, passing Haymarket Monument.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
For your wonderful photojournalism during the great blackout, I award you this star. Guerillero | My Talk 07:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Caton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gsingh (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your photos

[edit]

I enjoyed perusing through your photos on your userpage. Nice job on them. :-) Killiondude (talk) 04:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You also have lots of template-y crap on your user talk page. You can just erase them if you'd like. Or archive them. Killiondude (talk) 04:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi Victor;

thanks for thinking of me for your interviews, feel free to send me an e-mail here with the details. If you think that the life of a wiki-addict like me deserves to be included in your project, go ahead (at yout own risk ;). I hope my story can be helpful to others. Cheers!.--Darius (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victor, and thanks for your interview proposal. Unfortunately, I'm not living in Buenos Aires (nor in Argentina) any more, but feel free to contact me if you happen to visit Slovenia. Cheers, Mariano(t/c) 08:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Victor. Thanks for your invitation. I don't think I could provide anything interesting enough though. But, hey, I will probably meet you in Natal (BR) on March \o/ ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 20:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sao Paulo Event

[edit]

Hello Victor!


Your portuguese is pretty good. Did you have that translated?

I must apologize, I am not in Sao Paulo, so I will not be available for an interview. I am actually in Haiti, doing after-quake aid work. If you ever stop by here, I'd be happy to give you a story. :)

-Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesblack (talkcontribs) 21:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cant take credit for the Portugese, I let Google Translate do all the work! Yes, I'd be interested in speaking with you via Skype or Phone or whatever means is easiest for you! Unfortunately I have no plans as of yet to travel to Haiti.


Hey Victor!

First of all, I wanna thank you for giving us such opportunity. Second, I'm living on Sao Paulo as now, so I'm pretty sure I will be able to meet you when you come here, and tell my history for you. Feel free to drop another message in my user talk so we can talk further about this.

--Agentel (talk) 23:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Agentel,

I'm glad to hear that you are interested in attending! Do you think you can come to the event we are holding? Are there any questions you have for me? I'd like to be as open as I can be! :D

Victor Victor Grigas (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Victor; I'm quite interested in the opportunity to talk about my experiences as a Wikipedian, even though most of my editing happens in the English language Wikipedia. If you need any help with translation as well, I'm a near-fluent American English speaker (and native Brazilian) and I'm willing to help with WikiSampa in any capacity required (within reason). Let me know if you need anything.

Ed Mercer (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ed,

That's Great! Thank you for your interest in helping! I see you put your name on the 'who wants to go' list on the signup page. Are there things that might deter you from coming? Do you have any questions for me? I'd like to help! :)

Victor

Victor Grigas (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victor,
I cannot be sure I'm going to be available at March 1st, I teach English to small children on Thursday mornings and early afternoons, but my Fridays are mostly free. So my participation, at least so far, is tentative at best. If you need help with translation when I'm not teaching, I'm definitely there! Just let me know. ;)
Ed

Ed Mercer (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stories Project

[edit]

Dear Victor. I'd love to participate in this Stories Project. Unfortunatelly I have a trip to a mission in Antartica (yes, really), starting March 6 and untill March 27. If you can antecipate that schedule or if you'd like to communicate through skype or phone, that'd be alright. I can try to record something from Antartica as well, saying how Wikipedia has helped me excel in my work environment and give me these kinds of opportunities. Anyway, feel free to contact me again, I hope we can arrange something. Regards. leguas (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interview

[edit]

Hey Victor! I responded to your e-mail about the stories project. Ursinism (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Thanks, but no. I don't like to meet with people I just knew on the internet, sorry. If I can help in anything else, tell me ;) --RatonBat Talk 2 me!! 14:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Greater Sudbury Police Service
Chemical waste
Pedro Laín Entralgo
Yolk plug
Occupation (protest)
Against Equality
Civic amenity site
Bulky waste
Occupy Pittsburgh
The One Percent
Occupy Berlin
Blackie Dammett
Emanuele Bindi
Household Hazardous Waste
The Beverly Hills Courier
Bindy
Occupy San Diego
Occupy Windsor
Demolition waste
Cleanup
Landfill diversion
Kangaroo emblems and popular culture
De-escalation
Merge
Occupy Toronto
Data erasure
Splinternet
Add Sources
Mark Buehrle
Occupy Rose Parade
Occupy Providence
Wikify
UR Chicago
Copy testing
Environmental Waste Controls
Expand
Occupy Austin
Polychrome
1976 African Cup of Nations

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
for the fantastic photojournalism that you've done lately, documenting an exciting time in the life of the Foundation. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting together

[edit]

It was a pleasure to meet you at the meetup this weekend! I posted some photos of you at the meetup on commons: User:Victorgrigas#San_Francisco_Wikipedia_Meetup_February_2012 Is there a time that would work for you to come into the office for a one-on-one interview (if you are interested of course)?

Victor Grigas (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed our discussion on Saturday. I have some business in San Francisco on Friday morning, and will probably be done by very early afternoon. So would sometime Friday afternoon work for you? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Because of the nature of the work I do, I can't say exactly when I will be finished with my San Francisco customer, but I would be surprised if it was after 1:00 p.m. How about if I post here on this page when I am wrapping up, and then I will head downtown to Wikimedia Galactic Headquarters? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have another interview scheduled from 12-1, but anytime around then works for me :) Victor Grigas (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia story

[edit]

Dear Victor Firs of all thank you very much for writing. Unfortunately I will not be able to be in Buenos Aires on the aforementioned dates. In addition I would like to know more about the stories. Do you mean stories of how we got involved with Wikipedia or our participation in it?. I am a casual user and I barely contributed so there isn't much story on my case. Anyways thank you for writing, I hope I hear from you soon InfoLove — Preceding unsigned comment added by InfoLove (talkcontribs) 05:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]
Sure, why not? –w2bh talkcontribs 16:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi, thanks for the invitation, but sorry, I will not be in the WikiSampa 12. However, anything I can help you, just ask me. --Ricvelozo (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Thank you for your invitation. I'm not sure if I'll be available on March 1st, but I will check it later. Victão Lopes I hear you... 23:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi there, sorry for the delay, and thanks for the invitation, but I am no longer active at Wikipedia, and it has been too long since I joined to remember many experiences that might have been convenient for the chat. I don't think it should be ethically correct to persuade people when I am no longer active. Regards -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Victor, I am contacting you because I am interested in the Wikimedia Stories Project and several Spanish Wikipedia users told me that you coming to Buenos Aires.

I was told to contact you and here I am, I have many questions as: Where will the interview, will it be in English? Also consult you if I can take my parents because I have only 10 years old.

I hope your answer :) regards Lucas --Rgaj123 (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi Victor, I left a reply to your message on my talk page :-) - MsBatfish (talkcontribs) 06:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentine's Day

[edit]
File:Valentine's Ducks.jpg Rubber duckies for you
Happy Valentine's Day Victor! May this year bring you lots of #WikiLove, as you deserve it! SarahStierch (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hello Victor I left 2 places on the page, the Planetarium Galileo Galilei (although not if you can) and the Centro Cultural General San Martin, where either made ​​a Meetup and Wikimania 2009.

