Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullets Ain't Got No Name, Vol. 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bullets Ain't Got No Name, Vol. 3

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable mixtape in a series of non-notable mixtapes. Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 already deleted for the same reasons. Fails WP:ALBUMS, no evidence of significant coverage by reliable 3rd party sources. Also see WP:Articles for deletion/Bullets Ain't Got No Name, Vol. 3.1 for the next in the series. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NALBUMS: mixtape with no significant independent coverage in reliable sources. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:NALBUMS: "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources". I can find no independent coverage in reliable sources, only coverage on blogs and promo/download sites. -- Boing! said Zebedee 00:22, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.