Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Academy of Manila
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Christian Academy of Manila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I recently put this article up for PROD which was declined with the note (deprod; secondary school). Being a secondary school does not make the subject automatically notable and GNG and WP:CORP apply. The article lacks any reliable independent sources and I have not been able to find any. Mccapra (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – I cannot find any independent sources with significant coverage on Google, other than possibly one academic paper on gamified teaching, which I cannot read. --Danski454 (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Keep -- I take "K to 12 " to refer to kindergarten to year 12, i.e. age 16/17. We normally allow articles on secondary schools. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs further evaluation on the basis of meeting WP:NSCHOOL.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 15:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Needs further evaluation on the basis of meeting WP:NSCHOOL.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 15:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I couldn't even find insignificant independent coverage. Not inherently notable for being a secondary school. Schazjmd (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't think the school is notable enough. Even the history section sounds like a personal essay. --Hiwilms (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.