Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bovey Tracey A.F.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 10:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bovey Tracey A.F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
doubtful notability Postoronniy-13 (talk) 07:02, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 07:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A team playing in the Premier Division of the SWPL is notable. I should know, my local team plays in it and has entered the FA Cup in all but two seasons since 1950. Bovey will be entering the FA Vase this season I believe. The one red link is because Camelford haven't played at level 10 (also known as Step 6) until now. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 07:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see in your comment any evidence of notability of this team. --Postoronniy-13 (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Take a look at this AfD, involving one of the articles that you have recently nominated. There is consensus there, and among multiple other AfDs, that English clubs playing at level 10 of the English football league system are notable. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 08:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see in your comment any evidence of notability of this team. --Postoronniy-13 (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Clubs playing at Step 6 in the pyramid have always been deemed notable. See this very recent AfD. Number 57 08:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - has played at a notable level. GiantSnowman 12:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:SNOW as the previous AfD quoted demonstrates notability. Keresaspa (talk) 17:09, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.