Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boogenhaagen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boogenhaagen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I hate to nominate articles for deletion, but this really need to be deleted, I make a PROD, but was removed by creator, something that must be forbidden. I am nominating it for the same reasons: The article fails WP:NBAND, it has no reliable sources. The most notable is the rumour about a future concert, that it's unsourced. Non-encyclopaedic and seems like a fansite. About the metal charts, a self-published source that state that only reached a number 17 on Harrogate borough (see WP:NSONGS). Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 00:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC) Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 00:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Hongkongresident (talk) 07:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fail WP:GNG and WP:MUS. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator and Catfish Jim. Bondegezou (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete MySpace band. Nothing resembling a reference that isn't self-published. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.