Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alonzo Hawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alonzo Hawk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is entirely WP:NOR. I checked amazon, google books, and google for information but was not able to find anything. I didn't think a simple redirect would work here. Peppage ^tlk 20:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To what are you proposing this be redirected? The article asserts that three movies between two separate Disney franchises have featured this character. I really don't see a redirect as a viable option on that basis--it should either be sourced or deleted, I'm afraid. Jclemens (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nomination seems to be entirely wrong as Amazon, Google and Google books all contain numerous references to this character. I have cited one in the article. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:21, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not about the character existing, the character exists, I said the article is original research. The source you added doesn't give support to the article. Peppage ^tlk 05:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-trivial coverage does not exist for this article at this time. JBsupreme (talk) 19:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – There is coverage from independent news sources for this character, as shown here [1]. At worst a redirect to The Absent-Minded Professor should be considered. Just-An-Average-Guy (talk) 13:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, 115 Google Books hits have to mean something. Note also that he appears in three very different Disney movies. I would be pleased if the nominator would nominate any of the hundreds of characters with zero Google News or Books hits. Abductive (reasoning) 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.