Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian fetish (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Editorial issues. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asian fetish

If the first sentence is not properly sourced, do you see how much of a problem it is to create an article? All the sources listed here is original research. Some of the references don't even work. Again, it is just blatant racism, and does not belong on Wikipedia. Hagadol (talk) 21:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball keep: Judging by the previous AFDs, personally I'm going to call it now. Blatant racism is the other white meat, and in any case WP:NOTCENSORED. Since when have you been able to have 5 AFDs anyway?- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 21:32, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is the 5th nomination. See WP:CRYSTAL, if it does not have reference to the definition of Asian fetish, it needs to go. --Hagadol (talk) 21:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm sticking to my vote. You're wasting your time.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 21:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball Keep per Wolfkeeper. Hagadol, this is not an issue for AfD, these are editorial issues. Discuss it on the talk page if you want to improve it. Jujutacular ^talk_contribs 22:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.