Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankur Dharmani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ankur Dharmani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can not find anything notable about the person and the company of which he is the CEO Rahul^{Text me} 19:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Reconsideration of article Ankur Dharmani

Hello sir (Text me) this is User:Afrojack255 im working on Ankur Dharmani project it's only thing i got which saved on his page in present but i have more data it's a good article. I request don't transfer for the deletion as it's not a voilation it will be a great article since he is a CEO of a big evolative fintech, New Zealand based company. —Preceding undated comment added 19:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flo2cash. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete as it stands, nothing about him as an individual. Flo2Cash is a separate matter, though I'm having trouble finding sources for that one even though it feels like the sort of article that should - David Gerard (talk) 21:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG or any other Wikipedia's inclusion standard. Anup [Talk] 22:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete: As per nomination and WP:BIO standards not met. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badnaam (talk • contribs) 23:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete No coverage in reliable secondary sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per all of the above. Non-notable businessman with a lack of independent secondary sources required to pass WP:NBIO Ajf773 (talk) 09:22, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom: this seems to be spam Nick-D (talk) 11:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as simply not notable. Schwede 66 19:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.