For me it would be easier to go on the afternoon of day, even I know that's not up to me. Although not if you go, by my parents auntos, makes it impossible to attend;)

Of course, greetings :) Lucas --Rgaj123 (talk) 01:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Well, it really would be more convenient for me on Sunday March 11. Because my father works all on Saturday. Thank you very much for the attention being, but I have a doubt. Do you know Spanish? Since it is complicated by the language.[reply]

Well greetings and sorry to bother you, because they sure have a busy schedule and interrupt to answer my messages greetings :) --Rgaj123 (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArgentinaStorytelling

[edit]

Hi Victor, did you receive my mail? Best, Galio (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just replied to your message - I'd like to organize the event with you! :) Thank you for your thoughtful reply Victor Grigas (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]

Thank you. You are too kind--Orestek (talk) 06:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

xoxox

Ashstar01 (talk) 17:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Victor, see the last line of the intro. Chico Venancio (talk) 20:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, again, Victor. I don't know if this is your area, but I figure you know a bit about motivating people to do something. Could you check out this project proposal I've made on pt.wiki? It is derived from a discussion I had at WikiRio. I have never made or participated heavily on a project before, so any feedback is appreciated. I translated everything so you guys could read it without the peculiar Google translation (you might want to ‎compare it just for fun). Chico Venancio (talk) 23:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Victor, I was wondering about the pictures you took... Chico Venancio (talk) 23:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, whats your email - il send them right over 216.38.130.162 (talk) 00:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArgentinaStorytelling

[edit]

Hi Victor, I have just sent you an email. See you, Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hi Victor! Yes, i would do that interview. Thanks for asking me! --Arne (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will do it too.--Mishae (talk) 00:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Victor. Thanks for asking me. I'd be glad to participate. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Reunião

[edit]

Sim claro, é só marcar, da última vez tive um compromisso que não poderia adiar, era minha primeira aula em um cursinho comunitário (pré-vestibular), atualmente ministro aulas em dois cursinhos, pretendo criar mais um ano que vem ampliando a rede. estou escrevendo um artigo aqui se quiser acompanhar, utilizei grande parte daquele email que eu te mandei. http://br.wikimedia.org/wiki/Artigo_para_livro_sobre_recursos_educacionais_abertos Abraços libertários


im of course, just check the last time I had an appointment that could not postpone my first class was a refresher course in Community (pre-university), currently Minister in two classes workshops, intend to create more than a year that has broadened the network. I'm writing an article here if you want to track, I used much of that email I sent you.

http://br.wikimedia.org/wiki/Artigo_para_livro_sobre_recursos_educacionais_abertos

Raul Campos hugs libertarians also sorry for bad translation lolRautopia (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eu gosto do artigo! I like the article! :) Victor Grigas (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interview

[edit]

Hi, I would love to . But how long you would stay in Brazil? I am 200miles from São Paulo Regards Ighor

Hello, Victor. Let me know when you going to Russia.--Soul Train (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! - I have tentative plans to travel around 6-12 to 6-21 but these dates are not set yet, and may change. Can you do me a big favor and refer me to some Wikipedians whom I should talk to? Victor Grigas (talk) 21:58, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

[edit]

Hello, Victor! If you plan to go to Russia, I can help to translate your message into Russian. And if you yourself do not know with whom you can meet, then it's not a problem. Can I ask in the Russian Wikipedia, referring to you, who will meet with you. But I myself participate in your idea to, unfortunately I can not. And I apologize for any poor translation of this letter) Thank you. --Korol Bumi (talk) 07:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Korol Bumi!

Thank you very much for your reply. I'm sad that you aren't interested in participating, because I have many questions for you, but I'm very happy that you want to help me to find some interesting editors. Can you introduce me to some interesting editors whom you know?

Can I send you a document in Russian and you can read it and tell me if it is correct?

Thank you!

Victor

  • Of course, on the translation into Russian, you can right now) I can not participate personally, because physically I did not get to do it. I live in the Transbaikal region, which is very far from the main mass of editors RuWiki. I'll write a post about your arrival. But what exactly is to write about? And with any Russian (possibly large) you copied the editors on this? Someone has to meet Al. Thank you. --Korol Bumi (talk) 08:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think first and foremost, you need to write Vladimir Medeyko (Dr Bug: meta and RuWiki). So it will be more accurate. Do not worry, he knows English well. And the translation I will help you, so send your text, I will be happy to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korol Bumi (talkcontribs) 08:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation. I'm not the best person to interview, but I'll think about other possible candidates, maybe other female wikipedians. Which cities in Russia are you going to visit? -- deerstop. 19:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I plan to be in Moscow and St. Petersburg, I encounter many people who have modest feelings about their contributions, do you think you have any contributions that you have made that you are particularly proud of? Thank you for offering to help find people for me to talk to! Victor Grigas (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Benzband's talk page.

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thanks for adding photographs to Gateway of India, ;) the current collaboration of WikiProject India. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 16:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

You have messages here, although I doubt it's the answer you are looking for. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 00:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be sure to ping you later when I can do it, but right now would you mind looking at the section below our convo? It's entirely up to you, of course. Cheers, and best of luck with your project. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 22:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have got mail!

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Netha Hussain (talk) 03:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interviewing people

[edit]

Hi, I saw from several of my edit-friend's talk pages that you were looking to talking to them for stories. [I saw on the talk pages of Netha Hussain and Naveenpf]. Might I make a suggestion of User:Sodabottle ??? He organised an excellent contest which resulted in the Wikimedia Commons getting 15k+ files. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) Victor Grigas (talk) 18:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the offer Victor (and for the reco Srikanth). Yes i would like to take part in the stories project. --Sodabottle (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. You have new messages at Ryan Vesey's talk page.
Message added 23:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ryan Vesey Review me! 23:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this on some talk pages

[edit]

I would like to be interviewed. I have been here for a while with over 24,000 edits, I have rollback, and my articles are patrolled automatically. SL93 (talk) 01:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Thank you for asking! As a medical editor taking part in almost all medical projects from the first days, I'm very much looking forward to doing the interview with you. You can easily reach me at berci.mesko at gmail.com. NCurse work 05:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories

[edit]

Yes, I would like to take a part in the project. I'm an editor since 2007 in the spanish Wikipedia, and I have a main focus in multimedia resources in Wikimedia Commons. You can contact me at magwhiz [at] me [dot] com House (talk) 06:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikimedia Stories

[edit]

Salve, I am only a quite normal wikipedia author, just looking for relevant lemmata, collecting notes + references and compiling this. Even in my mother tongue I am critizised for my bad German. If you still want to interview me, you know where to find me.--Symposiarch (talk) 08:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stories

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. You have new messages at Sctechlaw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Victorgrigas. You have new messages at FT2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Hmm, you surprised and encouraged me to consider this my year on Wikipedia ;). I started work in full swing in April 2011, I have got 1500 edits in Polish Wikipedia main namespace in this time. Even before I could not understand license issues and I learned a lot about them. Now free culture movement took all my free time, I'm perhaps the youngest active editor on pl.wiki.

I bubbled too much, so yes, I would like to take part in this project. My e-mail is przemub [at] yahoo [dot] pl.

--Przemub (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at User:SMcCandlish's talk page.. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 01:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Sorry for the late reply, but I was absolutely baffled. I like to know more about the project and how I can help. Night of the Big Wind talk 10:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia stories

[edit]

Hi Victor,

As I am not currently regular on Wikipedia, I saw your message only today. I find your proposal interesting. Please let me know how I can help.

--Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. You have new messages at La Pianista's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia stories

[edit]

I'd be glad to participate. Perhaps some initial written questions and a response at least to start? I'm open to a chat as well. VєсrumЬаTALK 20:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YGM

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

— La Pianista  22:10, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stories Project

[edit]

Victor, I would be delighted to take part in this project. Please let me know how and when the interview might take place

Rob Aleksandrowicz (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

I think it would be good if I took part in the project. I've enjoyed being an editor on Wikipedia for the mere 2 years I've been here. You can leave a message on my talk on just e-mail me. Davykamanzitalk  · contribs 15:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stories Project

[edit]

Yes, there are some things I would enjoy sharing.....Coal town guy (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Victor, I just sent an e mail

Re:Wikipedia Stories Project

[edit]

Count me in. I would like to share my story. Anything for Wikipedia. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

St.Petersburg, June 2012

[edit]

Dear colleague! June, 4, I have given to You my mobile number and other contact info. Alexander, Your translator, called me. The all from his side is fine, but unfortunately I have not found a time to meet You a second time in this week. I am sorry. But I filmed my short speech. You can see the video and read the text; sorry for the low quality of the video. Gamliel Fishkin (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From Saint Petersburg

[edit]

At Flickr. -- Vlsergey (talk) 21:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ViswaPrabha from India

[edit]

Hi there, I am here :) ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭtalk 21:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Taos, New Mexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mike Reynolds
Tin can wall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mike Reynolds

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User page images

[edit]

Hello, your user page is about 18 MB heavy, are you sure this is wise? Nemo 10:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing the images will still make people load them on page opening, you need to move them on another page or make them smaller. If you want to transclude them here there's perhaps some way (which I don't know) to load them dynamically, but the easiest thing to do is to place them all on a subpage and direct people there, so that those who don't care about loading such a huge page can just do it, and those who arrived on your user page randomly e.g. to click "talk" or to check your user language information can do so. Thanks, Nemo 16:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article You Weren't There has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, and none found in my search as per WP:BEFORE. No obvious redirect target.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 00:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please archive your talk page

