Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinemassacre's Monster Madness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cinemassacre's Monster Madness

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I love James Rolfe's work but how can this have an article when Cinemassacre as a whole does not have one? BUC (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wishing to be "viral" doesn't make it so. If someone wants to demonstrate notability of Cinemassacre in the usual way, sources would have to be added. Otherwise, this is nothing more than a set of links to the YouTube videos, and YouTube has its own navigation system. Mandsford (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even after making a concerted effort I can't find any sources which would support notability for this subject. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into broader article on Cinemassacre. As per what nom noted, this is a popular, influential and notable series. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Merge It's a useful piece of info, and why should a few people decide what is interesting, it may be interesting to some people. Or at least make an article about Cinemassacre and place this article on that page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.78.131.174 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could also be merged into an article on James D. Rolfe, whose work is the subject of at least one other article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article seems unnecessary. There are thousands of similar videos on Bllip/YouTube. CB's Movie Reviews for example.

CB's Movie Reviews? You don't see the difference between someone showing still images of recent films and telling his opinion on a film and someone going into full detail of the history of a genré? Why does even Angry Video Game Nerd or Nostaliga Critic have a website if you all think it's so unimportant? Can't you at least MERGE the info into the James D. Rolfe page so people can now the episode guide and what the series is about. I thought that's what Wikipedia did, share information, not delete for no reason except that "there are other similar videos we don't have listed on this site, so let's remove this." Seriously. Get your head out of your asses. Do you think I spent 6 hours providing links to an episode guide just to see it deleted? If I knew Wikipedia admins hated Information so much, I wouldn't even have bothered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MorbidChid (talk • contribs) 21:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.