Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantal Feghali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 17:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chantal Feghali

Delete - there is no indication of notability as per WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE as a post-production supervisor. Google search for "Chantal Feghali" does not bring up any significant mentions of the name, only the usual imdb- and Amazon-type listings. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 00:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does a wonderful job of failing to meet WP:BIO. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 02:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the IMDB link has a nice picture of her face but she is mostly listed as a 'post-production supervisor' on films rather than a movie director. This doesn't prove her innate notability. Artene50 (talk) 04:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She was a senior special effects person for some films which made heavy use of special effects, and I think that demonstrates notability. I added some references, including one mentioning a phone call she made to some special effects efforts that led to their participation in a project. --Eastmain (talk) 04:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Jauerback. Cliff smith ^talk 05:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--SkyWalker (talk) 08:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable. Schmidt (talk) 05:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are thousands of excellent production personel withing the film and television industries. The article in AfD does not show ant special notability beyond she being one of these excellent many. Schmidt (talk) 06:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.