Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriy Khlyvnyuk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andriy Khlyvnyuk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly lacks reliable references. Aksnahar (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Page was created without {{afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. One of a series of malformed nominations by an account with few edits. Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. --Finngall ^talk 17:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vocalist of a band with an article but nothing to indicate he is relevant in his own right. KaisaL (talk) 19:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I still have found nothing for convincing independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would have closed this as consensus to delete, but has anyone looked at the current sourcing? At least some of it looks like it should be considered, as it comes from major news sites. And if the artist is not individually notable, what about the band that he leads? Isn't this content worth merging/redirecting somewhere? (Russian/Ukrainian-language sources should not be discounted just because most enwp editors can't read them.) czar 08:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 11:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.