Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chi Sigma Tau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chi Sigma Tau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. Article is entirely promotional. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 10:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone tell me why this is significantly less notable than anything else at Template:Fraternities and Sororities.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of fraternity and sorority articles that have no place on Wikipedia. I've listed only three for the moment but there is certainly a lot more work to do. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 22:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 10:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 16:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is essentially a copy-pasted version of the Chi Sigma Tau website. There are a few sources out there that are technically "news" but the information provided in those sources isn't enough to pass WP:GNG. No independent source details the history of the fraternity, and the coverage is otherwise insubstantial. Gargleafg (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It looks suspiciously promotional. WP:SOAPBOX. Ceosad (talk) 01:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.