Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buyersphere
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xclamation point 02:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Buyersphere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Removed PROD. Bringing to AfD for community view --GedUK 13:23, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. The only sources I could find were blogs. This is too soon, and certainly not widespread enough. SilkTork *YES! 18:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. It's hard to find any evidence that the term has ever been used except by one company. Either way, the term is certainly not widespread, and the sources are very weak. The only source that actually uses this word is, by its own admission, coining it. If there are no independent sources using the term then it cannot be notable enough for wikipedia. I actually suspect this is a veiled attempt at spam for marketing purposes.--Pan20 (talk) 22:53, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. The trademark symbol puzzles me - what are they planning to do with it? Peridon (talk) 23:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Seems to be a trademarked word (brand?) coined by Base One Branding. Nothing but an advert with zero evidence of notability. 01:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.