[edit]

Hello! I just wanted to request that you archive your user talk page. While it may not be bothersome to you, many editors have slow connections, and having a very large talk page can hamper communication. If you need help, just check out the guide over at Help:Archiving a talk page. Thanks! —Yutsi Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 19:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+1 from me. Some users pay per volume, so visiting your talk page costs money unnecessarily. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A truffle for you

[edit]
for being the most delicious
now i'm getting into wiki...! ahhhh Ashstar01 (talk) 22:29, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yankee image

[edit]

That's not Núñez‎ (didn't play for the Yankees in July 2012) or Peña (didn't bat against the Red Sox this season). It looks like Darnell McDonald, but if you're the person who took the picture, shouldn't you know this? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update! I didn't know who the person was!! was looking around by number for the roster - ill change it :) Victor Grigas (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see, not a big baseball fan and just got a chance to go to the game. Let's see...
Thanks, I'm glad you like the photos!!! This is great that we can post these to the appropriate pages! :) Victor Grigas (talk) 20:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Incredible Edible Todmorden project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban gardening (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image of a telephone kiosk in India

[edit]

This image -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bangalore_India_Cellphone_Cellphone_Repair_Kiosk.jpg -- is labeled as being in Bangalore, but the sign above the kiosk clearly gives the address as "Colaba, Mumbai," which is a neighborhood of Mumbai, not Bangalore. Acsenray (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for noting! feel free to change the name :) Victor Grigas (talk) 21:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would change the name, but I don't know how Acsenray (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go to the commons and tag it for renaming. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind if I tagged the revisions too? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 14:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead :) Victor Grigas (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Victor, I'm afraid somebody beat me to it. (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cellphone_repair_kiosk,_Colaba,_Mumbai.jpg) ---------User:DanTD (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Video you attempted to add

[edit]

The video you appeared to attempt to add didn't show up correctly, so I have reverted it. StringTheory11 (tc) 04:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Sandy

[edit]

I will see what is visible in the morning.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windowfarm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban gardening (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your opinion...

[edit]

Greetings Victor,

the video is awesome. Introduction is way to awesome. I'm jealous that I'm not here this time :( -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 12:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your thanks for LT contributions at my talk page

[edit]

Kind of you to say that, thanks and best wishes. You do a lot of good work here :). Novickas (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wall of Honor

[edit]

Once in awhile, I am lucky enough to come across and interact with some Wikipedians who are not only well mannered, but who makes interacting a pleasure. You are one of those people, therefore it is with great pleasure that I induct you into the "Wall of Honor". Tony the Marine (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wall of Honor

Victor Grigas
2012
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Cinematic Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In Motion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Franz Huth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 09:14, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coppertone ATAT.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Coppertone ATAT.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Katz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Co-Prosperity Sphere (art gallery) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Co-Prosperity Sphere (art gallery) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-Prosperity Sphere (art gallery) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love dart article video

[edit]

Hello Victor, Sure... I am willing to be part of this project. Invertzoo (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Select Media Festival for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Select Media Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Select Media Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 13:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clay Shirky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PIPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cloud filmmaking, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://vimeo.com/57467478.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cloud filmmaking requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repurposed_Imac

[edit]

Is there any way I may acquire a reproduction of that lamp, please? I was sold on Mac's when my Cuz showed me his Classic just like that in your photo. I also had a Flip identical to yours for several years and it beat out the stuff we're stuck with today. 173.206.78.171 (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC) remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (173.206.78.171 (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)) or whatever that means[reply]

patrickforbes@mac.com

The article Frank Bardacke has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PeterWesco (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of BLP stubs

[edit]

Hi. I see that you are creating small, poorly sourced stubs of barely notable people. This is discouraged on Wikipedia. Instead, please move these stubs to your user space and work on them there, otherwise they will be deleted. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 05:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File talk:Clinton Yeltsin 1995.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

this has nothing to do with improving the file

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Begonia Brandbygeana (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jentri Anders for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jentri Anders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jentri Anders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jay Σεβαστόςdiscuss 00:17, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Updates from ‘Help distribute WikiReaders and provide an opportunity for kids to learn!’

[edit]

Hello,

I wondered if it was feasible or possible to monitor the activity levels on each WikiReader? Presumably, we fit each WikiReader with a program logging all activity (The times the articles are opened and closed, and the names of the article) somewhere. Then someone retrieves just the logging information from these after 6 months. At the same time, we might also be looking towards possibly replacing the memory cards with updated ones.

That way, we could be potentially looking towards some good research on how these Readers are utilised by the children, which would help immensely in understanding various kinds of trends. [What I had in mind was something similar to the Hole in The wall project by Prof Sugata Mitra, which makes me think directly contacting them might not be a bad idea either.]

Do tell me your thoughts on the same. Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 11:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don't know how we could implement this, I just think that it would take quite a bit of work, and then you have ethical considerations about 'monitoring' people (children) who look things up. I think that your idea would yield better data, but i think simply looking at grades over time would be less energy intensive (no need to program or install anything) and more ethical. I'm open to your ideas about this too. (and sorry for the delay, I have been away for a bit) Victor Grigas (talk) 14:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I think it could be worth a shot to ping the prof, and see what he thinks about it. What do you think?
Also, if we're looking at grades, there will be tests based on General Knowledge, right? Not strictly school grades
[No worries about the delay. It's fine :) ]
Cheers,
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

[edit]

Victor, this is incredible -- well done! Again, pleasure meeting you at Wikimania in Washington, D.C. Keep up the amazing work! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I'm glad you like it :) Do you want to start a page on Meta to collaborate with the learners for their campaign? I'd be happy to share it with them directly Victor Grigas (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Victorgrigas. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Chicago 7.
Message added 03:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 03:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article ideas for Xhosa Wikipedia

[edit]

Hi, Victor!

At xh:User:WhisperToMe I have a list of proposed topics for the Xhosa Wikipedia. Many are related to South Africa, and if Xhosa articles are established in these topics it can lead to more people coming to the Xhosa Wikipedia. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll pass this along to some Xhosa editors I know, they only have minimal time by computers, but hopefully they workVictor Grigas (talk) 18:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi

[edit]

hiBucio17 (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi

[edit]

how are youBucio17 (talk) 14:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine thank you, how are you?Victor Grigas (talk) 15:21, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hi

[edit]

hi how are you doing today i am fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bucio17 (talkcontribs) 15:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm building an edit visualization tool

[edit]

A demo of the edit visualization tool I'm building. You could add your feedback or feature requests here--jeph (talk) 02:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luis Gabriel Aguilera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

South African high school video

[edit]

Hello Victor, I've previously conversed with you about the video, although I can't find which talk page that was on. You said the video is still being prepared, which I well understand, but I would love, love, love to show it in the opening session of the EduWiki Conference on 1st November. Is there any chance the video will be available for public consumption by then? Cheers, MartinPoulter Jisc (talk) 11:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! So the 2 minute trailer should be up and online in about a week. We are still working on the full documentary, and don't have an exact date for that yet. I'll publish blog posts when each are up :)Victor Grigas (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's great. It's only the trailer that I need, if that was the children's message video that Sue showed at Wikimania. But I'll show whatever video there is relating to this awesome project. Cheers, MartinPoulter Jisc (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's not online yet so I can't use it in the opening of the conference (but yeah I know how it is with busy blogs that need to be scheduled in advance). If it's available, even privately, in the next 40 hours I could show it in the closing session. MartinPoulter (talk) 20:11, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go!
An open letter for free access to Wikipedia

and without burned-in English Subtitles:

This is an open letter for free access to Wikipedia

Victor Grigas (talk) 21:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are officially awesome, Victor. Thanks, MartinPoulter Jisc (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI

[edit]

User:Hyper3 removed your picture again at Slutwalk. He/She doesn't seem to like talking and usually waits a few weeks until editors leave in order to revert their edits. If you want it to stick, you should probably watch the page... PraetorianFury (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are already a few pictures - they each have a purpose. Just adding more pictures doesn't really help, it looks cluttered. See WP:LAYIM. If you want to discuss it further, let's do it on the talk page. Hyper3 (talk) 23:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
commented! Talk:SlutWalk#PhotosVictor Grigas (talk) 03:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln Park, Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soo Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for the civility Barnstar, you made me smile a lot (and also reassured me it's always worth it). Luxxxbella (talk) 11:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just sharing

[edit]

Victor, I want to share this with you. Today I spent Veterans Day outside eating with the family here in Arizona. I had a good day, but when I returned home I found out that I was honored in a speech made today in the town of Guanica, Puerto Rico, making the day even more special. Here is the link:

https://www.facebook.com/notes/kenneth-d-mcclintock/mensaje-d%C3%ADa-del-veterano-guánica-2013/10151716515001338 Sometimes good things happen when you least expect them, right> Tony the Marine (talk) 03:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's so awesome!Victor Grigas (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Old Town, Chicago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bavarian
Sedgwick (CTA station) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Hunter (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon

[edit]
Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - In a city near you! - You are invited!
The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Chicago! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join!

Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors.
Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here!

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:48, Thursday, November 21, 2024 (UTC)


My 2012 Wikimania interview

[edit]

Hi, Victor! You interviewed me at the 2012 Wikimania, but never published it. Can you send the file to me, even if it's raw or compressed? Thanks! --NaBUru38 (talk) 23:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sure I can, do you have an email address I can send the link to? I could also upload the whole (unedited) interview to commons if you like? Let me know how to deliver it :) Victor Grigas (talk) 22:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great! I just mailed you. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Victor! Can you upload the video to Google Docs and send me the link? Thanks! --NaBUru38 (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marriage proposal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Armenian Genocide memorials (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Watertown
Renovation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Watertown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marvelous, isn't it!

BTW, do you know where I can get a free photo of Malinga Nopote ?

Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! I'm so happy!

I don't have her photo unfortunately, when I was there, she was on maternity leave, so I never had a chance to meet her. On the Facebook page for the class you could potentially message someone to take a photo and upload it? Also I added a bunch of links to the talk page on Sinenjongo High School, since at this point I feel I'm too connected to the content to add anything myself, so if you could update it that would be great. Vgrigas (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links - I got something up. This NekNominate thing is a bit strange, isn't it?
Smallbones(smalltalk) 20:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
yeah it is weird, but apparently it's become a thing in SA. Thanks for updating the page! The school also received some Wikireaders, might want to mention that too? lots of photos on the bottom of that page. Vgrigas (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, got the pic. will put it with the TED video under the school Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Check out the license! [1] it can be migrated to commons and put into the article!!Victor Grigas (talk) 19:33, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Sinenjongo_High_School#Gaining_recognition. As far as the license on the video - that's ok, but I'd like everybody to be able to actually view it! Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dub Terminator

[edit]

Hello Victorgrigas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dub Terminator for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Xhosa calendar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Video production at Wikimania

[edit]

Hi Victor, I've seen your are producing a lot of videos and I'm looking for people who are attending Wikimania this year to collaborate in production (esp. because I am not able to edit video myself) and it's mor fun together. Would you like to join my submission?

And do you know other Wikipedians who could be interested? I (hope I) will be offering a production tutorial, too:

--BR, .js (talk) 09:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jan!

I'm happy that you got in touch with me, so I have several ideas about this. It sounds like your first submission is a sort of informal video-tech gathering, no? It's cool and if I have time, I'd love to participate, (I just signed up for it).

But your second submission really interests me. I'd love to talk to everyone about tools to create video. I'm a big fan of low-tech and high tech cameras. Basically the community is made up of a huge volume of people who have computers and can edit and move things around online, but not alot of people who can create very polished video because those tools are VERY expensive, and other outlets (like Vimeo.com) attract the more professional video types of people. It also takes a great deal of time to make a high-quality video. Let's just estimate that for every ten editors, maybe one has a decent camera, and for every ten with a decent camera, maybe one knows anything about shooting for video. You could keep dividing based on access to money for equipment, et cetera.

Now, that said, I have an idea. What if we created a place to:

  • Attract more video/audio contributors from outside the movement (like reach out to the YouTube & Vimeo crowds)
  • Divide and share tasks in a semi-organized workflow with a production queue, like a ticket system in programming. I would think that we could establish something that allows the maximum number of community members to get involved without having a camera, just a computer.

For the first part, we could make a video that we post to YouTube and Vimeo where we could read an open letter to the crowd of Vimeo and have a URL on the bottom of the video linking to our place for such collaboration. This way, we can attract professional video producers to help create content.

for the second part, Once we can establish a system to say what kinds of content should be created, then the community can make scripts for it, then established shooters can shoot the footage, and maybe we can upload it to vimeo to share (since .webm and .ogv is not easy to edit) and find editors to work on it and sound mixers to mix the sound, captioners to provide captions, etc.

You should message User:Nkansahrexford, User:Fuzheado, User:Ragesoss, User:Rock drum, User:Fabrice Florin. They all have some level of video production experience. I know a closed-captioner who donates his services to create subtitles for all my videos too.

Basically, video benefits when there is a producer, not just a 'one-man-band', because there are so many elements to it. It sounds like the kind of thing that could really scale if we could create some kind of group on Meta or something. Or maybe this would need it's own thematic organization? I like sharing tools, but networking is what makes video better, and I'd like to bring that idea to your presentation.

Thoughts?

Victor Grigas (talk) 23:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Victorgrigas: @.js: I like this idea, and actually was thinking about it just a few weeks ago. This is the 10th year of Wikimania, and I actually have some video interviews from 2005 in Frankfurt that I wanted to try to edit together before London. In order to collaborate on this, we'd have to have some idea of the story line we wanted to pursue, and also the shooting style we're looking for. BTW, if you haven't seen, this is the video creation project I started last year Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wiki_Makes_Video. -- Fuzheado | Talk 04:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew, this is a great start. I'd start with the 'suggest' section and go from there. I think we need a few people to get started with this. Who else have you met who might be interested?Victor Grigas (talk) 16:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor & Fuzheado: thanks for your enthusiasm, that sounds all very good! Here in DE Volker Grassmuck just started a big project "Videos for Wikipedia articles" – perhaps a possible cooperation with you?! As you might have seen, I currently introduced WikiTV to the en.wiki and have started a list trying to find all the Wikipedians involved video projects that we already have/had: List of WikiTV & WikiVideo projects, if you know more please post them there. --BR, .js (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
a) For the Wikimania I've started the collaboration site wm2014:Videos - let's plan the productions all together there, OK?
b) For the general Wiki+video planning there should be one place to get ideas and planning together instead of a hundred places. I've heard and seen so many ideas and "I want to have"s on this matter – the question is that users get together and do it + that many more other Wikipedians get to see the results. --BR, .js (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Impact of Wikipedia by Adrianne Wadewitz

[edit]
Original – 'The Impact Of Wikipedia' -- how Wikipedia works, in the voices of a few of those who make it. Produced during Wikimania 2012 by the Wikimedia Foundation for the 2012 Wikimedia fundraising campaign. Featuring Adrianne Wadewitz.
  1. File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm by Vgrigas
  2. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Impact of Wikipedia by Adrianne Wadewitz

I've nominated the video file File:The Impact of Wikipedia Adrianne Wadewitz.webm by Vgrigas for Featured Picture candidacy.

The discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Impact of Wikipedia by Adrianne Wadewitz.

Thank you for your time,

Cirt (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

click here and you can fix the typos :) just don't change the timecodeVictor Grigas (talk) 14:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A few minor typos in the caption were discovered during a nomination of this for featured picture. Is there any chance you could help? Cheers, Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

click here and you can fix the typos :) just don't change the timecodeVictor Grigas (talk) 14:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Captions

[edit]

Thanks! I've fixed it up. Turns out Wikimarkup works, so I could even add italics. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great - yeah i love these open captions, i just added a link to a period when she dis alot of editing to the page during her words when she says 'the article i wrote on mary shelley [2]'Victor Grigas (talk) 14:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great idea! Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bassem Sabry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian Revolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mors (drink)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Mors (drink), Victorgrigas!

Wikipedia editor Polyglot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your contribution

To reply, leave a comment on Polyglot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fakeflash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No statement of notability. Could not find any reliable sources other than the one already mentioned in the article. A google search returs that most of the results are blogs that claim it is in fact a Windows virus, not a Mac OS virus as the article claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheChampionMan1234 04:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Repurposing for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Repurposing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repurposing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 18:09, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup!

