Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1992 Big Bear earthquake (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Big Bear earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a news item, which lacks ongoing notability. Furthermore there was no damage or casualties. Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 16:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the reasons articulated in detail in the first AfD, especially by User:Davemcarlson and User:Oakshade, clearly demonstrating that WP:NOTNEWS does not apply and explaining why this earthquake is better covered at its own page. Also, it is not correct that this earthquake caused no damages; USGS characterizes it as having caused "substantial damage and landslides in the Big Bear Lake and Big Bear City areas."[1] --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:56, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Very significant coverage, much of it even years after the earthquake, therefore WP:NOTNEWS doesn't apply. [2][3][4] WP:NOTNEWS, as it states, is meant to discourage articles from "routine news reporting on things like announcements, sports, or celebrities." A 7.3 earthquake is not a routine event. There is no "must be deaths" requirements for article topics. --Oakshade (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article is notable and covers a significant even. Judging from review of article and review of WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTNEWS is not applicable. 08OceanBeach^S.D. 02:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.