User talk:XJ-0461 v2

November 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "XJ-0461 v2", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because your username is too confusing. It is hard to find in searches.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Hoops gza (talk) 21:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR.

SOHR is way more reliable than Ejm,and SOHR is a relibale source agreed by all editors here,so SELF-REVERT your edit. and SOHR confirmed that the fighting reached the walls of the Airport.Alhanuty (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

General sanctions notification

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR

I see you reinserted reportedly again. Did you even see me writing in according to SOHR at the beginning of that sentence? You wanted your SOHR tag. This makes the word reportedly redundant. There, tried to compromise. But, contrary to your assertion that there was an agreement to use the word reportedly in the last discussion on SOHR, it actually ended with DuckZz, Boredwhytekid, André437, Alhanuty and me for the use of SOHR as a reliable source based on Wikipedia's own guidelines which deemed it as a reliable source, while you, Hanibal911 and ChrissCh94 continued to be in opposition, without any definite result for the discussion at its conclusion. In any case, I reworded the sentence so it states that its according to SOHR, so thus we leave it to the reader to decide whether he will believe it or not. EkoGraf (talk) 12:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but per Wikipedia policy a simply majority of just ONE is not a consensus. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a democracy. In any case, doesn't matter at the moment. EkoGraf (talk) 13:52, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rityan

Maybe Edward Dark not said that Rityan contested he just said that this village on front line. Also pro government source showed that Rityan taken by rebels or Al Nusra but clashes continued near this village.here Hanibal911 (talk) 21:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I did not see the map. XJ-0461 v2 (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naseeb and Charles Lister and dailystar

Naseeb cross was captured,Charles Lister is an analyst for the brookings institute https://twitter.com/Charles_Lister ,a very reliable source,plus dailystar confirmed it http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2015/Apr-01/293048-syrian-rebels-seize-jordan-crossing-from-govt-control-rebel-security-source.ashx buddy leith abu fadel confirmed it https://twitter.com/leithfadel/status/583367581223903232,so you stop vandalism,or else i report you for vandalism.Alhanuty (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No good faith edit is vandalism, so you cannot report me. Also, Charles Lister is a declared pro-opp source on Wikipedia. If you want that changed, start a talk page discussion. XJ-0461 v2 (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help

I need your help because editor on the basis of their assumptions distort the map. This is vandalism.here Hanibal911 (talk) 16:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Leith Abo Fadel confirmed the edits https://twitter.com/VivaRevolt/status/587650786416537600.Alhanuty (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Hannibal,Leith Abo Fadel confirmed it,so just admit it,and stop accusing me with Vandalism,i edited based upon al-masdar and its editor in chief leith abou fadel.Alhanuty (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC) https://twitter.com/leithfadel/status/587655276368625664 https://twitter.com/leithfadel/status/587655710508523520 .Alhanuty (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not really see anything wrong with Alhanuty's edit Hanibal. Is there anything specific that he did that you can mention that violates the rules? XJ-0461 v2 (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tanf

it clearly states mountains,so the Mountain also fell,stop doing random reverts,and please self-revert yourself.Alhanuty (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the town. Stop sweep editing. XJ-0461 v2 (talk) 01:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the town is very near the mountains of the area,thus the status of the mountain and village is related,check for yourself http://wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=33.511629&lon=38.652134&z=13&m=b.Alhanuty (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, you know what, I will self-revert. ISIS is on a role anyway and if they have not captured the town already, the probably will soon. Thanks. XJ-0461 v2 (talk) 01:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, you already did. XJ-0461 v2 (talk) 01:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 18 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:44, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

`{{unreliable source}}`

Please see Template:Unreliable_source, Template:Inline_cleanup_tags 495656778774 (talk) 19:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAA advance in Latakia

SAA captured village Bayt ‘Ayyash. source and pro-opp. source confirmed that Samakufah under SAA.source 95.134.186.238 (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, XJ-0461 v2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, XJ-0461 v2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]