[edit]

Hey Victor! Just a reminder that our meetup for the Chicago Great American Wiknic is tomorrow at 11:00 AM at the Pritzker Military Museum & Library! Hope to see you there. I, JethroBT drop me a line 04:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old Town Ale House, Chicago, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saloon and Life Itself. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Institut Lumière may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You just added 30+ pictures to this article. Really? --NeilN talk to me 19:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake! I copy pasted and didn't look at what i did whale i have like 10 windows open. Thanks for revertingVictor Grigas (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 26 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feliz Navidad

[edit]


<font=3> Wishing you a
"Feliz Navidad and a Prospero Año Nuevo"
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year)
Tony the Marine (talk)
External audio
audio icon Jose Feliciano's "Feliz Navidad "
Why Thank you Tony! How thoughtful! I just played this with my wife. I hope all is well with you and your family! Feliz Navidad https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr5RGTc17Bo Victor Grigas (talk) 02:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets!

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Victorgrigas, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
 !dea4u  09:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Smerling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page USC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln Park, Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mob. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chicago City Council
added a link pointing to Federal
Peter Schivarelli
added a link pointing to WBBM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago City Council

[edit]

I enjoyed looking at your photography. How about your City Hall postcard image for the Chicago City Council article? Hugh (talk) 04:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! DoneVictor Grigas (talk) 04:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John O'Shay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 16:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old Town, Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayor Daley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore riots videos

[edit]

I noticed that you reverted my edit again. I've left a message on Talk:2015 Baltimore riots explaining my position. Epic Genius (talk) 14:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll respond on that pageVictor Grigas (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emmanuel Engelhart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to the San Francisco Ferry Building. I notice it does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Prhartcom (talk) 04:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata Game

[edit]

Hi Victor, do you remember the Wikidata Game I mentioned Friday evening? Maybe it’s useful to leave a link ;-) so here it is: toollabs:wikidata-game. It is a cool set of games, perfect to play in between. Have fun! Regards --Schniggendiller talk 04:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Thank you for the link, I was just talking to my wife about Roots, she had seen it, so now it's my turn.Victor Grigas (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you should see it. I’ll test you next year in Esino Lario ;-) Regards --Schniggendiller talk 00:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sharkula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wicker Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln Avenue (Chicago), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clark Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Italians in Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neapolitan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five million

[edit]
                                                  We've reached five million!!                                                  

The English Wikipedia now has over 5,000,000 articles! Woo-hoo!

Feel free to pass this message on! You can never celebrate too much. 5 000 000

Eman235/talk 18:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spark Energy

[edit]

Hi. You had added material to the Spark Energy article and I have removed some of that material. There are two companies with the same common name: one is based in Scotland, the other based in the US. I view the primary topic as being the company that is based in Scotland, but the other company based in the US is listed on the NASDAQ. There has only been one article created and an article for deletion discussion is underway. There hasn't been an article created for the company that is based in the US. I had removed some content from the main article that related to the company based in the US; I put that material on the talk page. I had started a disambiguation page: Spark Energy (disambiguation). I am letting you know in case you were wanting to start an article on the US company, although I would note the disambiguation page itself has been nominated for speedy deletion. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michelle A. Harris for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle A. Harris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle A. Harris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. smileguy91talk - contribs 03:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

KCBX Terminals
added links pointing to Clinker and Docking
Emma Mitts
added a link pointing to Garfield Park

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OR/Edit-warring

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Shooting of Laquan McDonald shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Dontmakemetypepasswordagain (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Globalisation of fashion

[edit]

Many of us are actively seeking out unique trends outside of the US and Europe to ensure the articles on 2000s fashion and 2010s fashion are truly globalized. However, very little exists for 1990s fashion before 1998 due to the expense and rarity of internet access outside of the US. Locating global trends for the 70s, 80s and earlier is almost impossible because media perspectives on fashion were very Western centric in those days, and because accurate surviving sources in English are hard to find.

So leave the tag on until those sources are found. You don't have to only use internet sources, I would imagine that there are libraries or institutions around the globe who would have such information. Victor Grigas (talk) 22:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if we were to find such library sources, it would still be futile to globalize fashions before 1990 because individual written articles (especially those written by outsiders) tend to present a skewed or outdated picture without independent documents to back them up. Since most 20th century fashions and trends originated in Europe and America, why not compromise and only globalize those eras for which sufficient evidence can be found, and for which there was widespread awareness of, and participation in, the said globalization movement (i.e. 1990s, 2000s and 2010s)?

A few comments (I appreciate your constructive conversation):
  • If you end your comments with four of these ~ then your signature will be automatically generated in your comments :)
  • Would you like to have this conversation on the talk page for one of the articles, where our discussion would perhaps be more conducive to public inquiry and further discussion? I'm ok with discussing here, just thought I'd share the thought.
  • I don't think it's futile to globalize fashions in one article. You could easily break up a decade about Fashion into "Western fashions", "South Asian fashions" and so forth. You don't need to do the research precisely either, you could find others who might know something about it to point in the right direction (people in the fashion industry, anthropologists, etc.)
  • Can you clarify what you mean by "individual written articles (especially those written by outsiders) tend to present a skewed or outdated picture without independent documents to back them up"? Who are "outsiders"?
  • You say "Since most 20th century fashions and trends originated in Europe and America" to this I say [citation needed]! Fashion is (from the Wikipedia article for fashion): "[...] a popular style or practice, especially in clothing, footwear, accessories, makeup, body piercing, or furniture. Fashion is a distinctive and often habitual trend in the style in which a person dresses. It is the prevailing styles in behaviour and the newest creations of textile designers." and while I do understand that there are fashion leaders, fashion is not 100% global, there are regions that have their own styles. Are there not popular indigenous fashions of particular regions that evolve and are influenced over time? There are plenty of places that have been isolated from western influence (North Korea comes to mind).
Video about editing the Wikipedia page for the Kanchipuram sari
  • I'd like to make a suggestion. When I click on 1980s in fashion and then click on earlier decades, when I hit the 1920's the article is titled 1920s in Western fashion. Perhaps these articles simply need to be renamed to be more accurate? I would prefer that the articles for 1960s in fashion, etc. actually represent a global perspective, but failing that, perhaps they just need to be renamed?

Victor Grigas (talk) 04:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some very good points. The "outsiders" I refer to are foreigners writing about localised trends outside of their country e.g. a Brit or American writing about fashion in India, or a Daily Mail journalist's observations about 2010s fashion in North Korea. They can never fully understand the reasons and customs behind these ethnic fashions, and even in their own country their perspectives can be outdated or inaccurate (example: the views of some "experts" on the emerging punk subculture of the early 80s). Your final suggestion is an excellent one, and I have added a new section in Template:Historical clothing to reflect the beginning of globalization in fashion.

Peace & love -Ossie

Great! I'm glad we had a productive conversation. Is there anything I can do for you! Victor Grigas (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unglue.it listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unglue.it. Since you had some involvement with the Unglue.it redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg (chat) 21:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

[edit]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form]. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coquí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graffito. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clark Street (Chicago), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm writing to inquire as to your reversion to the uncropped version of the photograph. I switched to the cropped version in an effort to enlarge the key details, with relatively unimportant details (such as the dashboard and windshield wipers of the car from which the picture was taken) removed. Do you disagree that this was an improvement and/or have any suggestions for revising the cropping? —David Levy 02:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just thought that the lowest 10% ought to be cropped, not the sides, because it removes the size of the fires. That's all, otherwise I get why you wanted to remove those details. Victor Grigas (talk) 23:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1968 Democratic National Convention protest activity
added links pointing to Grant Park, National Guard and Michigan Avenue
Chicago
added a link pointing to National Guard
History of Chicago
added a link pointing to National Guard

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your re-revert at Orlando

[edit]

[3] [4] [5]

I reverted you per WP:BRD and, in case you weren't familiar with BRD concepts I politely asked you to discuss. Your re-revert was disruptive and a violation of WP:EW. Please revert your re-revert and discuss on the article's talk page if you like, per standard process. Thank you very much. ―Mandruss  20:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure the article can be improved but it seems silly to suggest the whole article is written like an advert. And why not just edit out whatever you thinks is a problem? Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was reading it and felt that much is written like an advert - I do intend to change it, but don't have the time now. So felt it good to flag it for the time being in case someone else has the time. Otherwise, the structure of the article I think is very good. Victor Grigas (talk) 21:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln Park, Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln Avenue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Four Mohawk Kings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jan Verelst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 5 Rabbit Cervecería for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 5 Rabbit Cervecería is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Rabbit Cervecería until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 16:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wait'll next year!

