Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DemandTec (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DemandTec

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Market analytics company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- coverage consists of WP:ROUTINE news stories about acquisitions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, Technology, California, and Massachusetts. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:52, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete I found a nyt article about it and the wsj article feels somewhat convincing, although the WSJ article focuses more on IBM than the subject. I can't really find anything else. Don't think this is notable but almost. Justi yaya 02:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*:I have updated with more citations. Check my comments below. But even with WSJ and NYT that you found, should be good. Why Weak Delete? Copwars (talk) 19:19, 16 September 2022 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet. MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't agree with this nomination. Nominator should do a better job at checking citations out there. This used to be a public NASDAQ company that got acquired by IBM and then sppined off again. There are many articles about it. I have updated and added more content. Also the article was poor and missing an intro, so I have improved it. Here are some of the articles I added: Venturebeat, bizjournals, progressivegrocer.com, ZDNET, Techcrunch. Copwars (talk) 19:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Copwars, I beg to differ. Those articles also seem to be routine coverage about acquisitions and selling stocks. In my opinion, they do not meet the threshold of in-depth coveraged required by WP:NCORP. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked spam sockpuppet. MER-C 11:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider today's expansion of content and sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:57, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I concur that the added coverage fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as it is all routine announcements about product launches and acquisitions, and from a search I was not able to find any additional coverage that would pass CORPDEPTH requirements. Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.