Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airbus G-EUPC
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay. Content currently in 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay is enough for this article; redirect kept to preserve history. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Airbus G-EUPC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable outside of the 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay, failing WP:GNG and WP:ONEEVENT. Any useful information can be merged there (which most of it is already). No real need for a redirect as it is an unlikely search term. Contested PROD, removed with request for a wider deletion discussion, so bringing here. Ravendrop 23:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay. Redirect is required regardless of liklihood to preserve history. Wholly unnotable aircraft; only claim to fame is carrying the Torch, and notability is not inherited. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay -- only notable for connection to torch relay. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment prior to the AFD, this was discussed at WT:AIRCRAFT#Notability of an aircraft, where it was generally recognized a merge was in order. 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, dicussion at WP:Aircraft has already established that a seperate article is not justified. Kyteto (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, as per above: already discussed in WT:AIRCRAFT#Notability of an aircraft. --CeruttiPaolo (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Retain I feel the article is unique enough to be of general interest to the public. As a newbie (joined in 2009) I regret I do not understand all Wikipedia's rules and regulations, and as I expect to be outvoted I have made a draft copy (Userification) so code is not lost.--Lidos (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one of thousands of specially painted aircraft hardly any of them worth a stand-alone article. Already mentioned in 2012 Summer Olympics torch relay so probably nothing much to merge. MilborneOne (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.