[edit]

It will be even better!

Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

:D Victor Grigas (talk) 02:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing streamlining US cannabis articles

[edit]

Your comments appreciated here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Do_we_need_to_do_some_consolidation_of_multiple_overlapping_US_cannabis_articles.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 22:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who hates Donald Trump? listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Who hates Donald Trump?. Since you had some involvement with the Who hates Donald Trump? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump protests listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trump protests. Since you had some involvement with the Trump protests redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback requested re major changes to Cannabis in the United States

[edit]

Please see: Talk:Cannabis_in_the_United_States#Proposing_bold_changes_at_Cannabis_in_the_United_States

Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 21:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fake news site

[edit]

Victor, thank you for your interest at Fake news site.

I made some comments at Talk:Fake news site, I worry listing all the fake news sites will overflow the article.

Maybe we should stick to paragraph form.

Perhaps you can revisit back at Talk:Fake news site and we can go from there? Sagecandor (talk) 02:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great! yes lets chat there Victor Grigas (talk) 02:37, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My contested response here: Talk:Fuck_Trump Victor Grigas (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

Sorry for the late reply... Haven't been on Wikipedia for a while, but looking at so many ignorant people, I'm going to get back in the flow.

You hit me up saying "I'm writing this article Mathias 'Paddy' Bauler about a crooked Chicago alderman - want to help? There's been a lot written about him Victor Grigas (talk) 02:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)" Yeah, I'll make some edits and go more in depth. Never too late. Lord David, Duke of Glencoe (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Let me know if I can help Victor Grigas (talk) 02:24, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ABCnews.com.co for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ABCnews.com.co is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABCnews.com.co until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 18:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith creation man, just thought it could use more discussion if it's notable. Sagecandor (talk) 18:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Named refs

[edit]

Hi there,

Noticed this edit duplicates a whole lot of references. When using a reference more than once, you can just give it a name like with <ref name=newyorktimes>{{cite news|title=blah blah|date=... }}</ref> and then for all subsequent instances you can recall the same ref with simply <ref name=newyorktimes/>. More info here: WP:REFNAME. Fixed at list of fake news websites, so just a heads up. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I did not know how to do that, I'll refer to this next time. I'm also thinking about the proposal on the talk page, havent collected all my thoughts yet, but mostly I'm in agreement. Victor Grigas (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump sex listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trump sex. Since you had some involvement with the Trump sex redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump COI listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trump COI. Since you had some involvement with the Trump COI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove rockettab mac listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remove rockettab mac. Since you had some involvement with the Remove rockettab mac redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trump sucks listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trump sucks. Since you had some involvement with the Trump sucks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Moore vs. Donald Trump listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Michael Moore vs. Donald Trump. Since you had some involvement with the Michael Moore vs. Donald Trump redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What happens when marijuana is legal? listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What happens when marijuana is legal?. Since you had some involvement with the What happens when marijuana is legal? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What happens when weed is legal? listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What happens when weed is legal?. Since you had some involvement with the What happens when weed is legal? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the effect of legalizing marijuana? listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect What is the effect of legalizing marijuana?. Since you had some involvement with the What is the effect of legalizing marijuana? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Capone's castle listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capone's castle. Since you had some involvement with the Capone's castle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dumbslate listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dumbslate. Since you had some involvement with the Dumbslate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Picasso sculpture listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Picasso sculpture. Since you had some involvement with the Picasso sculpture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of fake news websites

[edit]

Are you still maintaining this page and/or improving it ?

Large influx of edits and users lately. Sagecandor (talk) 07:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just re-added infowars.com with 3 references, I wish I had more time to work on it (full time dad right now)Victor Grigas (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good luck with that ! Hope you are getting some sleep ! Sagecandor (talk) 16:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Just added more references to infowars - if you find any more please add to it. The CBS slideshow is very good too. Do you have time to cross-reference it and add any in?Victor Grigas (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victor, came over to say I am willing to help with writing up some prose for the rescue of the post-AfD material on Trump's personal connections to various foreign countries, and incorporating the pieces into proper locations within larger articles (constitutionally-restricted emoluments-related stuff in presidency of donald trump article, stuff about patronage/nepotism concerns in the list of donald trump political appointments article, and so on per the afd and article-talkpage conversations).

I also, quite frankly, came over to give you a stern welcome-to-wikipedia talking-to, about how you need to be aware that people are topic-banned and site-banned from all of post-1932 united states politics, for WAY LESS than some of your recent actions. But reading your talkpage and userpage -- there are advantages to never archiving! -- it seems clear that you don't need a welcome-to-wikipedia, you need a thank-you-for-all-your-years-improving-wikipedia. Rather than notify you about arbcom sanctions (which I see somebody already did), or explain that some people might see your Trump-related contributions as attack-pages (again already done), I will just point out to you that there is a difference between *impeccably* sourced criticism, such as creating a page called IBM and the Holocaust in 2007,[6] and *adminz do not permit that nowadays* criticism, such as creating 'Fuck Trump' or similar BLP violations.[7] Once it *is* the title of a book, or a restaurant, or some similar encyclopedic topic beyond a crass t-shirt slogan (just $15 each! buy more save more!), may I suggest you let somebody else create the article? All this annoying and arguably-unwarranted caution is doubly-especially important, since you are a WMF person. Please please tread carefully, because although we both know that you act under your personal volition here on this username, it will indubitably be 'linked' to your WMF status, should there ever be an Epic Editing Scandal which blows up into the public eye. My friendly unsolicited advice, after which I shalt remain silent on the topic unless specifically asked: please BE SURE that there is never such a scandal involving yourself, even tangentially. Remember where the wikipedia webservers are, if nothing else.

On that grim note!... can you ask Sandstein, or whomever deleted the article, to restore it to your userspace temporarily, if you don't have an offline copy saved somewhere? We can start integrating the sources we have in the article-talkpage, to the appropriate places. I will try and put together a paragraph for the Presidency of Donald Trump article first, and then once that is in place we can start working on drafting material for the biographical article, which summarizes the personal connections to foreign countries (ancestry and personal friendships), the business connections to foreign countries (some of which are stronger than others and some of which are interconnected with ancestry-n-friendship ties), and the political connections to foreign countries (e.g. Nigel Farage of UKIP is an international political contact in much the same way that Sarah Palin is a within-the-country political contact). I don't expect this to happen very quickly, because I think it will take significant time and discussion to put the pieces together in a neutral way, that keeps our own noses clean and wikipedia's broader reputation sterling. But the work does need to be done... and for exactly those reasons, as a matter of fact. If you would like to start collecting URLs of sources, and dump them onto my usertalk page, I will start working on draft-language, and when we have something useful we can propose it on the talkpage of the relevant article(s). Let me know if there are any flaws in this wise and superbly impressive tactical plan.  ;-) Best, 47.222.203.135 (talk) 14:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll say that your post here caused me to re-read all the messages on my talk page. Damn. I've got a lot of spaghetti I've thrown, and a lot of it stuck!
Anyway - I appreciate all the thinking you've done. Let me think about it some more. In the meantime, here's an archive of the deleted article from December 9:
(snipped per AfD outcome but thank you for the retrieval, I will see what I can do with the stuff, anybody else who is interested, please click edit on this section to view the html comment containing the AfD'd prose)
Victor Grigas (talk) 01:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes your storied skills as a pasta-chef of the wiki-spaghetti variety is noted and appreciated  :-)
I'm still working on this project, and am looking for where it best ought to fit. There are a bunch of articles on Trump, but none of them are an exact fit, since this is a crossing-the-streams-of-business-and-politics subtopic. But making it standalone is also no good, because it would not properly contextualize the conflict-stuff within the larger scope of his business career (decades) and his presidency (per WP:CRYSTAL ball one term or possibly two), and if the press coverage of the Clinton family is any indication, I will go out on a limb and predict the post-presidency of the Trump family will continue to generate WP:RS talking about financial conflicts and ethical issues, too. But in the short-term, I think we probably need a paragraph at Presidency of Donald Trump, which points via Template:main to a subsection of Legal affairs of Donald Trump (which in turn points to the proper subsection of Trump.com which can then backpoint to the presidency article). Does that make sense, as a starting goal at least? 47.222.203.135 (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are some details about the quasi-blind-trust arrangement, which were announced at the press conf on January 11th. I've given a rough list of some of the key points at Talk:Donald_Trump#No_blind_trust, and participating in the placement and phrasing of that material, may help us figure out the broader goal of where to put the other conflict-refs that exist. 47.222.203.135 (talk) 11:53, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey did this stuff get added anywhere? Victor Grigas (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, closed as WP:NOTFORUM  :-)
But as of yesterday I have permission to again re-open the conversation ;-)
This conflict-and-emolument-and-semi-blind-trust material *is* necessary stuff, but I suspect lots of good-faith wikipedians are feeling pressure right now as being members of an alleged 'fake news website' that purposely promotes Clinton and attacks Trump, so everybody is trying to make things neutral... which in many cases, means flat out fucking deleting *impeccably* well-sourced material as 'not really encyclopedic' or sometimes 'not relevant' with a weaponized form of WP:UNDUE. Completely misunderstanding what the trifecta's number one STAY NEUTRAL commandment actually means, obviously....
No worries, though, I am persistent. This will get figured out eventually. If you decide to WP:BEBOLD and pull some WP:IAR, or have a suggestion as to where I could pull some IAR, drop me a note on my talkpage please. Anons have no watchlist, so if I don't respond promptly it is because I forgot to come back and refresh the page, not because I don't care anymore :-) 47.222.203.135 (talk) 12:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"420" collaboration

