Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armin van Buuren: In the Mix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Nomader (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Armin van Buuren: In the Mix

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came to this page to improve it, but this game fails WP:SIGCOV, unfortunately. Instead of PRODing, I've brought to AfD as there are some sources that I found in my search, and I think it would benefit from a community discussion before deletion. The sources that I've found are noted below:

GameSpot (a reliable source per WP:VG/RS has an extensive preview of the game here ([1]).
The press release about the creation of the game is covered in a number of blog posts from reliable sources. ([2], [3], [4])

There is no coverage in any sources I searched for in Newspapers.com or Newsbank, and absolutely no coverage of the released game. This Wii music game just doesn't meet our mark. Nomader (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, and Video games. Nomader (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn. Per source finds from Zxcvbnm, Timur9008 and Mika1h, this nomination was pre-mature and the sources easily pass WP:GNG. Nomader (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ keep As you are likely aware, foreign-language sources are admissible in the Wikipedias of other languages, and I found this review in GameZone which covers the "multiple sources with significant coverage" criterion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also found a preview in Gamer.nl, so I am changing it to a normal "Keep" !vote. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One note to your foreign language comments -- they're not only admissible in the Wikipedias of other languages, but they're also obviously admissible here, and I'm a bit embarrassed that I missed the mark following the steps of WP:BEFORE on this nomination in my sources search. On the sources themselves, if I were an uninvolved editor coming around and a WP:THREE argument was a GameSpot preview, a GameZone review, and a Gamer.nl preview, I'd be inclined to say Weak Keep and I'm strongly considering withdrawing the nomination right now. I'm going to sleep on it before I do. Nomader (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nomader: See also the Eurogamer and other source found below, I think this is a clear withdraw as there is not a snowball's chance in Hell it will be deleted at this point. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment probably a potential source [5]. I've checked the game developer's website and publisher's webiste for reviews but there is nothing there. Timur9008 (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure if this should be kept but I believe there is a viable place to redirect this to if there is a a consensus against having an article. That target would be Armin van Buuren#2007–2009: Imagine since the game is mentioned in thr final paragraph of that section.--65.93.193.94 (talk) 20:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, reviews from Eurogamer and Power Unlimited: [6], [7] --Mika1h (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.