Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advance Romance
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (whisper) @ 15:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Advance Romance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable song. No evidence of charting. No evidence of awards. No evidence of independent recording. One-paragraph all-music review seems to be the peak of coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The author should merge the mention of the song - as a brief note or line - into Bongo Fury. Wikipedia is not a listing of everything, but what is notable and enduring. Jrcrin001 (talk) 02:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's a known enough song that has enough in it to keep. Plus it's properly cited, unlike many song articles. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 23:06, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If you give me a list of some of these improperly cited song articles, I'll deal with them too. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fine here's a few: "Mōggio", Sheik Yerbouti (which is a NEEDED article, but needs cleaning up as well), and Raymond Kelly --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 01:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 09:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.