[edit]

Hey, Victor! Hope you're well (you interviewed me at Wikimania back in 2012). As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:39, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Love Trumps Hate listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Love Trumps Hate. Since you had some involvement with the Love Trumps Hate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Victorgrigas. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tiziana Cantone, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 TT me 19:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Devon Avenue (Chicago), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An update from the Sustainability Initiative

[edit]
Thank you for supporting the Sustainability Initiative!

Hi, Victorgrigas! Thank you again for supporting the Sustainability Initiative, which aims at reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement. Over the past two years, more than 200 Wikipedians from all over the world have come together to push the Wikimedia movement towards greater sustainability.

What's new?

We are writing you this message because there is great news: The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has finally passed a resolution stating that the Foundation is committed to seeking ways to reduce the impact of its activities on the environment. Also, we have created a cool logo and found a nice name for the project which you can see on the right :-)

What's next?

Currently, we are working with Wikimedia Foundation staff to make sustainability a key priority for the selection of a new location for Wikimedia servers in Singapore. Also, we have presented the Wikimedia Foundation with a green energy roadmap to have all Wikimedia servers run on renewable energy by 2019.

Please help!

Let's keep this project moving forward – and there are several ways in which you can help:

  • Ask other Wikipedians to sign the project page as well – this way we can show the Wikimedia Foundation that this is an issue that the community really cares about.
  • Talk to Wikimedians you know about the importance of reducing the environmental impact of the Wikimedia movement.
  • Improve and translate the project page on Meta.

If you have any questions, you can contact us on on Meta. Again, thank you very much for your support! --Aubrey und Gnom, 2 April 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 21:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharkula School Fools set.JPG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharkula School Fools set.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (tJosve05a (c) 20:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharkula Sticker.JPG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharkula Sticker.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (tJosve05a (c) 20:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharkula 2.JPG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharkula 2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (tJosve05a (c) 20:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharkula flyer -1.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sharkula flyer -1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evil losers

[edit]

Heh, first off, don't worry I'm not calling you one :P So, I've seen ya around doing great stuff and I thought this an opportunity to say hi, and pick your brain about something. So, I was kinda curious about your thinking with the "Evil losers" redirect. Now, I know that "redirects are cheap" but initially it kinda felt like a bit of a stretch. I'm not proposing it shouldn't be around or anything, just kinda wanted to get your thinking around it, if for nothing else, my own education. I mean, we certainly wouldn't have a snippet of Australia's comment redirect, "brutal attack". Although maybe that's an unfair comparison. Anywho, look forward to your feedback, and again, hi! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 04:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! So I was just reading the news about the attacks and heard the BBC quote this term then I googled it and it seems to have a bunch of sources all about that one quote, so I thought it would be appropriate to redirect the term (which as far as I can tell has not been used elsewhere) to the reactions section of the attack article. That was my thinking :) Victor Grigas (talk) 23:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, thanks for the insight! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_5o2URXUsbSfhZKl&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Time lapse videos of Wikipedia articles being created

[edit]

Hey, Victor. Thanks for all your work here and offline! I've seen some really cool time-lapse videos of Wikipedia articles being built. I was wondering if you knew of a tool that creates these, or if they're just from someone taking a large number of screenshots during the article's evolution? ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Boston Free Speech rally

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Boston Free Speech rally should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Free Speech rally .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

DrStrauss talk 14:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Chuck's Gun Shop & Range

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Chuck's Gun Shop & Range should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck's Gun Shop & Range .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Fbdave (talk) 20:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liberator (gun), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enbridge Line 3 page

[edit]

Hello - I noticed that you made some contributions to the Enbridge Line 5 page before. I just started the Enbridge Line 3 and would welcome you to contribute to that page as well. Take care...

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unite the Right 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Podmajersky, Inc.

[edit]

Nomination of Podmajersky, Inc. for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Podmajersky, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podmajersky, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I added a reference to the article. I'm not the nominator, but I'm leaving this message for you since the nominator didn't. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 04:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved with (Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article (Brett Kavanaugh sexual assault allegations). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at the article's talk page. Thank you. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camp Fire (2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bay Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Super Xmas

[edit]
Wishing you a
"Feliz Navidad and a Prospero Año Nuevo"
(Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year)
Tony the Marine (talk)
External audio
audio icon Jose Feliciano's "Feliz Navidad "

January 2019 Donald Trump speech

[edit]

Hi, Victor! You sometimes add images/video content for current events. I was wondering if you might have anything in mind for improving the January 2019 Donald Trump speech article. If not, no worries! Happy editing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) 73.162.21.192 (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, IP! :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United States federal government shutdown of 2018–2019

[edit]

Your attempt at adding a video removed 23,000 bytes worth of content from the article. Please be more precise with your edits, or explain what you are trying to do on the talk page. Bradv🍁 18:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I commented on the talk page - basically I've been adding most of the illustrations on the article for the past week, before it was a main page article and just now I tried to get this video added --
Department of State press briefing with Deputy Spokesperson Robert Palladino about the effects of a possible of a shutdown on government function.

I added the video, and the timecode to play the video at a particular time was wrong, and I changed it twice to fix it (captions are more detailed but the thumbnail start time is less detailed in terms of timecode, and I didn't know that), then an admin reverted my edits entirely, and i pressed undo on that which created 2 sections of the 'pre-shutdown' on the article. I erased the extra section and thats what you saw. Sorry for the headache, I just want to keep things appropriately illustrated.

Victor Grigas (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you were editing an old version of the article, which erased all subsequent edits. Please ensure you only edit the current version (you can use the "Show changes" button to check before you publish). Bradv🍁 18:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Presidents Day protest

[edit]

Hi, Victor! Curious if you're aware of any images/media to add to 2019 Presidents Day protest. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not aware, but I haven't looked. I'm quite busy these days, if I find any I'll migrate them - but you could look on Flickr too? Just do like 5 keyword searches :) 2601:647:5800:A046:F5C9:7309:FDE6:778D Victor Grigas (talk) 04:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template Removal on Bass Pro Shops Page

[edit]

NOTE: I am proposing this removal request for FleishmanHillard on behalf of Bass Pro Shops. I am a paid editor and am aware of the COI guidelines. I am posting this message to request to remove the current maintenance template at the top of the page Bass Pro Shops page, which you placed in January 2017.

The first couple paragraphs of the History section could be seen as promotional, so I would argue to remove the entire second paragraph of the History section, and additionally revise the first paragraph to simply read: "Company founder John Morris founded Bass Pro Shops in 1971 after selling fishing equipment in a corner of his family's liquor store[1]." Thanks for your consideration!

