Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne K. Block

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I took the bold step of deleting this article as an attack page. The whole thing was written by an SPA with the obvious intent to hurt the subject. No objection to neutral rewrite. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anne K. Block

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is to some extent a procedural nomination. The article was recently drafted. It reads like an attack piece. At the same time, the apparent subject of the article is blanking the article and substituting her version of who she is in its stead, which is essentially a whitewashed version. As for notability, the subject is a local figure who has achieved notability locally and to a limited extent attracted the attentiion of some mainstream press like The Seattle Times. Whether she satisfies notability guidelines is unclear. Regardless, the article is a BLP nightmare. Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per COI and BLP concerns. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Neither version, the attack page or the whitewash, seem to contain sufficient notability to meet the WP:GNG, mostly because the subject's notoriety is in an extremely limited geographic area. Deletion will solve the serious BLP and COI concerns. Ubelowme _U ^Me 02:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.