Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertazzoni-Italia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bertazzoni-Italia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot locate enough in-depth reliable sources to indicate it passes WP:GNG or WP:CORP. (GBooks, Google, GNews, even archive.org were checked and found wanting). Previous AfD 9 years ago closed as no consensus with most opinions swinging delete but a few arguing for keep. One keep !voter from previous discussion provided a source from the Dallas News but it's dead, even on archive.org, so there's no way to tell what it said and whether it was in-depth. I also can't find the source mentioned on the page, (so again no way to tell if it's in-depth or just a mention) although I'm willing to admit I could just have weak Google-fu. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 05:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.