Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chorophobia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chorophobia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thereis absolutely no valid sources besides various lists of weird phobias, occasional usages and spammy/snake oil websites. Fails WP:MEDRS miserably. The prev afd was improperly closed by a non-admin. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable. Fails WP:MEDRS. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nominators rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete non-notable neologism. — soupvector (talk) 00:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. Bondegezou (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. --Iztwoz (talk) 06:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, all but a couple of main phobia's should be merged to an article called "listed of phobia". You can have a phobia to anything. We are not a Greek dictionary. We did something similar with strains of cannabis a while ago. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.