References

  1. ^ "HISTORY OF BASS PRO SHOP". The Southern Illinoisan. Retrieved March 18, 2018.

Alec Voss (talk) 02:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate the message but I would argue that the article needs more work than just "to remove the entire second paragraph of the History section, and additionally revise the first paragraph to simply read: "Company founder John Morris founded Bass Pro Shops in 1971 after selling fishing equipment in a corner of his family's liquor store". For example, the section about the NRA National Sporting Arms Museum could use more references and it is phrased in a promotional way - "After nearly a decade of work" or "a multi-million dollar collection".

Victor Grigas (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Gallagher

[edit]

Hi Victorgrigas, I wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit to Ed Gallagher because it doesn't link to any articles. As disambiguation pages are supposed to guide readers to existing articles, entries that have no links or only external links are not useful. I tried to find another article that mentions Ed Gallagher, Navy Seal, but failed. Leschnei (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok! There are lots of articles about 'Ed Gallagher, Navy Seal', if you want to start an article?:

Victor Grigas (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enlargement of NATO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Victorgrigas,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Never Again Action, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nsk92 (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Policy Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert, please read

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have read this, thank you for the alert! Victor Grigas (talk) 16:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skullcap Crew for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skullcap Crew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skullcap Crew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article revert?

[edit]

Hello @Victorgrigas: as the originator to Shooting of Laquan McDonald, your input to the article's title would be sublime on Talk:Murder of Laquan McDonald. Some comments are illogical at best; others, nonconforming to Wikipedia policy. Cheers, Eli Bigeez (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United Front propaganda content from the Chinese Communist Party

[edit]

You do realize that the video you uploaded and linked in the 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak article was produced by China News Service run by the United Front, which is a part of the propaganda operations of the Chinese Communist Party, don't you?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.87.212 (talk) 08:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's why I captioned it as made by China News Service. Victor Grigas (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That in itself does not make the creator's true identity obvious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.87.212 (talk) 15:25, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, If you look below, another editor helped to translate captions on a few videos on this topic. I just used Google translate to translate the captions on one into English. I put the video in the article about the timeline of the virus, if you want to add something to the caption on that, I'm writing now to advise that you now can. My opinion is that it's enough to say where the report came from, but you have a different opinion so I wanted to inform you. Victor Grigas (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Captioning video about "2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak"

[edit]

Give me a list of videos that you want to get Captions. I will search it on goolge first to see if there is a news which already contain infomation of that video. Then we can translate the news. Otherwise I will make a chinese caption on Youtube first. —— Woclass (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here is my list:

Thank you, Victor Grigas (talk) 18:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some results: 2019-nCoV all six Captions. I have found or extracted all the conversations and have used youtube tools to create 2 subtitles. Wait till I wake up. You can have a look first, or trying to translate some conversations. If you have any questions, just go to that page and leave a message. ——Woclass (talk) 17:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Victor Grigas (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{safesubst:#if:|== Proposed deletion of Shadow Inc. ==| – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shadow Inc. for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadow Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Self-isolation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

article already exists at Isolation (health care)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 03:04, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strikes during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASOS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Can I enlist your help? The Handbook of COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment is threatened with deletion. I think it is a worthwhile wikipedia page, and would like your help to save it. Thanks in advance for your time, and thanks for your contribution to Coronavirus Tech Handbook Magnovvig (talk) 18:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for N95 mask

[edit]

On 30 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article N95 mask, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the melt-blowing technology used to create N95 respirators was previously used to produce ready-made ribbon bows and bra cups? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/N95 mask. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, N95 mask), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Strike virus" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Strike virus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 6#Strike virus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Atomos (company)

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Nightenbelle, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Atomos (company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomos (company).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nightenbelle}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nightenbelle (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Pandemic team" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pandemic team. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 12#Pandemic team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ed Marszewski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Marszewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Marszewski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Patty"

[edit]

Victor, I've started importing your local uploads onto Commons.

Is there any reason to keep "file:PATTY.JPG" instead of just deleting it? DS (talk) 23:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you want an example of MySpace-era content that Wikipedia accepted in 2006? Victor Grigas (talk) 23:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas Victorgrigas!!
Hi Victorgrigas, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all you do--Tony the Marine (talk) 04:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Fantastic editing on that 20th anniversary video—that was a lot of footage! czar 04:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diet Coke button for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diet Coke button is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diet Coke button until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ChipotleHater (talk) 21:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Victor Dziekiewicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are brief mentions or non-independent, notability not established with significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 05:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Us insurrection" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Us insurrection. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Us insurrection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 05:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Sharkula: Diarrhea of a Madman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, tagged since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al Jalaa Highrise for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Jalaa Highrise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Jalaa Highrise until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 07:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Karol Chwiesiuk" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Karol Chwiesiuk. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 27#Karol Chwiesiuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Law (artist)

[edit]

I was wrong for reverting your change removing the credit from the photo caption at John Law (artist) as per Wikipedia:WATERMARK. It looks good now. Thanks! Cxbrx (talk) 17:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 11th Ward, Chicago has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable municipal electoral district

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edge3 (talk) 04:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 11th Ward, Chicago for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 11th Ward, Chicago is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11th Ward, Chicago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edge3 (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amos G. Throop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles McDonnell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jetpack man requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kazamzam (talk) 15:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article List of events affected by the COVID-19 pandemic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of events affected by the COVID-19 pandemic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

{{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Darrow for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Darrow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Darrow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aerin17 (tc) 05:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts

[edit]
The Current Events Barnstar
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Victor Grigas (talk) 02:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Andrei Sukhovetsky

[edit]

On 10 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Andrei Sukhovetsky, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 08:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anne-Laure Bonnel for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anne-Laure Bonnel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-Laure Bonnel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sandstein 06:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article 2022 Russian mystery fires has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicate of another article. Also incorrectly calls the incidents "conspiracy theories" when no official fact-checking has been done. Fails WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 13:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And as for 2022 Siberian wildfires--your writing was far, far from neutral. Drmies (talk) 00:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was and am still in the middle of writing it, if you like, you can help me? Victor Grigas (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas

Thank you for creating Strike Out (game).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Epps articles

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

Please see the instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge to merge the history from Ray Epps to Raymond Epps. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas

Thank you for creating East-West United Bank.

User:Mako001, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The "Notes" section seems unnecessarily long, please review it and see if it can be improved in any way.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mako001}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 02:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matas Grigonis moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Matas Grigonis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 19:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Matas Grigonis

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Victorgrigas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matas Grigonis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matas Grigonis

[edit]

Hello, Victorgrigas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matas Grigonis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon An article you recently created, Vytautas Kaniusonis, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, place {{subst:submit}} atop the article, then publish. Note that IMDb is not a reliable source. Silikonz💬 00:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Diversey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illingen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Littleton mill is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well played, the Sound Logo barnstar

[edit]

MPourzaki (WMF) (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Looptopia El Advertisement.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A picture of a copyrighted work cannot be put into the public domain by the author of the picture.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Auguel (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Looptopia for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Looptopia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looptopia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Izno (talk) 20:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vytautas Kaniusonis

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Victorgrigas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vytautas Kaniusonis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page List of Wikipedia Pages Banned in Russia to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Fram (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Russian mystery fires (2022–present) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian mystery fires (2022–present) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian mystery fires (2022–present) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Marcelus (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Mob theft has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14 § Mob theft until a consensus is reached. All the best! TartarTorte 01:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Death of Diana, Princess of Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hysterical.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hassan Eslaiah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Osarius 16:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please remove wiki/Gabriel_Villa. Im Gabriel Villa, this information is no longer current. Thank you. Gabriel Villa

[edit]

Hello. Please remove wiki/Gabriel_Villa. Im Gabriel Villa, this information is no longer current. Thank you. Gabriel Villa 2600:1700:F051:3290:A186:11DA:9965:B50F (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Trump Death Clock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NSUSTAINED, see also Talk:Trump Death Clock#Is this still active?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FMSky (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trump Death Clock for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump Death Clock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump Death Clock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMSky (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Direct action, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public mandate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

[8]: FYI: the link to Wikimedia Commons is on the sidebar now of every wikipedia article. - Altenmann >talk 23:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Franklin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moselle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinyard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]