Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Montorgueil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete without prejudice against later creation of a referenced article if possible. Tikiwont (talk) 11:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Montorgueil

Nothing notable at all. No links, no titles or works, not even a birth/death timeline. This article should not be here. Metal Head 18:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable in his field. Kingturtle (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 09:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If he were notable in his field, there would be some references cited. --Russ (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Plenty of hits in Google, which suggest notability, but there isn't much in the article that would be lost by deletion. If someone looked for some references and put them in the article, then there would be some references cited. A lack of references does not equate to a lack of notability.--Michig (talk) 16:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I'm no expert on pornographers, but I'm guessing this isn't a notable one (as a writer at least) because a quick search of the main bibliographical instruments brings up very, very little (and nothing before 1970 - which suggests that even the few facts provided here are wrong). --Paularblaster (talk) 00:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nix it--Its not even stub class. --- Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.